Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Compiler:
BAYU SENJAHARI, M.Pd., M.Ed
2014
Preface
Alhamdulillah, praise to Allah SWT the beneficent and merciful. The handbook entitled
Research is People Routine: Why are you anxious? is finally completed. This handbook
is a compilation from several references that is purposively bound to enrich students
knowledge in research. The idea of contents is based on the compiler experiences in
supervising and examining students thesis. Thus, it is expected that the book be benefited
for everyone.
List of Contents
Preface ................................................................................................................................... 2
List of Contents ..................................................................................................................... 3
ELICITING RESEARCH TOPIC ......................................................................................... 3
RESEARCH BACKGROUND/ INTRODUCTION............................................................. 6
THE RESEARCH QUESTIONS/ PROBLEMS ................................................................. 10
REVIEW OF THE RELATED THEORIES ....................................................................... 16
QUANTITATIVE OR QUALITATIVE RESEARCH ....................................................... 62
QUANTITATIVE RESEARCH ......................................................................................... 68
QUALITATIVE RESEARCH (I) ....................................................................................... 71
QUALITATIVE RESEARCH (II) ...................................................................................... 77
DATA COLLECTION TECHNIQUES ................................................................................ 81
CONCLUSION AND SUGGESTION................................................................................ 85
Dont limit yourself to one book/article different authors and researches may
show various insights to theories and address the same problem in a different way.
When reading an article, focus on objective of the study, its results and the
conclusion use fast screening!
Be patient! Notice that to get an extensive overview of the field, it takes time and
cant be done in one day or a week.
Dont only collect literature analyze it!
Moreover, dont forget about practical aspects before starting our own research. Ask
yourself the following questions:
Is it possible to investigate your subject? This means, will you be able to change
psychology concepts to measures/categories with your results?
Do you have appropriate tools and human resources for your project (methods
e.g., questionnaires; colleagues or a research group that could be involved, should
you need more people)?
Should there be no adequate method you may need to develop one. Are you ready
to handle the extra work before even starting research and performing pilot studies?
Are you overwhelmed with how much information you are finding? Try the suggestions
below:
Scan your textbook and other class readings for topic ideas and suggestions
Draw on what you have read or seen recently that interested you
Introduction/Background: This section should describe the research area and findings from
previous studies. Write in a goal-directed manner. You will eventually be proposing some
experiment/models, therefore, the literature review should be designed so that it discusses
an issue or question that needs to be addressed in that area and provides a rationale for
your proposed study. Moreover, you should structure your Introduction so that the
motivation for your proposal becomes clear. To achieve that you should begin with a
relatively big issue and then focus down to the specific issue you are interested in,
highlighting the aspects of previous research (for example, some methodological flaw in
previous approaches or a novel finding opening a new field) that your proposal will
address. Summarize the most important and relevant results/expertise from your own
previous research/studies. You should try to demonstrate that you are (i) familiar with the
field of research and (ii) able to conduct the research in this field. By the end of the
Introduction, the reader should have a very good idea of what the central issue of your
proposal will be. Your Introduction should reference at least three original research articles
(see the section about references).
College students and even beginning graduate students are often confronted with questions
on how to write the introduction of a research paper correctly. Questions such as what
should be the content of the introduction or how should the introduction be written are
common.
Step 1. Define the Objectives of the Research Paper
What essentially are the objectives of the research paper? The main objectives of the
research paper should reveal the reasons for undertaking the research. It should provide the
reader the right direction needed to evaluate the results of the research paper. The
background information should be written in such a way that the reader need not examine
or browse other publications about the topic discussed in the research paper. The
introduction should provide the reasons behind the conduct of the research paper. The
introduction narrates the circumstances that led the author to conduct research and come up
with a solution to the problem identified.
Most important, the introduction should briefly and clearly state the objectives in writing
the research paper. It should be brief so that the reader will see immediately if the research
paper is relevant to his interest or discipline. The information provided should be founded
on some other previous study that has a bearing on the issues at hand.
There are rules to be followed on how to write the introduction of the research paper. The
introduction should state the nature as well as scope and limitations of the research paper.
The nature of the research paper refers to the circumstances that produced the existing
phenomena while the scope and limitations of the research paper refers to the extent by
which the problem was researched on and what issues have not been covered. This should
be written in easily understandable terms.
Writing an Introduction
http://www.crlsresearchguide.org/17_Writing_Introduction.asp
What is it?
An introduction is the first paragraph of a written research paper, or the first thing you say
in an oral presentation, or the first thing people see, hear, or experience about your project.
It has two parts:
1. A general introduction to the topic you will be discussing
2. Your Thesis Statement
Why do it?
Without an introduction, it is sometimes very difficult for your audience to figure out what
you are trying to say. There needs to be a thread of an idea that they will follow through
your paper or presentation. The introduction gives the reader the beginning of the piece of
thread so they can follow it.
When do I do it?
Many books recommend writing your introduction last, after you finish your project. This
is to make sure that you introduce what you are actually going to say. If your project
changes in the creating process, it is important to make sure that your introduction
accurately reflects what you will be saying. If, however, you have written a good outline
and stick to it, then it is fine to start writing your introduction first. Just make sure in your
proofreading that you have kept the thread consistent throughout the paper.
How do I do it?
Start with a couple of sentences that introduce your topic to your reader. You do not have
to give too much detailed information; save that for the body of your paper. Make these
sentences as interesting as you can. Through them, you can hook a reader and get them
very interested in the line of thinking you are going to develop in your project.
Then state your thesis, which may be done in one or more sentences. The length of your
introduction depends on the length and complexity of your project, but generally, it should
not exceed one page unless it is a very long project or a book. The average length of an
introduction is one-half a page.
Writing an introduction (2)
http://www.ruf.rice.edu/~bioslabs/tools/report/reportform.html
General intent:
The purpose of an introduction is to acquaint the reader with the rationale behind the work,
with the intention of defending it. It places your work in a theoretical context, and enables
the reader to understand and appreciate your objectives. The abstract is the only text in a
research paper to be written without using paragraphs in order to separate major points.
Approaches vary widely; however, for our studies the following approach can produce an
effective introduction.
Describe the importance (significance) of the study - why was this worth doing in
the first place? Provide a broad context.
Defend the model - why did you use this particular organism or system? What are
its advantages? You might comment on its suitability from a theoretical point of
view as well as indicate practical reasons for using it.
Provide a rationale. State your specific hypothesis(es) or objective(s), and describe
the reasoning that led you to select them.
Very briefly describe the experimental design and how it accomplished the stated
objectives.
Style:
Use past tense except when referring to established facts. After all, the paper will
be submitted after all of the work is completed.
Organize your ideas, making one major point with each paragraph. If you make the
four points listed above, you will need a minimum of four paragraphs.
Present background information only as needed in order support a position. The
reader does not want to read everything you know about a subject.
State the hypothesis/objective precisely - do not oversimplify.
As always, pay attention to spelling, clarity and appropriateness of sentences and
phrases.
Writing a research paper is a challenge for many high school and college students. One of
the biggest hang-ups many students have is getting started. Finding a topic and doing, the
research may be half the battle, but putting words to paper or starting an introduction often
proves to be an intimidating task. If done correctly, an introduction is a simple and
effective way to write the entire paper quickly.
Step 1
Conduct your research thoroughly. One-problem students run into when starting a research
paper introduction is failing to properly research the topic. Research doesn't involve just
gathering sources. It also involves reading and mentally digesting the source material.
Some students have difficultly with the introduction because they don't understand the
topic.
Step 2
Create a map or outline of your paper. You must understand the direction your paper is
going before you can properly write the introduction. By definition, an introduction
introduces the paper topic. Your intent should be to summarize the extent of your research
in one or two paragraphs, without necessarily giving away the ending.
Step 3
Write multiple rough drafts of your opening paragraph. You should complete each one
independently of the others and of your paper outline. You shouldn't ignore your paper
outline; instead, attempt to write the introduction without directly relying on the outline.
This allows your creative juices to flow and provides new insights about developing the
paper's body and conclusion. If you can't write the introduction without looking at source
material, you don't grasp your research.
Step 4
Choose the best version of your introduction and revise it. You should write a final version
of your introduction before moving on to the research paper's body. Your introduction
should summarize your paper, indicate its importance for future research and describe your
research's extent or sources.
Step 5
Ask someone to proofread and critique the introduction. Preferably, you should ask the
teacher or professor who assigned the paper to read the introduction, making sure it
conforms to the assignment's requirements. If it's written correctly, your instructor can
ascertain most of the paper's content without reading the entire document. Your instructor
can also provide direction for the rest of your paper.
10
Choose an interesting general topic. Even directed academic research should focus
on a topic in which the writer is at least somewhat personally invested. Writers
should choose a broad topic about which they genuinely would like to know more.
