Teacher-student interactions are quiet, meaningful, and build closer relationships. A teacher should be the facilitator, not the dictator, says karissa kalisz. Students should be thoughtfully engaged in the subject matter, she says.
Teacher-student interactions are quiet, meaningful, and build closer relationships. A teacher should be the facilitator, not the dictator, says karissa kalisz. Students should be thoughtfully engaged in the subject matter, she says.
Teacher-student interactions are quiet, meaningful, and build closer relationships. A teacher should be the facilitator, not the dictator, says karissa kalisz. Students should be thoughtfully engaged in the subject matter, she says.
As learners, I believe that students have immense potential that only
needs to be facilitated and guided by the right kind of teacher. When students act and look like learners, they have full understanding of their motivational skills, show resilience, and put forth a growth-based mindset. Students who are learners do not solely need extrinsic motivators; they understand the intrinsic value of motivation and strive to learn for that reason. In an ideal classroom, teacher-student interactions are quiet, meaningful, and build closer relationships either academically or emotionally. I strongly believe that a teacher can learn to know and understand each of their students on a personal level, all while building trust and mutual respect along the way. By showing your students genuine care, each student will know that they are heard and have potential. A teacher should be, again, the facilitator, not the dictator. This is why student-student interactions are so important to securing a welcoming classroom environment. If students are given more opportunity to have these opportunities of student-student interactions, then they will strengthen in socio-emotional and academic skills as each student progresses alongside one another. In regards to subject matter, I understand that there is a stress on the importance of mathematics and literacy within the curriculum, but I believe that there are methods in which these can be taught in a way that integrates multiple domains. Teaching through domains such as aesthetics and kinetics can give students the opportunity to have variation within their day and keeps lessons interesting and engaging. I also strongly believe in teaching through integration of outdoor learning. By providing students with time to get outside and learn through meaningful, real-world application, students are presented with opportunities to problem solve and apply background knowledge. Additionally, I believe that there is not enough emphasis in learning through scientific inquiry. This type of learning can be powerful to a student within all learning areas because it scaffolds for investigative strategies within other domains. Finally, I have a firm belief of what an effective learning environment looks like in a classroom. I do not believe that all students should be consistently still and quiet. In a classroom where learning is happening, students are thoughtfully engaged in the subject matter and are given opportunities to participate through a variety of engagement strategies. Strong small group lessons are important to the learning environment because there is more opportunity for meaningful discussions and it allows me to see the learning process for all of my students, make conscious adjustments, and assess the effectiveness of the whole-group instruction. As stated previously, the most successful way to promote student learning is to create meaningful connections with each student, find what academic and
social needs they have, and differentiate according to those needs.
Differentiation is critical in order to ensure that each students needs are being met, which then continues a development of a motivated, growthbased mindset.