Professional Documents
Culture Documents
PROJECT REPORT
Submitted by
PAUL JOSE
REG. NO.098001155027
BONAFIDE
BONAFIDE CERTIFICATE
SRI VENKATESWARA COLLEGE OF COMPUTER APPLICATIONS AND
MANAGEMENT
DEPARTMENT OF MANAGEMENT
PROJECT WORK
JUNE 2011
This is to certify that the project entitled
A STUDY ON CAPITAL STRUCTURE OF FEDERAL BANK, ALUVA
is the bonafide record of project work done by
PAUL JOSE
Register No: 098001155027
of MBA during the year 2009-2011.
___________________
___________________
Project Guide
________________
(Internal Examiner)
________________
(External Examiner
DECLARATION
DECLARATION
I affirm that the internship training report titled A STUDY ON CAPITAL
STRUCTURE OF FEDERAL BANK -ALUVA being submitted in partial
fulfillment for the award of MASTER OF BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION
is the original work carried out by me. It has not formed the part of any other
project work submitted for award of any degree or diploma, either in this or any
other university.
ACKNOLEDGEMENT
ACKNOWLEDGMENT
COLLEGE
OF
COMPUTER
APPLICATIONS
AND
PAUL JOSE
ABSTRACT
ABSTRACT
The project was done at FEDERAL BANK LIMITED.It is a leading private sector bank in
India. Provide financial service to the public at conveniently .
The project A STUDY ON NCAPITAL STRUCTURE OF FEDERAL BANK. The main
purpose of doing this project is to find out the strength of capital structure of federal bank. I have
done the project in Federal Bank Limited Aluva
The research done through the 5 years of annual report of the company and using the internet
and books.
The recommendations were purely based on what was derived from the study . The study
will help the company to know about the financial position as well as myself. The recommendations
are noted by the company
CONTENTS
CONTENTS
CHAPTER
NO
DESCRIPTION
PAGE NO
ABSTRACT
LIST OF TABLES
II
LIST OF CHARTS
III
INTRODUCTION
1.1. INTRODUCTON
INDUSTRY PROFILE
COMPANY PROFILE
25
REVIEW LITERATURE
33
76
78
LIST OF TABLES
LIST OF TABLES
TABLE NO
PARTICULERS
PAGE NO
3.1
31
4.1
40
4.2
PROFITABILITY RATIOS
54
4.3
55
4.4
55
4.5
OTHER RATIOS
56
4.6
57
4.7
58
4.8
RETURN ON EQUITY
59
4.9
60
4.10
OPERATING RATIO
61
4.11
62
4.12
63
4.13
COST TO INCOME
64
4.14
65
4.15
66
4.16
CAPITALIZATION RATIO
67
4.17
68
4.18
69
4.19
70
4.20
PAYOUT RATIO
71
4.21
BOOK VALUE
72
4.22
PROPRIETORY RATIO
73
4.23
74
LIST OF CHARTS
LIST OF CHARTS
CHART NO
PARTICULERS
PAGE NO
4.1
42
4.2
57
4.3
58
4.4
RETURN ON EQUITY
59
4.5
60
4.6
OPERATING RATIO
61
4.7
62
4.8
63
4.9
COST TO INCOME
64
4.10
66
4.11
66
4.12
CAPITALIZATION RATIO
68
4.13
69
4.14
70
4.15
71
4.16
PAYOUT RATIO
72
4.17
BOOK VALUE
73
4.18
PROPRIETORY RATIO
74
4.19
75
CHAPTER 1
INTRODUCTION
CHAPTER 1
1.1
INTRODUCTION
A firm communicates financial information to the users through
financial statement and reports. The financial statements contain summarized information
of the firms financial affairs .The amount of information contained in a co-operative
financial statement is voluminous spanning the co-operatives internal operations, its
relationship with the outside world and its relationship with its members. To be useful,
this information must be organized into an understandable, coherent and sufficiently
limited set of data.Analysis and Interpretation of Financial Statements can be beneficial
in this respect because it highlights a firms strengths and weakness. Financial statements
provide certain basic information that focus on the entity as a whole and meet the
common needs of external users. Three main financial statements are required from
businesses:
Ratio analysis is one of the important tools of analyzing the Capital Structure
Ratio analysis may be defined as the process of computing and interpreting the
relationship between items of financial statement for arriving at conclusion about
financial position and performance of an enterprise Therefore I have selected the title of
the project as capital structure of federal bank
Ratio analysis is a tool for financial statement analysis which helps the management to
measure the financial position and capital structure of the company
1.9
DATA COLLECTION
The data collected only for a period of 5years and this is not enough for making a
detailed analysis.
CHAPTER 2
INDUSTRY PROFILE
History
Indian merchants in Calcutta established the Union Bank in 1839, but it failed in
1848 as a consequence of the economic crisis of 1848-49. The Allahabad Bank,
established in 1865 and still functioning today, is the oldest Joint Stock bank in India; it
was not the first though, that honor belongs to the Bank of Upper India, which was
established in 1863, and which survived until 1913, when it failed, with some of its assets
and liabilities being transferred to the Alliance Bank of Simla.
When the American Civil War stopped the supply of cotton to Lancashire from
the Confederate States, promoters opened banks to finance trading in Indian cotton. With
large exposure to speculative ventures, most of the banks opened in India during that
period failed. The depositors lost money and lost interest in keeping deposits with banks.
Subsequently, banking in India remained the exclusive domain of Europeans for next
several decades until the beginning of the 20th century.
Foreign banks too started to arrive, particularly in Calcutta, in the 1860s. The
Comptoire d'Escompte de Paris opened a branch in Calcutta in 1860, and another in
Bombay in 1862; branches in Madras and Puducherry, then a French colony, followed.
HSBC Established itself in Bengal in 1869. Calcutta was the most active trading port in
India, mainly due to the trade of the British Empire, and so became a banking centre.
The first entirely Indian joint stock bank was the Oudh Commercial Bank,
established in 1881 in Faizabad. It failed in 1958. The next was the Punjab National
Bank, established in Lahore in 1895, which has survived to the present and is now one of
the largest banks in India.
Around the turn of the 20th Century, the Indian economy was passing through a
relative period of stability. Around five decades had elapsed since the Indian Mutiny, and
the social, industrial and other infrastructure had improved. Indians had established small
banks, most of which served particular ethnic and religious communities.
The presidency banks dominated banking in India but there were also some
exchange banks and a number of Indian joint stock banks. All these banks operated in
different segments of the economy. The exchange banks, mostly owned by Europeans,
concentrated on financing foreign trade. Indian joint stock banks were generally
undercapitalized and lacked the experience and maturity to compete with the presidency
and exchange banks. This segmentation let Lord Curzon to observe, "In respect of
banking it seems we are behind the times. We are like some old fashioned sailing ship,
The period between 1906 and 1911, saw the establishment of banks inspired by
the Swadeshi movement. The Swadeshi movement inspired local businessmen and
political figures to found banks of and for the Indian community. A number of banks
established then have survived to the present such as Bank of India, Corporation Bank,
Indian Bank, Bank of Baroda, Canara Bank and Central Bank of India.
