o Have a good idea of how to approach arguments o Answering kritiks – framework, • During 1NC o Read through their ev, consult partner o CX – develop key holes in args, set up positions you will go for Allows 2AC to spend less time on certain args o How to find parts of their args you can exploit o • During 2AC speech o Assemble 1AR blocks, ev o Be sure to communicate with your partner o Develop args on flow – write out extensions o Efficient extensions Don’t just write any args – group them • During the block o 1AR shouldn’t be flowing block – should prep ext. o 2A should respond to important arguments o Difficult fpr 1AR to read ev – 2As job o 1AR will require certain ev o • 1AC preempts • 1AR proper o T, case, CP, DA, K o 1AR should group things – ie. group the uniqueness debate Should group: uniqueness, solvency deficits, link turns, impact calc, impact turns Shouldn’t group: case, DA Try to frame and organize the debate for the judge o 1AR should be the most efficient debater Signpost Argument + warrant (1 sentence) Comparison/framing AT: x arg More evidence • Read most predictive ev – show debate direction • Strategy o Determine your present situation – nexis question Solvency deficits Any arg that changes the basic calculus of magnitude o Judge who is winning and the outcome of the debate How many cards has each team read? Time investment o CP solvency areas could be exploited by aff – o Your task is to construct a strategy o 1AR needs to makes choices on when//where to use evidence o Value comes first – go on things that could change the outcome of the debate – nexis questions o If you can’t read cards – it’s not because you’re slow it’s becaue you need to be more selective of what arguments you go on • Make the 2NR’s life hell o Conditionality extensions o Strategic cross-applications o Extending impact turns Especially for things they won’t go for Neg side bias disappears o 1AR impact turns Don’t focus too much o OVERWHELM THE NEGATIVE ON A GIVEN POINT o Read new evidence •