Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Anita M. Youngman
April 16, 2016
1st grade
Math
University of Alaska Southeast
ED 688 Student Teaching MAT
Contextual Factors
Learning Goals
Assessment Plan
Instructional Decision-Making
13
16
19
Attachments
22
Assessment Plan
22
30
Instructional Decision-Making
35
37
Contextual Factors
I am doing my student teaching at Government Hill Elementary, in Anchorage Alaska.
Government Hill is part of the Anchorage School district and has some pretty unique circumstances that I
consider to be of high quality and design. Government Hill has a school within a school: a two way
Spanish immersion along with a neighborhood program. The neighborhood program would typically
qualify for title one funding that provides additional funding and supports for students from lower socioeconomic backgrounds. The unique quality I see in this design is that mixing socio-economic classes has
a significant impact in providing a more enriching environment for the neighborhood students within the
community.
Along with the Spanish immersion program comes an extremely pro-active PTA that
provides many enriching extra curricular opportunities for all the children at Government Hill.
For example, PTA parents write grants for Artists in Residence, they facilitate an ice-skate loan
and pack back packs of food for students to take home on the weekends. A typical title one
school within the Anchorage School District does not have this type of community support and
enriching experiences.
I am student teaching on the neighborhood side of Government Hill Elementary this
semester. The students in my class are very diverse in abilities, ethnic backgrounds and
behaviors. In two weeks of being at the school, I have only seen two parents come into the
classroom briefly. Three of the students have active IEPs and a couple more are being referred
by the classroom teacher as additional possibilities. Along with the students supported by the
SPED program there are 6 students who are considered English Language Learners. In addition,
there are behavior challenges that easily send the class into a spiral of chaos.
I feel very fortunate that there is an effective behavior management program in place for
this challenging 1st grade class. Since the beginning of the semester, I have been working on
implementing some additional reward systems. In this environment I believe that behavior
management is the cornerstone for student learning. With the variety of abilities that range from
above average to far below average, behavior management is a crucial for effective
differentiation of lessons.
I really like the set up of the classroom. Students sit in table groups, except for one
student who has an IEP and has her own desk. The only downfall to the classroom design is the
supplies always being on the tables. It feels very chaotic to me at times and often becomes a
distraction to some of the more energetic students who will play with supplies rather than listen
to instructions. The choices I have will be, molding behaviors to fit this design, learning to
tolerate the distraction or figuring out a different routine for supplies.
My main goal as a teacher this semester is to find out what motivates this group of kids.
My next step is to design curriculum that can be taught at various times throughout the day in
various scenarios. Providing these students with lessons that continuously hit on a core theme
while teaching new concepts will be my most challenging aspect of curriculum design. Paying
close attention to formative assessment will be another ally that I will have in the curriculum
design process.
In designing a unit this semester, I plan on creating authentic learning opportunities with
games and interactive play. With a strong reward system and interactive lessons, placed at a
variety of times, students will have multiple opportunities to internalize the math they will be
learning. Additionally, I will be implementing the old fashion drills to these young learners. I
Learning Goals
Learning goal # 1 Math-Fluency with Addition and Subtraction
Number fluency is a significant indicator that students will be successful in future math
abilities and concepts. With some organization and diligence, I will administer daily/frequent
formative drills that test for students ability to quickly and accurately provide math addition
and subtraction facts. All students will start at a beginner level and move towards harder drills.
This model will allow students to work independently towards mastering addition and
subtraction math facts. By scaffolding student learning through drills, students will establish
the background knowledge and fluency needed to eventually understand and apply math facts
to more abstract, higher thinking problems associated with math.
Common Core Standards for 1st grade math: 1.OA.C.6 Add and subtract within 20 1.0A.D.7
Work with addition and subtraction equations 1.OA.A.1 Represent and solve problems
involving addition and subtraction.
Formative assessments will be frequent and students can work at their own pace to develop
fluency with addition and subtraction.
Learning goal # 2 Understanding interchangeable fact families with addition and
subtraction
Students will learn about fact families and the properties they share when using addition and
subtraction. Students will explore how numbers within fact families stay the same and are
related and interchangeable. Much like the importance of fluency, fact families and the
understanding that some numbers are connected will help students with fluency and later they
will be better equipped to deal math problems that promote higher thinking. This goal is more
abstract but lends way to students applying their knowledge to a variety of math concepts.
