I would assume that decision in payout reduction would result in
giving a better positioning to the company in the long run with regards to the performances & growth strategy. In The decision to reduce payout ratio can also lead to minimize the risk exposure to the market volatility and deregulation. It can also result in excess cash that is beneficial to the growth strategy in terms of being able to conduct acquisitions. It is known that the market had reacted badly to the decision that the stock price fell to 23% this is due to the fact that the utilities market is not normally used to dividend cuts in the event of financial distress; noting that FPL held an inappropriate very high payout ratio.
The Merger & Acquisition Leader's Playbook: A Practical Guide to Integrating Organizations, Executing Strategy, and Driving New Growth after M&A or Private Equity Deals
Finance Secrets of Billion-Dollar Entrepreneurs: Venture Finance Without Venture Capital (Capital Productivity, Business Start Up, Entrepreneurship, Financial Accounting)