An example of a general topic might be Slavery in the American South or Films
of the 1930s.
Do some preliminary research on your general topic. Do a few quick searches in
current periodicals and journals on your topic to see whats already been done and
to help you narrow your focus. What questions does this early research raise?
Consider your audience. For most college papers, your audience will be academic,
but always keep your audience in mind when narrowing your topic and developing
your question. Would that particular audience be interested in this question?
Start asking questions. Taking into consideration all of the above, start asking
yourself open-ended how and why questions about your general topic. For
example, How did the slave trade evolve in the 1850s in the American South? or
Why were slave narratives effective tools in working toward the abolishment of
slavery?
Evaluate your question.
Is your research question clear? With so much research available on
any given topic, research questions must be as clear as possible in
order to be effective in helping the writer direct his or her research.
11
of argument are you hoping to make/support? What will it mean if your research
disputes your planned argument?
Sample Research Questions
Unclear: Why are social networking sites harmful?
Clear: How are online users experiencing or addressing privacy issues on such social
networking sites as MySpace and Facebook?
The unclear version of this question doesnt specify which social networking sites or
suggest what kind of harm the sites are causing. It also assumes that this harm is proven
and/or accepted. The clearer version specifies sites (MySpace and Facebook), the type of
harm (privacy issues), and who the issue is harming (users). A strong research question
should never leave room for ambiguity or interpretation.
Unfocused: What is the effect on the environment from global warming?
Focused: How is glacial melting affecting penguins in Antarctica?
The unfocused research question is so broad that it couldnt be adequately answered in a
book-length piece, let alone a standard college-level paper. The focused version narrows
down to a specific cause (glacial melting), a specific place (Antarctica), and a specific
group that is affected (penguins). When in doubt, make a research question as narrow and
focused as possible.
Too simple: How are doctors addressing diabetes in the U.S.?
Appropriately Complex: What are common traits of those suffering from diabetes in
America, and how can these commonalities be used to aid the medical community in
prevention of the disease?
The simple version of this question can be looked up online and answered in a few factual
sentences; it leaves no room for analysis. The more complex version is written in two
parts; it is thought provoking and requires both significant investigation and evaluation
from the writer. As a general rule of thumb, if a quick Google search can answer a research
question, its likely not very effective.
It is important to start your thinking about the dissertation with a question rather than
simply a topic heading. The question sets out what you hope to learn about the topic. This
question, together with your approach, will guide and structure the choice of data to be
collected and analyzed. Some research questions focus your attention onto the relationship
of particular theories and concepts: 'how does gender relate to career choices of members
of different religions?' Some research questions aim to open an area to let possible new
theories emerge: 'what is going on here?' is the most basic research question in exploratory
research. For an undergraduate dissertation, your question needs to be more targeted than
either
of
these.
Creating a research question is a task. Good research questions are formed and worked on,
and are rarely simply found. You start with what interests you, and you refine it until it is
workable. There is no recipe for the perfect research question, but there are bad research
12
questions. The following guidelines highlight some of the features of good questions.
Top Tips:
a. Relevant.
b. Manageable in terms of research and in terms of your own academic abilities.
c. Substantial and with original dimensions.
d. Consistent with the requirements of the assessment.
e. Clear and simple.
f. Interesting.
Relevant
The question will be of academic and intellectual interest to people in the field you have
chosen to study. The question arises from issues raised in the literature or in practice.
You should be able to establish a clear purpose for your research in relation to the chosen
field. For example, are you filling a gap in knowledge, analyzing academic assumptions or
professional practice, monitoring a development in practice, comparing different
approaches or testing theories within a specific population?
Manageable
You need to be realistic about the scope and scale of the project. The question you ask
must be within your ability to tackle. For example, are you able to access people, statistics,
or documents from which to collect the data you need to address the question fully? Are
you able to relate the concepts of your research question to the observations, phenomena,
indicators or variables you can access? Can this data be accessed within the limited time
and resources you have available to you? Sometimes a research question appears feasible,
but when you start your fieldwork or library study, it proves otherwise. In this situation, it
is important to write up the problems honestly and to reflect on what has been learnt. It
may be possible, with your supervisor, to develop a contingency plan to anticipate possible
problems of access.
Substantial and (within reason) original
The question should not simply copy questions asked in other final year modules, or
modules previously undertaken. It shows your own imagination and your ability to
construct and develop research issues. And it needs to give sufficient scope to develop into
a dissertation.
Consistent with the requirements of the assessment
The question must allow you the scope to satisfy the learning outcomes of the course.
For example, you can choose to conduct a theoretical study, one that does not contain
analysis of empirical data. In this case, it will be necessary for you to think carefully before
making such a choice. You would be required to give an account of your methodology, to
explain why theoretical analysis was the most appropriate way of addressing the question
and how you have gone about using theoretical models to produce new insights about the
subject.
13
Most people associate research with doing something: observing people, using equipment,
or analyzing data. However, the most critical parts of the research process are those parts
that are associated with thinking not doing. This section explains how to develop research
14
questions, define variables, and formulate hypotheses. Unless these three areas are
carefully done the researcher will waste his/her time in running around observing people,
using equipment, and analyzing data.
After one has become interested in an area of inquiry, and has studied the available
literature, it is time to formulate a research question and develop hypotheses. This stage is
the most crucial part of research. If one is not exactly clear about what one is studying,
then the result is a very muddy research study. Contrary to myth many research studies are
muddy and ill conceived, because of careless thinking at this stage of the process. A
research question is a formal statement of the goal of a study. The research question states
clearly, what the study will investigate or attempt to prove. The research question is a
logical statement that progresses from what is known or believed to be true (as determined
by the literature review) to that is unknown and requires validation.
It is important to be able to identify the research question. The other components of a study
grow from the research question in a logical manner. Once we have a clear research
question, the question leads to specific variables. The variables are the observable
phenomena that can be studied. A variable varies, that is it can be observed to change, or
can take on different attributes. Gender is a variable and it can take on two different
attributes, male and female. A knowledge of the variables allows us to understand the
hypotheses of the study. The hypotheses describe the predicted relationships between the
variables. The next chapter goes into more details.
15
The literature review. A review of the literature is an essential part of your academic
research project. The review is a careful examination of a body of literature pointing
toward the answer to your research question. Literature reviewed typically includes
scholarly journals, scholarly books, authoritative databases and primary sources.
Sometimes it includes newspapers, magazines, other books, films, audio and video tapes,
and other secondary sources.
Primary sources are the origin of information under study, fundamental documents relating
to a particular subject or idea. Often they are first hand accounts written by a witness or
researcher at the time of an event or discovery. These may be accessible as physical
publications, as publications in electronic databases, or on the Internet. Secondary sources
are documents or recordings that relate to or discuss information originally presented
elsewhere. These, too, may be accessible as physical objects or electronically in databases
or on the Internet.
All good research and writing is guided by a review of the relevant literature. Your
literature review will be the mechanism by which your research is viewed as a cumulative
process. That makes it an integral component of the scientific process. Why do it? The
purpose of the literature review remains the same regardless of the research method you
use. It tests your research question against what already is known about your subject.
Through the literature review you will discover whether your research question already has
been answered by someone else. If it has, you must change or modify your question.
Considering your question. If you find that someone else, then search for these answers,
has not answered your research question satisfactorily:
What is known about my subject?
What is the chronology of the development of knowledge about my subject?
Are there any gaps in knowledge of my subject? Which openings for research have been
identified by other researchers? How do I intend to bridge the gaps?
Is there a consensus on relevant issues? Or is there significant debate on issues? What are
the various positions?
What is the most fruitful direction I can see for my research as a result of my literature
review? What directions are indicated by the work of other researchers?
Remember that nothing is completely black or white. Only you can determine what is
satisfactory, relevant, significant or important in the context of your own research.
16
17
down. Turn to your research question. Write it out again at the head of a list of the various
keywords and authors that you have uncovered in your search. Do any pairings or
groupings pop out at you? You now are structuring or sketching out the literature review
which is the first step in writing a research paper, thesis or dissertation.
Writing the lit review. One draft won't cut it. Plan from the outset to write and rewrite.
Naturally, you will crave a sense of forward momentum, so don't get bogged down. Don't
restrict yourself to writing the review in a linear fashion from start to finish. If one area of
the writing is proving difficult, jump to another part.
Edit and rewrite. Your goal is to communicate effectively and efficiently the answer you
found to your research question in the literature. Edit your work so it is clear and concise.
If you will be writing an abstract and introduction, leave them for the last.
Communicating ideas is the objective of your writing, so make it clear, concise and
consistent. Big words and technical terms are not clear to everyone. They make it hard for
all readers to understand your writing. Consider their use very carefully and substitute a
50-cent word for a $5 word wherever possible.
