Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Zoe Ervolino
Introduction
In this study, Brandon, Nell, and I wanted to see whether a persons judgment of a quotation
was related to the person who said the quote. In order to do this, we explored whether or not
changing the identity of the person who said a quotation would impact the way that people
would perceive the quote. Specifically, we tested to see if there was a notable distinction
between Donald Trump and Peter J. Douglas, a person who was created specifically for this
experiment, in order to see if connotations with Trump would cause students to respond
differently. Because the quotation was the same for both Trump and Douglass, tracking the
change in the response as the names changed would be a way to examine the association
between the name and the reaction. As Packer is considered an institution that primarily
consists of liberals, we predicted that students would be more likely to be neutral or disagree
with the quotation when it came from Trump, and more likely to agree with the quotation when it
came from Peter J. Douglas, because we assumed the students would have fewer (or no)
preconceived notions of Douglas. The specific quotation used came from Donald Trumps Time
to Get Tough, and says that Any system that penalizes success and accomplishment is wrong.
Any system that discourages work, discourages productivity, discourages economic progress, is
wrong.[1]
Data/Results
Figure 1. Survey results
Trump
Strongly Agree
Douglas
15
22
Agree
65
43
29
35
Disagree
14
Strongly Disagree
Total
119
111
Affirmative Response
Neutral Response
Trump
Douglas
87
58
29
35
Negative Response
Because the p-value (1.1 x 10-3) is less than .05, we can reject our null hypothesis that the true
difference in the proportion of affirmative responses to the quote on Survey A and the proportion
I have cheated
within the past year
0-2 years
22
11
3-4 years
19
12
10
5+ years
51
33
24
Total
77
67
45
H0 = There is no association between the amount of years a student has spent at Packer and
their cheating habits.
Ha = There is an association between the amount of years a student has spent at Packer and
their cheating habits.
Conditions: Random? The surveys were randomly assigned. Independent? The sample taken
was essentially a census but independence is still met because no response affected another.
Large sample size? Expected counts: 16.296, 14.179, 16.703, 14.534, 44, 38.286, which are all
larger than 5.
[1] http://www.ontheissues.org/Celeb/Ronald_Reagan_Tax_Reform.htm