Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Nos. 96-2246
97-1570
Plaintiff, Appellee,
v.
Defendant, Appellant.
____________________
____________________
Before
____________________
on brief
for appellant.
____________________
____________________
been engaged in a heated battle over the proper setting for their
while appellant
Matrix
Communications Corp.
through arbitration,
asserts
that
the
The
then
aside that
appeals
decision.
ruling based
both the
After
on newly
judgment
on
discovered evidence.
the merits
and
the Rule
Matrix
60(b)
Little
dispute,
needs to
be said
about
the companies'
Agreement") in which
services.
The
commissions if
Agent
Agreement
Matrix generated
provided
a specified
for
to sell MCI
substantial
minimum amount
of
owed it
underlying
more than
pay.
was proper
breached
because
Matrix
-2-
in commissions
that the
the
terms
of
the
Agent
Following
MCI's
Massachusetts state
court.
It
then
termination,
court.
moved
MCI
to
clause
in
parties'
agreement.
removed the
stay
Matrix
the
filed
suit
action to
litigation
the
Agent
Agreement
unambiguously
intent
to
arbitrate all
disputes
federal
and
compel
arbitration
evidenced
arising
in
the
from that
Agreement, states:
Any
dispute
relating
submitted for
the
rules
to
this
Agreement
binding arbitration
contained
judgement[sic]
on
in
in accordance
MCI Tariff
any award
shall
FCC
entered
No.
be
with
therein may
and
be
Matrix
opposed the
motion to
stay, arguing
customer billing
that,
because MCI
limited arbitration to
other
relevant
information
telecommunications services
to the
about
Regulations,"
spans
34
rules.
No. 7
is labeled
Rule
pages
and
provision
the
of
carriers
contains
and
nineteen separate
"Payment Arrangements"
and has
twenty-one subsections.
One
of those
subsections, B-7.13,
is
All
disputes
concerning
invoices
issued after
totaling
$10,000 and
or
affecting
February 28,
above
may be
payment
of
1994 for
charges
resolved
through
binding arbitration.
Subsection B-7.13
is further
for example,
divided into
to be used in such
requires
answer within 17
numerous parts
arbitrations.
the Responding
-3-
Party
that
Section
to file
arbitration commences;
Judge
Harrington of the
the District of
compel arbitration
on September
signed
granting
an
order
arbitration
27, 1996.
the
the agreement
motion,
concluding
day, he
that
an intention
the
by the
to arbitrate but
MCI's motion to
Later that
Court for
to provide the
In
of
procedural rules
under
Fed. R.
Harrington,
decided to
receive all
Civ.
P. 41(a)(1)(i).2
Matrix's
ask the
of voluntary dismissal
counsel
explained
arbitrator to rule
the relief
In
a letter
that
Judge
the company
on whether
it sought through
to
had
Matrix could
arbitration.
If so,
day
both the
dismissal
order
compelling
were entered
on
arbitration
the
docket,
and the
Matrix
grant
initiated
of
the
____________________
section
days of
the arbitration's
commencement;
bias or
exchange of
"other good
cause"; section
.135 provides
for an
the arbitration
commences; and
section .1391
provides for
the
2 Although
filed
Judge Harrington
may have
ruled before
Matrix
time it filed
that the
-4-
arbitration by filing a
the
by MCI in
("JAMS"),
its Tariff.
arbitration clause
that limited
its scope
to billing
disputes
exceeding $10,000.
MCI responded
on October 2, by
filing its
own
action in
federal court
Matrix's claims.
in arbitration,
seeking to
compel arbitration
of
not follow
Matrix's position.
proceeding,
Judge
Without additional
Matrix, he
Because
of his
Harrington
was
hearings
entered an order
or
any
involvement in the
assigned
the
responsive
MCI
earlier
action.
pleading
on October 10 compelling
from
Matrix to
Meanwhile, the
forward,
and, on
arbitration that
Matrix had
initiated went
the arbitrator
ruled that
were unavailable
in the
such
In
remedies.
induced
it to
Agreement by
arbitration because
February
1997, Matrix
the Tariff
filed
barred
a motion
in
enter into
the arbitration
concealing an agreement
-5-
clause in
the Agent
MCI that
provided
for
close
working
relationship
between
the
two
by
MCI to
JAMS.
