Professional Documents
Culture Documents
WORLD
BANK
SUBMITTED TO SUBMITTED BY
Prof. Chadda AANCHAL AGGARWAL
AARZOO DALAL
M.B.A (HR) 2Nd SEMESTER
INDEX:-
World Bank
History
Constituents
Operations
Changing Role Of World Bank
World Bank and India Strategy 2009-2011
Need for Reforms In World Bank
& the ways to bring reforms
World Bank:
The World Bank is an International financial institution that provides technical and
financial assistance to developing countries for development programs( E.g. Bridges,
Roads, Schools) with the stated goal of reducing poverty. The World Bank is
an international financial institution that provides loans to developing
countries for capital programmes. The World Bank has a goal of
reducing poverty.By law, all of its decisions must be guided by a commitment to
promote foreign investment, international trade and facilitate capital investment.
The World Bank differs from the World Bank Group, in that the World Bank
comprises only two institutions:
The International Bank for Reconstruction and Development (IBRD)
The International Development Association (IDA)
Conceived during World War II at Bretton Woods, New Hampshire, the World Bank
initially helped rebuild Europe after the war. Its first loan of $250 million was to
France in 1947 for post-war reconstruction. Reconstruction has remained an
important focus of the Bank's work, given the natural disasters, humanitarian
emergencies, and post conflict rehabilitation needs that affect developing and
transition economies.
Today's Bank, however, has sharpened its focus on poverty reduction as the
overarching goal of all its work. It once had a homogeneous staff of engineers and
financial analysts, based solely in Washington, D.C. Today, it has a multidisciplinary
and diverse staff including economists, public policy experts, sectoral experts, and
social scientists. 40 percent of staff are now based in country offices.
The Bank itself is bigger, broader, and far more complex. It has become a Group,
encompassing five closely associated development institutions: the International
Bank for Reconstruction and Development (IBRD), the International Development
Association (IDA), The International Finance Corporation (IFC), the Multilateral
Investment Guarantee Agency (MIGA), and the International Centre for Settlement of
Investment Disputes (ICSID).
Transition
During the 1980s, the Bank was pushed in many directions: early in the decade, the
Bank was brought face to face with macroeconomic and debt rescheduling issues;
later in the decade, social and environmental issues assumed center stage, and an
increasingly vocal civil society accused the Bank of not observing its own policies in
some high profile projects.
To address concerns about the quality of Bank operations, the Wapenhans Report
was released and soon after, steps toward reform were taken, including the creation
of an Inspection Panel to investigate claims against the Bank. However, criticism
increased, reaching a peak in 1994 at the Annual Meetings in Madrid.
Since then, the Bank Group has made much progress. All five institutions have been
working separately and in collaboration - to improve internal efficiency and external
effectiveness. Clients report to be broadly pleased with the changes they see in
Bank Group service levels, commitment, deliveries, and quality.
More than ever before, the Bank is playing an important role in the global policy
arena. It has effectively engaged with partners and clients in complex emergencies
from post-conflict work in Bosnia to post-crisis assistance in East Asia to post-
hurricane clean-up in central America to post-earthquake support in Turkey and in
Kosovo and East Timor.
Notwithstanding these considerable progress, the Bank Group's agenda is not yet
complete, nor can it ever be, while the challenges of development continue to grow.
The IBRD provides loans to governments, and public enterprises, always with
a government (or "sovereign") guarantee of repayment subject to general
conditions (pdf). The funds for this lending come primarily from the issuing of
World Bank bonds on the global capital markets—typically $12–15 billion per
year. These bonds are rated AAA (the highest possible) because they are
backed by member states' share capital, as well as by borrowers' sovereign
guarantees. (In addition, loans that are repaid are recycled, or relent.)
Because of the IBRD's credit rating, it is able to borrow at relatively low
interest rates. As most developing countries have considerably lower credit
ratings, the IBRD can lend to countries at interest rates that are usually quite
attractive to them, even after adding a small margin (about 1%) to cover
administrative overheads.
The International Development Association (IDA) is the part of the World
Bank that helps the world’s poorest countries. It complements the World
Bank's other lending arm — the International Bank for Reconstruction and
Development (IBRD) — which serves middle-income countries with capital
investment and advisory services.
IDA was created on September 24, 1960 and is responsible for providing
long-term, interest-free loans to the world's 80 poorest countries, 39 of which
are in Africa. IDA provides grants and credits (subject to general conditions ),
with repayment periods of 35 to 40 years. Since its inception, IDA credits and
grants have totalled $161 billion, averaging $7–$9 billion a year in recent
years and directing the largest share, about 50%, to Africa. While the IBRD
raises most of its funds on the world's financial markets, IDA is funded largely
by contributions from the governments of the richer member countries.