During the First World War (1914-1918) through the end of the Second World
War (1939-1945), and two years thereafter until the independence of India were
challenging for Indian banking. The years of the First World War were turbulent, and it
took its toll with banks simply collapsing despite the Indian economy gaining indirect
boost due to war-related economic activities. At least 94 banks in India failed between
1913 and 1918 as indicated in the following table:
Post-Independence
economy. This resulted into greater involvement of the state in different segments of the
economy including banking and finance. The major steps to regulate banking included:
The Reserve Bank of India, India's central banking authority, was nationalized on
January 1, 1949 under the terms of the Reserve Bank of India (Transfer to Public
Ownership) Act, 1948 (RBI, 2005b).[Reference www.rbi.org.in]
In 1949, the Banking Regulation Act was enacted which empowered the Reserve
Bank of India (RBI) "to regulate, control, and inspect the banks in India."
The Banking Regulation Act also provided that no new bank or branch of an
existing bank could be opened without a license from the RBI, and no two banks
could have common directors.
Nationalization
Thereafter, her move was swift and sudden. The Government of India issued
an ordinance and nationalized the 14 largest commercial banks with effect from the
midnight of July 19, 1969. Jayaprakash Narayan, a national leader of India, described the
step as a "masterstroke of political sagacity." Within two weeks of the issue of the
ordinance, the Parliament passed the Banking Companies (Acquisition and Transfer of
Undertaking) Bill, and it received the presidential approval on 9 August 1969.
Liberalization
The next stage for the Indian banking has been set up with the proposed
relaxation in the norms for Foreign Direct Investment, where all Foreign Investors in
banks may be given voting rights which could exceed the present cap of 10%,at present it
has gone up to 74% with some restrictions.
The new policy shook the Banking sector in India completely. Bankers, till
this time, were used to the 4-6-4 method (Borrow at 4%; Lend at 6%; Go home at 4) of
functioning. The new wave ushered in a modern outlook and tech-savvy methods of
working for traditional banks. All this led to the retail boom in India. People not just
demanded more from their banks but also received more.
With the growth in the Indian economy expected to be strong for quite some
time-especially in its services sector-the demand for banking services, especially retail
banking, mortgages and investment services are expected to be strong. One may also
expect M&As, takeovers, and asset sales.
RBI announced norms in 2005 that any stake exceeding 5% in the private sector banks
would need to be vetted by them.
In recent years critics have charged that the non-government owned banks
are too aggressive in their loan recovery efforts in connection with housing, vehicle and
personal loans. There are press reports that the banks' loan recovery efforts have driven
defaulting borrowers to suicide.
B) Lending:
Another function of commercial banks is to make loans and advance out of the deposit
receive in various forms. Bank Apply the accumulated public deposits to productive uses
by way of loans and advances, overdraft and cash credits against approved securiti es.
C) Investment:
Now a days commercial banks are also involved in Investment. Generally investment
means long term and medium term investments.
It is a commercial institution
Branches
ATMs
Easy Deposits
Call Centers.
Internet Banking
Mobile Banking
On the liability side, there is likely to be large additions to capital base and reserves. As
the reliance on borrowed funds increases, the pace of deposit growth may slow down.
On the asset side, the pace of growth in both advances and investments is forecast to
weaken.
Consolidation
On the growing influence of globalisation on the Indian banking industry, the
report is of the opinion that the financial sector would be opened up for greater
international competition under WTO. Opening up of the financial sector from 2005,
under WTO, would see a number of global banks taking large stakes and control over
banking entities in the country.
They are expected to bring with them capital, technology, and management skills
which would increase the competitive spirit in the system leading to greater efficiency.
Government policy to allow greater FDI in banking and the move to amend Banking
regulations Act to remove the existing 10 per cent cap on voting rights of shareholders are
pointer to these developments, says the report.
The pressure on banks to gear up to meet stringent prudential capital adequacy
norms under Basel II and the various Free Trade Agreements that India is entering into
with other countries, such as Singapore, will also impact on globaliz ation of Indian
banking.
However, according to the report, the flow need not be one way. Some of the
Indian banks may also emerge global players. As globalisation opens up opportunities for
Indian corporate entities to expand their business overseas, banks in India wanting to
increase their international presence could naturally be expected to follow these corporate
entities and other trade flows out of India.
Alongside, the growing pressure on capital structure of banks is expected to trigger
a phase of consolidation in the banking industry. In the past mergers were initiated by
regulators to protect the interest of depositors of weak banks. In recent years, there have
been a number of market-led mergers between private banks.
This process is expected to gain momentum in the coming years, says the report.
Mergers between public sector banks or public sector banks and private banks could be
the next logical development, the report adds. Consolidation could also take place th rough
strategic alliances or partnerships covering specific areas of business such as credit cards,
insurance etc.
Risk and reward
The ability to gauge the risks and take appropriate position will be the key to
successful banking in the emerging scenario. Risk-takers will survive, effective
risk managers will prosper and risk-averse are likely to perish, the report asserts.
In this context, the report makes a very pertinent recommendation that risk
management has to trickle down from the corporate office to branches.
The report also talks of the need for banks to deal with issues relating to
`reputational risk' to maintain a high degree of public confidence for raising
capital and other resources.
Technology
Technological developments would render flow of information and data faster
leading to faster appraisal and decision-making. This would enable banks to make credit
management more effective, besides leading to an appreciable reduction in transaction
cost.
To reduce investment costs in technology, banks are likely to resort more and
more to sharing facilities such as ATM networks, the report says. Banks and financial
institutions will join together to share facilities in the areas of payment and settlement,
back-office processing, date warehousing, and so on.
The advent of new technologies could see the emergence of new players doing
financial intermediation. For example, according to the report, we could see utility service
providers offering, say, bill payment services or supermarkets or retailers doing basic
lending operations. The conventional definition of banking might undergo changes.
Social banking
All these developments need not mean banks will give the go-by to social banking. Rather
than being seen as directed lending such lending would be business driven, the report
predicts. Rural market comprises 74 per cent of the population, 41 per cent of the middle class, and 58 per cent of disposable income.
Consumer growth is taking place at a fast pace in 17,000-odd villages with a population
of more than 5,000. Of these, more than 50 per cent are concentrated in just seven states.
Small-scale industries would remain important for banks.
However, instead of the narrow definition of SSI based on the investment in fixed assets,
the focus may shift to small and medium enterprises (SMEs) as a group. Changes could
be expected in the delivery channel for small borrowers, agriculturists and unorganized
sectors also.
2.6. CHALLENGES WITH IN BANKING INDUSTRY
Regulation
The expected integration of various intermediaries in the financial system would
require a strong regulatory framework, the report states. It would also require a number of
legislative changes to enable the banking system to remain contemporary and
competitive. Underscoring that there would be an increased need for self-regulation, the
report states that development of best practices could evolve better through self regulation rather than based on regulatory prescriptions.
For instance, to enlist the confidence of the global investors and international
market players, the banks will have to adopt the best global practices of financial
accounting and reporting. It is expected that banks would migrate to global accounting
standards smoothly, although it would mean greater disclosure and tighter norms, the
report adds.
Notwithstanding the limited time ahead, the expectations, suggestions and
recommendations of the Banking Industry Vision report are well within the realm of
realisation in part or whole. The first phase of banking reforms was born out of panic.
The second phase can be implemented from a position of strength and confidence in a
compressed time-frame.
