Professional Documents
Culture Documents
PAKISTAN ECONOMY
PREPARED BY:
SADIQ ABBAS
MALIK ALI
INTRODUCTION
The misery of Under Developed Countries like Pakistan, which have the resources to
become a prosperous country, however, have not fully achieved their potential, is mainly
associated with the problem of poverty. Because of low incomes, the saving ratios also
remain low, resulting in low investment levels. At the same time, due to low income the
taxable capacity remains lower, i.e. government earnings also remain low. Due to low levels
of investment along with the low income on the part of the government the country faces
saving-investment deficit as well as the deficit in balance of payments.
The theory of Two Gap Model suggests that the economic development policy focuses on
two constraints: the need for savings to finance investment, and the need for foreign
exchange to finance imports”. The Two-Gap Model suggests that developing countries have
to rely on the Foreign Inflows to fill these two gaps. The Foreign Inflows are available in
various manifestations to a country, which includes the grants, loans, foreign direct
investment (FDI), export credit, project/non-project assistance, technical assistance and
emergency relief etc.
Moreover, the nature of the FI available to a country also depends upon various factors
however mainly on the size of the country its economic circumstances. African nations rely
mainly on the foreign aid however countries in East Asia enjoy the benefit of foreign direct
investments owing to their investor friendly policies and the availability of infrastructure in
the form of land and human resource. In case of Pakistan the foreign aid is mainly in the
form of foreign aid because it lacks physical, financial & human capital as well as political &
macroeconomic stability, which are the main attraction for foreign direct investments.
As mentioned in the captioned subject, our purpose of the study is to assess the role of
foreign aid in the economy of Pakistan. In this regard we would explore
There are many forms of the FCIs, which includes the grants, loans, foreign direct
investment (FDI), export credit, project/non-project assistance, technical assistance and
emergency relief etc. The objectives behind these inflows vary from political to humanitarian
grounds however, following objectives could be broadly categorized:
b) Humanitarianism and altruism are, nevertheless, significant motivations for the giving of
aid.
Grants
Foreign Direct Investments
Loans and credits
Foreign Grants:
Grants, otherwise known as international aid, overseas aid, or foreign aid, are a voluntary
transfer of resources from one country to another. These grants could be in the form of
project assistance, commodity assistance, technical assistance or other assistance such as
relief aid and foreign aid.
Foreign direct investment (FDI) refers to long term participation by country into another
country. It usually involves participation in management, joint-venture, transfer of technology
and expertise. There are two types of FDI: inward foreign direct investment and outward
foreign direct investment, resulting in a net FDI inflow (positive or negative).
External loan (or foreign debt) is that part of the total debt in a country that is owed to
creditors outside the country. We can categorize the sources of these loans as official
creditors such as World Bank, Asian Development Bank and Industrial Development Bank
and bilateral loans by governments and their agencies.
There are three leading multilateral agencies viz. IMF, World Bank and the ADB that provide
loans and credit on soft and hard terms. The core function of IMF is to provide support to
countries facing acute imbalances between their external payments and receipts. The World
Bank or the ADB, unlike the IMF, are development banks dedicated purely for poverty
reduction and improving the living standards of people. Nevertheless, all the three
institutions pursue a common objective of promoting economic growth and reduce
unemployment.
For Pakistan all the three agencies have contributed significantly in providing assistance and
almost 50 percent of our external debt is owed to these to these institutions.
IMF loans have been an important source to manage the financial problems of Pakistan
such as balance of payment deficits, stabilization of currency, rebuilding international
reserves, managing liquidity problems along with enabling the respective countries to meet
their short term needs by providing various types of loans which IMF calls as its lending
„facility‟. In the last few months, there was a lot of speculation and discussion on the
government decision to call for IMF loan to meet its liquidity and financial problems. In spite
of effective policy actions taken by State Bank of Pakistan, issues such as sharp
EMBA-BFS-2nd BATCH Page 5 of 18
The Role of Foreign Aid in the Pakistan Economy
depreciation of exchange rate, depletion of foreign exchange reserves of $5 billion till
November 2008, inflation rate of more than 25%, and increase in import bill by 35.2%
created immense challenges for the government and State Bank of Pakistan. Finally, the
IMF loan of $7.6 billion was approved to help Pakistan come out of the liquidity and financial
crisis albeit with certain IMF conditions. The IMF facility is still an important topic of
discussion until the real gains from IMF loans are realized.