Additional funds come from IBRD income and repayment of IDA credits.
Fund Generation
IDA is the world's largest source of interest-free loans and grant assistance to the
poorest countries. IDA's funds are replenished every three years by 40 donor
countries. Additional funds are regenerated through repayments of loan principal
on 35-to-40-year, no-interest loans, which are then available for re-lending. IDA
accounts for more than 40% of our lending.
Loans
Through the IBRD and IDA, we offer two basic types of loans and
credits: investment operations and development policy operations.
Countries use investment operations for goods, works and services in support of
economic and social development projects in a broad range of economic and social
sectors. Development policy operations (formerly known as adjustment loans)
provide quick-disbursing financing to support a country’s policy and institutional
reforms.
IDA long term loans (credits) are interest free but do carry a small service charge
of 0.75 percent on funds paid out. IDA commitment fees range from zero to 0.5
percent on undisbursed credit balances. For FY09 commitment fees have been set
at 0.0 percent.
For complete information about IBRD financial products, services, lending rates
and charges, please visit the World Bank Treasury. Treasury is at the heart of
IBRD's borrowing and lending operations and also performs treasury functions for
other members of the World Bank Group.
Trust Funds and Grants
Donor governments and a broad array of private and public institutions make
deposits inTrust funds that are housed at the World Bank. These donor resources
are leveraged for a broad range of development initiatives. The initiatives vary
significantly in size and complexity, ranging from multibillion dollar arrangements—
such as Carbon Finance; the Global Environment Facility; the Heavily Indebted
Poor Countries Initiative; and the Global Fund to Fight AIDS, Tuberculosis, and
Malaria—to much smaller and simpler freestanding ones.
See how these grants have made a difference at IDA at Work. Visit
the Grants website for more information.
While we are best known as a financier, another of our roles is to provide analysis,
advice and information to our member countries so they can deliver the lasting
economic and social improvements their people need. We do this in various ways.
One is through economic research and data collection on broad issues such as the
environment, poverty, trade and globalization Another is through country-specific,
non-lending activities such as economic and sector work, where we evaluate a
country's economic prospects by examining its banking systems and financial
markets, as well as trade, infrastructure, poverty and social safety net issues. For
example.
We also draw upon the resources of our knowledge bank to educate clients so
they can equip themselves to solve their development problems and promote
economic growth. By knowledge bank we mean the wealth of contacts, knowledge,
information and experience we've acquired over the years, country by country and
project by project, in our development work. Our ultimate aim is to encourage the
knowledge revolution in developing countries.
These are only some of the ways our analyses, advice and knowledge are made
available to our client countries, their government and development professionals,
and the public:
Poverty Assessments
Public Expenditure Reviews
Country Economic Reports
Sector Reports
Topics in Development
Capacity Building
Another core Bank function is to increase the capabilities of our partners, the
people in developing countries, and our own staff —to help them acquire the
knowledge and skills they need to provide technical assistance, improve
government performance and delivery of services, promote economic growth and
sustain poverty reduction programs. Linkages to knowledge-sharing networks such
as these have been set up by the Bank to address the vast needs for information
and dialogue about development:
o Advisory Services and Ask Us help desks make information
available by topic via telephone, fax, email and the web. There are more
than 25 advisory services at the Bank. Staff members who respond to
inquiries add value to the work of clients, partners and our own staff by
responding quickly to their knowledge needs. Often, they are the first and
possibly the only contact the public at large—especially people in developing
countries--have with the World Bank.
o Global Development Learning Network is an extensive network
of distance learning centers that uses advanced information and
communications technologies to connect people working in development
around the world.
o Knowledge for Development offers policy advice to client
countries on the four pillars of a knowledge economy: economic and
institutional regime, education, innovation, and information and
communication technologies (ICTs) to help clients make the transition to a
knowledge economy.
o Capacity Development Resource Center is a repository of
literature, case studies, lessons learned, and good practices in the area of
capacity development, the key to development effectiveness.
o World Bank Institute Global and Regional Programs bring
together leading development practitioners online and face-to-face to
exchange experiences and to develop skills.
o B-SPAN webcasting service is an Internet-based broadcasting
station. The station presents World Bank seminars, workshops and
conferences on sustainable development and poverty reduction via
streaming video. The unedited discussions and debates about pressing
development issues attract government officials, development practitioners,
academics, students, researchers, journalists, NGO representatives, and the
public-at-large.
