Professional Documents
Culture Documents
The report contains the following section: Executive Summary, Option 1: Add new nurses to service
increase number of visits per years, Option 1: Assumption Table, Option 1: Evaluation, Option 2: Do not
add new nurse but replace existing laptop with new tablet to service increase number of visits per years,
Option 2: Assumption Table, Option 2: Evaluation, Recommendation
Contents
Executive Summary .................................................................................... 3
Option 1: Add new nurses to service increase number of visits per years ... 4
Option 1: Assumption Table ........................................................................ 5
Option 1: Evaluation ................................................................................... 6
Option 2: Do not add new nurse but replace existing laptop with new tablet
to service increase number of visits per years ............................................ 7
Option 2: Assumption Table ........................................................................ 8
Option 2: Evaluation ................................................................................... 9
Recommendation...................................................................................... 10
2|Page
Executive Summary
The report contains a present worth analysis of a proposal that is under consideration
by Home Health Care (HHC) which supplies nursing care to the patients at latters
home. Mostly patients are referred to the agency by doctors and hospitals which
transmit information electronically to HHC office. The agency is facing two business
issues. One is the slow growth and the other is requirement to add capacity. Besides,
laptop issued to nurses need replacement as they are nearing their end of economic
life.
The note covers evaluation of two different proposals for as a solution to above
problem:
Do not add capacity. Replace laptop of existing force of 40 nurses with tablets to
Both the proposal has been evaluated based on present worth of incremental cash
of visits per year, incremental operating cost and minimum acceptable rate of return.
Based on evaluation, both proposals are yielding positive NPV. In case of option 1, the
NPV or present worth is $298,488. However, in case of option 2, the NPV or present
worth is $398,491.
Based on NPV or present worth approach, option 2 is more profitable and hence the
3|Page
Option 1: Add new nurses to service increase number of visits per
years
Under this proposal, new nurses are assumed to be added over next three years and
investment required in laptop for such increase staff is considered in year 0. Additional
No change has been assumed in average number of visits per week per nurse.
However it is assumed that every new nurse will be doing same average number of
Average revenue per visit for entire year in case of each nurse is $112.
For every new nurse salary which is considered per year is $95,000. This cost is
Other costs which are considered on a per visit basis are travel cost and supplies which
are $6.50 and $8.00 per visit per year per nurse respectively. In addition, site annual
maintenance contract expense and depreciation expense are considered for the
purpose of evaluation. Depreciation is considered basis 3-year MACRS table. Tax rate
assumed for calculation is 22%. Minimum acceptable rate of return used for calculating
4|Page
Option 1: Assumption Table
Laptop Replacement
Year 0 Year 3
Investment Depreciable
Replacement Laptops ( to be spend in Yr
$1,000
0) each nurse yes
Laptop Conversion $5,000 total cost Yes
Nurse Training
Staff Training
Office Staffing
Added staff 0 0 0 0
Staff Salary incl. benefits
Revenue
Average revenue per visit $112.00 all years
Cost per visit
Travel cost $6.50 per visit all years
Cloud Processing cost $0.00 per visit all years
Supplies $8.00 per visit all years
Annual Expenses
Tablet Software Licenses $0.00 annually per nurse all years
Site Office software $0.00 annually- all all years
Site Maintenance contract $45,000.00 annually- all all years
Wireless contract $0.00 Monthly per nurse all years
Other
Present Laptops Book Value $0.00 each
Time horizon 3 Years
Tax Rate 22%
MARR 14%
MACRS 3 years
5|Page
Option 1: Evaluation
Year Cost per visit per year 0 1 2 3 4
Change in # of Nurses 15
Replacement capex per nurse $1,000
Laptop Replacement capex $15,000
Laptop Conversion cost $5,000
Total Capex ($20,000)
Revenue
Additional visits of patients per year 4,320 7,200 10,080 -
Avg revenue per visit per year $112.00
Yearly incremental revenue $483,840 $806,400 $1,128,960 $0
Costs
Travel cost per visit per year $6.50
Cloud processing cost per visit per year $0.00
Supplies per visit per year $8.00
Total per visit cost per year $14.50
6|Page
Option 2: Do not add new nurse but replace existing laptop with new
tablet to service increase number of visits per years
Under this proposal, existing laptop is replaced with efficient tablet so as to increase the
per visit capability of each nurse within the existing force of 40 nurses. No new nurses
under this option are considered for evaluation. Additional cost is considered for
conversion of database for alignment with tablet in year 0. Further initial cost on training
Under this option change has been assumed in average number of visits per week per
nurse. Only incremental number of visits per week per nurse has been considered for
evaluation. Average revenue per visit for entire year in case of each nurse is $112.
