Professional Documents
Culture Documents
~2
16
U.S.- Tcxas v, White, 74 U.S . 700, 19 L. Ed.
227, 1868 WL 11083 (1868) (overruled in part on
other grounds by, Morgan v. U.S., 20 Ct. Cl. 533,
113 U.S. 476, 5 :::>. Ct. 588, 28 L. Ed. 1044 l1885)).
17
U.S.- Clafiin v. Houseman, 93 U.S. 130, 23
L. Ed. 833, 1876 WL 19239 (1876).
As to r elation of states to United States, gen
erally, see C.J.S., States 38 to 41.
18
Conn.-McLaughlin v. Poucher, 127 Conn.
441, 17 A.2d 767 (1941).
1
SU.S.-U. S. ex rel. Marcus v. Hess, 317 U .S.
537, 63 S. Ct. 379, 87 L. Ed. 443 (1943).
20
U.S.-State ofRussia v. National City Bank
of Now York, 69 F .2d 44 (C.C.A. 2d Cir. 1934).
N.D.-Harding v. City of Dickinson, 76 N.D.
71, 33 N.W.2d 626 (1948).
[Section 3]
1
U.S .- Cunard S.S. Co. v . Mellon, 262 U.S.
100, 43 S. Ct. 504, 67 L. Ed. 894, 27 A.L.R. 1306
(1923); Matter of Arawak Trust Co. (Cayman) LLd.,
489 F'. Supp. 162 (E.D. N.Y. 1980).
As to territorial extent and jurisdiction
therein, generally, see C.J.S., international Law
10 to 21.
2
U.S.- Lam Mow v. Nagle, 24 F.2d 316 (C.C.A.
9th Cir. 1928).
Proof of acquiescence in claimed territorial sovereignty inadequate
U.S.- U.S. v. Alaska, 422 U.S. 184, 95 S. Ct.
2240, 45 L . Ed. 2d 109 (1975).
Inland Water Line
The ''Inland Water Line,'' established in aid of
navigation, is not treated by United States as territorial boundary of iLs inland waters.
U.S.-U.S. v. Louisiana, 394 U.S. 11, 89 S . Ct.
773, 22 L. Ed . 2d 4-4 (1969), decision s upplemented
on othtlr grounds, 394. U.S. 836, 89 S. Ct. 1614, 23
L. Ed . 2d 22(1969), decision supplemented on other
grounds, G25 U.S. 1, 119 S. Ct. :~13, 142 L. Ed. 2d 1
(1998).
St. Lawrence River
1'he St. Lawrence River on the UniLed Sta Les
!!ide of the inLernational boundary is water over
which Congress has jurisdiction.
U.S.- Lake Ontario Land Development and
UNT'l'F.D STA1'ES