Deregulation: This continuous deregulation has made the Banking market extremely
competitive with greater autonomy, operational flexibility and decontrolled interest rate
and liberalized norms for foreign exchange. The deregulation of the industry coupled with
decontrol in interest rates has led to entry of a number of players in the banking industry.
At the same time reduced corporate credit off take thanks to sluggish economy has
resulted in large number of competitors batting for the same pie.
New rules: As a result, the market place has been redefined with new rules of the game.
Banks are transforming to universal banking, adding new channels with lucrative pricing
and freebees to offer. Natural fall out of this has led to a series of innovative product
offerings catering to various customer segments, specifically retail credit
.
Efficiency: This in turn has made it necessary to look for efficiencies in the business.
Banks need to access low cost funds and simultaneously improve the efficiency. Thebans
are facing pricing pressure, squeeze on spread and have to give thrust on retail assets.
Diffused Customer loyalty: This will definitely impact Customer preferences, as they
are bound to react to the value added offerings. Customers have become demanding and
the loyalties are diffused. There are multiple choices, the wallet share is reduced per bank
with demand on flexibility and customization. Given the relatively low switching
delivery.
Misaligned mindset: These changes are creating challenges, as employees are made to
adapt to changing conditions. There is resistance to change from employees and the Seller
market mindset is yet to be changed coupled with Fear of uncertainty and Control
orientation. Acceptance of technology is slowly creeping in but the utilization is not
maximized.
Competency Gap: Placing the right skill at the right place will determine success. The
competency gap needs to be addressed simultaneously otherwise there will be missed
opportunities. The focus of people will be on doing work but not providing solutions, on
escalating problems rather than solving them and on disposing customers instead of using
the opportunity to cross sell.
The first bank in India, though conservative, was established in 1786. From
1786 till today, the journey of Indian Banking System can be segregated into three
distinct phases. They are as mentioned below:
New phase of Indian Banking System with the advent of Indian Financial &
Banking Sector Reforms after 1991.
To make this write-up more explanatory, I prefix the scenario as Phase I, Phase II and
PhaseIII.
Phase1
The General Bank of India was set up in the year 1786. Next came Bank of
Hindustan and Bengal Bank. The East India Company established Bank of Bengal (1809),
Bank of Bombay (1840) and Bank of Madras (1843) as independent units and called it
Presidency Banks. These three banks were amalgamated in 1920 and Imperial Bank of
India was established which started as private shareholders banks, mostly Europeans
shareholders.
In 1865 Allahabad Bank was established and first time exclusively by
Indians, Punjab National Bank Ltd. was set up in 1894 with headquarters at Lahore.
Between 1906 and 1913, Bank of India, Central Bank of India, Bank of Baroda, Canada
Bank, Indian Bank, and Bank of Mysore were set up. Reserve Bank of India came in
1935.
During the first phase the growth was very slow and banks also
experienced periodic failures between 1913 and 1948. There were approximately 1100
banks, mostly small. To streamline the functioning and activities of commercial banks,
the Government of India came up with The Banking Companies Act, 1949 which was
later changed to Banking Regulation Act 1949 as per amending Act of 1965 (Act No. 23
of 1965). Reserve Bank of India was vested with extensive powers for the supervision of
banking in india as the Central Banking Authority
.During those days public has lesser confidence in the banks. As an
aftermath deposit mobilization was slow. Abreast of it the savings bank facili ty provided
by the Postal department was comparatively safer. Moreover, funds were largely given to
traders
PhaseII
Government took major steps in this Indian Banking Sector Reform after
independence. In 1955, it nationalised Imperial Bank of India with extensive banking
facilities on a large scale especially in rural and semi-urban areas. It formed State Bank of
India to act as the principal agent of RBI and to handle banking transactions of the Union
and State Governments all over the country.
Seven banks forming subsidiary of State Bank of India was nationalised in 1960
on 19th July, 1969, major process of nationalisation was carried out. It was the effort of
the then Prime Minister of India, Mrs. Indira Gandhi. 14 major commercial banks in the
country was nationalised.
Second
phase
of
nationalisation
Indian Banking Sector Reform was carried out in 1980 with seven more banks. This step
brought 80% of the banking segment in India under Governmen ownership.
The following are the steps taken by the Government of India to Regulate
Banking Institutions in the Country:
offer
economical
lending
and
borrowing.
in
the
state
following
the
nationalisation
of
the
banks
in
1969.
The State Bank of India (S.B.I.), Canara Bank and Syndicate Bank are the principal
nationalized banks. The State Bank of India offers around 228 branches and the Syndicate
Bank
has
115
branches
in
the
fourteen
districts
of
Kerala.
Apart from these commercial banks like Vijaya Bank, Dhanlakshmi Bank and the Federal
Bank also offer commendable finance and banking facilities. Dhanalakshmi Bank offers
112 branches in the state. The Grameen Banks like SMGB and NMGB provide loans at
low interest rates, special, subsidized lands and relief facilities to the lo cal farmers and
plays
great
role
in
enhancing
the
agrarian
productivity
of
the
state.
44 PCARDBs
49 Commercial Banks
1StateCooperativeBank
All these banks altogether had 3813 branches in the rural as well as the urban
areas and among them 2956 branches belonged to the Commercial Banks. Besides, there
are also 1593 Primary Agriculture Credits Co-operatives in Kerala. The commercial
banks of Kerala have also witnessed an increased flow of non-resident deposits toward
the end of 2005. Kerala is done experiencing better growth of economy in the banking
sector. Besides the banks, the other financial institutions which give a boost to the
economy of Kerala are
Government Institutions
CHAPTER 3
COMPANY PROFILE
CHAPTER-3
3.1. COMPANY PROFILE
History:
The history of Federal Bank dates back to the pre-independence era. Though initially it
was known as the Travancore Federal Bank, it gradually transformed into a full -fledged
bank under the able leadership of its Founder, Mr. K P Hormis. The name Federal Bank
Limited was officially announced in the year 1947 with its headquarters nestled on the
banks on the river Periyar. Since then there has been no looking back and the bank has
become one of the strongest and most stable banks in the country
The Federal Bank Limited (FBL) (the erstwhile
Travancore Federal Bank Limited) was incorporated with an authorised capital of rupees
five thousand at Nedumpuram, a place near Tiruvalla in Central Travancore in 28th April
of the year 1931 under the Travancore Company's Act. Shri K.P.Hormis founded the
Bank. It started business of auction -chitty and other banking transactions connected with
agriculture and industry. The bank though successful in the earlier periods, suffered
setbacks and was on the verge of liquidation. As a largest traditional private sector bank
in the country, FBL nurtured for more than seven decades, gaining the reputation of being
an agile, technology savvy and customer friendly bank and mostly built wide network of
branches, reaching out to cover all the major cities of the country.
In 18th May of the year 1945, the registered office of the Bank was shifted to
Aluva and the Bank commenced business by opening of its first branch at Aluva. The
Bank opened its second branch at Angamally during the year 1946. As of 24th March of
the year 1947, it was resolved to change the name of the Bank as 'The Federal Bank
Limited' and in the same year the third branch of the Bank was opened at Perumbavoor in
the moth of April. The Bank was licensed under Sec.22 of the Banking Companies Act,
1949 in 11th of July of the year 1959. FBL had floated several kuries one after another.
