Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Agenda
Why ergonomics? Ergonomics and the DMAIC methodology Case study (if time permits) Questions
Define
Define
Complete surveys to get opinions of most difficult areas, bottlenecks, or unreliable areas Use the Ergonomics Hit List
ry
ry
Se
gu st pt em be r O ct ob er N ov em be D r ec em be r
AIHce Annual Conference 2006 Humantech, Inc
M ay
br ua
Ja n
M ar
Ap
Ju n
ua
Ju ly
ch
ril
Fe
Au
Define
120%
100%
Occurences
80% 10 8 6 40% 4 20% 2 All Other Number of WMSDs Cum % % of Total 14 35% 35% Helium Test 6 50% 15% Lacing 5 63% 13%
60%
Assembly 3 80% 8%
0%
All other 2 100% 5%
Time Period:
2000-2003
Cumulative Percent
12
$1
$5 TO $50 TO
LEDGER COSTS LEDGER COSTS
$1 TO $3 TO
MISCELLANEOUS MISCELLANEOUS COSTS COSTS
Cost of hiring and/or training replacements Overtime Extra supervisory time Clerical time Decreased output of injured worker upon return AIHce Annual goodwill Loss of business and Conference 2006 Humantech, Inc
Long term
Reduced injury/illness rates Reduced injury/illness costs
Define
Measure
Measure
Measure
BRIEF Survey
Cause
Cause
Cause
Cause
Cause Cause
Effect (Y)
Cause
Cause
Cause
Cause
Measurements
Manpower / People
Ergonomic Categories
For ergonomics-related projects, recommend the following category modifications to the 6 M's:
Machines workstation layout and design Methods tools, behaviors Materials manual material handling and applied forces Measurements Mother Nature (Environment) lighting, vibration, temperature Manpower (People)
AIHce Annual Conference 2006 Humantech, Inc
FMEA
Process Name: Left Front Seat Belt Install Process Number: SBT 445 Date: 1/1/2001 Revision Level: 1.3
A) SEVERITY FAILURE MODE Rate 1-10 10=Most Severe B) OCCURRENCE Probability Rate 1-10 10=Highest Probability C) DETECTION Probability Rate 1-10 10=Lowest Probability RISK PRIORITY NUMBER RPN AxBxC ACTION TO IMPROVE REVISED VALUES A B C RPN
1) Select Wrong Seat Belt Color 2) Seat Belt Not Fully Tightened 3) Trim Cover Clip Misaligned
5 9 2
4 2 3
3 8 4
60 144 24
0 0 0
Analyze
Motion Waste
Motion Waste
Improve
Improve
Improve
Improve
Control
Control
Control
Design Template
DEFINE
TCIR (Recordables) January 2000 - November 2001
30
UCL=28.52
Individual Value
20 Mean=14.08 10
LCL=0
DEFINE
Recordable Injuries by Type Focus on Strains
90 80 70 80 60 40 20 0
io ma di t s y n on rau os rai od t is e on on c T i i rs t ur at i rn gL ry / Sp ve nB rat us he i t n g Bu rac ce at o Ot erm l at ai n on ari rei F ir D C La St r He mu Fo sp Cu Re
100
50 40 30 20 10 0
Defect
Count Percent Cum %
26 28.3 28.3
15 16.3 44.6
12 13.0 57.6
10 10.9 68.5
10 10.9 79.3
4 4.3 83.7
4 4.3 88.0
3 3.3 91.3
2 2.2 93.5
Percent
Count
60
DEFINE
2nd Level Pareto - Strain Injuries by Cell
r to c 3 1 2 p a h1 h2 h3 e m e m e m m ac ac ac ss ss ss A A A M Co M M
Injury = Strain/Sprain
Count
15 10 5 0
r 3 1 1 h2 3 2 t o ch c c h em em em c pa M a Ma Ma A ss A ss A ss m Co
DEFINE
Year Jan-June 2000 July-Dec 2000 Jan-June 2001 July-Dec 2001 Total # Injuries 8 4 8 5 25 Direct Cost $5,931.45 $2,042.76 $17,415.37 $220.50 $25,610.08 Actual Cost*
(Direct Cost x 3)
MEASURE
MEASURE
Process Steps
Outputs
Shut plexiglass door & twist up/down button to lift. Twist and hold
-Loaded compactor
MEASURE
Job Name: Trash Compactor Dept: Site: G20 Plant 7 Shift: Station: V-1 Product: 0 0 Date: 10/06/03
1. Put a "1" for each risk factor is observed
1 >10 lb
1 >10 lb
1 >10 lb
1 > 2 lb
1 > 25 lb > 10 lb
1 1 1 1 > 10 sec > 10 sec > 10 sec > 10 sec 1 1 > 30/min. > 2/min. > 2/min. > 2/min. 1 1 1
> 30 % of Day
> 2/min.
