Professional Documents
Culture Documents
MANUAL
ON
ROAD SAFETY AUDIT
INDIAN
ROADS CONGRESS
2010
2014
https://archive.org/details/govlawircy2010sp88
IRC:SP:88-2010
MANUAL
ON
ROAD SAFETY AUDIT
Published by
INDIAN
ROADS CONGRESS
Kama
Koti
Marg,
New
Delhi-110 022
NOVEMBER
-2010
Price
(Packing
Rs
& postage
1200/extra)
!RC:SP:88-2010
First
Revision
Reprinted
(All
November, 2010
August, 2013
Rights Reserved.
No
translated or transmitted in
(1000 copies)
New
Deliii
CONTENTS
PERSONNEL OF THE HIGHWAYS SPECIFICATIONS AND
STANDARDS COMMITTEE
INTRODUCTION
GENERAL
Road Safety Situation
1.1
1
.2
Accident Prevention
.3
India
in
Part of
2.1
What
2.2
Quality Assurance
2.3
Where
2.4
2.5
2.6
2.7
Organisations Involved
is
in
is
2.7.1
Role of designer
2.7.2
Role of
2.7.3
Role of auditor
2.9
2.1
2.12
of Projects
should be Audited?
Safety Audit
2.10.2
Size of
2.1 0.3
and
RSA
RSA team
Success Factors
Stage
in
and background
2.10.1
Done
client
What Type
not
2.8
2.1
Done and
training content
IRC:SP:88-2010
3.2
20
3.3
21
3.4
21
3.5
23
3.6
24
3.7
24
in
Different
Stages
of the Project?
3.8
24
Audit of
26
26
4.1.1
4.1.2
Enhancing
team
availability of skilled
27
28
personnel for
4.2
28
4.1.3
4.1.4
Commencement meetings
4.1.5
29
4.1.6
30
4.1.7
30
4.1.8
32
4.1.9
Responding
32
4.1.10
32
Audit of Existing
Roadway Sections
Road
4.2.2
Classified
4.2.3
Speed surveys
4.2.4
inventory
volume counts
34
34
34
34
Road Safety
5.2
33
34
29
33
4.2.1
5.1
Road Designs
36
5.2.1
36
5.2.2
Design speed
36
IRC:SP:88-2010
Design context
5.2.4
Horizontal
5.2.5
Intersections
39
5.2.6
Access control
43
5.2.7
Cross-section
44
5.2.8
Trees
47
5.2.9
Road signs
48
5.2.10
Merges
50
5.2.11
Sight distance
51
5.2.12
Night
51
5.2.13
Parked vehicles
52
IN
THE PRESENT
53
53
6.1.1
Pedestrian walking
53
6.1.2
Pedestrian crossings
54
6.1.3
Lay-byes/bus bays
55
6.
visibility
PARAMETERS TO BE CONSIDERED
DAY TRAFFIC SCENARIO IN INDIA
6.2
39
SPECIFIC
6.1
38
5.2.3
.4
Bicyclists,
facilities
57
58
60
60
7.1
Context
7.2
Safety Aspects
7.3
Safety Audit
in
Rural
Roads
61
61
7.3.1
Projects to be audited
7.3.2
Audit
7.3.3
62
7.3.4
Audit process
62
7.3.5
Checklists
63
team
CHECKLISTS
8.1
General
8.2
Purpose
61
61
63
63
of Checklists
63
!RC:SP:88-2010
When to
8.4
use Checklists
64
64
9
1
8.3
ITS
SUCCESS
64
65
ORGANISATION?
Annexure
67
Stage
Checklist 2
Stage 2 Audit
Checklists
Stage 3 Audit
72
Checklist 4
Stage 4 Audit
77
Checklists
Stage 5 Audit
78
Checklist 6
Stage 6 Audit
79
Checklist 7
Planning
80
Checklist 8
Alignment
Checklist 9
Cross-Section
81
Checklist 10
Junctions
82
Checklist 11
Road Signs
84
Checklist 12
Road Markings
85
Checklist 13
Lighting
85
Checklists
Roadside Hazards
86
Checklist 15
Roadside
88
Checklist 16
Vulnerable
Checklist 17
Developmental Proposals
89
Checklist 18
Maintenance Work
90
Checklist
68
Audit
'
;^
Facilities
Road Users
69
80
88
!RC:SP:88-2010
Singh, Nirmal
Jit
3.
&
Delhi
Sinha.A.V.
Road
(Co-convenor)
Transport
Kandasamy
(Convenor)
2.
