Professional Documents
Culture Documents
July 6, 1995
____________________
No. 94-1772
UNITED STATES,
Appellee,
v.
CHRISTOPHER ONYEJEKWE,
Defendant, Appellant.
____________________
____________________
Before
____________________
____________________
____________________
Per Curiam.
___________
Onyejekwe pled
Sentence
On
May
guilty to
2,
one
1994, appellant
count of
Christopher
credit card
fraud.
various sentencing
errors.
In particular,
He also alleges
he contends that
residence at
two
criminal
the suppression
history points
hearing; (2) in
based
on
assessing him
a finding
that
he
conduct) while
the amount
of restitution.
For the
following reasons,
we
affirm.
BACKGROUND
Because
plea,
we derive
portion of
well
appellant's conviction
the
the
resulted from
pertinent facts
from the
Presentence Investigation
record.1
a guilty
uncontested
Report (PSR),
as
____________________
1.
This
record
includes transcripts
evidentiary
hearing
disposition
hearing.
on
the
We
note
motion
that
of
the arraignments,
to
suppress,
and
appellant's appendix
transcripts of
testimony before
the grand
15,
access
devices.2
arrested on
was
maiden names,
18 U.S.C.
carrying "a
list
etc."
1029(a)(2), 2.
Appellant was
of names,
dates
An arraignment
of birth,
mothers'
were
held
on
services
October 21,
and the
1993.
Appellant informed
magistrate that
Avenue, Providence.
he lived at
pre-trial
202 Bellevue
appellant
Avenue,
Medeiros.
where
she
was
On October
living
25, 1993,
under
the
name
federal agents
of Althea
executed a
On
from
the
cellar
of
the
Stamford property.
in
the names
of
Althea and
Leonard Medeiros;
These
bags
credit cards
counterfeit
____________________
10(a).
decision.
2.
-33
appellant
or Mogaji;
a list
of names
and other
data; and
On
November
returned
which added
U.S.C.
2-6).
1993,
superseding
a conspiracy count
indictment
(Count 1),
was
see 18
___
Several
suppress
months
the evidence
8,
3,
1994.
later, appellant
seized
at the
filed a
motion to
Stamford property
on
on April
bags of documents
that address.
he
two
He
residences.
the cellar at
magistrate that
The district
court denied
that he had
the motion
to
suppress
lacked standing.
The
It further
seems to me
that insofar
as
what he told
That
he lived
the Magistrate
at 202
Bellevue.
no
privacy in
expectation of
number 10
Appellant
pled guilty
May
1994.
Count 3
The
of the
superseding
remaining
counts were
indictment
on
dismissed.
The PSR
Avenue.
Appellant objected on
2,
to
-44
that he maintained
a second address
at 10 Stamford
Avenue.
presentence
address
interview,
that
his
Avenue.
advised
legal
with
appellant
stay
of III,
of 15 and a criminal
to be 24-30
months.
Based on
history category
to 28
months
was also
He
DISCUSSION
I.
Appellant,
court-appointed
was
inept and
rendered
who
was
represented
by
three
successive
that
their
combined
deficient
performance
incompetent.
Ordinarily,
we
do not
is no
exception.
attorneys failed
Appellant
address
direct appeal.
alleges, inter
_____
-55
ineffective
This case
alia, that
____
his
information.
e.g.,
____
United States
_____________
v. McGill,
______
1991)
(fact-specific claims
952 F.2d
of ineffective
16, 19
See,
___
(1st Cir.
assistance must
Accordingly,
appellant's claim
not properly
of ineffective assistance is
before us.
II.
SENTENCING
A. Obstruction of Justice
U.S.S.G.
3C1.1 directs
a defendant's offense
or attempted to obstruct or
impede,
the
investigation,
offense."
perjury.
administration
prosecution,
The enhancement
See U.S.S.G.
___
United States v.
______________
found
justice
during
sentencing of
the
the
instant
113 S.
In the instant
that appellant
hearing.
or
Dunnigan,
________
(defining perjury).
of
perjured
Accordingly,
Ct.
(1993)
himself
the court
1111, 1116
at the
made a
suppression
two level
upward
Appellant contends
identify which
false.
that
portions of his
This contention
the district
court failed
testimony it believed
is misplaced.
The district
to
to be
court
-66
specifically found
suppress.
The
district
further subsidiary
appellant's
court
was
not required
findings or to explain
testimony.
to
make
its evaluation of
v. Tracy, 36 F.3d
___ _____________
Appellant
evidence
also
to support
falsely.
We
residence
argues
the court's
disagree.
was an
that
stated
there
is
insufficient
finding that
he testified
Although
issue from
the
the very
until the
_____
location
district court
residence at 10 Stamford
that he
Avenue.
his
beginning, appellant
to the
of
first time, he
maintained a
second
entitled to
announcement with
skepticism.
indigent.
two
residences is
implausible,
at
least
without
further
explanation.