Matrix argued
that
the MCI/JAMS
Agreement
in favor of MCI.
other
materials
in
support
of
its
position
affidavits and
that
the
JAMS
Agreement had not been concealed and did not evidence bias on the
Following a hearing,
denied the
Rule 60(b) motion,3 concluding that Matrix had failed to show the
elements
Matrix
order compelling
arbitration of
II. Discussion
__________
Before discussing
must
rejection of Matrix's
address a threshold
because Matrix
to
arbitrable,
arbitrator's
Matrix
cannot
authority
to
10 judgment
we
It claims that,
issue of arbitrability
at
this
hear the
juncture
case.
challenge
This
the
appeal, MCI
contends, is moot.
____________________
-6-
We
have little
should go
forward.
the district
difficulty in
From
in
sought
concluding
the
Although
later agreed to
appeal
explicitly advised
arbitral forum.
that the
MCI
the relief it
cites language
if
the
that that
language was
of context
and that
opposition to
resolving
to obtain
full relief.
Indeed, we
think it
disingenuous, and
At the
outset of
our analysis, it
arbitration.
The motion
is worth
recalling the
on which the
by
MCI on October 2.
27, the
held a hearing
court had
Matrix's action,
and had
on arbitrability
concluded that
the Agent
pursuant to
Agreement's
________
enforced
then
because,
dismissed
its
question,
MCI jumped
responded
on
suit.
October
all disputes.
___
virtually
Seeking
in
10
to
contemporaneously,
resolve
with
its own
by
compelling
-7-
the
action,
Matrix
arbitrability
and the
arbitration,
court
thereby
effectively
(though
not
technically) reinstating
its
earlier
decision.4
If
the
court properly
arbitration
of
straightforward
our analysis,
interpreted the
the
parties'
Agent
dispute,
two of which
Agreement to
our
task
compel
would
be
First, the
difficulty
arbitration
is
that
Matrix's
clause includes
appellate
arguments
challenge
that the
of
The second
to
the
district court
never considered, an
taking them
into account.
us from
Bongiorno, 106
_________
____________________
4 Matrix complains
its October 10 order
a
"nullity" once
wrongly "based"
Matrix
dismissed its
suit.
Although
Judge
to the content of that decision -- which he chose not to repeat - rather than
as a statement of precedent
10 ruling.
The
court shall
satisfied
that
arbitration or the
in
hear
the
the
making
parties,
the
upon
for
is not
to arbitration
being
agreement
parties to proceed
of
and
in accordance
with
9 U.S.C.
4.
-8-
intertwined;
Matrix
logically
points
out
that
it
had
no
court because,
The third
factor, somewhat
simplifying our
task, is
that
complaints
about the speed of the court's judgment and its failure to hold a
hearing.
issue
It maintains
of whether
that we
should resolve
no
material facts
therefore, are
are
waived
a basis
its claims
against MCI
in dispute."
as
"the underlying
Procedural
for
vacating
errors alone,
the
district
court's judgment.6
We
address
first the
straightforward
conflict.7
We
argument that
that the
billing
think it
does,
the reference to
Agent Agreement
disputes in
finding
issue: whether
unpersuasive Matrix's
limited arbitration
excess of
$10,000 --
the
clause meant
only to
the types
customer
of claims
specifically
arbitrable under
the Tariff.
incorporated
to
provide
Like the
district
set
of
procedural
rules
for
____________________
In any
event, as
we
discuss infra
_____
at 13-14,
Matrix's
Our review
Shipping Co. v.
____________
on this
question
is de
__
novo. See
____ ___
Keystone
________
1997).
-9-
Not
only is the
broad
-- "any"
submitted
proposed
for
dispute relating
arbitration
by Matrix
would
--
to this
but
have the
the
the
absurd
agreement
limited
"shall" be
construction
result of
entirely
Matrix
to
MCI by
Matrix.
We find
this argument
to be
implausible.
Either the MCI Tariff would directly govern the customers' claims
--
making
reference
to
the
Tariff
in
the
Agent
Agreement
arbitration.
portion
Tariff states
arbitration
that arbitrations
through B-7.139
of text.
"shall be
conducted under
set forth in
the
Sections B-7.131
the
heading
governs
arbitration,
makes
this portion of
another, limited
Rule 7, which
use
of
the term
-10-
"Rules"
to
arbitration.
the
denote
It
the
specific
provisions
relating
to
the use of
contained in
Section B
of the
Tariff on
v.
Memorial Hosp.