Style and writing guides are worth browsing if you are unsure how to approach writing.
Always re-read what you have written. Get someone else to read it. Read it aloud to see
how it sounds to your ear. Then revise and rewrite.
Writing the conclusion. Throughout your written review, you should communicate your
new knowledge by combining the research question you asked with the literature you
reviewed. End your writing with a conclusion that wraps up what you learned in the
literature review process.
While the interaction between the research question and the relevant literature is
foreshadowed throughout the review, it usually is written at the very end. The interaction
itself is a learning process that gives researchers new insight into their area of research.
The conclusion should reflect this.
One of the most important early steps in a research project is the conducting of the
literature review. This is also one of the most humbling experiences you're likely to have.
Why? Because you're likely to find out that just about any worthwhile idea you will have
has been thought of before, at least to some degree. I frequently have students who come to
me complaining that they couldn't find anything in the literature that was related to their
19
topic. And virtually every time they have said that, I was able to show them that was only
true because they only looked for articles that were exactly the same as their research topic.
A literature review is designed to identify related research, to set the current research
project within a conceptual and theoretical context. When looked at that way, almost no
topic is so new or unique that you can't locate relevant and informative related research.
Here are some tips about conducting the literature review.
First, concentrate your efforts on the scientific literature. Try to determine what the most
credible research journals are in your topical area and start with those. Put the greatest
emphasis on research journals that use a blind or juried review system. In a blind or juried
review, authors submit potential articles to a journal editor who solicits several reviewers
who agree to give a critical review of the paper. The paper is sent to these reviewers with
no identification of the author so that there will be no personal bias (either for or against
the author). Based on the reviewers' recommendations, the editor can accept the article,
reject it, or recommend that the author revise and resubmit it. Articles in journals with
blind review processes are likely to have a fairly high level of credibility.
Second, do the review early in the research process. You are likely to learn a lot in the
literature review that will help you determine what the necessary tradeoffs are. After all,
previous researchers also had to face tradeoff decisions. What should you look for in the
literature review? First, you might be able to find a study that is quite similar to the one
you are thinking of doing. Since all credible research studies have to review the literature
themselves, you can check their literature review to get a quick start on your own. Second,
prior research will help ensure that you include all of the major relevant constructs in your
study. You may find that other similar studies routinely look at an outcome that you might
not have included. Your study would not be judged credible if it ignored a major construct.
Third, the literature review will help you to find and select appropriate measurement
instruments. You will readily see what measurement instruments researchers used
themselves in contexts similar to yours. Finally, the literature review will help you to
anticipate common problems in your research context. You can use the prior experiences
of others to avoid common traps and pitfalls.
You should use the literature to explain your research - after all, you are not writing a
literature review just to show what other researchers have done. You aim should be to:
1. Show why your research needs to be carried out,
2. How you came to choose certain methodologies or theories to work with,
3. How your work adds to the research already carried out, etc.
Read with a purpose: you need to summarize the work you read but you must also decide
which ideas or information are important to your research (so you can emphasize them),
and which are less important and can be covered briefly or left out of your review.
You should also look for the major concepts, conclusions, theories, arguments etc. that
underlie the work, and look for similarities and differences with closely related work. This
is difficult when you first start reading, but should become easier the more you read in
your area.
20
Write with a purpose: your aim should be to evaluate and show relationships between the
work already done (Is Researcher Y's theory more convincing than Researcher X's? Did
Researcher X build on the work of Researcher Y?) and between this work and your own.
In order to do this effectively you should carefully plan how you are going to organize
your work.
A lot of people like to organize their work chronologically (using time as their organizing
system). Unless developments over time are crucial to explain the context of your research
problem, using a chronological system will not be an effective way to organize your work.
Some people choose to organize their work alphabetically by author name: this system will
not allow you to show the relationships between the work of different researchers, and
your work, and should be avoided!
Academic conventions and copyright law require that you acknowledge when you use the
ideas of others. In most cases, this means stating which book or journal article is the source
of an idea or quotation.
Books (print and online)
General forms (when DOIs are assigned, use them):
Author, A. A. (year). Title of work. doi:xx.xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Author, A. A. (year). Title of work. Location: Publisher.
Author, A. A. (year). Title of work. Retrieved from http://www.xxxxxxxxxxx
Author, A. A. (year). Title of work. Retrieved from xxxxxxxxxxxx database.
Include subtitles. All titles must be italicised.
Information about editions (if other than the first), series, volume numbers or chapter page
ranges should be included in parentheses ( ) after the title - not in italics but before the full
stop.
Other descriptive information may also follow the title and any parenthetical
information in brackets [ ] also before the full stop.
Type
Examples
Online books
21
22
More than seven List the first six and then the last.
authors
Midgley, C., Maehr, M. L., Hruda, L., Anderman, E. M.,
Freeman, K. E., Gheen, M., ... Urdan, T. (2000).
Manual for the patterns of adaptive learning scales
(PALS). Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan.
In-text: (Midgley et al., 2000).
Edited books
General form:
Editor, A. A. (Ed.). (year). Title of work. Location: Publisher.
Roy, M. J. (Ed.). (2006). Novel approaches to the diagnosis and
treatment of posttraumatic stress disorder (NATO Security
Through Science Series). Amsterdam: IOS.
Grubb, M., & Neuhoff, K. (Eds.). (2006). Emissions trading &
competitiveness: Allocations, incentives and industrial
competitiveness under the EU emissions trading scheme.
London: Earthscan.
23
24
Author as
publisher
Group authors
25
26
Examples
Journal articles
with a DOI
(Digital Object
Identifier)
27
If no DOI is assigned, give the URL of the journal home page if the
article is available there.
Even if you obtain your article from an online database or another
source, try to locate the URL of the journal's home page that provides
access to the article.
Russell-Bowie, D. (2010). Cross-national comparisons of
background and confidence in visual arts and music
education of pre-service primary teachers. Australian
Journal of Teacher Education, 35(4), 65-78. Retrieved
from http://ajte.education.ecu.edu.au/
Voogt, J. (2010). A blended in-service arrangement for
supporting science teachers in technology integration.
Journal of Technology and Teacher Education, 18(1),
83-109. Retrieved from http://www.editlib.org/j/JTATE
If you are unable to locate the DOI or the journal's home page and the
article was obtained from one of the University's limited circulation
database subscriptions, use the URL for the journal's entry/search page
within the database (or the database's overall search page if that is not
available).
Powell, D. E. (1990). Home-based intervention of
preschoolers with emotional disturbances and
autism. Preventing School Failure, 34(4), 41-45.
Retrieved from http://web.ebscohost.com.ezproxy.
28
usq.edu.au/ehost/detail?hid=22&sid=49a21459-73
a6-4898-a22f-571dafe2e955%40sessionmgr10&
vid=5&bdata=JnNpdGU9ZWhvc3QtbGl2ZQ%3d%
3d#db=a9h&jid=PSF
Online newspaper articles. Give the URL of the home page.
McMahon, S. (2010, July 19). Fund new Victorian era.
Herald Sun. Retrieved from http://www.heraldsun.com.au/
Newspaper articles from a database (if the article is not available from
the newspaper's home/search page). Give the URL of the database's
entry/search page. Include page number(s) if available.
Susskind, A. (1986, September 2). Academic blast for English
class texts. Sydney Morning Herald, 1. Retrieved from
http://global.factiva.com/sb/default.aspx?|nep=hp
Newsletter articles. The exact URL of the article can be used.
Print articles
without a DOI
29
More than seven List the first six and then the last.
authors
Vaillancourt, T., Trinh, V., McDougall, P., Duku, E.,
Cunningham, L., Cunningham, C., ... Short, K.
(2010). Optimizing population screening of bullying
in school-aged children. Journal of School Violence,
9(3), 233-250. doi:10.1080/03069885.1010.482395
In-text: (Vaillancourt et al., 2010).
No authors
30
Reviews, peer
Identify the type of medium being reviewed in [ ] brackets (including
commentary and author names) as required.
abstracts
If the details of the item being reviewed are clear from the title of the
review, no additional explanatory material in brackets is needed.
If the review is untitled, use the bracketed information as the title.
Boyd, W. (2010). Man as an island. [Review of the
book William Golding, by John Carey]. Retrieved
from http://www.nytimes.com/
Morris, S. (2008). Henry Giroux - urgently necessary and
necessarily urgent: An essay review [Review of the
31
32
Follow previous sections for format of author, date, and title elements.
The date element should indicate the year of publication or, if the source undergoes
regular revision, the most recent update.