It also introduced several new deposit schemes
during the same period. The Bank embarked for a massive takeover bids during the year
1964, which accelerated its growth horizontally and vertically. In that process it took over
the assets and liabilities of the Chalakudy Public Bank Ltd, The Cochin Union Bank Ltd
and The Alleppey Bank Ltd. The St.George Union Bank Ltd was merged with the Bank in
the year 1965 and in the year 1968, The Marthandom Commercial Bank Ltd was
amalgamated with the FBL. During the year 1970, The Bank became a Scheduled
Commercial Bank, which also coincided with the Silver Jubilee Year, since the Bank
commenced its operation in Aluva. Witnessed expansion beyond the home state during
the year 1972. The Bank became an Authorised Dealer in Foreign Exchange and the
International Banking Department of the bank was started functioning from Mumbai in
the year 1973. The sustainable growth of the bank was survived during the year 1975 and
1976. In 1975, the Bank opened 53 branches and in 1976 it opened 42 branches.
The International Banking Department of the bank was
shifted to Cochin in the year 1982 as part of consolidation and centralisation of activities.
As part of the organisation redesigning recommended by National Institute of Bank
Management (NIBM) in November of the year 1984, the Agricultural Finance
Department was set up in Head Office. After a year, in 1985, in tune with the NIBM
recommendation, Personnel and Industrial Relations Department was set up in July and in
the same year the first Advanced Ledger Posting Machine (ALPM-a Wipro banker) was
installed at Br.Aluva-Bank Junction branch. The administrative building complex of the
bank was inaugurated in the year 1987. During the year 1989, Federal Bank entered into
the Merchant Banking Operations. Tapped the Capital Market with a public issue in
March of the year 1994. The Bank's first ATM was inaugurated at Eranakulam North in
27th February of the year 1997.
During the year 2000, FBL had started its Any Where Banking (ABB) at
Bangalore connecting all branches located in the Bangalore metro, launched Depository
Services in association with NSDL and also the Bank commenced Internet Banking under
the name of 'Fed Net' during April of the same year 2000 with software support from
Infosys Technologies Ltd. Also E-commerce business, The Bank had entered into
marketing pacts with some commercial agencies for its E-commerce business in the same
year. In the year 2001, the bank made a tie up with Escotel Communications to launch
mobile banking services using SMS technology and in the identical year FBL had
launched a new deposit scheme christened as Suraksha' for senior citizens. The bank
became a member of INFINET, the financial network supported by RBI. Full-fledged
systems for the RBI's Negotiated Dealing Systems (NDS) were set up at the Funds &
Investment Branch in Mumbai, enabling online trading in securities from February of the
year 2002. FBL had unveiled the Anywhere Banking in the year 2003 provides the
convenience of doing transactions from 300-plus interconnected branches. The Bank had
obtained the level of 100% interconnectivity among all its branches during the year 2004
and also in the same year FBL had launched an Equity Subscription Scheme, a new retail
product for financing the IPOs and public issue applications of its own customers.
In the identical year of 2004, Federal Bank joined
hands with ICICI Prudential Life Insurance Company Ltd for premium collection through
its branches and introduced new Fed e-Pay services. JRG Securities Ltd had forged
alliance with the Bank in the year 2005 for providing loans for subscribing to initial
public offers (IPOs). The bank has emerged as the first bank in India to offer Real Time
Gross Settlement (RTGS) across all of its branches. The 32 branches of erstwhile Ganesh
Bank of Kurundwad Ltd were successfully integrated to bank's network. Ganesh Bank
was amalgamated with effect from 2nd September of the year 2006. During the period of
2006-07, the bank entered into a joint venture agreement with IDBI Ltd & Fortis
Insurance International N V for incorporating a Life Insurance Company under the name
of IDBI Fortis Life Insurance Company Ltd. During the year 2007-08, FBL had opened
its Representative office at Abu Dhabi, Capital of U.A.E. for the gateway of the bank to
the whole of Middle East and also as an interface between its existing customers of GCC
countries and its Branches /Offices in India. FBL won the Best Core Banking Project
Award 2007' at the Asian Banker IT Implementation Awards 2008. The bank's Joint
Venture life insurance company, in association with IDBI Bank Limited and Fortis
Insurance International N.V. namely IDBI Fortis Life Insurance Company Limited
commenced its operation in March of the years 2008. As of May 2008, the bank has 606
branches, 544 ATMs, 10 extension counters and one satellite office.
3.2 VISION
Become the dominant numero uno bank in Kerala and a leading player in target
markets.
Be the trusted partner of choice for target (SME, Retail, NRI) customers.
Offer innovative yet simple products supported by the state-of-the art technology.
3.3. MISSION:
to deploy most of these technology enabled services at the smaller branches including rural
and semi-urban areas.
3.4. ABOUT OUR FOUNDER
Kulangara Paulo Hormis, educated as a lawyer, began his
career as an Advocate in the Courts of Perumbavoor. But the path breaker soon gravitated
to commercial banking and soon took up the reins of Federal Bank in 1945 as its Chief
Executive. Fired by a passion for institution building Shri Hormis built out of a OneBranch-Small-Time Bank, a nationwide institution of 285 branches in the 34 years that he
remained at the helm. The quintessential banker that he was, a structure for extending
finance to agriculture and the weaker sections of society was laid by him much before
these areas came into national focus.
Accounts departments
ALM department
Inspection department
Legal
Planning department
department
NRI division
MIS division
Treasury department
Vigilance department
Year
No. Of Branches
Deposits
Advances
Capital
1945
0.01
0.10
0.01
1955
0.20
0.15
0.01
1965
16
1.33
0.84
0.05
1975
188
38.12
24.12
0.25
1985
324
356.51
186.16
1.40
1995
355
2790.96
1631.51
14.81
2004
440
13124.34
7700.53
21.76
2005
456
15192.88
8822.59
65.60
2006
506
17878.74
11736.47
85.60
2007
536
21584.44
14899.10
85.60
2008
612
25913.35
18904.66
171.03
2009
669
32192.31
22391.87
171.03
2010
729
36057.95
26950.11
171.03
Depository Services
Credit Cards
CHAPTER 4
REVIEW LITERATURE
REVIEW LITERATURE
4.1. MEANING CAPITAL STRUCTURE
A mix of a company's long-term debt, specific short-term
debt, common equity and preferred equity. The capital structure is how a firm finances its
overall operations and growth by using different sources of funds.
CLARIFYING CAPITAL STRUCTURE AND RELATED TERMINOLOGY
The equity part of the debt-equity relationship is the easiest to
define. In a company's capital structure, equity consists of a company's common and
preferred stock plus retained earnings, which are summed up in the shareholders' equity
account on a balance sheet. This invested capital and debt, generally of the long-term
variety, comprises a company's capitalization, i.e. a permanent type of funding to support
a company's growth and related assets
A discussion of debt is less straightforward. Investment literature
often equates a company's debt with its liabilities. Investors should understand that there
is a difference between operational and debt liabilities - it is the latter that forms the debt
component of a company's capitalization - but that's not the end of the debt story.
Among financial analysts and investment research services, there
is no universal agreement as to what constitutes a debt liability. For many analysts, the
debt component in a company's capitalization is simply a balance sheet's long-term debt.
