Professional Documents
Culture Documents
REQUIREMENTS
1. OFFER
2. ACCEPTANCE
3. CONSIDERATION
It may also be proved by the party doing some act requested by the other
party such as shifting over to live in another place.
4. CAPACITY
Both parties to the marriage must have the capacity to marry (at the time
of their marriage).
The religion of one or both parties to the contract to marry does not
prevent them from marrying
D aged 70 and P aged 31. D promised to marry P upon death of his wife (D’s
wife suffered a heart ailment from which she was expected to die suddenly
and early). P knew that D was a married man. D then refused to marry P. P
sued for breach of promise.
EXCEPTIONS
1. If P had no knowledge that D was married when the promise was made.
“…the most important breach of all was at the moment of his death
because when he died she was not his widow, as she thought she was.
She was in law a stranger. That is the breach for which, in my judgment,
damages can be recovered.” (Denning LJ)
D’s wife had already obtained a decree nisi of divorce on the ground of D’s
adultery with P at the time when D had promised to marry P upon a date
after the decree had become absolute. D broke off the engagement.
Subsequently he married another woman and P sued him for breach of
promise.
P sued for damages for breach of contract to marry. The parties were
Muslims. D’s Counsel attempted to rely on the general rule of law which
invalidates a promise to marry if the woman knew that the man was
already married at the time of the promise.
Held: that when D’s personal law allowed him to marry more than one
wife, the promise was valid. Damages was granted to P.
When the religion of one or both parties to the contract to marry prevent
them from marrying. In such situation the contract is not valid
A Hindu man had promised to marry a Christian girl. The girl was informed
that the man’s wife had died. The man, however breached his promise.
AGE
LRA is silent on the matter as regards to permitted age to enter into the
contract to marry. However, since LRA provides for the minimum
marriageable age, it is contended that these ages be the minimum age
requirements for contracts to marry.
Minimum marriageable age for girls is 16 years (after the solemnisation was
authorised by the Chief Minister) and for boys is 18 years (Sec 10 LRA)
P was a girl who had entered into a contract to marry when she was still a
minor. D had breached the contract and she sued him for damages.
Section 11 LRA
Section 12 LRA
Consent of parents or guardian in writing:-
BREACH OF BETROTHAL
The action for breach of betrothal will lie against the party in breach whether
it is a man or a woman.
Where a specific date of the marriage is not fixed or known, the marriage
should take place within a reasonable time.
If a party demand for the marriage, the other party must have a reasonable
excuse for not wanting to go through with the marriage.
DEFENCES
Misrepresentation of facts by P
D may prove that he or she had entered into the contract to marry as a result
of a material misrepresentation of facts by P.
Facts: Before the engagement, P’s brother had informed D that her father
would leave property to her upon his death. As it turned out, the father had a
short time before, paid off his creditors. (P’s brother and father represented
the information as false)
The other point was in relation to P’s past when she was at Oxford. D had
broken off the courtship when he received information concerning the
questionable life P had been leading in Oxford. (it was discovered that P had
in fact been leading a questionable life)
Held: misrepresentation did not occur as he was not induced by the promise.
Defense failed. (P was awarded damages by the Court)
A contract uberrimae fidei is one where a party has to disclose to the other all
relevant facts and information.
D had raised the defence that P had agreed to marry another when she
entered into an engagement with D. had he known this, he would not have
agreed to marry P.
Held: not entitle D to refuse to fulfill his engagement. “where it turns out that
a woman is of unchaste conduct, which goes to the very root of the contract
of marriage, there, from the excess and necessity of the case, the man is
released from his contract” (Cockburn CJ)
P’s own moral, physical or mental infirmity which renders P unfit for the
marriage
It must be proved that the infirmity was discovered either after the
engagement contract had been made or that the infirmity had only begun to
develop after the making of the contract.
Facts: P contracted a disease of the chest soon after her engagement. She
thought it was a mere chill, but the doctor diagnosed tuberculosis. In any
case, she was not ready and was unfit for marriage on the day fixed for the
wedding. She underwent treatment but D refused to marry her even though
she was given a clean bill of health less than 6 months thereafter. However, it
turned out that P’s illness was not tuberculosis. D was sued for breach.
CONSEQUENCES
1. Damages
Special damages: damages for specific items and which may be quantified
in monetary terms, such as damages for medical expenses and wedding
preparations
Facts: P alleged that as the result of the breach, she had endure
humiliation and mental anguish. She has incurred expenses to the amount
of RM870.10 and wished to claim both general and special damages.
2. RETURN OF GIFTS
Only the wrongful party/ D should return the gifts and ring to P.
Facts: a man who had been awarded damages for breach of promise
claimed the return of the ring.
Held: “if a woman who has received a ring refuses to fulfill the conditions
of the gifts she must return it. So, on the other hand, I think that if the
man has, without a recognised legal justification, refused to carry out this
promise of marriage, he cannot demand the return of the engagement
ring…if the engagement to marry dissolved by mutual consent, then in the
absence of agreement to the contrary, the engagement ring and like gifts
must, I think, be returned by each party to the other….” (McCardie J)