33
When citing entire websites, it is sufficient to give the address of the site in the text only
(e.g. Comprehensive information about the University can be found at
http://www.usq.edu.au, or, the University of Southern Queensland website
(http://www.usq.edu.au) gives comprehensive information). Specific information from a
site, or parts of a site, need to be cited as follows:
Type
Examples
Follow previous sections for format of author, date, and title elements.
The date element should indicate the year of publication or, if the source undergoes
regular revision, the most recent update.
34
After the title of the work, insert in brackets as part of the title element (i.e., before
the period) the type of medium for the material.
A retrieval or availability statement replaces the location and name of the publisher
typically provided for text references. Use "Available from" when the URL leads to
information on how to obtain the cited material (rather than to the material itself).
Include retrieval dates where the source material is likely to change over time (e.g.
Wikis).
See also, the audiovisual section of this guide for some examples not included here.
Type
Examples
Theses or
dissertations
Encyclopedias
and dictionaries
35
wiki/Main_Page
Psychotherapy. (2008). In AskOxford.com. Retrieved
from http://www.askoxford.com/?view=uk
Annual reports
Fact sheets,
brochures and
press releases
Presentation
slides
Images
36
Wikis
Audio podcasts
37
au/correspondents/content/2008/s2274772.htm
Curtis, B., & Diez, M. (2008). Intermediate Spanish podcast
42: La Mafia [Audio podcast]. Available from http://www.
notesinspanish.com/category/intermediate-spanish-podcast/
Video podcasts
38
Blog posts
Video blog posts BridgeTEFL. (2007, October 5). TEFL online tutorial:
(e.g. Youtube)
Teaching grammar in context [Video file]. Video
posted to http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=
EXg3w_jbNrc
Westrom, M. (2009, June 18). Psychology - short and long
term memory [Video file]. Video posted to http://www.
youtube.com/watch?v=TausqSK9p9k
Computer
programs,
software, or
programming
languages
39
40
treasure-hunt-the-interactive/id4425986640?
mt=8
Data sets
Examples
Motion pictures
General form:
Producer, A A. (Producer), & Director, B. B. (Director).
(year). Title of motion picture [Motion picture].
Country of Origin: Studio.
Grazer, B. (Producer), & Howard, R. (Director). (2001).
A beautiful mind [Motion picture]. USA: Universal
Studios.
Television
programs
Television program.
Campbell, C. (Executive producer). (2011, February 9).
The 7pm project [Television program]. Melbourne,
Vic: Network TEN.
Television series.
Gunton, M. (Executive producer). (2009). Life [Television
41
42
43
Examples
Legislation
(includes Acts
and Bills)
44
Examples
Personal
communication
45
In preprint archives, articles are posted online ahead of print and are not
yet indexed. Use the DOI or the exact URL.
Charles, S. J., & Hogan, N. (in press). Dynamics of wrist
rotation. Journal of Biomechanics. doi:10.1016/
j.biomech.2010.11.016
Vickers, P. (in press). Theory eliminativism as a
methodological tool. Philosophy of Science.
Retrieved from http://philsci-archive.pitt.edu/8472/1/
Theory_Eliminativism.pdf
Advance online publications are generally peer reviewed but may not be
copyedited or formatted for final production. If there is no DOI
assigned, give the URL of the journal home page.
Diekelmann, S., Buchel, C., Born, J., & Rasch, B. (2011).
Labile or stable: Opposing consequences for memory when
reactivated during waking and sleep. Nature Neuroscience.
Advance online publication. doi:10.1038/nn.2744
Update your references and refer to final versions, if possible, before
you submit your work.
Manuscripts
General form.
Author, A. A. (year). Title of manuscript. Unpublished manuscript
[or "Manuscript submitted for publication", or "Manuscript in
preparation"].
Geisel, T. S. (n.d.). All sorts of sports. Unpublished manuscript.
46
Examples
Published
proceedings in
book form
47
Conference
papers and
symposium
contributions
48
Liu, C., Wu, D., Fan, J., & Nauta, M. M. (2008, November).
Does job complexity predict job strains? Paper presented
at the 8th Biannual Conference of the European Academy
of Occupational Health Psychology, Valencia, Spain.
Rosenshine, B. (1997). The case for explicit, teacher-led,
cognitive strategy instruction. Paper presented at the
Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research
Association, Chicago, IL. Retrieved from http://apaa.asu.
edu/barak/barak1.html
Abstract.
Dickens, A. (2003). Working with the community. Paper
presented at the 8th Australian Institute of Family Studies
Conference, Melbourne. Abstract retrieved from http://www.
aifs.gov.au/conferences/aifs8/dickens-ab.pdf
Technical and
research reports
General form:
Author, A. A. (year). Title of work (Report No. xxx).
Location: Publisher.
This format can be used for issue briefs, working papers and other
corporate documents. Include the appropriate document number where
available.
For online reports, identify the publisher in the retrieval statement unless
the publisher is also identified as the author.
Queensland School Curriculum Council. (2000).
Consistency of teacher judgement (Research Report).
Brisbane: Author.
Ford, M., Gurney, A., Heyhoe, E., & Gunasekera, D. (2007).
49
50
Examples
These are treated like books if they are published, but like personal
communication if they are your own notes or unpublished. Lecture notes
are considered published if they have been copied and distributed in
print or on the web with the instructor's permission.
Lewis, M. (2011). EDC1300 Perspectives in
education: Course notes. Toowoomba:
University of Southern Queensland.
Customized
If you need to cite from a book of readings, use the date for that
publications and publication. If page numbers are required in text, use the book of
selected readings readings page numbers, not the page numbers from the original source.
(print)
Mishkin, F. S., & Eakins, S. G. (2012). Overview of the
financial system. In D. Pensiero & G. Adkins (Comps.),
FIN8201 Finance for executives, (pp. 55-75). Sydney,
NSW: Pearson Australia. (Reprinted from Financial
markets and institutions, 7th ed., pp. 55-75, Harlow,
Essex: Pearson Education)
Thompson, W. R., & Grusec, J. (2010). Studies of early
experience. In R. Pauley (Comp.), Early experience
and cognitive development: Selected readings (2nd
51
52
usqstudydesk.usq.edu.au/resource/view.php?
inpopup+true&id=428028
BBC World Service. (2011). The family (Family, Sex &
Society) [Audio podcast]. Retrieved from http://bbc.
co.uk/worldservice/sci_tech/features/essentialguide/
theme_fam.shtml
Series titles included in the above two examples.
Online course
readings
53
from https://usqdirect.usq.edu.au/usq/items/a2s66b-678mbg7f-e098-0as9907d58/1/shore_1997_15.pdf
Tuczay, C. (2005). Trance, prophets and diviners in the Middle
Ages. In E. Pocs (Ed.), Communicating with the spirits:
Christian demonology and popular mythology (pp. 215233). Retrieved from https://usqdirect.usq.edu.au/usq/items/
d6s66b-511m-bg7f-e098-0as5507g32a3/1/Tuczay_2005_
215.pdf
If a DOI is evident, use that in place of the retrieval statement.
Dafni, A. (2007). The supernatural characters and powers of
sacred trees in the Holy Land. Journal of Ethnobiology &
Ethnomedicine, 3, 10-16. doi:10.1186/1746-4269-3-10
How to cite references within the text of an assignment
Use the author-date method of citation for quotations (exact words of another author) and
paraphrasing (summarizing the words and ideas of one or more authors).
Every line in the work should be double-spaced including the headings, footnotes,
quotations, references and figure captions. Triple- or quadruple- spacing may be applied in
special circumstances such as before and after displayed items. Single- or one-and-a-half
line spacing is never used except inside tables or figures.
Paraphrasing
Paraphrasing is when you summarize the ideas, concepts or words from the work or one or
more authors.
Please note: changing only a few words from another author does not constitute
paraphrasing.
Type
Examples
If you are
Brown (1991) investigated the effects of ...
referring to the
general theme of An investigation into the effects of maternal age
a book or article
(Brown, 1991) found that ...
When to include When paraphrasing or referring to an idea in another work, page or
54
page numbers
paragraph numbers are not required. But it can be helpful, for example
when paraphrasing or referring to information or an idea that can be
located on a particular page, quoting or referring to images, figures or
data, or when a work is particularly long and page numbers might be
useful for the reader.
Soil layers below the well tip contribute relatively little
water (Kozeny, 1988, pp. 223-224).
Kozeny (1988, p. 223) found soil layers below the well
tip contributed little.
When the authors Both the authors and years of publication appear in parentheses,
of a source are
separated by semicolons.
not part of the
formal sentence Reviews of research on sport and reading have concluded
structure
that at least some types of reading behaviours are related to
higher levels of physical health (Austin, 1990; McGovern &
Henderson, 2001; Wright & Morgan, 2001).