Since no new nurses are added under this option no incremental cost has been
assumed on nurse salary. However, since 1 extra staff is required, incremental salary
Other costs which are considered on a per visit basis are travel cost, cloud processing
cost and supplies which are $6.50, $3.00 and $8.00 per visit per year per nurse per
year. In addition, tablet software license fee has been assumed at $50 per nurse per
year. Further, site office software annual cost at $40,000 per year has been also been
considered. Also wireless annual contract charges of $500 per month per nurse have
also been considered. Lastly, annual site maintenance contract expense and
considered basis 3-year MACRS table. Tax rate assumed for calculation is 22%.
Minimum acceptable rate of return used for calculating NPV or present worth is 14%.
7|Page
Option 2: Assumption Table
Tablet Proposal
Year 0 Year 3
Investment Depreciable
Replacement Tablets $750.00 each nurse Yes
Database Conversion $30,000.00 total cost Yes
Nurse Training $500.00 each nurse No
Staff Training $10,000.00 total cost No
Office Staffing
Added staff 1 1 1
Staff Salary incl. benefits $60,000 $60,000 $60,000 $60,000
Revenue
Average revenue per visit $112.00 all years
Cost per visit
Travel cost $6.50 per visit all years
Cloud Processing cost $3.00 per visit all years
Supplies $8.00 per visit all years
Annual Expenses
Tablet Software Licenses $50.00 annually per nurse all years
Site Office software $40,000.00 annually- all all years
Site Maintenance contract $35,000.00 annually- all all years
Wireless contract $500.00 Monthly per nurse all years
Other
Present Laptops Book Value $0.00 each
Time horizon 3 Years
Tax Rate 22%
MARR 14%
MACRS 3 years
8|Page
Option 2: Evaluation
Year Cost per visit per year 0 1 2 3 4
Existing force of nurses 40
Tablet capex per nurse $750
Laptop Replacement capex $30,000
Database conversion $30,000
Equipment Capex ($60,000)
Nurse Training $20,000
Staff Training $10,000
Training Capex ($30,000)
Total Capex ($90,000)
Revenue
Additional visits of patients per year 3,840 7,680 9,600 -
Avg revenue per visit per year $112.00
Yearly incremental revenue $430,080 $860,160 $1,075,200 $0
Costs
Travel cost per visit per year $6.50
Cloud processing cost per visit per year $3.00
Supplies per visit per year $8.00
Total per visit cost per year $17.50
Tablet Software License (Annual cost per nurse) $50
Wireless contract (monthly cost per nurse) $500.00
9|Page
Recommendation
Based on above evaluation, NPV / Present worth or IRR is higher in case of Option 2.
NPV / Present worth in case of Option 1 is $298,488 and IRR is 434.85%. In case of
Option 2, NPV / Present worth is $398,491 and IRR is 123.39%.
Basis IRR, both options are feasible and make economic sense as IRR under both
options is significantly higher than MARR of 10% (higher is case of Option 1). Hence,
NPV is the best metric for arriving at final decision. Since NPV is higher in case of
Option 2, hence Option 2 is profitable and should be chosen.
10 | P a g e