To determine the effects of IMF loans on Pakistani economy, it is important to analyze the
history of IMF loans to Pakistan briefly. Since 1988 when Pakistan became member of IMF,
almost eleven loan arrangements (including the recent IMF loan of $7.6 billion in 2008) have
taken place under various IMF facilities/programs. Almost six loan arrangements were made
during the regime of Benazir Bhutto including standby arrangement, Structural Adjustment
Programs (SAP), Poverty reduction and Growth Facility (PRGF) and Extended SAP. Two
IMF loan arrangements were made during Nawaz Sharif regime and two standby agreement
and PRGF under Musharraf regime to stabilize the economy. It is important to note that in
the tenure of last two decades, on average almost 44% of the total lending amount has been
drawn from the original 100% agreed upon lending amount because of the failure of the
government to act upon the strict measures determined by IMF. For the first time in the year
2000, this tradition was broken in Musharraf regime when Musharraf‟s government
successfully implemented the conditions proposed by IMF and successfully drew the whole
lending amount of $1.3 billion. It is also very interesting to note that only two loan
arrangements were made during the military regime whereas nine IMF agreements
(including the recent IMF loan) were made during the civilian regime.
The conditions posed by IMF mostly include the close monitoring, reduction of government
spending, revision in tax collection policies, change in policy/discount rate etc. to make sure
that funds granted to the borrower country are utilized in optimal manner. The IMF loans
greatly impact the economic indicators and bring change in the regulatory framework which
has both positive and negative impacts on the country. Pakistan saw a decline in GDP
growth rate and other economic indicators right after infusion of IMF funds in the economy
except in the second last lending arrangement in Musharraf‟s regime when full amount of
loan was drawn from IMF. The economic indicators after IMF loans in the last two decades
followed a typical cycle. Usually the trend after IMF loans show immediate decline in GDP
growth rate, increased tax revenues to GDP ratio, increased CPI, increased debt on the
The current IMF loan is expected to have both positive and negative impacts. The
immediate benefits include quick influx of liquidity, improvement in credit rating by reducing
the country‟s default risk, enhancement of foreign exchange reserves, stabilization of rupee
(which faced 25% depreciation against U.S. dollar till November), increased investor‟s
confidence in both money and capital markets and increased financial assistance from the
friends of Pakistan. However the negative impacts associated with the increase in policy
rate include increased costs for the banks, increase in unemployment (because many banks
and organizations will go for restructuring and downsizing to reduce their operating costs)
and increase in poverty rate.
The International Bank for Reconstruction and Development (IBRD), better known as the
World Bank, was established in 1944 to help Europe recover from the devastation of World
War II. The success of that enterprise led the Bank, within a few years, to turn its attention to
the developing countries. By the 1950s, it became clear that the poorest developing
countries needed softer terms than those that could be offered by the Bank, so they could
afford to borrow the capital they needed to grow.
With the United States taking the initiative, a group of the Bank‟s member countries decided
to set up an agency that could lend to the poorest countries on the most favorable terms
possible. They called the agency the "International Development Association." Its founders
saw IDA as a way for the "haves" of the world to help the "have-nots." But they also wanted
IDA to be run with the discipline of a bank. For this reason, US President Dwight D.
Eisenhower proposed, and other countries agreed, that IDA should be part of the World
Bank
The ADB, functioning since December, 1966, has been engaged in promoting the economic
and social progress of its developing member countries in the Asia-Pacific region. The
Bank‟s principal functions are: (i) to make loans and equity investments for the economic
and social advancement of developing member countries, (ii) provide technical assistance
for the preparation and execution of development projects and advisory services, (iii)
promote investment of public and private capital for development purposes, and (iv) respond
to requests for assistance in coordinating development policies and plans of member
countries. The Bank‟s operations cover the entire spectrum of economic development, with
particular emphasis on agriculture, energy, capital market development, transport &
communications and social infrastructure.
