PowerPoint Content Rubric

Research, Design, & Development

Student(s) Name: __________________________________________________
Multiplier:

Content:

Quantity:

Style:

Organization:

Writing
Conventions:

Sources:

1.0

Relevant, informative,
and accurate information.
Focused and consistent
with topic. Shows
understanding and
comprehension of task
requirements. Many
illustrations.
Quantity of content and
material presented
consistent with task
requirements.
Material presented with
unique and interesting
style and personality.
Inspires curiosity about
topic, while being
appropriate for topic and
audience. Readable font
and color scheme.
Topic breakdown follows
logical pattern and flow.
Easy to follow. Includes
proper headings or
outlines. Introductions
and conclusions where
appropriate.
Follows rules of
grammar, spelling,
punctuation, and
capitalization. Very few
or no conventional
writing errors.
All sources used for
quotes, statistics and
facts are credible and
cited correctly according
to APA, Harvard, or
IEEE conventions.

.75
Somewhat relevant, or
some inaccuracies,
somewhat focused.
Consistent with topic, but
did not understand or
ignored some task
requirements. Some
illustrations.
Quantity of content
somewhat incomplete or
somewhat exceeds
requirements.

Date: ________________

.5

Percentage

Many inaccuracies,
lack of focus, or
inconsistent with topic
and task requirements.
May be unnecessarily
repetitive. Few or no
illustrations.

30

Quantity of content is
significantly
incomplete or greatly
exceeds requirements.

20

Material shows some

attention paid to style,
although a bit misdirected
or inappropriate for topic
or audience. Readable
font and color scheme.

Material shows little

attention to style.
Inspires little curiosity
about topic, or is
distracting. Font and/or
color scheme may
make reading difficult.

20

Topic somewhat
disorganized, presentation
of material
understandable,
somewhat difficult to
follow. Incomplete slide
headings.

Topic not properly

organized, presentation
of material does not
flow, or is very difficult
to follow. Few, if any
headings.

15

Some errors in writing

conventions, including
grammar, spelling,
punctuation, and/or
capitalization errors.

Many conventional
writing errors, difficult
to read, many
grammatical, spelling,
and/or punctuation
errors.

10

Some reference errors in

convention, consistency,
or accuracy, although
most or all works cited.

Many sources are

suspect (not credible)
and/or are not cited
correctly.

Total:
NOTE: Projects which are deemed unacceptable include those for which the following is true:
Quantity is less than 2/3 or over twice of whats required.
Content is overly irrelevant and/or hardly addresses the topic or subject matter.
Writing conventions and/or style make it extremely difficult to understand or read.
Organization makes little or no sense, making it extremely difficult to follow.

100

Score