When the names
of the authors of
a source are part
of the formal
sentence
structure
Group authors
The names of groups are usually spelled out each time they appear in
and abbreviations text.
(University of Southern Queensland, 2009)
University of Southern Queensland (2009)
Only abbreviate if the name is long, cumbersome and the abbreviation is
familiar or easily understood.
First citation in text.
(Office of the United Nations High Commissioner for
Refugees [UNHCR], 2008)
Office of the United Nations High Commissioner for
Refugees (UNHCR, 2008)
55
Subsequent citations.
(UNHCR, 2008)
UNHCR (2008)
One or two
authors
For three, four or five authors, cite all authors in the first instance,
thereafter, only first author followed by "et al." (not underlined and with
no stop after "et") and the year of publication.
Campbell, Brady, Bradley, and Smithson (1991)
found ... (first citation)
Campbell et al. (1991) found ... (subsequent citations)
For with six or more authors, cite only the first author followed by "et
al." and the year. In the list of references give all names up to and
including six authors.
"and" or "&"?
In running text use "and" to join the names of multiple authors, but use
an ampersand (&) inside parentheses.
Jones and Brady (1991) continued to find ...
The authors found the same result in the second and
third trials (Jones & Brady, 1991).
Citing multiple
works by the
same author at
the same time
Arrange dates in order (oldest to newest). Use suffixes after the year
when there are multiple publications from the same year. If the
publication dates are same, the suffixes are assigned in the reference list
where these kinds of references are ordered in alphabetical order by title
(article, chapter or complete work).
Several studies (Jackson, 1999, 2001a, 2001b, 2005)
revealed a similar outcome.
Primary authors
with the same
surname
Include the first author's initials in all text citations even if the year of
publication differs.
T.R. Smith (2006) and B. E. Smith (2007) found that ...
56
No author
Legislation
(includes Acts
and Bills)
57
Quotes
Quotations or quotes are when you use the exact words of another author or your own
previously published work. Quotations must always be referenced with page numbers.
Type
Quotations of less than 40 words (approximately) should form part of the text and
be designated with double quotation marks.
With quotations of 40 or more words, DO NOT use quotation marks; set the
quotation in an indented (about a half inch) free standing block of text. Use doubleline-spacing to separate the quote from the text of your work.
Examples
58
Examples
Reproducing or
adapting
copyrighted
photographs,
images, tables
and figures.
59
Examples
Creative
Commons
60
Including the
If a journal or newsletter does not use volume numbers, include the
month, season or month, season or other designation with the year.
other designation
Within the text - (Jones, 2007, December) or Jones (2007, December)
List of References - (2007, December)
Including the day For dailies and weeklies, include the day.
Within the text - (Brown, 2007, December 12) or Brown (2007,
December 12)
List of References - (2007, December 12)
Works accepted
for publication
but not yet
published.
No date
available.
61
Qualitative Methods
Quantitative Methods
Primarily deductive process used to test prespecified concepts, constructs, and hypotheses
that make up a theory
Text-based
Number-based
No statistical tests
Less generalizable
More generalizable
In the world of research, there are two general approaches to gathering and reporting
information: qualitative and quantitative approaches. The qualitative approach to research
is focused on understanding a phenomenon from a closer perspective. The quantitative
approach tends to approximate phenomena from a larger number of individuals using
survey methods. In this research corner, I describe methods that are generally used in each
strand of research. Each approach has its benefits and detriments, and is more suitable to
answering certain kinds of questions.
62
Qualitative Approach
The qualitative approach to gathering information focuses on describing a phenomenon in
a deep comprehensive manner. This is generally done in interviews, open-ended questions,
or focus groups. In most cases, a small number of participants participate in this type of
research, because to carry out such a research endeavor requires many resources and much
time. Interviews can vary from being highly structured and guided by open-ended
questions, or be less structured and take the form of a conversational interview. Because of
the investment in this type of research and the relatively few number of participants,
findings from qualitative research cannot be generalized to the whole population.
However, such research serves as a spring board for larger studies and deeper
understanding that can inform theory, practice, and specific situations.
Example from youth mentoring research:
Ahrens, DuBois, Garrison, Spencer, Richardson, & Lozano (2011) used semi-structured
interviews to outline themes of mentor characteristics and factors that youth perceive to
influence mentor relationships. They spoke with participants on the phone and asked them
open-ended questions. In identifying barriers and facilitators for relationship initiation and
maintenance, Ahrens et al. provide important points of inquiry to be used in a larger scale
survey-based research. One of the cautions in using qualitative approaches is that the
findings apply only to this small group of 23 individuals. This research was crucial in
providing evidence that these factors should be examined and further elaborated through
quantitative methods prior to making any wide-range recommendation.
Benefits of the qualitative approach:
Using open-ended questions and interviews allows researchers and practitioners to
understand how individuals are doing, what their experiences are, and recognize important
antecedents and outcomes of interest that might not surface when surveyed with predetermined questions. Although qualitative research can be thought of as anecdotal, when
pooled across a number of participants it provides a conceptual understanding and
evidence that certain phenomena are occurring with particular groups or individuals.
Limitations:
63
Quantitative Approach
The quantitative approach to gathering information focuses on describing a phenomenon
across a larger number of participants thereby providing the possibility of summarizing
characteristics across groups or relationships. This approach surveys a large number of
individuals and applies statistical techniques to recognize overall patterns in the relations
of processes. Importantly, the use of surveys can be done across groups. For example, the
same survey can be used with a group of mentors that is receiving training (often called the
intervention or experimental groups) and a group of mentors who does not receive such a
training (a control group). It is then possible to compare these two groups on outcomes of
interest, and determine what influence the training had. It is also relatively easy to survey
people a number of times, thereby allowing the conclusion that a certain features (like
matching) influence specific outcomes (well-being or achievement later in life).
Example from youth mentoring research:
Grossman and Rhodes (2002) examined duration of matched relationships in over 1,100
Big Brothers Big Sisters mentor-mentee matches. Because the information they used was
survey-based and numerical, they were able to employ statistical techniques examining
how duration of match was related to different outcomes of interest.
In using a variety of statistical techniques, they concluded that youth who were in
[matched mentoring] relationships that lasted a year or longer reported improvements in
academic, psychosocial, and behavioral outcomes (p. 213). If Grossman and Rhodes had
not used survey-based quantitative research, they would not have had such a large sample
of matches and therefore could not generalize to matches in general. In addition, with a
smaller number of participants, it is challenging to apply some statistical techniques to
examine emerging patterns across such a large group of mentored matches. The current
rule of thumb to using complex statistical modeling is that you need a sample of at least
130 participants. However, for more complex modeling that controls for characteristics, a
larger pool of participants is needed.
Benefits of the quantitative approach:
Using survey methods across a large group of individuals enables generalization. For
example, if policy makers wanted to instantiate a policy about mentor training, they would
likely require some evidence that this training actually works. Interviewing a few
individuals, or conducting a focus group with forty matches, might be reflective of specific
cases in which the mentoring training worked, however, it would not provide strong
evidence that such training is beneficial overall. Stronger support for successful training
would be evident if using quantitative methods.
64
Limitations:
In general, qualitative research generates rich, detailed and valid (process) data that
contribute to in-depth understanding of the context. Quantitative research generates
reliable population based and generalizable data and is well suited to establishing causeand-effect relationships. The decision of whether to choose a quantitative or a qualitative
design is a philosophical question. Which methods to choose will depend on the nature of
the project, the type of information needed the context of the study and the availability of
recourses (time, money, and human). It is important to keep in mind that these are two
66
different philosophers, not necessarily polar opposites. In fact, elements of both designs
can be used together in mixed-methods studies. Combining of qualitative and quantitative
research is becoming more and more common. Every method is different line of sight
directed toward the same point, observing social and symbolic reality. The use of multiple
lines of sight is called triangulation.
It is a combination of two types of research. It is also called pluralistic research.
Advantages of combining both types of research include: research development (one
approach is used to inform the other, such as using qualitative research to develop an
instrument to be used in quantitative research) Increased validity (confirmation of results
by means of different data sources) Complementarities (adding information, i.e. words to
numbers and vice versa) Creating new lines of thinking by the emergence of fresh
perspectives and contradictions. Barriers to integration include philosophical differences,
cost, inadequate training and publication bias.
