c













|
  

    |     |
 || 

 |    ||

|
   |
  |
| | | 
EFFECTS OF LEADER  autocratic (high Survey Participants Means,
STYLE, LEADER SEX, AND  !"#$ scores) versus were 165 standard
1 SUBORDINATE LEADER STYLE, democratic undergraduates deviations,
PERSONALITY ON LEADER SEX, AND (low scores). at a large internal
LEADER EVALUATIONS SUBORDINATE midwestern consistency
AND FUTURE PERSONALITY urban reliability coeffi
SUBORDINATE university. cients, and
MOTIVATION  There were 99 correlations
 !"#$ women, 62
LEADER men, and 4
EVALUATIONS individuals who
AND FUTURE did not report
SUBORDINATE their sex on the
MOTIVATION forms provided.
SOURCE OF  Questionnaires Data were variance
RECRUITMENT AND  !"#$ collected
EMPLOYEE ATTITUDES: RECRUITMENT directly from
2 AN ANALYSIS OF JOB AND EMPLOYEE employees by
INVOLVEMENT, ATTITUDES means of a
ORGANIZATIONAL  short question
COMMITMENT, AND  naire,
JOB SATISFACTION  !"#$ completed on
JOB company time.
INVOLVEMENT, Of 85
ORGANIZATIONAL questionnaires
COMMITMENT, administered,
AND JOB 68 were
SATISFACTION returned for an
80% response
rate.
 c