ADB continued with its large lending program to Pakistan in 2009 with $1.10 billion
disbursement and $942.7 million in newly approved assistance. As of 31 December 2009,
the portfolio contained 42 active loans amounting to $4.36 billion, 37 ongoing loans of $3.97
billion, and 3 grants totaling $180 million, with bulk of these supporting development
initiatives in energy, social sectors, governance, and transport in the four provinces and at
the national level.
ADB is working with the government and the private sector to improve the country‟s
infrastructure, energy security, and basic public services. Aligned with national development
objectives, ADB‟s partnership priorities aim to attract investment, create industries and jobs,
and improve the quality of life of citizens.
1
The history of U.S. assistance to Pakistan follows a predictable script: aid is tied to security
imperatives that come and go, while the country‟s political and economic well-being is
effectively ignored. As an early ally in the cold war, Pakistan received nearly $2 billion from
1953 to 1961, a quarter of which was military assistance. The United States then suspended
assistance during the Indo-Pakistan wars and following Pakistan‟s construction of a uranium
enrichment facility in 1979. Pakistan remerged as an ally in the 1980s during the Soviet
Union‟s occupation of Afghanistan and was again the recipient of aid. But following the
withdrawal of Soviet troops in the late 1980s, assistance to Pakistan took another nosedive.
Following 9/11, Pakistan became a U.S. ally once more, and unsurprisingly, almost all of the
aid provided since has gone to military operations.
Unfortunately, all the aid after the post 9/11 was either in the form of military equipment or
aid genuinely given for fighting against terrorism. This is evident form the below statistics
$7.89 billion: The amount of U.S. military assistance to Pakistan since 9/11, the majority of
which has been from “coalition support funds” intended as reimbursement for Pakistani
assistance in the war on terror.
$3.1 billion: The amount allocated to economic and development assistance, including food
aid, during the same period.
1
http://www.americanprogress.org/issues/2008/08/pakistan_aid_numbers.html
(Thousands of US $)
2
Child Survivor and Health (CSH)
Development Assistance (DA)
Economic Support Funds (ESF)
Foreign Military Financing (FMF)
International Military Education and Training (IMET)
Counter-narcotics and law enforcement assistance (INCLE)
Non-proliferation, Anti-terrorism, Demining and Related Programs (NADR)
2
CRS Report for Congress “U.S Foreign Aid to East and South Asia: Selected Recipients”
The result depicts the positive effect of aid on the GDP in Pakistan from the year 2000-2009.
It is seen that the GDP increases as the ODA increases but at the decreasing rate.
The increased debt burden in Pakistan can be depicted by the Table 1.3 (External Debt) and
Table 1.4 (Trend of Debt). It shows that the amount of external debt rises over the period of
the 1970-2002 in Pakistan. It is clear that the overall debt burden also rises as the flow of
foreign capital also increased over the same period.
3
Khan, Omar Asghar (1993). “The Impact of Foreign Aid on Economic Development”. in Viqar Ahmad and Rashid Amjad. The Management of
Pakistan’s Economy (1947-82)”. Karachi: Oxford University Press.
EMBA-BFS-2nd BATCH Page 14 of 18
The Role of Foreign Aid in the Pakistan Economy
CONCLUSION
The current study shows positive effects of foreign aid on the economic development.
Foreign aid, on positive side, has helped in boosting the GDP Growth through structural
transformation of the economy, laid foundations of the industrial and agricultural sectors,
provided technical assistance, policy advice and modern technology, assisted in overcoming
the budget deficits and the BOP deficits and has also funded the projects for the social
sector development projects. GDP increases at the decreasing rate, as the flow of foreign
capital increases. Thus, the overall impact of the aid on the economic development is
positive.
4
http://www.google.com/publicdata?ds=wb-
wdi&met=dt_oda_alld_cd&idim=country:PAK&dl=en&hl=en&q=trend+of+oda+in+pakistan
Note: Rupee value of external debt for each year computed by applying the corresponding average
annual exchange to the end-June stock.
Sources: i) SBP, ii) DM section, Finance division