Professional Documents
Culture Documents
com
Abstract
Ordered metal (Co, Pt, and CoPt alloy) nanotube and nanowire structures were fabricated by a simple electroplating method in high aspectratio anodic aluminum oxide (AAO) membrane. The growth rate in pulse mode is always larger than that in constant-current mode, which
represents that diffusion limitation exists in this electroplating condition. It is also found that the sputtered Au layer structure could influence the
electroplating. Traditional nanowires could be fabricated in the template with a uniform Au layer as conducting contact. In case of unblocked
AAO membrane, metal electroplating begins from the Au particles which were attached inside the holes during the sputtering step and produces
metal nanotubes. Pt and CoPt nanotubes could be easily prepared by this method and might be applied as catalyst and magnetic material. 2008
Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
Keywords: Electroplating; AAO; Nanotemplate; Nanowire; Nanotube; CoPt
1. Introduction
Recently, one-dimensional (1D) nanostructures of metals
and semiconductor materials have attracted considerable
interest due to their charming performances in several fields,
especially the magnetic or catalytic Co, Fe, and Pt nanowires
[15]. Compared to the traditional chemical vapor deposition
(CVD) or other growth techniques for nanostructures,
electroplating has lots of advantages, such as low cost, easy
implementation, and absence of high vacuum. Besides,
accompanying with nanotemplate method makes it easier to
confine and control the profile of nanomaterials. Anodic
aluminum oxide (AAO) membrane is the most widely used
nanotemplate due to its self-assembled regular hexagonal
array. By fabricating the smaller pore-diameter AAO and
treating with chemical ornament, various 1D nanostructures
are to be obtained, down to tens of nanometer in diameter.
*
Corresponding author. Tel.: +82 31 290 7260; fax: +82 31 290 7272.
E-mail address: chchung@skku.edu (C.-H. Chung).
-2481/$ - see front matter 2008 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
doi:10.1016/j.elecom.2008.01.015
J. Fu et al./Electrochemistry Communications
(2008) 514518 515
and the10 Au-sputtered
AAO membrane was the working
Fig. 1. SEM images of the backside of AAO membranes with Au sputtering for: (a) 0 min, (b) 10 min, (c) 15 min, and (d) 20 min. 516 J. Fu et
al./Electrochemistry Communications 10 (2008) 514518
Fig. 2. Schematic illustration of electroplating process in: (a) blocked, and (b)
unblocked AAO membrane.
growth rate is calculated by both nanowire length per time (left ordinate)
and nanowire volume per time (right ordinate).
Fig. 5. SEM images of electroplated Pt nanotubes (a) before and (b) after
removing AAO templates.
Fig. 6. SEM images of: (a) 2 lm CoPt nanotube, and (b) 5 lm CoPt nanowire.
applications due to its large surface area, such as catalyst layer for various electro-oxidation reactions of methanol and hydrogen.
CoPt is also applicable as magnetic materials. We are currently investigating the catalytic performance of Pt nanotubes and the
magnetic property of
CoPt nanostructures.
4. Conclusions
In conclusion, we have studied the mechanism of metal electroplating in high aspect-ratio AAO membrane with different Au
sputtering structures. Diffusion limitation exists in this electroplating process. When use the unblocked AAO membrane, metal
electroplating begins from the Au particles attached on the AAO inner walls and forms a nanotube structure at the initial state. After
a further electroplating, the metal deposition could fully fill the template as nanowires. By controlling the Au sputtering structure
and other experimental conditions, such as current density, operating mode, and electrolyte compositions, we were able to
manipulate this electroplating process and fabricate particular nanotube or nanowire structures.
Acknowledgements
This work was supported by the Korea Science and Engineering Foundation (KOSEF) grant funded by the Korea government
(MOST) (No. R01-2007-000-10322-0).
References
[1]
[2]
N.B. Chaure, P. Stamenov, F.M.F. Rhen, J.M.D. Coey, J. Magn. Magn. Mater. 290 (2005) 1210.
T.R. Gao, L.F. Yin, C.S. Tian, M. Lu, H. Sang, S.M. Zhou, J. Magn.
Magn. Mater. 300 (2006) 471.
[3] A. Saedi, M. Ghorbani, Mater. Chem. Phys. 91 (2005) 417.
518 J. Fu et al./Electrochemistry Communications 10 (2008) 514518
[4] Q.F. Zhan, Z.Y. Chen, D.S. Xue, F.S. Li, H. Kunkel, X.Z. Zhou, R. Roshko,
[8] W. Wang, N. Li, X.T. Li, W.C. Geng, S.L. Qiu, Mater. Res. Bull. 41
G. Williams, Phys. Rev. B 66 (2002) 134436. [5] Y.G. Guo, L.J. Wan, C.F. Zhu,
(2006) 1417.
D.L. Yang, D.M. Chen, C.L. Bai, Chem. Mater. 15 (2003) 664.
[9] S. Franz, P.L. Cavallotti, M. Bestetti, V. Sirtori, L. Lombardi, J. Magn.
[6] C.J. Brumlik, V.P. Menon, C.R. Martin, J. Mater. Res. 9 (1994) 1174. [7]
Magn. Mater. 272276 (2004) 2430.
J.C. Hulteen, C.R. Martin, J. Mater. Chem. 7 (1997) 1075.
[10] F.M.F. Rhen, E. Backen, J.M.D. Coey, J. Appl. Phys. 97 (2005) 113908.