Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Role Confusion:
Understanding the Jews Slavery and Liberation from a Psychological
Perspective
In memory of Itai Zilberschmid "
Erikson's Stages of Psychosocial Development
psychology.about.com/library/bl_psychosocial_summary.htm
Stage
Basic
Conflict
Important
Events
Outcome
Infancy (birth
to 18 months)
Trust vs.
Mistrust
Feeding
Early
Childhood (2
to 3 years)
Autonomy vs.
Shame and
Doubt
Toilet
Training
Exploration
School
Social
Relationships
Relationships
School Age (6
to 11 years)
Industry vs.
Inferiority
Identity vs.
Adolescence
Role
(12 to 18 years)
Confusion
Young
Adulthood (19
to 40 years)
Intimacy vs.
Isolation
Middle
Adulthood (40
to 65 years)
Generativity
vs. Stagnation
Work and
Parenthood
Maturity(65 to
death)
Ego Integrity
vs. Despair
Reflection on
Life
There follows adolescence with its basic tensions between the development of
a sense of psychosocial identity and its interplay with an unavoidable identity
confusion. As this tension gets resolved, a sense of fidelity emerges both towards
ones own accruing identity and towards some overall orientation that helps unify
ones identity with an existing or emerging ideological world image. This can be
formulated thus: fidelity is the ability to sustain loyalties freely pledged in spite of
the inevitable contradiction of value systems. It is the cornerstone of identity and
receives inspiration from confirming ideologies and affirming companionships.
And now for adulthood. The ideological commitment of adolescence, it is
hoped, will lead to intimate associations and eventually to patterns of close living:
for that reason, we would define the dominant tensionin young adulthood as that
between intimacy and isolation.
.1
(
:)
:) (
:) (
(
:)
:) (
:) (
(
:)
(
:)
:) (
(
:)
(
:)
:) (
:) (
(
:)
.2"
) - , , ,
:
.3"
() - , :
.4
() :
() :
() :
() :
() :
.5
() :
.6
)
.7
)
:
(
:)
(
:)
(
:)
(
:)
(
)
:
:
.8 ( ) -
'] ' " " [
() [] , , ()
[] ( ' ") (
/ ' /") ' ( /
' /") , " = = " ,
[] ,
( "
9. Rav Soloveitchik Kol Dodi Dofek
When we probe the nature of our historical existence we arrive at a very important
insight, one that constitutes a fundamental element of our world view. The Torah
relates that God made two covenants with the Israelites. The first covenant He made in
;)Egypt: And I will take you to Me for a people, and I will be to you a God (Exodus 6:7
the second covenant, at Mount Sinai: And he took the book of the covenantand said:
Behold the blood of the covenant, which the Lord hath made with you in agreement with
all these words (Exodus 24:7-8) What is the nature of these two covenants? It seems
to me that this question is implicitly answered at the beginning of our essay. For just as
Judaism distinguishes between fate and destiny in the personal-individual realm, so it
differentiates between these two ideas in the sphere of our national-historical existence.
.10
:
()
:
()
.11
() :
()
.12
() :
() :
.13
( )
:
()
:
.14
' ' ' ' '
' ( ) ' (') ()
<> '
' (' ) ' ( ) ' "
' ' (' )
( ) [' ] " [] [] [ '] '
[] ' ' ' (' ) [] '
.15
:
( )
:
()
:
( )
:
( )
.16
:
()
:
( )
:
()
:
( )
:
()
.17
:
)
.18"
- ,
.19" -
. " " ( ):' " : "
( , ) ," " " , ',
, , ," ()
, ," ( ):
." .
, ' , " " ( " )
' , . ( : ) : ,
' , "
,' , ,
' ." . (" ' ) ,
, " ." '
" , . " ('
) ' , " " ,"
( ," ' ' ) . ,"