This definition is too simplistic. Investors should stick to a stricter interpretation of debt
where the debt component of a company's capitalization should consist of the following:
short-term borrowings (notes payable), the current portion of long-term debt, long-term
debt, two-thirds (rule of thumb) of the principal amount of operating leases and
redeemable preferred stock. Using a comprehensive total debt figure is a prudent
analytical tool for stock investors
It's worth noting here that both international and U.S. financial
accounting standards boards are proposing rule changes that would treat operating leases
and pension "projected-benefits" as balance sheet liabilities. The new proposed rules
certainly alert investors to the true nature of these off-balance sheet obligations that have
all the earmarks of debt.,
Financial terms, debt is a good example of the proverbial two-edged
sword. Astute use of leverage (debt) increases the amount of financial resources available
to a company for growth and expansion. The assumption is that management can earn
more on borrowed funds than it pays in interest expense and fees on these funds.
However, as successful as this formula may seem, it does require that a company
maintain a solid record complying with its borrowing committee
4.2. OBJECTIVES OF CAPITAL STRUCTUE ANALYSIS
Evaluate the key structural features of a companys existing and new financial
obligations and their potential effect on the companys financial flexibility, cash flows and credit quality/rating
Identify the key drivers of company and sector performance and the potential
impact on profitability, cash-flow, access to capital, etc. in order to assess a
companys ability to meet its existing obligations and determine the appropriate
funding structure
Consider the degree to which the level of indebtedness might affect liquidity and
the potential impact on business strategy and ability to finance future growth.
Compute the financial leverage index, debt to capital ratio, debt to equity ratio, and
other techniques for analyzing capital structure. Relate capital structure
composition to owner and creditor investment objectives.
so that a firm that is optimizing its overall value will focus on this trade-off when
choosing how much debt and equity to use for financing. Empirically, this theory may
explain differences in D/E ratios between industries, but it doesn't explain differences
within the same industry.
Pecking order theory
Pecking Order theory tries to capture the costs of asymmetric information. It states
that companies prioritize their sources of financing (from internal financing to equity)
according to the law of least effort, or of least resistance, preferring to raise equity as a
financing means of last resort. Hence: internal financing is used first; when that is
depleted, then debt is issued; and when it is no longer sensible to issue any more debt,
equity is issued. This theory maintains that businesses adhere to a hierarchy of financing
sources and prefer internal financing when available, and debt is preferred over equity if
external financing is required (equity would mean issuing shares which meant 'bringing
external ownership' into the company. Thus, the form of debt a firm chooses can act as a
signal of its need for external finance. The pecking order theory is popularized by Myers
(1984) when he argues that equity is a less preferred means to raise capital because when
managers (who are assumed to know better about true condition of the firm than
investors) issue new equity, investors believe that managers think that the firm is
overvalued and managers are taking advantage of this over-valuation. As a result,
investors will place a lower value to the new equity issuance
Trend ratios show the nature and rate of movements in various financial
factors. They provide a horizontal analysis of comparative statements and reflect the
behavior of various items with the passage of time. Trend ratios can be graphically
presented for a better understanding by the management. They are very useful in
predicting the behavior of the various financial factors in future. However, it should be
noted that conclusions should not be drawn on the basis of a single trend. Trends of
related items should be carefully studied, before any meaningful conclusion is arrived
at. Since trends are sometimes significantly affected by externalities, i.e. reasons
extraneous to the organizations, the analyst must give due weightage to such extraneous
factors like government policies, economic conditions, changes in income and its
distribution, etc.
4.6.1. COMPUTATION OF TREND PERCENTAGES:
For calculation of the trend of data shown in the financial
statements, it is necessary to have statements for a number of years, and then proceed
as under:
1) The accounting principles and practices must be followed constantly over the
period for which the analysis is made. This is necessary to maintain consistency
and comparability.
2) Take one of the statements as the base with reference to which all other
statements are to be studied. In selection of the best statement, it should be noted
that it belongs to a normal' year of business activities. Statement relating to an
'abnormal' year should not be selected as base, otherwise the trend calculated will
be meaningless.
the
base
Various time series data formats are supported within the TIME environment.
After downloading TREND to the default directory, sample data file can be found
in c:\Program Files\Toolkit\TREND\Data.
TREND performs the statistical tests on annual time series data. TREND will
convert daily and monthly time series data into an annual time series before
carrying out the statistical testing on the annual time series (see the TREND User
Guide on how you can modify the data file to use TREND for non-annual time
series data). Input data files must be continuous and complete (daily and monthl y
data files must have complete years of records)
Output Data
TREND displays as an output (for all the statistical tests selected by the user):
Critical values of the test statistic for a = 0.01, a = 0.05 and a = 0.1 significance
levels (from statistical table)
Critical values of the test statistic for a = 0.01, a = 0.05 and a = 0.1 significance
levels (from resampling analysis)
(Base as 100)
As at
st
As at
st
As at
st
As at
st
As at
st
31 Mar
31 Mar
31 Mar
31 Mar
31 Mar
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
As at
31
st
Mar
2010
CAPITAL &
LIABILITIES
Capital
Reserves
260.71
100
130.49
130.49
260.71
260.71
100
177.03
215.37
570.84
631.68
142.07
170.56
211.93
687.11
&Surplus
Deposits
100
117.68
Borrowings
100
328.40
414.31
426.00
402.87
Other &
100
125.76
171.54
260.90
219.50
100
122.64
149.16
193.25
230.97
100
176.20
178.67
341.77
100
75.92
124.81
44.98
100
108.15
121.27
238.34
832.04
192.04
provisions
TOTAL
259.65
ASSETS
336.42
321.27
Balances with
banks & money
46.68
141.09
Investments
172.90
208.98
225.11
Advances
100
133.03
168.87
214.28
Fixed assets
100
93.75
100.36
Other assets
100
128.35
143.91
130.35
135.88
TOTAL
100
122.72
149.16
193.25
230.97
Contingent
100
135.56
106.19
109.10
62.17
100
135.70
163.27
254.07
245.43
125.56
242.87
151.41
305.47
156.26
143.64
259.64
78.95
liabilities
Bills for
264.27
collection
INTERPRETATION:
There is a continuous increase in the capitals and liabilities of the bank and also some
assets are increased but some assets are decreased. Trend analysis of the balance sheet is
also helpful to know the increase or decrease of the balance sheet items in the year 2005 to
2010
Graph 4.1
900
800
700
600
500
2005
400
2006
2007
300
2008
2009
2010
200
100
Ratio analysis is an important and age-old technique of financial analysis. The following
are some of the advantages / Benefits of ratio analysis:
4. Problems of price level changes: A change in price level can affect the validity
of ratios calculated for different time periods. In such a case the ratio analysis may
not clearly indicate the trend in solvency and profitability of the company.
CATEGORIES OF RATIOS
Profitability ratios
Operating ratios
1 PROFITABILITY RATIOS
The purpose of study and analysis of profitability ratio are to assess the adequacy
of profiles earned by the company and also to discover whether profitability is increasing or
decreasing. The profitability of the firm is the net result of a large number o f policies and
decisions. The major profitability are as follows:
Earnings per share
The objective of financial management is wealth or value maximization of
a corporate entity. The value is maximized when market price of equity shares is
maximized. The use of objectives of wealth maximization or net present value
maximization has been advocated as an appropriate and operationally feasible criterion
to choose among the alternative financial actions. In practice, the performance of a
corporation is better judged in terms of its earnings per share.