Assessment Plan
Learning goal # 1
Learning goal # 2
Goal
Math-Fluency with
Addition and subtraction
Understanding
interchangeable fact families
with addition and
subtraction
Assessment
Pre/Post assessment of
students ability to accurately
create addition/subtraction
number sentences in a fact
family model.
(fig. AP.8)
Formative Assessment
Accommodations
Built in accommodation,
A variety of levels of
students dont progress until
difficulty will be provided.
they have mastered a 2 minute Interactive partner work.
timed fluency drill.
Scoring
Learning goal # 2
Goal
Assessment
Accommodations
Built in accommodation,
A variety of levels of
students dont progress until
difficulty will be provided
they have mastered a 2 minute
timed fluency drill.
Scoring
10
Technology is not used by
students but teacher uses
computer design in
formulating tests that scaffold
learning. Paper and pencil
tests are appropriate in
meeting standards and goal
for this objective.
Length of Unit
# of Students: 23
Materials: Include all materials including technology: 1 die/student, 1 dice fact families
worksheet/student, 1 pencil/student, white board/overhead for demonstration. Timer, Drill
checklist, 23 student specific drills, 23 privacy folders, 23 pencils. White board projector, deck of
playing cards, 23 worksheets (Fig. ), 23 pencils, white board markers. GoMath books and Think
Central. Class set of 10 frames and markers.
Alaska Content and Subject area Standards: Math
1. 1.OA.C.5.6 Add and subtract within 20
2. 2. 1.OA.A.1 Represent and solve problems involving addition and subtraction.
3. 1.0A.D.7 Work with addition and subtraction equations
4. 1.OA.B.3.4understand and apply properties of operations and the relationship between addition and
subtraction
TRANSFER GOALS (Unpacked Standard(s)
1. Students will choose a method for subtracting numbers up to 20.
2. Students will relate what they know about addition to solving subtraction.
3. Students will develop math fluency with subtraction up to 20.
4 Students will solve subtraction problems.
11
1. Math fluency
Learning Activities
Learning/Instructional Strategies
1. Introduction / Hook
Pre test on fact families and drill
Lesson 1
1. Drill
2. GoMath 4.1
Lesson 2
1. Drill
2. GoMath 4.2
3. Fact Families game with table groups
Lesson 3
12
Students play/explore what they
know about addition to perform
subtraction sentences. Teacher
demo, student exploration
Lesson 4
1. Drill
2. GoMath 4.4
3. 10s subtraction demo/game
Lesson 5
1. Drill
2. GoMath 4.5
3. 10 Frames and markers
Lesson 6
1. Drill
2. GoMath 4.5
3. Fact Families card game
Conclusion
Closure
Post test on fact families and drill
Differentiation
Students work at personal speed on drills starting with addition and working up to subtraction to gain
fluency with math facts up to 20. Students are exposed to a variety of methods to
successfully subtract numbers. Students can use number cards, fingers, lines to
compute math facts. Drills are intended to accommodate different learning rates.
Differentiated Assessments: Drills move at student pace. One student with an IEP will not be timed and
will work at times that are best for her.
Differentiated Instruction: A variety of methods and individualized instruction will happen periodically
when reviewing drills with students who are not successful. Giving students new ways to successfully
complete their drills. Instruction will vary, using manipulative and games to promote different learning
styles.
13
Instructional Decision-Making
Fluency in addition and subtraction are my main focus points for my students with this
math unit. From what I have learned about teaching math, students that are successful in math
have a strong background in math fluency. Drills have a long history in education as being a
proven method of strengthening student abilities in math. On the other hand, drills do not fall
in line with my overall personal philosophy of an authentic, engaging and fun education for
students. However, drills promote skills that when mastered, create a platform where students
are ready to have some fun with numbers and math. When students dont have fluency, their
brain is bogged down with figuring out math facts and cant focus on more challenging,
engaging and fun math concepts. With this in mind, during my unit and more specifically the
drill portion, some modifications were needed to ensure that all students were successful.
My first modification based on student needs, happened close to the beginning of the
unit. I planned on starting a lesson with a simple demonstration. I started writing on the board,
11-10=1, 12-10=2, etc., all the way up to 20. As I was writing out the problems, I asked if any
of the students noticed a pattern. Many students acknowledged there was a pattern and I felt
successful in my demonstration. Next, I grouped students by table groups and we played a
game adding and subtracting this base 10 concept. After playing the game a bit, I noticed that
there was a good handful of students who really didnt understand this base ten subtraction
concept. Originally, it was unclear that some of the students were not getting the concept.