The World Bank began operations on June 25, 1946. Although it was
established to finance European reconstruction after World War II, the bank
today is a considerable force in the health, nutrition, and population (HNP)
sector in developing countries. Indeed, it has evolved from having virtually no
presence in global health to being the world’s largest financial contributor to
health-related projects, now committing more than $1 billion annually for new
HNP projects. It is also one of the world’s largest supporters in the fight
against HIV/AIDS, with commitments of more than $1.6 billion over the past
several years.
The World Bank's ongoing work to develop a strategy on climate change and
environmental threats has been criticized for (i) lacking of a proper overall vision and
purpose, (ii) having a limited focus on its own role in global and regional governance,
and (iii) having limited recognition of specific regional issues, e.g. issues of rights to
food and land, and sustainable land use. Critics have also commented that only 1%
of the World Bank's lending goes to the environmental sector, narrowly defined.
Environmentalists are urging the Bank to stop worldwide support for the
development of coal plants and other large emitters of greenhouse gas and
operations that are proven to pollute or damage the environment. For instance,
protesters in South Africa and abroad have criticized the 2010 decision of the World
Bank's approval for a $3.75 billion loan to build the world's 4th largest coal-fired
power plant in South Africa. The plant will greatly increase the demand for coal
mining and corresponding harmful environmental effects of coal.
As we all know the global recession which came in 2008 due to the bubble burst in
US. The World bank gave it’s supports and declared policies for the same to protect
the poorest and most vulnerable from immediate and long-term harm, take actions to
help financial and private sectors cope with the crisis, support countries in managing
the fiscal challenges, and avoid delays in the long-term investments upon which
recovery and long-term development will depend.
The World Bank Group is in a position to expand its financial support to our clients
considerably. IBRD is well capitalized and has the ability to make new
commitments of up to $100 billion over the next three years, including a tripling of
commitments this year. With a record replenishment, IDA has $42 billion available
for the poorest countries for the coming 3 years, with the capacity to front-load a
significant amount. IFC is launching 4 new facilities for bank recapitalization,
infrastructure financing, trade facilitation and refocused advisory services. Combined
with monies mobilized from others, these new facilities could provide more than $30
billion over the next three years. MIGA can also provide much needed liquidity in
developing country banking systems.
World Bank and India Strategy- 2009-12:
The World Bank is one of the world’s largest sources of funding and knowledge for
developing countries. India is one of our oldest members, having joined the
institution at its inception in 1944.
In India, the World Bank works in close partnership with the Central and State
Governments. It also works with other development partners: bilateral and
multilateral donor organizations, nongovernmental organizations (NGOs), the private
sector, and the general public—including academics, scientists, economists,
journalists, teachers, and local people involved in development projects.
PROJECTS
The Bank’s method of operation is not to implement “World Bank projects,” but to
provide financing and advice for projects which are owned and supported by the
Indian government and the people and form part of their overall development
agenda.
Various financing options are available based upon the type of assistance needed. It
is important to note that the implementation of projects is managed by the
government itself. The government designates an office, referred to as the Project
Implementing Agency (PIU), which is responsible for aspects such as procurement
and selection of consultants and day-to-day work, monitoring, and evaluation.
The Bank’s operational policies set guidelines to ensure that projects meet its own
criteria such as social and environmental standards. Projects are evaluated to
capture and share lessons for similar projects in future.
LENDING
At the end of June 30, 2010, the World Bank group had 75 active projects in the
country. The net commitment for these projects was about $21.4 billion. New lending
in FY10
(1 July 2009- 30 June 2010) amounted to $9.3 billion.
Total IBRD/IDA Commitments as on June 30, 2010 (FY10): $21.4 billion
(by fiscal year, in nearest $ billion)
Over the past 30 years the globalization of the economy-led by the World Bank, the
International Monetary Fund and transnational corporations-has proceeded at a
quickening pace. These institutions have pressured governments to remove barriers
to the cross-border flows of money and products. Advances in telecommunications
and computer technology have made it possible for trillions of dollars in finance
capital to zoom around the world, 24 hours a day, searching for the highest rate of
interest.