_______________
(1983),8
and
the
generous
commercial arbitration
agreements,
882
provision here
cannot bear
assign to it.
We thus
arbitration
reading
F.2d
given
to
see, e.g.,
___ ____
6, 9-11
(1st
the interpretation
provision contained in
460 U.S.
1,
broadly
24-25
worded
Raytheon Co.
____________
v.
Cir. 1989),
the
Matrix seeks
to
paragraph 22 applies
the
to any
incorporated by reference
an arbitrator as
to
Having concluded
that
paragraph
22
requires
arbitration
assertion that
____________________
8 The Supreme
the
construction of
contract
language
itself
or
an
-11-
MCI officials
applied only to
by Matrix.
billing disputes
Fraud in inducing
the
that issue.
contractual agreement on
See
___
generally Prima
_________ _____
Paint Corp. v. Flood & Conklin Mfg. Co., 388 U.S. 395, 403-04
___________
_________________________
n.12
(1967); see
___
925 F.2d
&
v. E.F.
____
v.
arbitration").
As
fraud
See
___
Bongiorno, 106
_________
F.3d
at
1034; Lawton
______
v.
Cir. 1996).
But
puzzle.
to
assert all
___
opportunity
theories because
to offer
any, having
the district
court gave
ruled without
a hearing
it no
and
____________________
9 In fact,
in its Memorandum
in Opposition to
Defendants'
Motion
to Stay
Action
and Compel
Arbitration
(in the
first,
Matrix-filed lawsuit),
Matrix stated:
contend
that the
not agreed to
arbitrate pursuant
to the
Tariff
parties have
Rules,
and
therefore
raises
no
questions
about
the
10
1996).
-12-
76 F.3d
1245, 1250
(1st Cir.
before
Matrix answered
remand, Matrix
improper and
MCI's
complaint.
contends that
Seeking
the questions we
to avoid
procedure was
face are
legal in
district
position.
First,
while interpretation
suitable
us
first.
factfinder.
We
may
not
In addition,
assume
the
Matrix's
trial
court's
assertion that
role
it
of
had no
is at
MCI filed
its
action,
the
district
court
had held
could
assume
that
on
the
hearing
Matrix's
position
with
court reasonably
respect
to
the
It is theoretically
changed
court's quick
action thus
case, however, we
to
its
new
to have deprived
Matrix of
position
through
-13-
motion
for
If
its most
reconsideration.
disinclined to
If
not have
Matrix did
the information
raise-or-waive rule.
within
the post-trial
motion period, its only recourse was through its 60(b) motion.
meant omission
before the trial court of the fraud theory upon which Matrix
wishes to rely.
now
conclude
the
district court
to move for
Cf. Berkovitz v.
___ _________
1996)
reconsideration of
be excused,"
Vanhaaren v.
_________
F.2d 1, 5 (1st
Cir. 1993).
("[T]his court
from time
to time
has refused
to permit
570
n.9
(1st
proceedings or
about use
IRS,
___
Cir.
1996)
(failure
for reconsideration
to
1352 (1st
move
to
undercuts claim
Cir. 1989)
reopen
the
of surprise
hearing); Beaulieu v.
________
("[I]t is
a party's
first obligation to
thought
available in
the district
appeal.").
We therefore conclude
claim that
court before
seeking
it on
should be invalidated
its
on the
-14-
Agreement.11
Matrix's
60(b)
rests
effort to undo
on
the
the October
agreement
10 decision
establishing
JAMS
via Rule
as
the
____________________
11
We recognize that
if
procedural errors
in
Matrix's waiver of
brought
its
addressed by the
attention
on
district
motion
for
12
Agent
Tariff
Equally unavailing is
Agreement's
arbitration
arbitration rules
is
that the
invalid because
foreclose remedies,
such as
the
multiple
of available
relief.
See
___
v.
involve a waiver of
It would
a claim should
a court,
question
forum.
of
and then,
forum,
be anomalous for
be referred to an
by
deciding issues
foreclose
the
("[T]he signing
of
a valid
across
presume
that
dispute
or
the
the
relating
procedures
unrelated to
from
the
deciding
(1st Cir.
to arbitrate
the
`arbitrability'
other issues
to
arbitrator rather
arbitrator
agreement
a court
of
threshold;
to
the
arbitration
we
will
substance of
are
for
then
the
the
arbitrator.")