Then, I realized that some modifications to my lesson were essential to meeting my goal with
student mastery and fluency with addition and subtraction.
Later that night, I went home and created three additional drills that focused on base ten
14
subtraction along with a little addition( fig. I.D.M.1). I immediately inserted these drills into
the subtraction mix. After administering the first drill, I realized quite a few of the students
benefited from doing this drill and finding the pattern on their own again. However, a couple
of students still had no idea what was going on. I thought I explained myself clearly but I
realized that a few students were still not getting the pattern/concept. I provided these students
with a number chart and had them figure out this base 10 subtraction concept on their own. I
showed them how to use the number chart and had them correct their drills using the number
chart, discovering the pattern on their own.
This glitch in my lesson reinforced the theory that discovering learning on your own is a
much more concrete and powerful method of teaching. Watching and discovering this theory
on my own was just as profound to me, as it was my students. The students needed a different
approach to discovering the base 10 concept and they were able to learn with guidance on their
own. In conclusion to my first example, I think there were many factors that led to this
successful modification of my unit. What started as a demonstration, game, and modification
transformed into a learning experience for myself and my students.
Another example of a modification that took place during this unit revolved around these
drills too. This example was needed for two students who were performing with abilities much
higher than a majority of the rest of the class. These two students mastered all the drills while a
majority of the class were still somewhere in the middle to lower end in the mastery drill
process. Fortunately, my host teacher had some old drill sheets that focused on addition and
subtraction of numbers between one and twenty. These new drill sheets were number specific.
For instance, on a sheet of 40 problems all the equations subtracted the number three.
15
So far, these are the only two students that are at this level. However, because of this
modification, I have a plan for the other students who start finishing up their drills (fig. I.D.M.
3). Additionally, these two students are still benefiting by the added practice with fluency. The
students are still motivated by the challenge of longer drills, keeping them engaged with the
other students.
The last part of this modification to the unit with these two students is the reward aspect.
I set this drill system up alongside a rewards system I have in place for completed work. When
students master a drill, I reward them with a Nanuq buck and a sticker on their paper (fig.
I.D.M.2). This has worked out great as a strong motivator as the students. It has been recent
that I have put these two students to work on their new drill sheets while the rest of the class
catches up. I dont want their work to become less rewarding, so I color the ones they get right
and when they beat their previous amount of correct answers they can still be rewarded with a
Nanuq buck. I feel confident that these two students are still on a path of having
meaningful, rewarding work that challenges them, while refining their fluency in math with
addition and subtraction.
16
Students
Raw
Score
Pretest
N=21
Top
possible
=32
Top
possible =
32
Post Test
Actual
Gain
Score
Potential
Learning
Gain Score Gain Score
Percentage
1 Aly
16
32
100%
100%
2 Bro
15
3%
47%
44
97
45
3 Bri
23
0%
72%
72
100
72
4 Eve
24
16%
75%
59
84
70
5 Eth
21
22%
66%
44
78
56
6 Geo
17
0%
53%
53
100
53
7 Jez
27
0%
84%
84
100
84
8 Jus
32
22%
100%
78
78
100
9 Jer
23
19%
72%
53
81
65
10 Jaz
0%
19%
19
100
19
11 Kay
14
27
44%
84%
40
56
71
12 Kia
14
32
44%
100%
56
56
100
13 Mek
23
0%
72%
72
100
72
14 Mac
29
19%
91%
72
81
89
15 Nya
32
19%
100%
81
81
100
16 Rus
31
0%
97%
97
100
97
17 Son
22
13%
69%
56
87
64
18 Tys
20
0%
63%
63
100
63
19 Tri
12
28
38%
88%
50
62
81
20 Tom
25
22%
78%
56
78
72
21 Xav
25
9%
78%
69
91
76
69
17
According to my data 7 of the 21 students did not have passing scores on their post
fluency drill. However, all but one student made gains in their fluency abilities. Since this drill
was at the end of a line of drills some of the students did not have as much practice with quickly
completing the test. If given more time with the drills and time on the drill test I think these
numbers would be much higher. With that being said, I think this learning goal of fluency with
subtraction was a successful learning goal that provided all students with quicker, more accurate
math skills. (fig. A.S.L.1)
The graph for my learning goal number two, math fact families, shows that only 2 out of
the 21 students did not make adequate progress (fig. A.S.L.2). Considering that the students had
no previous experience with math fact families, all the students made significant gains in their
abilities with a majority going from no knowledge in the beginning to 100% accuracy in the end.