The EPS is one of the important measures of economic performance of a
corporate entity. The flow of capital to the companies under the present imperfect capital
market conditions would be made on the evaluation of EPS.
A higher EPS means better capital productivity. EPS is one of the most
important ratios which measure the net profit earned per share. EPS is one of the major
factors affecting the dividend policy of the firm and the market prices of the company. A
steady growth in EPS year after year indicates a good track of profitability. EPS is
computed by dividing the net profit after tax and dividend to preference share holders. This
avoids confusion and indicates the profit available to the ordinary shareholders on a "per
share basis". This is computed as follows:
Net Profit
-------------------------No. of equity shares
Sales
the funds employed by them. However, this measure is based on the historical net worth
and will be high for old plants and low for new plants.
Net Profit
---------------- x 100
Net worth
The ratio of all operating expenses administration and selling expenses to sales is the
operating ratio. A comparison f the operating ratio would indicate whether the cost content
-------------------------------- x 100
Total asset
2. OPERATING RATIOS
Includes the following ratios:
1. Operating Profit Margin
2. Cost To Income Ratio
Banks operating profit is calculated after deducting administrative expenses, which mainly
include salary cost and network expansion cost. Operating margins are profits earned by
the bank on its total interest income. For some private sector banks the ratio is negative on
account of their large IT and network expansion spending.
Net interest income Operating expenses
----------------------------------------------------------- x100
Total interest income
Controlling overheads are critical for enhancing the banks return on equity. Branch
rationalization and technology up gradation account for a major part of operating expenses
for new generation banks. Even though, these expenses result in higher cost to income
ratio, in long term they help the bank in improving its return on equity. The ratio is
calculated as a proportion of operating profit including non-interest income (fee based
income).
Operating expenses
------------------------------------------------------------ x100
3.
OTHER RATIOS
1. PAT EBT Ratio
2. Financial Leverage Ratio
3. Debt Equity Ratio
4. Payout Ratio
5. Book Value Ratio
6. Proprietary Ratio
7. Price Earnings Ratio
PAT
-------------------------------EBT
Payout Ratio
The size of the payout ratio is often dependent on the growth stage the company
is in. For a young, rapidly growing company, the payout ratio is going to be small (or zero) as
the company keeps most or all of its earnings to reinvest in growing the business. As the
company matures and begins to pay a dividend, the payout ratio increases.
Payout Ratio=
-------------------------------NUMBER OF SHARES
Proprietary Ratio
Proprietary ratio refers to a ratio which helps the creditors of the
company in seeing that their capital or loans which the creditors have given to the
company are safe. Proprietary funds includes equity and preference share capital of the
company and reserves and surplus of the company, while total assets of company includes
both fixed assets and current assets of the company
PROPRIETORS FUND
Proprietary Ratio =
-------------------------------TOTAL ASSET
Profitability Ratios
4.2 Table
Ratios
1. Net Profit
Ratio
Equation
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
(Net profit /
6.42
13.62
13.61
12.65
0.54
1.09
1.17
1.11
1.29
12.44
18.02
9.38
11.60
0.69
1.36
1.59
1.54
5.81
5.94
6.51
13.06
2010
11.05
Total
income)
100
2. Return on
(Net profit /
Total Assets
Total
Ratio
assets) 100
3. Return on
(Net profit /
Equity
Net worth)
19.49
1.05
9.90
100
4. Earnings
Power Ratio
(Profit
2.04
1.99
before tax /
Total
assets) 100
5. Operating
(Operating
Ratio
cost / Total
5.96
6.61
6.72
29.26
27.16
income)
100
1. Earnings per
share (EPS)
Net profit /
No. Of
equity
shares
13.73
32.71
34.20
32.42
Equation
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
2010
Operating profit /
28.54
27.35
29.13
27.29
32.88
30.09
43.94
44.64
39.85
38.54
31.24
34.86
Performance
Total Interest
Margin
Income) 100
2. Cost to Income
Ratio
(Operating
Expenses / Net
Interest Income +
Non Interest
Income) 10
Ratio
1. Credit to
Deposit
Equation
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
(Advances /
58.07
65.64
69.03
72.95
69.54
11.27
13.75
13.43
22.46
20.14
2010
74.74
Deposits) 100
Ratio ( C/D
Ratio)
2. Capital
(Teir1
adequacy
Capital+Teir2
Ratio
Capital / Risk
(CAR)
Weighted
Capital) 100
17.27
OTHER RATIOS
4.5 Table
Ratio
PAT to EBT
Equation
PAT/EBT
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
2010
0.77
0.80
0.74
0.74
0.63
0.54
27.97
23.35
26.68
8.24
8.24
10.91
23.25
16.51
16.70
8.28
8.98
9.31
0.04
0.06
0.06
0.14
0.13
0.12
0.18
0.13
0.1
0.19
0.17
0.18
110.26
181.53
175.49
345.76
273.24
0.06
0.06
0.12
0.11
0.11
6.14
6.75
6.66
4..71
9.83
ratio
Capitalizati
Long
term
on Ratio
Debt/Long term
Debt+owners
equity
Financial
leverage
Ratio
Total Asset/
Total Equity
Debt Equity
Net worth/total
Ratio
Debt
Payout
Dividend per
Ratio
share/Earning
per share
Book Value
Book Value/
Ratio
Number of
shares
Proprietary
Proprietors
Ratio
fund/Total Asset
Price
Current Market
Earnings
Price/Annual
Ratio
Earnings per
Share
0.04
RATIO ANALYSIS
Profitability Ratios
Net profit ratio for the period of 2005-2010
Table 4.6
in thousands
Year
Net Profit
Total Income
2005
900859
14030056
6.42
2006
2252057
16534772
13.62
2007
2927328
21040417
13.61
2008
3680538
29101627
12.65
2009
5004936
38311515
13.06
2010
4645451
42041439
11.05
Graph 4.2
5
0
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
2010
INTERPRETATION:
This ratio helps in determining the efficiency with which the affairs of the
business are being managed. An increase in the ratio from 6.42 to 11.05 indicates
improvement in the operational efficiency of the bank. The ratio is an effective measure to
check the profitability.