3 High
3 High
3 High
4 High
3 High
3 High
2 Medium
2 Medium
0 Low
MEASURE
Transferred BRIEF Scores Hands and Wrists Left Right Elbows Left Right Shoulders Left Right Neck Back Legs
10
41 +
Physical Stressors
0 0 2 0 2
Total Physical Stressors
4 =
Job Risk
45 x
15
Time Multiplier
0.8 =
High
36
ANALYZE
Machine
Controls Poorly Positioned Lift not Functioning Not Following Method Sheet Did not get OJT
Person
Not using PPE
Environment
Cool Outside Temperature
Materials
Method
Measurement
AIHce Annual Conference 2006 Humantech, Inc
ANALYZE
Cause and Effect Matrix for Trash Compactor Solutions
Rating of Importance to Customer 10 1 6 2 Ease of Implementation 4 3 Cost Effectiveness 9 3 9 9 9 3 1 9 208
Ergonomic Impact
Total
Process Step 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Load Compactor Load Compactor Load Compactor Load Compactor Load Compactor Load Compactor Load Compactor Load Compactor
Proposed Solutions to Reduce Strains Reposition Cart on Lift for Closer Reach Reposition Controls Chute Redesign Rotate 2 x Per Shift Conduct Equipment P.M. every 3 Months Replace Broom With Shaker Table Replace Broom with Air Knife Replace Broom with Hook 9 9 3 3 3 9 9 1 460 3 3 9 9 9 1 1 9 264 144 120 120 120 120 108 100 100
Total
IMPROVE
Process Step/Input S Potential Potential Failure E Failure Mode Effects V Potential Causes O C C 4 Current Controls D E T R P N Removal of Can't remove Production does not New lift does not 10 old lift & lift & demo the allow access get installed demo of area area Receive new Lift does not Project end date 6 Shipping problems lift from arrive in time gets pushed out. vendor. from vendor. Production of the lift 6 is delayed because of schedule. Install new lift Wrong dimensions Lift does not fit Project end date & house over 10 and or drawings of in the area. gets pushed out. dumpster. area. Lift is built for Make sure lift Lift does not Customer cannot different application operates as operate as use the lift for the 10 then what was specified promised. process. specified. Customer cannot Bad communication Make sure use the lift and between Facilities compactor & The installation compactor to 10 and General lift operate was wrong. complete the Contractor and together process. Production. Communication between Facilities and 3 120 Production and Maint. Verify ship date with vendor. 3 36
54
Check with production, 3 maint, general 5 150 contractor & vendor. Case studies. Speak 2 with other users of this 6 120 type of lift. Daily dialogue between 3 Facilities and General 3 Contractor.
AIHce Annual Conference 2006 Humantech, Inc
90
IMPROVE
Actions Recommended Resp. Actions Taken S E V O C C D R E P T N
Hold planning meeting with Operations Management to Develop Demolition plan and logistics Negotiate Penalty clause in purchasing contract for late shipment. Place order ahead of supplier's quoted lead time. Drawing and equipment review with Operations, Maintenance, Contractor and Vendor.
Joe G.
Demolition Planning meeting held 10/10/03 and documented 10 1 in meeting minutes. Contract includes verbiage for late shipment penalty. Purchase order released on 9/8/03 Lift dimensions have been verified on 9-15-03. 6 1
1 10
Paul P.
3 18
Joe G.
2 12
Bill B.
10 1
2 20
Run test trials at vendor prior to General Test run lift before installation on shipment and operate the lift Contractor 10 1 11/13/03 mechanism before installation on site. and Joe G. Gen.Con., Draft requirements document and hold Maint, meeting to discuss details. Production & Joe G. Requirements meeting held 9/1/03 and specifications established.
2 20
10 1
2 20
IMPROVE
IMPROVE
Job Name: Trash Compactor Dept: Site: G20 Plant 7 Shift: Station: V-1 Product: 0 0 Date: 11/26/03
1. Put a "1" for each risk factor is observed
1
Pinch Grip or Finger Press >2 lb Power Grip > 10 lb
1 >10 lb
1 >10 lb
1 >10 lb
1 >10 lb
1 > 2 lb
1 > 25 lb > 10 lb
> 10 sec > 10 sec > 10 sec > 10 sec 1 > 30/min. > 2/min. > 2/min. > 2/min.
> 30 % of Day
> 2/min.
0 Low
1 Low
1 Low
1 Low
1 Low
1 Low
0 Low
Low Medium
IMPROVE
Transferred BRIEF Scores Hands and Wrists Left Right Elbows Left Right Shoulders Left Right Neck Back Legs
9 +
Physical Stressors
Vibration
1 =
0 0 0 1
Job Risk
10 x
15
Time Multiplier
0.8 =
Low
CONTROL
TCIR (Recordables) January 2000 - June 2003
Baseline 30 New
Individual Value
20
UCL=18.42
10
Mean=8.76
LCL=0