Professional Documents
Culture Documents
of 2
Appellate Case: 11-6017 Document: 01018574699 Date Filed: 01/26/2011 Page:
United States Court 1
of Appeals
Tenth Circuit
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v. No. 11-6017
Defendants - Appellees.
OR DER
This matter is before the court on the appellant’s “M otion for Permission to
motion (captioned for this court) with the District Court for the W estern District of
Oklahoma. Although the District Court has not yet ruled on that motion, we note
that it dismissed the appellant’s complaint pursuant to § 1915 (e) (2) (B) (ii), for
failure to state a claim, and warned the appellant that future repetitive filings may
lead to sanctions.
In light of the district court’s disposition of the complaint, this court will
require the appellant to either pay the fee for this appeal or file w ith this court a
properly completed motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis. See Fed. R.
Case 5:10-cv-01345-C Document 19 Filed 01/26/11 Page 2 of 2
Appellate Case: 11-6017 Document: 01018574699 Date Filed: 01/26/2011 Page: 2
Forma Pauperis,” currently pending with this court, is denied without prejudice to
W ithin 30 days of the date of this order, appellant shall either pay the fee
for this appeal (to the district court) or file (with this court) a properly completed
motion for leave to proceed in form a pauperis, using the form provided with this
order. In addition, also within 30 days of the date of this order, appellant shall file
his appellate brief. A form for appellant’s use in preparing his brief is also being
Appellant is advised that his failure to file his brief and either pay the fee
for this appeal or file a properly completed in form a pauperis motion with this
court, within 30 days, may result in the dismissal of this appeal for lack of
by:
Christine Van Coney
Counsel to the C lerk