I thought it would be interesting to see how different AIMS web ability levels
progressed during this unit with fluency, drilling and practice (fig. A.S.L.3). The graphs show
that in every category of ability from above average to well below average, at least one student
was able to master the fluency drill. While watching the students grow during this process, I
have confidence that more students would have attained a 100% score if they had more time. All
of the students, except for two, more than doubled their pre test scores.
Based on student scores, I think that my first learning goal of fluency provides evidence
that students were able to work at their level while many of them were able to master subtraction
facts with numbers between 1-20.
There are two students whose results made me reflect. The first student, Jus, stands out
because according to his AIMS web scores he is below average in his abilities with math.
18
During this unit, not only did he double his original score but he out performed many of the
average and above average students.
In the beginning of this unit, as I administered drills Jus would get frustrated that he
could not complete the drills in time and became upset. In addition, his overall self confidence
was lacking, he thought he could not do math. Fortunately, the drills were short and frequent in
delivery and his attitude changed quickly too. Jus quickly realized that many students were just
like him giving him just the right amount of boost in confidence to keep going. Before I knew it,
Jus began to soar in math and his drills.
I think, the fluency drills have really helped Jus understand that practice makes perfect.
Not only did it help him with fluency but I see that his confidence in math in general has
improved and he really feels as if he can and will be able to do the math with practice (fig. A.S.L.
4).
The other student that stands out is Xav. This student was categorized as well below
average and it is apparent when I work with him that he does struggle with math. However, he
also performed very well, perfecting his math fact families and tripling his fluency score.
Xav started off with the same kind of attitude of helplessness but as time passed his
confidence was beginning to change for the better. I think that having little practiced successes
for these students created more of a growth mindset for both of these students. I believe that
these students having more of a growth mindset can change the way they think about education
and what they can do. The fact families might have come easy to Xav in the end but I think that
the drills paved the way for his success too. Having built confidence through the fluency drills,
Xav found his motivation and desire to succeed (fig. A.S.L.5).
19
20
The fluency portion was short, motivating and a great intro for beginning daily math
lessons. Student accountability was at the heart of the implementation of the fluency goal.
Students were responsible for working each drill until they performed at a 100%, mastery level.
Differentiation was a natural fit into this routine, and students didnt advance until they were
ready. Morning work time became a correcting, conferencing time with me and students where I
could provide one on one teaching moments.
This type of drill lesson does not entirely fit with what I consider best practice of a
creative learning experience. However, I was pleased that students were motivated, learning at
their own levels and at their own paces. In addition, most of the students made significant
progress with fluency in addition and subtraction.
As I reflect on the two learning goals, I could easily connect the two goals. As students
correct their drills, I could have students add their answers in an upward fashion to correct their
work. This would give students another opportunity to discover the associative properties of
addition and subtraction in math. Connecting these two goals would strengthen student fluency
and flexibility that students can utilize in doing math in the future.
Over the course of my studies in teaching elementary students, Ive learned in theory that
students need the opportunity to learn and discover concepts on their own. While working on the
math unit, this idea manifested itself and I realized on my own the validity of this theory. As a
future professional teacher, I plan to find ways to help students with self discovery and
exploration, encouraging a growth mindset. Just as I had to actively encounter and explore
student learning, I would like to see the students actively encountering various problems that
they are encouraged to discover on their own.
21
Having a deep understanding of the curriculum and the flexibility to change direction
according to student needs will aid in my ability to promote this growth mindset. Strengthening
a variety of teaching methods based on learning styles, from using manipulatives to paper and
pencil work will reach a wider range of students. To accomplish this goal, I will continue to
learn from my students and actively research new engaging methods to teach young students
subtraction.
Another area I would like to work on is, having students support each other. This one is
tricky to manage with potential behavior disasters, but in the long run I realize I dont speak 1st
grader. However, 1st graders share language and experiences. Through observation and
continued learning of developmental stages, I will continue to build a repertoire of methods that
are critical for effective communication with students. In addition to this idea of learning their
language, would be to continue refining and expanding my toolbox of rhymes and sayings that
pertain to what students are learning. As a child, the rhymes and proverbs that teachers taught
are still present in my memory today.