in thousands
Year
Net Profit
Total Asset
2005
900859
168209623
0.54
2006
2252057
206429063
1.09
2007
2927328
250899325
1.17
2008
3680538
325064570
1.11
2009
5004936
388508646
1.29
2010
4645451
436756051
1.05
Graph 4.3
INTERPRETATION:
The graph shows the upward trend of Return on total assets. The return on total asset was
increasing from 0.54 in the year 2005 to 1.05 in the year 2010
in thousands
year
Net Profit
Net Worth
2005
900859
7233484
12.45
2006
2252057
12499873
18.02
2007
2927328
15022078
19.49
2008
3680538
39256972
9.38
2009
5004936
43258758
11.60
2010
4645451
46904485
9.90
Graph 4.4
0
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
2010
INTERPRETATION:
The graph shows the upward trend of return on equity. ROE was decreasing from 12.45 in the
year 2005 to 9.90 in the year 2010. Return on equity is the indicate profitability from the
point of view of equity share holders
Earning power ratio for the period of 2005-2010
Table 4.9
in thousands
year
EBT
Total Asset
2005
1160727
168209623
0.69
2006
2807661
206429063
1.36
2007
3982274
250899325
1.59
2008
5001549
325064570
1.54
2009
7930095
388508646
2.04
2010
8595420
436756051
1.99
Graph 4.5
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
2010
INTERPRETATION:
The graph shows the upward trend of earning power ratio. Earning power ratio was
increasing from 0.69 in the year 2005 to 1.99 in the year 2010
Operating Ratio for the period of 2005-2010
Table 4.10
in thousands
Operating cost(Interest
year
Total Income
Operating Ratio
expepended+Operating expenses)
2005
10026138
14030056
71.45
2006
12012981
16534772
72.65
2007
14910589
21040417
70.86
2008
21160435
29101627
72.71
2009
25713795
38311515
67.11
2010
29392967
42041439
69.91
Graph 4.6
Operating Ratio
74
72
70
Operating Ratio
68
66
64
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
2010
INTERPRETATION:
The operating ratio indicates the operational efficiency of the bank. The lowest operating
ratio was in the year 2006 and highest ratio was in the year 2010The graph shows that there
is a decrease in the operating ratio from 5.96 in the year 2005 to 6.72in the year 2010.
Earnings per share (EPS) for the period of 2005-2010
Table 4.11
year
in thousands
Net Profit
2005
900859
65602
13.73
2006
2252057
68857
32.71
2007
2927328
85603
34.20
2008
3680538
113539
32.42
2009
5004936
171033
29.26
2010
4645451
171033
27.16
Graph 4.7
15
10
5
0
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
2010
INTERPRETATION:
This helps in determining the market price of equity shares of the company and in
estimating the companys capacity to pay dividend to its equity share holders. EPS was
increased 34.19 in the year 2007 and it declined to 21.52 in the year 2008
OPERATING PERFORMANCE RATIOS
OPERATING PROFIT MARGIN FOR THE PERIOD OF 2005-2010
Table 4.12
in thousands
year
Operating profit
Total Income
2005
4003918
14030056
28.54
2006
4521791
16534772
27.35
2007
6129828
21040417
29.13
2008
7941192
29101627
27.29
2009
12597720
38311515
32.88
2010
12648472
42041439
30.09
Graph 4.8
Operating Margin
10
0
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
2010
INTERPRETATION:
Operating profit margin was increasing from (2005) to (2007).But in the next year
decreased, the next year the result was a shocking one, then it maintained It shows the bank
was able to maintain a healthy operating margin and will be able to pay for its fixed cost.
Cost to Income Ratio for the period of 2005-2010
Table 4.13
in thousands
Operating
Cost
Expenses
Ratio
2005
3138624
7142548
43.94
2006
3645693
8167483
44.64
2007
4061006
10190770
39.85
2008
4866186
12627285
38.54
2009
5714557
18312353
31.24
2010
6768937
19417376
34.86
year
to
Income
Graph.4.9
20
0
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
2010
INTERPRETATION:
The cost to income ration indicates the changes in the cost/asset
ratio and in interest margin. It is useful to measure how costs are changing compared to
income - for example, if a bank's interest income is rising but costs are rising at a higher
rate looking at changes in this ratio will highlight the fact. The highest cost to income
ratio was in the year 2006 and the lowest cost to income ratio was in the year 2009
indicating a downward trend of cost to income ratio In 2010 it gone up at minimum
Specially for banking sector Ratios
Credit to Deposit Ratio for the period of 2005-2010
Table 4.14
in thousands
Year
Credit
to
Deposit Ratio
Advance
Deposit
2005
88225905
151928796 58.07
2006
2007
2008
2009
2010
Graph.4.10
30
20
10
0
2005
2006
2007
INTERPRETATION:
2008
2009
2010
banks from the deposits received..The ratio indicates that the proportion of loan assets
created by banks from the deposits received had an increasing trend in the all the financial
year under consideration.
Capital adequacy Ratio (CAR) Ratio for the period of 2005-2010
Table.4.15
year
2005
11.27
2006
13.75
2007
13.43
2008
22.46
2009
20.14
2010
17.27
Graph 4.11
0
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
2010
INTERPRETATION:A bank's capital ratio is the ratio of qualifying capital to risk adjusted
(or weighted) assets. It is expressed as a percentage of a bank's risk weighted credit
exposures. This ratio is also known as capital to risk weighted assets ratio. The ratio was
increasing from 2005 to 2008. The next years bank gone through some trouble situations, but
in 2011 records we can see the developments it indicates that the bank will be able to absorb
a reasonable amount of losses in the event of operating losses and winding up.
Other Ratios
Capitalization Ratio for the period of 2005-2010
Table.4.16
year
in thousands
Capitalization Ratio
Equity
2005
2809400
10042884
27.97
2006
3809900
16309773
23.35
2007
5467400
20489478
26.68
2008
3527900
42784872
8.24
2009
3889300
47148058
8..24
2010
5744700
52649185
10.91
Graph .4.12
Capitalization Ratio
30
20
Capitalization Ratio
10
0
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
2010
Interpretation
Provides information about the companys ability to absorb asset reductions
arising from losses without jeopardizing the interest of creditors. Here the capitalization ratio
we can see the changes directly
Debt Equity Ratio for the period of 2005-2010
Table.4.17
in thousands
year
Net worth
Debt
2005
7233484
153787800
0.04
2006
12499873
184892319
0.06
2007
15022078
223546479
0.06
2008
39256972
267053077
0.14
2009
43258758
329471266
0.13
2010
46904485
376047072
0.12
Graph.4.13
0.05
0
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
2010
Interpretation
This ratio summarizes the capital structure of a business. Companies with high
debt levels will often see high returns on equity, but the risk exists that the high amount of
debt could topple the firm. The ratio will vary by industry so it is difficult to establish one
guideline for an acceptable debt level
PAT to EBT Ratio for the period of 2005-2010
Table 4.18
year
in thousands
PAT
EBT
PAT to EBT
Ratio
2005
900859
1160727
0.77
2006
2252057
2807661
0.80
2007
2927328
3982274
0.74
2008
3680538
5001549
0.74
2009
5004936
7930095
0.63
2010
4645451
8595420
0.54
Table 4.14
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
2010
Interpretation
Profit after Tax to Earnings before Tax, this ratio gives the information
about the earnings of the firm. The continuous improvements give the positive sign to the
company
Financial Leverage Ratio for the period of 2005-2010
Table 4.19
in thousands
year
Total Asset
Total Equity
2005
168209623
7233484
23.25
2006
206429063
12499873
16.51
2007
250899325
15022078
16.70
2008
325064570
39256972
8.28
2009
388508646
43258758
8.98
2010
436756051
46904485
9.31
Graph 4.15
10
5
0
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
2010
Interpretation
Provides information about the companys ability to absorb asset reductions arising from
losses without jeopardizing the interest of creditors.
in rupees
Dividends Earnings per share
per share
2005
2.50
13.73
0.18
2006
4.35
32.71
0.13
2007
3.40
34.20
0.10
2008
6.03
32.41
0.19
2009
5.0
29.26
0.17
2010
5.0
27.16
0.18
Graph 4.16
0.05
0
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
2010
Interpretation: The ratio is also dependent on the industry in which the company operates.
Utilities, for instance, don't grow very fast and have relatively large payout ratios. Computer
hardware companies, on the other hand, always need money for research & development and
are reinvesting in themselves, so the payout ratio is quite small.
