Professional Documents
Culture Documents
College Students
Stephanie Parrish
Food Systems: Local to Global
Oregon State University
3 June 2015
Introduction
Many low-income college students are struggling to make ends meet
while pursuing a higher education. Some students may qualify for SNAP
benefits if they are between the ages 18-49 and are enrolled at least half
time. They must meet the income requirement and at least one additional
requirement. These include: be physically or mentally unfit for employment,
be a paid employee working an average of 20 hours a week, be awarded
state or federally funded work-study, be responsible for the care of a child or
other qualifying dependent in their household, be receiving Temporary
Assistance for Needy Families (TANF), be in a Workforce Investment Act, be
receiving unemployment, or be participating in at least one of the
Employment Department training programs (United States Department of
Agriculture [USDA], 2014).
Despite the need for financial assistance, reaching any of the
additional requirements can be extremely difficult for many students. Though
many students work a part-time job, it can be academically punishing to
work twenty hours or more per week. Research has shown that a lower
workload of 10-15 hours per week enhances students performance,
increasing the likelihood of degree completion (Pike, Kuh & Massa-McKinley,
2008). It is the proposal that in the 2019 Farm Bill the eligibility parameter of
minimum working hours be lowered from 20 hours to 12 hours per week for
students enrolled in 12 credits, minimum full-time level. This policy change
Problem Statement
College students are juggling many different stressors as they are
transitioning from adolescence to becoming independent adults. As federal
funds for colleges have been cut and tuition has been on a steady incline,
students are having to make up for expenses like textbooks, housing, and
utilities through part time jobs, often not leaving enough money for
groceries. A 2011 study at Western Oregon University found that 59% of all
students were food insecure at some point during the previous year, a rate
three times higher than the national average among the general population
(14.9%) (Patton-Lpez et al., 2011).
Food insecurity is defined as not having adequate resources to feed
oneself, nutritionally or at all. Food insecure individuals may experience
reduced caloric intake and quality of foods, lack of variety in diet, disrupted
eating patterns, uncertainty about having enough food, and hunger (USDA,
2014). Not only does food insecurity affect health and development
negatively, but it is also associated with decreased academic performance
(Patton-Lpez et al., 2011).
To mitigate some of the existing food insecurity among students, food
assistance programs like WIC, SNAP, and food banks and kitchens have been
created. Many campuses have even established their own food pantries
(Cady, 2014). These assistance programs only reached 27% of the surveyed
students; this left over half of the food insecure student population without
assistance (Patton-Lpez et al.).
Students who are struggling financially and find themselves in need
for food assistance may be denied program benefits, because they do not
meet the eligibility requirements. One student requirement for the
Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP) is having to work at least
20 hours per week (USDA, 2014). Many students do not work 20 hours, with
the average number in the Western Oregon University study being 18 hours
(Patton-Lpez et al.). For on-campus employment the maximum number of
work hours per week allowed is 20, giving students no room for error in
meeting both SNAP and employment eligibility.
Additionally, students' primary occupation is attending university or
college, which requires a majority of their focus. Research has shown that
working more than 20 hours per week has a negative impact on GPA (Pike,
Kuh & Massa-McKinley, 2008). Student poverty also increases the likelihood
for mental health issues as severe as, depression and suicidal ideations
(Cady, 2014). By extension, a student's low-income background
predetermines a higher likelihood of lower grades; experiencing food
insecurity or working 20+ hours per week to attain SNAP benefits are both
linked to lower academic outcomes.
In a country with the world's highest GDP, it is unacceptable that
Recommendations
The proposal for the 2019 Farm Bill is for the existing SNAP program to
remain in place for students to utilize, and for its eligibility requirements to
be adjusted such that participation in the program enhances, rather than
compromises, students academic outcomes. Research has shown that
students' grades and engagement are most positively affected by an
employment workload of 10-15 hours per week, based on full-time
enrollment (King, 2006). Full-time students, who wish to participate in SNAP
and meet the income requirement, would therefore benefit the most from the
program if the number of required working hours fell into this range. We
propose that the minimum required working hours for student SNAP eligibility
be lowered to 12 hours for students who are enrolled in 12 credit hours. Put
differently, the sum of total working hours and credit hours must equal or
Analysis
The 2019 Farm Bill provides an excellent opportunity to increase
support for university and college students. A comprehensive review of SNAP
is already planned as part of this Farm Bill, in which this proposed change
would be one of several others. A change in SNAP eligibility requirements for
students would broaden the number of potential benefit recipients. This in
turn would entail a higher amount of total benefits distributed, necessitating
an increase in funding for SNAP. Of the additional funds, the vast majority
would reach program participants. Since this proposal would only change
eligibility parameters for one group of potential SNAP participants, minimal
adjustments to the program rules will be made. Therefore, the administrative
Conclusion
SNAP has been a valuable resource for individuals and families who are
struggling to make ends meet. However, the way SNAP eligibility is currently
assessed, the program cannot effectively serve the college student
population who is facing a considerable amount of food insecurity. Having a
full college schedule prevents many students in need from meeting the
required minimum of working hours to receive SNAP benefits. This proposal
suggests that the working hour requirement be adjusted and takes into
account the varying credit hours of each student SNAP applicant. This will
help students stay both mentally and physically healthy, ultimately
increasing retention and graduation rates.
References
Center on Budget and Policy Priorities. (2015) Policy Basics: Introduction to
the Supplemental
http://www.cbpp.org/research/policy-basics- introduction-to-thesupplemental-
nutrition-assistance-program-snap
272
King, J., (2006). Working their way through college: Student employment and
its impact on the college experience. Washington, DC: American Council on
Education.
Lape, E., (2014) Farm Bill 2019. Snap to Health. Retrieved from
http://www.snaptohealth.org/farm-bill-2019/.
Patton-Lopez, M. M., Lopez-Cevallos, D. F., Cancel-Tirado, D. I., & Vazquez, L.,
(2014). Prevalence
http://www.ers.usda.gov/topics/food-nutrition-
assistance/food-security-in-the-
us/definitions-of-food-security.aspx
http://www.fns.usda.gov/snap/students