... He was the assistant city attorney representing the Pasadena Police Dept whom I had sued for excessive force among other things, at an intersection traffic incident on Feb 3, 2000 . Halford was new to Pasadena at the time, having just been apparently relieved from his duties as an assistant city attorney in Santa Ana, due to a case entitled The People v Mooc . Just my luck to get this guy against me-- everything you think of when you think of "bad lawyer jokes" .. and here's one bit of proof. He rants & raves in his correspondence to me--it's very disturbing material to get from a so-called "professional person." I'm still disturbed by everything he did and still trying to get it addressed by a legal system that refuses to correct & discipline its "own people" .
Original Title
AN EXAMPLE of the SLEAZY, TAUNTING, STYLE of ATTORNEY HUGH HALFORD, AUGUST 2002
... He was the assistant city attorney representing the Pasadena Police Dept whom I had sued for excessive force among other things, at an intersection traffic incident on Feb 3, 2000 . Halford was new to Pasadena at the time, having just been apparently relieved from his duties as an assistant city attorney in Santa Ana, due to a case entitled The People v Mooc . Just my luck to get this guy against me-- everything you think of when you think of "bad lawyer jokes" .. and here's one bit of proof. He rants & raves in his correspondence to me--it's very disturbing material to get from a so-called "professional person." I'm still disturbed by everything he did and still trying to get it addressed by a legal system that refuses to correct & discipline its "own people" .
... He was the assistant city attorney representing the Pasadena Police Dept whom I had sued for excessive force among other things, at an intersection traffic incident on Feb 3, 2000 . Halford was new to Pasadena at the time, having just been apparently relieved from his duties as an assistant city attorney in Santa Ana, due to a case entitled The People v Mooc . Just my luck to get this guy against me-- everything you think of when you think of "bad lawyer jokes" .. and here's one bit of proof. He rants & raves in his correspondence to me--it's very disturbing material to get from a so-called "professional person." I'm still disturbed by everything he did and still trying to get it addressed by a legal system that refuses to correct & discipline its "own people" .
Orrice oF tHe City Arronney
August 1, 2002
‘Mr. J. Phillip A. Kok
PO Box 93261
Pasadena, CA 91109)
Re Your Letter dated 7-28-02
Dear Mr. Kok
Your self-ighteousness, emotional, rational and violent responses to your environment
are inconsistent with your attempts to portray yourself a a religious person committed tothe
‘good of the “community.” Your emotional responses and diatribes, while they appear as
atiempis to intimidate are ineffectual and continue to be amusing, not factual or rlated to
reality, bt amusing. Obviously, your anger counseling has not been successful. You continue
to make emotional nd irrational, statements that could be viewed as threatening.
You also reflect back what was stated to you. Do you ever have an original idee, or must
you always rely on others to make a statement. Again, your lack of emotional control causes,
you to react irrationally
Also, you continue to be untruthful in your statements. You have not provided three
hook te the City, You made an inital payment of $100.00 which was followed by a check for
$3500.00, No further checks were received from you until the check for $560.00 which was
‘received today. Not only are you untruthful when you stated that the City has received a tind
check from you fer $550.00, but you are inaccurate when you state in your curent lete that you
have enclosed a check for $550.00. In fact, you enclosed a check for $560.00, Since you have
‘male an overpayment of $10.00, we willbe forwarding a check to you for the $10.00
‘overpayment. Ifyou have proof that you have made a prior payment for $550.00, please present
itto the City and ve will reimburse you for our error. Otherwise, admit that this is another case
‘of you remembering the facts in a way that benefits you, but never really occurred.
‘You are again being dishonest in your statements regarding the events of August 22,
2001. Not only do I know the truth, but 50 does the witness wi testified in the criminal trial in
which you were convicted by a jury of your peers and the deputy who witnessed you emotionally
‘ut of contro, irrational in your words and violent in the act of throwing your briefease down a
100 North Garfield Avenue, Room 228 « FO, Box 7115 + Pasadena, CA 911087215public hallway. As I stated before, in your emotional reaction to events, you see what you want
to see, hear what you want to hear and remember what benefits you, not the actual events.
Nor did I make a statement to you that I was pushed up against a wall. Again, your
imagination is trying to defend your conduct as that event never occurred, nor Wasa statement
made by me to you regarding that action.
As you saw in the criminal til, a jury of your peers did not find you truthful. Nor will 8
jury of your peersbelieve you inthis civil case. { doubt that a video tape of your behavior would
convince you that you were an emotional, rational and violent individual on the date of your
atest for battery on a police officer. Obviously the deposition of Ms. Bustamante did not
convince you. You have not, and I believe cannot, abjectively look at the facts oF accept
responsiblity for your actions. Please seck help.
Officers Brown and Mosman, as confirmed by Ms. Bustamante, identified your actions as
irrational and violent. The officers didn't beat you tothe ground, but used reasonable free to
control an emotionally out-of-control individual, you. ‘Your injuries esulted fiom your viofent
actions and the officers’ reasonable aetions in rest
‘Think about it
Your disparaging remarks about government atomeys, and stomeys, in general, shows
your lack of knowledge and respect for others. No mater what you may say about attorneys
andr judges, they work hard. Before you eiicize others, perhaps you should “work.” 1
appears from the information I have developed that your employment history, other than your
academic endeavors, have ben intermitent and unsuocesful. IF you were reuied 1 Work 1
support yoursel perhaps you would stop initiating fivlous litigation. Your “litigation”
experience, whick obviously lacks the ability to work with opposing counsel to resolve issues
informally, when coupled with your lack of training and knowledge makes you an
entaordinaily dificult person to dal with,
‘Your comments that Ihave nothing o lose is another example of your lack of concern for
‘others. The City, and its employees, deserve a song detense, particularly inthis ype of
litigation, when the plaintiff's own actions have resulted in his injury, if any, andthe officers’
response has been both necessary to protect themselves and others. Your desire to obtain
‘monetary compensation for your emotional, irrational and violent actions against officers who
‘wore doing theit jb to protect the public is appalling.
‘Your actions in initiating this litigation are self-serving, not based in fac, and an act of
revenge against police officers who were performing their duty with great restraint. Your refusal
‘to accept personal responsibilty for violating Ms. Bustamante's right-of-way and your emotional
and violent response fo being informed that you were primarily responsible for the minor, traffic
accident, resultedin your arrest.
Page? of 3