67
QUANTITATIVE RESEARCH
Basic Inquiry of Quantitative Research
http://ksumail.kennesaw.edu/~rouyang/ED-research/details.htm
Correlational research
attempts to determine the
extent of a relationship
between two or more
variables using statistical
data. In this type of
design,
relationships
Causalcomparative/quasiexperimental
research
attempts to establish causeeffect relationships among
the variables. These types
of design are very similar
Experimental
research,
often
called
true
experimentation, uses the
scientific
method
to
establish the cause-effect
relationship among a group
of variables that make up a
68
When
analyses
and
conclusions are made, Examples of Experimental
determining causes must be Research:
done carefully, as other
variables, both known and
The effect of a new
unknown, could still affect
treatment plan on
the outcome. A causalbreast cancer
comparative
designed
The
effect
of
study, described in a New
positive
York Times article, "The
reinforcement
on
Case
for
$320,00
attitude
toward
Kindergarten Teachers,"
school
illustrates how causation
The
effect
of
must
be
thoroughly
teaching with a
assessed
before
firm
cooperative group
relationships
amongst
strategy
or
a
variables can be made.
traditional
lecture
approach
on
Examples of Correlational
students
Research:
achievement
The effect of a
systematic
The
effect
of
preparation
and
preschool
support system on
attendance on social
children who were
maturity at the end
scheduled
for
of the first grade
surgery
on
the
The effect of taking
amount
of
multivitamins on a
psychological upset
students
school
69
the extent to
which elementary
teachers use math
manipulatives
absenteeism
The effect of gender
on
algebra
achievement
The effect of parttime employment
on the achievement
of high school
students
The
effect
of
magnet
school
participation
on
student attitude
The effect of age on
lung capacity
and cooperation
A comparison of
the effect
of
personalized
instruction
vs.
traditional
instruction
on
computational skill
70
Case Studies
http://isites.harvard.edu/icb/icb.do?keyword=qualitative&pageid=icb.page340344
71
resemble, if not entirely become, methods in their own right. Both Robert E. Stake and
Robert K. Yin are good resources for such methods, with Stakes work being more
humanistic in nature. Case studies in the field of education abound. One particular type of
case study you may find at HGSE is the "teaching case," which is a study specifically
designed to elicit discussion, and to be taught in (usually) higher education classrooms.
Other fields such as business and law engage in case study research using their own
specific approaches not outlined here. It is important to note that case study methods can at
times resemble ethnographic methods in both their purposes and scope though their
disciplinary histories are different.
Designing a Case Study
http://writing.colostate.edu/guides/page.cfm?pageid=1292
After considering the different sub categories of case study and identifying a theoretical
perspective, researchers can begin to design their study. Research design is the string of
logic that ultimately links the data to be collected and the conclusions to be drawn to the
initial questions of the study. Typically, research designs deal with at least four problems:
In other words, a research design is basically a blueprint for getting from the beginning to
the end of a study. The beginning is an initial set of questions to be answered, and the end
is some set of conclusions about those questions.
Because case studies are conducted on topics as diverse as Anglo-Saxon Literature (Thrane
1986) and AIDS prevention (Van Vugt 1994), it is virtually impossible to outline any strict
or universal method or design for conducting the case study. However, Robert K. Yin
(1993) does offer five basic components of a research design:
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
A study's questions.
A study's propositions (if any).
A study's units of analysis.
The logic linking of the data to the propositions.
The criteria for interpreting the findings.
In addition to these five basic components, Yin also stresses the importance of clearly
articulating one's theoretical perspective, determining the goals of the study, selecting one's
subject(s), selecting the appropriate method(s) of collecting data, and providing some
considerations to the composition of the final report.
Method: Single or Multi-modal?
To obtain as complete a picture of the participant as possible, case study researchers can
employ a variety of methods. Some common methods include interviews, protocol
analyses, field studies, and participant-observations. Emig (1971) chose to use several
methods of data collection. Her sources included conversations with the students, protocol
72
analysis, discrete observations of actual composition, writing samples from each student,
and school records (Lauer and Asher 1988).
Berkenkotter, Huckin, and Ackerman (1988) collected data by observing classrooms,
conducting faculty and student interviews, collecting self reports from the subject, and by
looking at the subject's written work.
A study that was criticized for using a single method model was done by Flower and Hayes
(1984). In this study that explores the ways in which writers use different forms of
knowing to create space, the authors used only protocol analysis to gather data. The study
came under heavy fire because of their decision to use only one method, and it was, at least
according to some researchers, an unreliable method at that.
What is Ethnography?
http://www.brianhoey.com/General%20Site/general_defn-ethnography.htm
The term ethnography has come to be equated with virtually any qualitative research
project where the intent is to provide a detailed, in-depth description of everyday life and
practice. This is sometimes referred to as "thick description" -- a term attributed to the
anthropologist Clifford Geertz writing on the idea of an interpretive theory of culture in the
early 1970s (e.g., see The Interpretation of Cultures, first published as a collection in
1973). The use of the term "qualitative" is meant to distinguish this kind of social science
research from more "quantitative" or statistically oriented research. The two approaches,
i.e., quantitative and qualitative, while often complementary, ultimately have different
aims.
While an ethnographic approach to social research is no longer purely that of the cultural
anthropologist, a more precise definition must be rooted in ethnography's disciplinary
home of anthropology. Thus, ethnography may be defined as both a qualitative research
process or method (one conducts an ethnography) and product (the outcome of this process
is an ethnography) whose aim is cultural interpretation. The ethnographer goes beyond
reporting events and details of experience. Specifically, he or see attempts to explain how
these represent what we might call "webs of meaning" (Geertz again), the cultural
constructions, in which we live.
Ethnographers generate understandings of culture through representation of what we call
an emic perspective, or what might be described as the "'insider's point of view." The
emphasis in this representation is thus on allowing critical categories and meanings to
emerge from the ethnographic encounter rather than imposing these from existing models.
An etic perspective, by contrast, refers to a more distant, analytical orientation to
experience.
An ethnographic understanding is developed through close exploration of several sources
of data. Using these data sources as a foundation, the ethnographer relies on a cultural
frame of analysis.
Long-term engagement in the field setting or place where the ethnography takes place, is
called participant observation. This is perhaps the primary source of ethnographic data.
The term represents the dual role of the ethnographer. To develop an understanding of
what it is like to live in a setting, the researcher must both become a participant in the life
of the setting while also maintaining the stance of an observer, someone who can describes
73
the experience with a measure of what we might call "detachment." Note that this does not
mean that ethnographers cannot also become advocates for the people they study.
Typically ethnographers spend many months or even years in the places where they
conduct their research often forming lasting bonds with people. Due to historical
development and disciplinary biases, in the past most ethnographers conducted their
research in foreign countries while largely ignoring the potential for work right here at
home. This has meant that much of the ethnography done in the United States today is now
being done outside of its disciplinary home. Increasing numbers of cultural
anthropologists, however, have begun doing fieldwork in the communities where they
themselves live and work.
Interviews provide for what might be called "targeted" data collection by asking specific
but open-ended questions. There is a great variety of interview styles. Each ethnographer
brings his or her own unique approach to the process. Regardless, the emphasis is on
allowing the person or persons being interviewed to answer without being limited by predefined choices -- something which clearly differentiates qualitative from more
quantitative or demographic approaches. In most cases, an ethnographic interview looks
and feels little different than an everyday conversation and indeed in the course of longterm participant-observation, most conversations are in fact purely spontaneous and
without any specific agenda.
Researchers collect other sources of data which depend on the specific nature of the field
setting. This may take the form of representative artifacts that embody characteristics of
the topic of interest, government reports, and newspaper and magazine articles. Although
often not tied to the site of study, secondary academic sources are utilized to "locate" the
specific study within an existing body of literature.
Over the past twenty years, interest has grown within anthropology for considering the
close relationship between personal history, motivation, and the particulars of ethnographic
fieldwork. It is undeniably important to question and understand how these factors have
bearing on the construction of theory and conduct of a scholarly life. Personal and
professional experiences, together with historical context, lead individual researchers to
their own particular methodological and theoretical approaches. This too is an important,
even if unacknowledged, source.
Ethnographic fieldwork is shaped by personal and professional identities just as these
identities are inevitably shaped by individual experiences while in the field. Unfortunately,
the autobiographical dimension of ethnographic research has been downplayed historically
if not discounted altogether. This is mostly understandable given a perceived threat to the
objectivity expected of legitimate science, to reliability of data, and to integrity of our
methodology, if we appear to permit subjectivity to intervene by allowing the
ethnographers encumbered persona to appear instead of adhering to the prescribed role of
wholly dispassionate observer.
Most anthropologists today point to Bronislaw Malinowski, author of such landmark
ethnographies as Argonauts of the Western Pacific (first published in 1922), as a kind of
founding father to ethnographic fieldwork, the practice of participant-observation.
