The Ancient Roots of Our
Ecological Crisis
Donald Hughes
J. Donald Hughes (b. 1932) is Professor of History
atthe University of Denver, Colorado. He has
writen extensively on the ecological perceptions and
environmental impacts of ancient civilizations
Hughes believes tha a human community's
relationship tothe natural environment is influenced
bby a umber of factors: the community members’
attitudes toward nature, their knowledge and
twiderstanding of nature's balance and structure,
their uses of technology, and their ability to exert
control over the actions of individual members that
fare directed toward the environment
‘Hughes idenifies animism, Judaism and
Christianity, and Greek and Roman philosophies as
the dominant factors influencing Western attitudes
toward nature. He notes that early Near Eastern
civilizations gathered much information about the
natural world through trial and error investigations
The Greeks were the first 10 apply a consistently
rational approach tothe study of nature; they sought
explanations based on reason forall natural
Phenomena. Under the Romans, interest in research
and discovery declined as thinkers often chose 10
‘uild on older foundations rather than to seek new
Anowledge. The human relationship tothe natural
‘environment worsened under Christianity, since the
‘world often was viewed as temporary and even as a
barrier to salvation. Contemporary Wester society
‘has supported an intensified interest in developing
‘accurate knowledge about the world in diverse
The technologies of older civilizations and their
impacts on nature are minor compared with those of
contemporary industrial nations. Hughes notes that
technological progress often was very slow in
ancient societies, because of common practice of
not pursuing inventions n contrast, the Romans”
auttudes, and emphasis on hight developed
technology were closest to those of contemporary
Western sociery.
CHAPTER 4: HISTORICAL CONTEXT 157
According to Hughes, ancient civilizations were
able o exert considerable social control because
‘most ancient peoples perceived themselves primarily
‘as members of their societies, and only secondarily
‘as autonomous individuals. Later, Greek and Roman
governments established some policies in agriculture
‘and natural resource use, but allowed citizens many
choices. In contrast, modern industrialized nations
‘have surpassed all previous societies in their degree
of organization and social control. Yer, they have
‘been slow to implement steps to protect the
‘environment. Among modem democracies,
‘environmental policies can be established only with
‘broad-based public support, which often faces
‘opposition from powerful interest groups. Likewise,
the former totalitarian states had not always made
environmental protection a high priority
‘The damaging changes being suffered today by the
natural environment are far more rapid and wide-
spread than anything known in ancient times.
Today deforestation proceeds on a worldwide scale,
the atmosphere becomes more turbid and opaque
every year, the oceans are being polluted on & mas-
sive scale, species of animals and plants are being
‘wiped out at arate unmatched in history, and the
earth is being plundered in many other ways. But
although the peoples of ancient civilizations were
unfamiliar with such recent discoveries as radioac-
tivity, insecticides, and the intemal combustion en-
gine, they faced problems sometimes analogous to
those the modem world faces, and we may look to
the ancients in order to see the beginnings of many
of our modem difficulties with an environment
which is decaying because of human misuse.
‘A human community determines is relationship tothe
anual envament in many ways. Among the mos in-
Portant are its members’ attudes toward nature, the
knowlege of nate and the understanding ofits balance
and snucture which they atin, te technology they are
ale to se, ane the social contol he community can exet
overs members ode ther ction which aet the en-
vironment. The ancient world shows us the roots of
cour present problems in each of these areas.
Ina wellknown and often reprinted article, “The
Historical Roots of Our Ecologie Crisis,"! Lynn
White traced modem Wester attitudes toward the
Hughes, J. Donald. 1998. The ancient roots of our ecological crisis. In Environmental ethics:
Divergence and convergence. 2nd ed. Edited by Richard Botzler and Susan Armstrong. Boston:
‘McGraw Hill. Reproduced with permission,4158 PaRTONe: METHODOLOGIES ANO PERSPECTIVES
natural world back to the Middle Ages. But both
‘medieval and modem attitudes have ancient roots
Greece and Rome, as well as Judaism and Chris-
tianity, helped to form our habitual ways of think
ing about nature. And itis evident that the modern
ecological crisis is to a great extent the result of at-
titudes which see nature as something to be freely
‘conquered, used, and dominated without calcula-
tion of the resultant cost to mankind and the earth.
‘These attitudes stem from similar ideas which
were held by the ancient peoples who have most
influenced us. Animism, which saw the natural
world as sharing human qualities and treated
things and events in nature as sacred objects of re-
spect or worship, was the dominant attitude in
carly antiquity and persisted almost everywhere in
the Mediterranean world, but it gradually gave
way to other ways of thinking. In Israel, tanscen-