Matrix's reliance on
F.3d
1244
(9th Cir.
1994),
is misplaced
because,
unlike the
designed
to
protect
bargaining
remedies in arbitration.
rights.
882 F.2d 6,
See
___
12 (1st Cir.
The
parties may
Raytheon Co. v.
____________
1989); see
also
___________________
Mastrobuono
___________
(1995)
___
____
include "an
-15-
been
discovered
59(b)."
in time
to
move for
new trial
not have
under Rule
must
demonstrate
material
and
that
"the missing
controlling
nature
evidence
as
[would]
was
`of
such a
probably
[have]
satisfies
prongs
of this
ability
standard.
First,
it asserts
that
it had
no
____________________
60(b) in the
refer to
based
briefs on
appeal do not
Anderson
________
(setting
forth
retrial
mandated
"substantially"
the
standard
only
when
interfered
or other misconduct.
F.2d 910,
applicable
the
with
924 (1st
to
aggrieved
Cir. 1988)
60(b)(3)
challenged
See
___
claims:
misconduct
party's ability
has
to
fully and
fairly prepare
reply brief
assertion
in its
brief
that
argue generally,
should be
vacated
misrepresentations by
waived a 60(b)(3)
abuse of
at trial).
Matrix's
Matrix does
orders
MCI.
the
60(b)(3) claim
however, that
because
of
waived.
the district
fraudulent
To the extent
was
court
conduct
that Matrix
and
has not
discretion in
rejection of
that
Judge
Matrix posits, if
Harrington.
had been
had
to
As
in
addition
to
that
called for
certain disputes,
in view
discussion of Matrix's
JAMS
before
the
he would have
contractual
language,
of the MCI/JAMS
60(b)(2) claim
the
arbitration of
Agreement."
demonstrates, see
___
As our
infra,
_____
access to the
to
effort
Matrix's
to
invalidate
arbitration provision.
-16-
the
Agent
Agreement's
commenced.14
Second,
Matrix
emphasizes
that
the
MCI/JAMS
financial and reporting ties" between MCI and JAMS, and it argues
the
lacking in
several respects.
We may
reject its
judgment only
___ _____
F.3d
886, 891
(1st Cir.
1997); Hoult, 57
_____
__________
F.3d at
3.
We are
unable to do so.
Judge
evidence earlier.
argument
that
corporate
sponsored
arbitration administrator.
failed to
conceded at oral
arbitration
programs
are
about the
discover them.
____________________
14
Although
Matrix
asserts
that
JAMS'
general
counsel
"professes he
litigation
stated that
was unaware of
commenced,"
the
he was unfamiliar
until this
Young,
actually
the agreement,
an unrelated case.
-17-
Matrix
foreclosed
argues on appeal,
from
conducting
however, that it
discovery
by
the
was essentially
sequence
of
proceedings in
lawsuit,
district
MCI secured
obligation
R.
the
Civ.
court.
an extension
In
of time
original
to comply
P. 26,
which
The
court
had
the
then
effect of
with its
that
MCI
therefore
holding
off
other
motion
to
compel
Matrix
granted
managed
the
to
avoid
producing
documents,
subsequent
MCI
presented
Matrix
discovery.
argues
the
lawsuit,
because
the
no
opportunity
court's ruling
for
In the
discovery
preceded
any
___
any
was
action by
Matrix.
We need
not resolve
whether the
district
court erred
in
with respect
not likely to
discussion, however, we
on
failure to make
Its refusal to do so
____________________
15
Agreement
Matrix
be
on November
provided
subpoena
as
requested
before
in
the
the
arbitrator.
scheduled
Matrix
to request
Tariff
a copy
directed Matrix
provided
meeting
that
of
the
with
the
15, the
the document
Arbitration
Rules.
via
requested
a copy
of
the
-18-
sign such an
undoubtedly
and
intensified the
wrangling
over
Rule
unquestionably
contents.
which
the Agreement's
60(b)(2)
is
reserved,
they
do
include
matters
MCI's nondisclosure.
Even if we
in
finding a
motion flunks
lack
of diligence,
her
barrier to relief.
judgment that
would stand
"Matrix's
as a
separate
have changed the outcome, and that Matrix was not challenging the
impartiality
of the
arbitrator selected
claimed were
pivotal.
hesitate in finding
and
Agreement at
one that
conclusions
JAMS, Judge
fact
by
Section XIIE).
law.