In summary, the teacher work sample has given me another great tool to utilize when I
feel that I need direction when teaching a unit. It gives a clear approach to organizing, planning,
assessing and reflecting upon teaching students.
22
Attachments
Assessment Plan
fig. AP.1 Student Tracking Sheet Learning Goal #1 Fluency
#1
AL
Br
Bri
C
Ev
Et
G
Jez
Jus
Jer
Jaz
Ka
Ki
Lo
Me
Mac
N
P
R
S
Ty
Tri
Toms
X
#2
#3
#4
#5
#6
#7
23
2
+3
___
0
+1
___
2
+1
___
5
+4
___
2
+1
___
5
+6
___
3
+2
___
3
+4
___
5
+4
___
3
+4
___
5
+4
___
5
+6
___
6
+5
___
5
+6
___
1
+0
___
2
+3
___
24
7
+6
___
8
+9
___
8
+7
___
8
+9
___
10
+9
___
6
+7
___
7
+6
___
7
+8
___
9
+8
___
7
+8
___
10
+9
___
9
+10
___
8
+7
___
9
+10
___
9
+8
___
6
+7
___
25
11
+10
___
11
+12
___
13
+12
___
10
+11
___
13
+12
___
5
+6
___
3
+2
___
3
+4
___
5
+4
___
10
+11
___
12
+11
___
12
+13
___
12
+11
___
12
+13
___
11
+10
___
11
+12
___
26
3
-2
___
0
-0
___
1
-1
___
4
-4
___
2
-1
___
5
-5
___
2
-2
___
3
-3
___
5
-4
___
3
-1
___
4
-3
___
5
-4
___
5
-3
___
5
-2
___
4
-2
___
4
-1
___
27
6
-5
___
8
-1
___
7
-2
___
8
-7
___
9
-7
___
6
-3
___
6
-4
___
7
-5
___
8
-2
___
7
-4
___
9
-1
___
9
-5
___
7
-3
___
9
-5
___
8
-4
___
6
-2
___
28
10
- 5
____
11
- 10
____
12
- 6
____
10
- 9
____
12
- 2
_____
5
-3
____
2
-1
____
3
-2
____
4
-2
____
10
- 2
____
11
- 10
____
12
- 10
____
11
- 5
____
12
- 7
____
10
- 3
____
11
- 6
____
29
30
Grade Level(s): 1
40 mins
# of Students: 24
Alaska Standards:
STAGE TWO:
Student Assessment:
1. Students will accurately compose addition and
subtraction number
sentences that are
randomly developed
based on dice game.
Differentiation/Accommodations/Modifications
31
Grade Level(s): 1
# of Students: 23
week
Topic of Lesson: Math Fluency
Alaska Standards:
1.OA.C.6 Add and subtract within 20 1.0A.D.7 Work with addition and
subtraction equations 1.OA.A.1 Represent and solve problems
involving addition and subtraction.
32
STAGE TWO:
Student Assessment:
1. Students will accurately solve math problems in
2 minutes.
Differentiation/Accommodations/Modifications
Closure: Students put away their privacy folders and get ready for daily math lesson.
33
Grade Level(s): 1
# of Students: 23
Alaska Standards:
STAGE TWO:
Student Assessment:
1. Students will accurately compose addition and
subtraction number
sentences that are
randomly developed
based on cards.
Differentiation/Accommodations/Modifications
34
Instructional Decision-Making
fig. I.D.M.1 New drill test with base ten concept with subtraction
35
36
37
Post test
A'Lr
Bro
Bri
Eve
Eth
Geo
Jez
Jus
Jer
Jaz
Kay
Kia
Mek
Mac
Nya
Rus
Son
Tys
Tri
Tom
Xav
0
12
16
38
Pre test
Post test
A'Ly
Bro
Bri
Eve
Eth
Geo
Jez
Jus
Jer
Jaz
Kay
Kia
Mek
Mac
Nya
Rus
Son
Tys
Tri
Tom
Xav
0
12
16
39
fig. A.S.L.3 Student Performance based on AIMS web scores for learning Goal #1 Fluency.
Average AIMS
Pre test
Pre test
Post test
Post test
Bro
Eve
Eth
Kia
Jez
Jer
Kay
Mac
Nya
Tom
Rus
Tri
0
12
16
12
16
40
Pre test
Post test
Bri
A'ly
Geo
Mek
Jus
Son
Jaz
Xav
Tys
12
16
12
16
41
42