Avenue.
out" that
house.
The government
appellant resided
In addition,
at 10
appellant when
documents belonging to
-77
Stamford
agents "staked
he left
the
appellant were
seized
from 10
Stamford
probation that
Avenue.
However, appellant
told
observed
departing 10
personal
papers
suggests
Stamford address.
be drawn from
sentencing
in
hearing.3
were found
there,
but
why some
of his
the evidence
also
the evidence,
court's superior
credibility, we
erred
cannot say
finding that
opportunity
to assess
appellant
United States v.
______________
deference to
lied
Brum, 948
____
at the
the
witness
court clearly
suppression
F.2d 817,
819 (1st
Cir.
1991) (finding
of perjury
reviewed for
clear error);
United States v. Martinez, 922 F.2d 914, 925 (1st Cir. 1991)
______________
________
(where
there
is
circumstances,
more
than
one
plausible
view
of
the
B. Criminal History
____________________
3.
We
court
We
this
defendant's
favor
"`those
conflicts about
which
the
other circuits)).
firm conviction
-88
state
was sentenced to
card fraud.
probation.
Acting
In
pursuant to U.S.S.G.
4A1.1(c),
the
history points
district
court
assessed
him
sentences.
two
criminal
The court
on the
then
4A1.1(d)
Appellant
argues
that
the
district
court
particular,
he
accountable
for the
eighteen
Mastercard
cash
contends
that
conduct
withdrawals
between
October
he
should
involved in
made
26,
by
erred
in
4A1.1(d).
In
not
Count 6,
Mogaji
1992 and
be
using
June
13,
held
namely,
GM
1993.
these withdrawals
use of the
were made
same credit
card.
Under
prosecution for
the circumstances,
he
argues, Mogaji's
relevant
conduct was
conduct
within the
meaning
of
so, not
U.S.S.G.
1B.3.
____________________
4.
The
commentary to
U.S.S.G.
(n.4).
that "[t]wo
4A1.1 states
justice sentence."
U.S.S.G.
4A1.1,
United States v.
______________
1993) (holding
Smith,
_____
of the
991 F.2d
-99
1B1.3.
1468, 1470-71
under
1B1.3).
comment.
See
___
(9th Cir.
4A1.1(d)-(e)
have considered
history under
this
conduct in
calculating
his
criminal
4A1.1(d).
question,
raised
4A1.1(d)
permits a
conduct
committed
defendant's
in
appellant's
sentencing
by
reply
court
co-defendant
criminal history.
Count
brief,
to consider
in
1 of
the
whether
relevant
calculating
the superseding
think there is
least until the date of his arrest, October 20, 1993, when he
was found
to be carrying "a
mothers'
See
___
of birth,
47 F.3d 434, 437 (D.C. Cir. 1995) (district court may rely on
any extraneous
acts offered
as relevant conduct).
Indeed,
October
20,
conspiracy.
defendant,
1993 was
an overt
This was
himself,
relevant
while
act
in furtherance
conduct
serving
of the
committed by
state
sentence
the
of
-1010
probation.
Accordingly,
there was
no error
4A1.1(d).5
in adding
two
C.
Restitution
Appellant
contends that
ordering him to
the amount of
the
district
pay restitution to
$7,036.17 for
court erred
in
in
in Count
3.
made by appellant
and Mogaji
Lechmere using
Chase
on two
Manhattan
separate occasions
Mastercard.
at
Appellant
the
value of
carrying away
certain goods
from Lechmere.
which they
did not
We decline to
succeed in
entertain this
____________________
5.
We
also reject
court failed to
PSR
R. Crim. P.
32(c)(1)).
history
The
points under
guilty
PSR assessed
4A1.1(d).
the specific
(Count 3)
probation.
district
fact as required
error because
that the
by former Fed.
Rule
appellant's argument
occurred
appellant two
In his
at
criminal
objections to the
offense to which
Onyejekwe pled
before Onyejekwe
was placed
on
did
points
under
Defense
4A1.1(d) were
counsel
never
took
based
on
issue
relevant
with
the
-1111
See
___
United States v.
_____________
Affirmed.7
________
____________________
6.
Appellant
also
argues that
$7,036.17
in
Chase
Manhattan
restitution.
We
think
it
Bank will
ordered to
plain
that
7.
We
also
district
deny
court
suppression
determined
to
produce
hearing.
reporter prepared
hearing,
appellant's
request that
the
Appellant
two transcripts
the two
order
audio
recording
contends
that
the
of his testimony
we
of
the
the
court
at that
is accurate
without comparing
them
to
the audio
recording.
He
also suggests
that the
has
clarifying the
when it
not
determined that he
followed
record.
the
See Fed.
___
proper
perjured himself.
procedure
R. App. P. 10(e).
for
In any
district
court.
The
differences
-1212
between
the
two