See
___
Judge
App.
that Matrix
caused her
to
entirely immaterial.
of
Saris
at
findings of
1190
(MCI/JAMS
Saris ultimately
concluded
____________________
agreement.
On December 10,
notice of the
next
The MCI/JAMS
-19-
MCI
is
an
institutional
litigant
and
probably
has
no
interest in
having an arbitrator
spell out
be used against
customers.
But
would have
regarded such a
findings and
it in future cases
legal
with its
position as material.
Its contract
capable
whether
of litigating
the
matters
afresh
before
an
arbitrator or in court.
Indeed,
cared
Matrix' only
about the
provision
explanation as to
involves
why it
terse
might have
suggestion
that
establish
That
however, and is
therefore inapplicable.16
the
liability
delays
and
relations
case,
limitation is
installation
with its
and Matrix is
brief.
clearly directed
And,
as it
and
like
customers and
under
matters
has nothing
visibly silent on
the Tariff
involving
to do
this issue
to
MCI's
with this
in its reply
in this
case does
____________________
16
We note
that, like
the
arbitration rules
in the
it covers
arbitrations administered
by JAMS for
-20-
MCI
The
applies to other
MCI, and we
likewise are
An
provision
additional
was
factor
reinforces the
immaterial.
"It
has
conclusion
long
that the
been settled
that
obligation .
Raytheon Co.,
_____________
. . to
Indeed,
882 F.2d
at
for an award
(citation
`[a]rbitrators have no
omitted).
at all.'"
See
___
also
____
Cir.
1995) ("It
is well
established that
legal
rulings or
reversal.
not
factual findings
See, e.g.,
___ ____
arbitrators are
do not
provide a
Prudential-Bache, 72 F.3d
________________
basis for
at 239
& n.6;
Eljer Mfg., Inc. v. Kowin Dev. Corp., 14 F.3d 1250, 1253-54 (7th
________________
_________________
1990).
that
We cannot see
was
not
sufficiently
914 F.2d 6,
guaranteed
to
material to have
begin
with
8 (1st
of arbitration
could
negated a party's
Cir.
be
deemed
willingness to
arbitrate.
MCI/JAMS
Agreement requires
to
be furnished
by
MCI to
JAMS,
Account,"
and
"[t]wo
free
is
required
to
provide under
dedicated
phone
lines."
These
the
contract
(such as
24-hour
-21-
work it
those
seeks to obtain
tools
are
the
its stock-in-trade.
specified
in
MCI/JAMS
provided,
plus a $40,000
particularly when
Likewise,
Agreement are
for
the payments
services
to be
cover administration
See App.
___
at
1192-95.
Matrix knew from the outset, or should have known, that JAMS
had a substantial
role
as
administrator
of MCI's
arbitration
out
their
working
relationship
in
some
program.
Matrix
form;
there would be no
virtue of its
we
think
it
written contract
between them.
find shocking in
public
request
arbitration
for
bids
program,
for
meaning
were included in
contract
that
claims to
those
to
MCI's
administer
aspects
of
its
MCI's
With
table,
this much
we are
reasonably
unpersuaded that
presumed to
be already
the district
court
on the
would have
____________________
17
For example,
the MCI/JAMS
Agreement
requires JAMS
to
provide weekly reports on the status of current arbitrations, 24hour electronic docketing containing any change
cases, deadlines
affect
system,
must do, a
meet and
in the status of
any decisions
that
-22-
deemed
the additional
Agreement material
arbitration.
in
the
cases,18
information
to Matrix's
contained
decision to
in
the
MCI/JAMS
participate in
the
Agreement
involve
the
arbitrators
who
are
deciding
as JAMS' customer,
is
contradicted by Matrix's
We consequently
it did not
abuse its
committed no
reversible error
in issuing
the October 10
order
____________________
18 In fact,
will
be
selected based
on,
among other
that arbitrators
factors,
"absence of
ENDISPUTE
The
interest
with MCI
When appointed to
prior to
inclusion
on the
panel.
will
with
since
the arbitrator's
addition,
arbitrators
appointment to
inclusion on
will
be
the
screened
a particular arbitration
the interim
panel.
In
prior
to
for potential
party to the
case.
Id. at (C).
___
19
The
arbitrator
is the
Honorable
Robert
L. Steadman,
-23-
Fed. R.
Civ. P. 60(b).
Each party to
______________
-24-