This globalization of market forces has greatly increased inequality. Just 150 years
ago there was not great inequality between the standards of living of people in the
global north and those in Africa, Asia and Latin America. Now the richest 20 percent
of the world's population receives 83% of the world's income, while the poorest 60%
of the world's people receive just 5.6% of the world's income. The richest 20% of the
world's population in northern industrial countries uses 70% of the world's energy,
75% of the world's metals, 85% of the world's wood, 60% of the world's food, and
produces about 75% of the world's environmental pollution.
2. The World Bank is wrong in arguing that economic growth will solve the
problems we face.
World Bank officials keep reassuring us that if we can just get economic growth
rates high enough, these problems will be solved. We regularly hear the refain, "a
rising tide floats all boats." But for those who don't own boats or have leaky boats, a
rising tide means greater inequality between them and the more fortunate. The data
shows that during a period of significant growth in world trade (1960 to 1989), global
inequality got significantly worse: the ratio between the richest 20% and poorest 20%
of the world population went from 30 to 1 to 59 to 1. We should also remember that
unrestrained growth is the ideology of the cancer cell.
3. The real function of institutions such as the World Bank is not to promote
"development" but rather to integrate the ruling elites of third world countries
into the global system of rewards and punishments.
Because direct colonial control of the third world is no longer tolerated, northern
elites need an indirect way to control policies implemented by third world
governments. By getting the elites onto a debt treadmill and promising them new
cash if they implement policies written in Washington, the World Bank can effectively
control third world policies. You can see the effects right next door in Mexico. For
more than a decade, Mexican elites have followed the "Washington consensus" of
policy reforms designed by the World Bank. This has created some billionaires, yet
for most of the 85 million Mexican people life is more difficult now than it was ten or
twenty years ago. If the ruling PRI party did not control the police and military, its
blatant corruption and disastrous economic policies would not be tolerated for long.
4. Evidence from many countries shows that the policies promoted by the
World Bank are disastrous.
Whether you look at poor countries such as Somalia, Rwanda and Mozambique or
well- endowed countries such as Ghana, Brazil and the Philippines, the policies
pushed by the World Bank have worsened conditions for the majority. Evidence from
dozens of countries under World Bank tutelage shows a similar pattern: structural
adjustment policies may help countries pay off their foreign debts and may create
some millionaires but the majority of the population suffers lower wages, reduced
social services and less democratic access to the policy-making process.
5. The World Bank's emphasis on expanding exports has been disastrous for
the environment.
As part of the standard structural adjustment package, the World Bank encourages
countries to expand their exports so they will have more hard currency (dollars, yen)
to make payments on their foreign debts. But this leads countries to overexploit their
natural resources. They cut down their forests, which contributes to the greenhouse
effect. They pump chemicals onto their land to produce export crops such as coffee,
tea and tobacco, thus poisoning their land and water. They rip minerals out of the
ground at a frantic pace, endangering human lives and the environment in the
process. They overfish coastal and international waters, depleting a resource of the
global commons.
All the wealthy countries-the USA, Japan, Germany, England, France and the recent
success stories such as Taiwan and South Korea-used a heavily state-interventionist
model that had government play a strong role in directing investment, managing
trade and subsidizing chosen sectors of the economy. The United States was in
many ways the "mother country" of protectionism, showing other wealthy countries
how to do it. Would we have a big electronics industry or nuclear power industry
were it not for the massive government subsidy program called the Pentagon?
The World Bank gets most of its capital by selling bonds to wealthy investors. If we
could pressure large institutional funds (e.g., university endowments and state
worker pension funds) to stop buying World Bank bonds as a way to protest the
Bank's destructive policies, we could exert serious pressure on the Bank.
Just think about the huge impact the divestment campaign had on South Africa's
white minority rulers during the closing days of apartheid. The divestment struggle
also raised a key question: who controls how capital is invested and why isn't it a
more democratic process?
Many institutions such as universities and retirement funds purchase bonds issued
by the World Bank. The name appearing on the bonds will be the World Bank's
formal name: International Bank for Reconstruction and Development. These are
fixed rate securities which are sold by underwriters such as Goldman Sachs, Fidelity,
First Boston, Credit Suisse and many Japanese banks. The bonds pay a good rate
of return and are considered safe investments because they usually carry a triple-A
rating. They are not officially insured by the U.S. government but, as one bond trader
told us, the U.S. government would not stand by and let the World Bank default on
its bonds. In other words, the U.S. taxpayer is the ultimate insurer of these bonds-
just as we were forced to bail out the Wall Street speculators and Mexican financiers
during Mexico's crash in early 1995.
REFERENCES:-
www.worldbank.org
www.globalexchange.org
www.highbeam.com
www.wikipedia.org
www.economywatch.org