'There must be one overarching formula, we are told, under which all intelligible locutions about freedom can be subsumed' 'to speak of the presence of freedom is always, in consequence, to speak of an absence' 'for different versions of this 'coherentist' approach see, for example, Rawls (1971), pp. 201-5; MacCallum (1972); Day (1983); Megone (1987); Narveson (1988, pp. 18
'There must be one overarching formula, we are told, under which all intelligible locutions about freedom can be subsumed' 'to speak of the presence of freedom is always, in consequence, to speak of an absence' 'for different versions of this 'coherentist' approach see, for example, Rawls (1971), pp. 201-5; MacCallum (1972); Day (1983); Megone (1987); Narveson (1988, pp. 18
'There must be one overarching formula, we are told, under which all intelligible locutions about freedom can be subsumed' 'to speak of the presence of freedom is always, in consequence, to speak of an absence' 'for different versions of this 'coherentist' approach see, for example, Rawls (1971), pp. 201-5; MacCallum (1972); Day (1983); Megone (1987); Narveson (1988, pp. 18