Malinowskis early twentieth century ethnographies were written in a voice removed and
utterly unrevealing about the nature of the ethnographer and his relationship to people
studied. Since Malinowskis time, the personal account of fieldwork has been hidden away
74
in notes and diaries. These off the record writings document the tacit impressions and
emotional experiences without which we cannot, as ethnographers, fully appreciate and
understand the project of our research itself. Malinowskis diaries were published after his
death in a revealing autobiographical account of his inner life while in the field (A Diary in
the Strict Sense of the Term, first published in 1967). We learn in his diaries that, among
other details, Malinowski longed to write great novels even as his scientific writing
effectively defined the practice of cultural anthropology for much of the twentieth century.
Of many important lessons for anthropologists, Malinowskis diaries hold two especially
relevant ones here. First of these is that, at its heart, ethnographic writing is a means of
expressing a shared interest among cultural anthropologists for telling stories stories
about what it means to be human. The other is that the explicit professional project of
observing, imagining and describing other people need not be incompatible with the
implicit personal project of learning about the self. It is the honest truth of fieldwork that
these two projects are always implicated in each other. Good ethnography recognizes the
transformative nature of fieldwork where as we search for answers to questions about
people we may find ourselves in the stories of others. Ethnography should be
acknowledged as a mutual product born of the intertwining of the lives of the ethnographer
and his or her subjects
Finding Connections & Insight
Whether implicit or explicit in nature, one of the basic characteristics of an anthropological
approach is that it is comparative. My research interests are varied and based on two
primary fieldwork experiences conducted during my doctoral training. One is located on
the other side of the globe and deals with issues in the relocation of mostly landless poor,
culture and identity politics, and post-colonial nationalism and nation building. The other is
located here in the United States among middle-class working families and addresses the
impact of post-industrial economic and social changes on the cultural meanings of person
and place. Although different, these projects share important traits which express enduring
intellectual interests including my desire to conduct community or organizational based
research and a focus on issues of migration and relocation, community building and
participation, personhood and place, narrative constructions and identity, and the personal
negotiations between work, family, and self in different social and historical contexts.
My first major research project involved a year of fieldwork in Sulawesi, Indonesia in
1998. This research was conducted in four government-sponsored relocation settlements
all part of the program known as transmigration that originally began during the Dutch
colonial period. In this community-based work, I employed both qualitative and more
quantitative approaches. I concentrated my participant-observation, in-depth interviewing
and social-surveys in a single village as a primary field site. In order to test my early
findings against other cases while comparing ethnographically interesting differences and
similarities with other locations, I extended data collection into three other nearby
settlements each with a unique set of circumstances for their establishment and continued
development as communities.
My dissertation fieldwork entailed two years of community-based fieldwork in the rapidly
growing lakeside communities of Northwest Lower Michigan centered in Traverse City.
The project was concerned with exploring the phenomenon of life-style migration a form
of non-economic, urban to rural migration that has led to the sudden, often unexpected
growth of formerly declining non-metropolitan areas.
75
I value the depth and breadth of my research interests and experience. Although at first
glance the "distance" between these two projects and their sites appears too great to offer
much in the way of comparative insight, this is not the case. My work with Indonesian
transmigrants offered insight into how I might interpret experiences of relocating
professionals as life-style migrants. Specifically, transmigrants spoke of how they used the
relocation to selectively edit out or enhance certain personal characteristics and even
cultural elements of their ethnic group. I was able to reveal a similar process among lifestyle migrants who relocated in order to bring about what they felt was a necessary break
from established routine. They used relocation to redefine priorities and, in many cases, to
get in touch with what they describe as a more authentic self.
The value of ethnographic research conducted in a variety of social, cultural, and physical
contexts is that it can encourage us as social scientists to be open to possibilities and to
imagine new ways of thinking about what might appear too familiar to be worthy of indepth consideration. This is another reason why I value the ethnography of everyday life. It
is in neglected details of day-to-day life that real insight into the meaning of social and
cultural change is most powerfully and relevantly expressed.
New Ethnography
"Do you get told what the good life is, or do you figure it out for yourself"?
Posed by a middle-aged lifestyle migrant who left a corporate career, this question invokes
the theme of Opting for Elsewhere that emerges from stories of people who chose
relocation as a way of redefining themselves and reordering work, family, and personal
priorities. This is a book about the impulse to start over. The accounts presented involve
new expressions of old dreams, understandings, and ideals. Whether downshifting from
stressful careers or the victims of downsizing from jobs lost in a surge of economic
restructuring, lifestyle migrants seek refuge in places that seem to resonate with an
idealized, potential self. Choosing the option of elsewhere and moving as a means of
remaking self through sheer force of will are basic facets of American character forged in
its history as a developing nation of immigrants with a seemingly ever-expanding frontier.
Stories told here are parts of a larger moral story about what constitutes the good life at a
time of economic uncertainty coupled with shifting social categories and cultural
meanings. Brian Hoey provides an evocative illustration of the ways these sweeping
changes impact people and the places that they live and work as well as how both react
devising strategies for either coping with or challenging the status quo. This stirring
portrait of starting over in the heartland of America will initiate fruitful discussion about
where we are going next as an emerging postindustrial society.
76
Introduction
Human beings are storying creatures. We make sense of the world and the things that
happen to us by constructing narratives to explain and interpret events both to ourselves
and to other people. The narrative structures and the vocabularies that we use when we
craft and tell our tales of our perceptions and experiences are also, in themselves,
significant, providing information about our social and cultural positioning: to paraphrase
Wittgenstein (1953), the limits of my language are the limits of my world.
In recent times, there has been what has been described as a narrative and
auto/biographical turn within the social sciences. This turn is associated with postmodernism and the concomitant lack of faith in grand, master or Meta narratives. For
researchers this has opened up the possibility of explicitly framing and realizing their
research in terms of it both being, and using, narrative.
What do we mean by narrative in a research context?
The Oxford Mini Dictionary defines narrative as a spoken or written account of
something (Hawker, 2002: 406). Chambers Twentieth Century Dictionary is not specific
about the written or spoken, with its an account of any occurrence (Macdonald, 1972:
876) thereby including the possibility of other types of account visual, aural, tactile and
so on. This broader, inclusive definition is important because it acknowledges and allows
the use of signing, Braille, and other communications systems/languages.
Put as simply as an account of something, it is clear that narrative is unavoidable, its
everywhere, and is fundamental to human understanding, communication and social
interaction. Roland Barthes commented, the history of narrative begins with the history of
(hu)mankind; there does not exist, and has never existed, a people without narratives
(1966: 14). Indeed, somewhat playfully, it has been suggested that there is a case for
revising the term homo sapiens to homo fabulans the tellers and interpreters of
narrative (Currie, 1998: 2). For narrative is what we do. We use it to make sense of the
world as we perceive and experience it and we use it to tell other people what we have
discovered and about how the world, or more specifically aspects of it, are for us. This
component, for example, is a narrative account of our understandings of narrative
approaches to educational research. Within the social sciences though, narrative and,
specifically in the context of this component, narrative research has come to have
particular meanings; meanings that carry or are attributed with, particular value, ethical,
ontological and epistemological positions. We should note that, as is the case with most
research approaches, there has been much disagreement and debate about definitions,
meanings and practices (see for example, Riessmann, 1993). Narrative is a contested,
complex, transitional and developing field (see Chase, 2005) and readers should be aware
that this component makes no claims to be definitive (see Rudrum, 2005, and Porter
Abbott, 2002 for contrasting, yet complementary examples of discussion).
77
78
looking at the narrative turn is to view a snapshot of what these turns have yielded
(2005: 91)
The process of learning and understanding the background and growth of a chosen field of
study or profession can offer insight into organizational culture, current trends, and future
possibilities. The historical method of research applies to all fields of study because it
encompasses their: origins, growth, theories, personalities, crisis, etc. Both quantitative and
qualitative variables can be used in the collection of historical information. Once the
decision is made to conduct historical research, there are steps that should be followed to
achieve a reliable result. Charles Busha and Stephen Harter detail six steps for conducting
historical research (91):
the recognition of a historical problem or the identification of a need for certain
historical knowledge.
the gathering of as much relevant information about the problem or topic as possible.
if appropriate, the forming of hypothesis that tentatively explain relationships between
historical factors.
The rigorous collection and organization of evidence, and the verification of the
authenticity and veracity of information and its sources.
The selection, organization, and analysis of the most pertinent collected evidence, and
the drawing of conclusions; and
the recording of conclusions in a meaningful narrative.