Book Value Ratio For the Period of 2005-2010
Table 4.21
Year
in thousands
NETWORTH Number of
Shares
2005
7233484
65602
110.26
2006
12499873
68857
181.53
2007
15022078
85603
175.49
2008
39256972
113539
345.76
2009
43258758
171033
252.93
2010
46904485
171033
273.24
Graph 4.17
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
2010
in thousands
Year
Proprietary Ratio
2005
7233484
168209623
0.04
2006
12499873
206429063
0.06
2007
15022078
250899325
0.06
2008
39256972
325064570
0.12
2009
43258758
388508646
0.11
2010
46904485
436756051
0.11
Graph 4.18
Proprietory Ratio
0.12
0.1
0.08
0.06
Proprieory Ratio
0.04
0.02
0
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
2010
Interpretation: It is also known as equity ratio. This ratio establishes the relationship
between shareholders funds to total assets of the firm. The shareholders fund is the sum of
equity share capital, preference share capital, reserves and surpluses. Out of this amount,
accumulated losses should be deducted
in rupees
Current Market
Annual Earnings
Price
per share
2006
201
32.71
6.14
2007
230
34.20
6.75
2008
216
32.41
6.66
2009
138
29.26
4.71
2010
267
27.16
9.83
Graph 4.19
4
2
0
2006
2007
2008
2009
2010
Interpretation: The price-to-earnings ratio of a stock is a measure of the price paid for a
share relative to the annual net income or profit earned by the firm per share. The P/E ratio
can therefore alternatively be calculated by dividing the company's market capitalization by
its total annual earnings. Here 2010 the ratio increased, it gives appositive sign to the
company as well as share holders
CHAPTER 5
FINDINGS AND SUGGESTIONS
5.1. FINDINGS
5.2. SUGGESTIONS
Complaints from the customers should be considered and steps should be taken to
improve the satisfaction of customers
Management should take steps for the timely collection of debtors. Cash discount
should offer to those debtors who make payment in time..
Concerned authority should spend the time to hear the suggestions of their
employees and consider their innovative ideas.
Diversification is the another important tool for success of business (IDBI FEDERAL
Life insurance)
CHAPTER 6
CONCLUSION AND
BIBLIOGRAPHY
6.1. CONCLUSION
The study was conducted at FEDERAL BANK Aluva
(Accounts Department, Federal Towers, and Marine Drive Cochin). The project work
titled Capital Structure of Federal Bank was an attempt to study about capital structure
and to make some recommendations and suggestions for the improvement and
development and smooth functioning of the organization. From the analysis, it is
concluded that Federal Bank limited, has a satisfactory financial performance So that
forecast may be made for future earnings ability to pay interest and debt maturities and
profitability of sound dividend policy.
6.2. BIBLIOGRAPHY
BOOKS
Financial Management-IM Pandey
Management accounting-principles and practice; R.K. Sharma & Shashi K.Gupta
Cost and management accounting; S.P. Jain & K.L.Narang.
Management accounting; J. Made GOWDA
JOURNAL
Annual reports of the bank in the year 2004 to 2009
WEBSITE
www.federalbank.co.in
APPENDIX
BALANCE SHEET
In Crores
Schedule
No.
As at
31st Mar
2004
As at
31st Mar
2005
As at
31st Mar
2006
As at
31st Mar
2007
As at
31st Mar
2008
As at
31st Mar
2009
171.03
CAPITAL&
LIABILITIES
capital
1
21.76
65.60
85.60
85.60
171.0
3
Reserves
&Surplus
627.08
657.75
1164.38
1416.6
0
3754.66
Deposits
13476.68
15192.88
17878.74
21584.44
25913.3
6
Borrowings
126.72
185.90
610.50
770.21
791.9
5
Other &
provisions
862.03
718.83
903.69
1233.08
1875.45
15114.2
7
16820.96
20642.91
25089.93
32506.4
5
4154.84
32198.1
9
748.93
1577.86
38850.8
TOTAL
ASSETS
2214.39
Cash &
balance
Reserve
Bank Of
India
725.89
689.27
1214.58
1231.54
2355.6
9
1222.69
Balances
with banks
& money at
cal and
short notice
565.71
866.62
657.91
1081.60
389.7
9
5521.0
3
5799.16
6272.38
7032.66
10026.6
0
12118.9
Investments
22391.8
Advances
7700.53
8822.59
11736.47
14899.10 18904.66
Fixed assets
10
175.72
185.44
173.87
186.10
232.8
4
Other assets
11
425.39
457.88
587.70
658.93
596.8
7
15114.27
16820.96
20642.91
25089.93
32506.4
5
8519.54
12204.53
16543.57
12960.69
13315.9
3
372.52
321.39
436.12
524.75
816.5
7
7
280.77
622.14
TOTAL
38850.8
Contingent
liabilities
6
7588.28
12
788.81
Bills for
collection
Sched
ule
No.
For the
year
ended
31st Mar
2004
For the
year
ended
31st Mar
2005
For the
Year
ended
31st Mar
2006
For the
year
ended
31sr Mar
2007
1.Income
Interest
earned
13
1192.06
1191.07
1436.52
1817.35
2515.44
3315.37
Other
incomes
TOTAL
2.Expend
iture
14
298.22
211.97
216.94
286.68
394.99
516.73
1490.29
1403.04
1653.48
2104.04
2910.43
3831.39
Interest
expended
15
770.23
688.69
836.66
1084.88
1646.82
1999.24
Operatin
g
expenses
16
282.93
313.90
364.64
406.13
470.51
572.29
300.80
310.29
226.97
320.26
426.08
759.32
6.93
28.51
3359.38
Provision
s and
continge
ncies
Share of
loss
associate
TOTAL
3.PROFI
T /LOSS
1353.97
1312.89
1428.29
1811.28
2550.36
Net profit
for the
year
Add
profit b/f
from
previous
year
136.31
90.15
225.18
292.75
360.06
472.01
-relating to
holding
company
-relating
to
subsidiary
company
2.31
49.19
2.30
13.46
14.45
7.68
21.77
22.71
29.26
27.21
29.27
75.46
138.83
90.8
227.78
306.49
374.81
478.93
4.APPRO
PIATION
Transfer
to
revenue
reserve
Transfer
to
statutory
reserve
Transfer
to capital
reserve
Transfer
to
investme
nt
fluctuatio
n reserve
nil
20.83
100.57
130.21
131.74
34.08
22.53
56.31
73.19
92.02
125.12
13.22
14.17
5.00
15.64
27.68
29.75
64.64
14.64
18.41
Transfer
to
contingen
cies
reserve
Transfer
to special
reserve
Provision
for
proposed
dividend
Provision
for
divided
tax
Balance
carried
over to
balance
sheet
197.25
30.00
9.00
12.00
18.00
18.00
18.00
11.00
15.22
16.44
29.96
34.24
68.41
85.52
1.95
2.30
4.20
5.82
11.63
14.54
71.90
2.59
13.73
14.74
6.92
-14.24
Total
Earnings
per share
Principal
accounti
ng
policies
Notes on
accounts
17
18
19
138.8
3
20.89
90.87
227.78
306.49
374.81
478.93
13.74
32.70
34.20
31.73
27.60