In the field of library and information science, there are a vast array of topics that may be
considered for conducting historical research. For example, a researcher may chose to
answer questions about the development of school, academic or public libraries, the rise of
technology and the benefits/ problems it brings, the development of preservation methods,
famous personalities in the field, library statistics, or geographical demographics and how
they effect library distribution. Harter and Busha define library history as the systematic
recounting of past events pertaining to the establishment, maintenance, and utilization of
systematically arranged collections of recorded information or knowledge.A biography
of a person who has in some way affected the development of libraries, library science, or
librarianship is also considered to be library history. (93)
There are a variety of places to obtain historical information. Primary Sources are the most
sought after in historical research. Primary resources are first hand accounts of
information. Finding and assessing primary historical data is an exercise in detective
work. It involves logic, intuition, persistence, and common sense(Tuchman, Gaye in
Strategies of Qualitative Inquiry, 252). Some examples of primary documents are:
personal diaries, eyewitness accounts of events, and oral histories. Secondary sources of
information are records or accounts prepared by someone other than the person, or persons,
79
80
The Quantitative data collection methods rely on random sampling and structured data
collection instruments that fit diverse experiences into predetermined response categories.
They produce results that are easy to summarize, compare, and generalize.
Quantitative research is concerned with testing hypotheses derived from theory and/or
being able to estimate the size of a phenomenon of interest. Depending on the research
question, participants may be randomly assigned to different treatments. If this is not
feasible, the researcher may collect data on participant and situational characteristics in
order to statistically control for their influence on the dependent, or outcome, variable. If
the intent is to generalize from the research participants to a larger population, the
researcher will employ probability sampling to select participants.
Typical quantitative data gathering strategies include:
Experiments/clinical trials.
Observing and recording well-defined events (e.g., counting the number of patients
waiting in emergency at specified times of the day).
Obtaining relevant data from management information systems.
Administering surveys with closed-ended questions (e.g., face-to face and
telephone interviews, questionnaires etc).
Interviews
In Quantitative research (survey research), interviews are more structured than in
Qualitative research.
In a structured interview, the researcher asks a standard set of questions and nothing more
.(Leedy and Ormrod, 2001)
Face -to -face interviews have a distinct advantage of enabling the researcher to establish
rapport with potential participants and therefore gain their cooperation. These interviews
yield highest response rates in survey research. They also allow the researcher to clarify
ambiguous answers and when appropriate, seek follow-up information. Disadvantages
include impractical when large samples are involved time consuming and
expensive.(Leedy and Ormrod, 2001)
Telephone interviews are less time consuming and less expensive and the researcher has
ready access to anyone on the planet that has a telephone. Disadvantages are that the
response rate is not as high as the face-to- face interview as but considerably higher than
the mailed questionnaire. The sample may be biased to the extent that people without
phones are part of the population about whom the researcher wants to draw inferences.
81
they tend to be open-ended and have less structured protocols (i.e., researchers may
change the data collection strategy by adding, refining, or dropping techniques or
informants)
they rely more heavily on interactive interviews; respondents may be interviewed
several times to follow up on a particular issue, clarify concepts or check the
reliability of data
they use triangulation to increase the credibility of their findings (i.e., researchers
rely on multiple data collection methods to check the authenticity of their results)
generally their findings are not generalizable to any specific population, rather each
case study produces a single piece of evidence that can be used to seek general
patterns among different studies of the same issue
82
Regardless of the kinds of data involved, data collection in a qualitative study takes a great
deal of time. The researcher needs to record any potentially useful data thoroughly,
accurately, and systematically, using field notes, sketches, audiotapes, photographs and
other suitable means. The data collection methods must observe the ethical principles of
research. The qualitative methods most commonly used in evaluation can be classified in
three broad categories: in depth interview, observation methods, document review.
Data Collection Techniques
http://cyfernetsearch.org/ilm_4_4
Information you gather can come from a range of sources. Likewise, there are a variety of
techniques to use when gathering primary data. Listed below are some of the most
common data collection techniques used for collecting data.
Overview of Different Data Collection Techniques
Technique
Interviews
Questionnaires
and Surveys
Observations
Key Facts
Example
Interviews can be
conducted in person or over
the telephone
Interviews can be done
One-on-one conversation with
formally (structured), semiparent of at-risk youth who
structured, or informally
can help you understand the
Questions should be
issue
focused, clear, and
encourage open-ended
responses
Interviews are mainly
qualitative in nature
Responses can be analyzed
with quantitative methods
by assigning numerical
values to Likert-type scales Results of a satisfaction
Results are generally easier survey or opinion survey
(than qualitative
techniques) to analyze
Pre-test/Post-test can be
compared and analyzed
Allows for the study of the
dynamics of a situation,
frequency counts of target
behaviors, or other
behaviors as indicated by
needs of the evaluation
Good source for providing
additional information
about a particular group,
can use video to provide
83
Focus Groups
Ethnographies,
Oral History, and
Case Studies
Documents and
Records
documentation
Can produce qualitative
(e.g., narrative data) and
quantitative data (e.g.,
frequency counts, mean
length of interactions, and
instructional time)
A facilitated group
interview with individuals
that have something in
common
Gathers information about
combined perspectives and
opinions
Responses are often coded
into categories and
analyzed thematically
Involves studying a single
phenomenon
Examines people in their
natural settings
Uses a combination of
techniques such as
observation, interviews,
and surveys
Ethnography is a more
holistic approach to
evaluation
Researcher can become a
confounding variable
A group of parents of
teenagers in an after-school
program are invited to
informally discuss programs
that might benefit and help
their children succeed
Consists of examining
existing data in the form of
databases, meeting minutes,
To understand the primary
reports, attendance logs,
reasons students miss school,
financial records,
records on student absences
newsletters, etc.
are collected and analyzed
This can be an inexpensive
way to gather information,
but may be an incomplete
data source
84
Writing a Conclusion
http://www.crlsresearchguide.org/18_Writing_Conclusion.asp
85
includes noting any implications resulting from your discussion of the topic, as well as
recommendations, forecasting future trends, and the need for further research.
The conclusion should:
be a logical ending to what has been previously been discussed. It must pull
together all of the parts of your argument and refer the reader back to the focus you
have outlined in your introduction and to the central topic. This gives your essay a
sense of unity.
never contain any new information.
usually be only a paragraph in length, but in an extended essay (3000+ words) it
may be better to have two or three paragraphs to pull together the different parts of
the essay.
add to the overall quality and impact of the essay. This is your final statement about
this topic; thus it can make a great impact on the reader.
just sum up
end with a long quotation
focus merely on a minor point in your argument
introduce new material
a summary of the arguments presented in the body and how these relate to the essay
question
a restatement of the main point of view presented in the introduction in response to
the topic
the implications of this view or what might happen as a result.
86
Additional elements that may be added include recommendations for future action and
speculations on future trends. Generally, although a short pithy quote can sometimes be
used to spice up your conclusion, the conclusion should be in your own words. Try to
avoid direct quotations, or references to other sources.
Summary of structure
A Typical Conclusion
Question: Workplace diversity is now recognized as an important feature in organizations,
especially in multicultural nations like Australia. What communication problems might
arise in a culturally diverse workplace, and how can managers best deal with them? (2000
word essay)
87
Identifying what these research limitations were and proposing future research suggestions
that address them is arguably the easiest and quickest ways to complete the Future
Research section of your Conclusions chapter.
Building on a particular finding or aspect of your research
Often, the findings from your dissertation research will highlight a number of new avenues
that could be explored in future studies. These can be grouped into two categories:
88
1. What is the context, location and/or culture that would best lend itself to my
conceptual framework (or theoretical model) if it were to be examined (or tested) in
the field?
2. What research strategy is most appropriate to examine my conceptual framework
(or test my theoretical model)?
If the future research suggestion that you want to make is based on examining your
conceptual framework (or testing your theoretical model) in the field, you need to suggest
the best scenario for doing so.
Examining a conceptual framework (or testing a theoretical model)
in a new context, location and/or culture
More often than not, you will not only have set out a conceptual framework (or theoretical
model), as described in the previous section, but you will also have examined (or tested) it
in the field. When you do this, focus is typically placed on a specific context, location
and/or culture.
If this is the case, the obvious future research suggestion that you could propose would be
to examine your conceptual framework (or test the theoretical model) in a new context,
location and/or culture. For example, perhaps you focused on consumers (rather than
businesses), or Canada (rather than the United Kingdom), or a more individualistic culture
like the United States (rather than a more collectivist culture like China).
When you propose a new context, location and/or culture as your future research
suggestion, make sure you justify the choice that you make. For example, there may be
little value in future studies looking at different cultures if culture is not an important
component underlying your conceptual framework (or theoretical model). If you are not
sure whether a new context, location or culture is more appropriate, or what new context,
location or culture you should select, a review the literature will often help clarify where
you focus should be.
Expanding a conceptual framework (or theoretical model)
Assuming that you have set out a conceptual framework (or theoretical model) and
examined (or tested) it in the field, another series of future research suggestions comes out
of expanding that conceptual framework (or theoretical model).
We talk about a series of future research suggestions because there are so many ways that
you can expand on your conceptual framework (or theoretical model). For example, you
can do this by:
89
90