C.
(Member-Secretary)
Ministry of
Transport
Delhi
Road
Delhi
Members
4.
Dhodapkar, A.N.
Chief Engineer
New
5.
Datta, P.K.
(Pig.), Ministry of
Delhi
New
(I)
Pvt. Ltd.,
Delhi
PWD
6.
Gupta K.K.
7.
Sinha, S.
8.
9.
Katare, P.K.
Agency, (Ministry
of Rural
Development),
Delhi
Roads Development
New
Delhi
10.
11.
Reddy, K. Siva
12.
Basu, S.B.
New
Delhi
13.
Bordoloi, A.C.
14.
Rathore, S.S.
15.
Pradhan, B.C.
16.
Prasad, D.N.
17.
Kumar, Ashok
New
18.
Kumar, Kamlesh
19.
Krishna, Prabhat
Bhubaneshwar
Delhi
Delhi
New
Deptt.
RCD, Patna
New
R&B
Delhi
(i)
IRC:SP:88-2010
20.
Patankar, V.L.
New
Delhi
PWD
21.
Kumar, Mahesh
Engineer-in-Chief, Haryana,
22.
Bongirwar, P.L.
23.
Sinha, A.K.
24.
Sharma, S.C.
25.
Sharma,
Consultant, AIMIL,
26.
Gupta, D.P.
27.
Momin, S.S.
28.
Reddy,
Ex-Scientist, Central
Road Research
Institute,
New
Delhi
29.
Shukia, R.S.
Ex-Scientist, Central
Road Research
Institute,
New
Delhi
30.
Jain, R.K.
31.
Chandrasekhar,
32.
Dr.
V.M.
Dr. T.S.
Dr. B.P.
UP PWD, Lucknow
& AS,
New
MORT&H
(Retd.),
New
Delhi
MORT&H
(Retd.),
New
Delhi
Delhi
& AS,
New
Singh, B.N.
PWD, Sonepat
New
Delhi
Delhi
PW
33.
Nashkar, S.S.
34.
35.
Alam, Parvez
36.
Gangopadhyay,
37.
Representative
Director, Central
Dr. S.
DGBR,
President,
IRC
Kolkata
Road Research
(Deshpande,
Mumbai
Ltd.,
Institute,
Ex-Officio
1.
(R),
New
New
Delhi
Delhi
Members
D.B.), Advisor,
Mumbai
2.
3.
&
Secretary
(Singh, Nirmal
New
Jit),
Ministry of
Delhi
Delhi
Corresponding Members
1.
2.
Khattar, M.D.
3.
Agarwal, M.K.
4.
Borge, V.B.
(ii)
Mumbai
PWD
PWD, Mumbai
IRC:SP:88-2010
This Manual on
The draft of the Manual was considered and reviewed by the Transport Planning, Traffic Engineering
and Road Safety Committee (H-1 ) of the Indian Roads Congress. As desired by the Committee,
the draft document was revised by the CRRI team headed by Dr. (Ms.) Nishi Mittal under the
direction of Dr. S. Gangopadhyay, Director, CRRI and supported by Shri D.P. Gupta in editing the
whole document in the light of comments made by the Members of the H-1 Committee (Personnel
given below)
Convenor
Sharma, S.C.
Gangopadhyay,
Velmurugan,
Co-Convenor
Dr. S.
Member-Secretary
Dr. S.
Members
Basu S.B.
Parida, Dr. M.
Bajpai
R.K.
Chandra,
Ranganathan,
Dr. Satish
Gajria, Maj.
Gen.
K.T.
Gupta, D.P.
Gupta,
Dr.
Prof. N.
Singh,
Sanjay
Pawan Kumar
Singh, Nirmal
Kandasamy, C.
Tiwari, Dr.
Kumar, Sudhir
Director (Tech.),
Mittal, Dr.
Pal,
(Ms) Nishi
(Dr. B.P.
(Ms) Nimisha
Jt.
Palekar, R. C.
Geetam
NDMC
NRRDA
Chandrasekhar)
Comm.
of Delhi Police
(Traffic) (S.N.
Rep. of E-in-C,
Jit
Srivastava)
IRC:SP:88-2010
Corresponding Members
Bahadur, A. P.
Sarkar, J.R.
Reddy,
Dr. T.S.
Vandana
aimed
is
at decision-makers,
all
those
District or
Local level.
It
is
It
provides procedures for applying quality assurance to road projects, from the standpoint of
road safety. The methodology
widespread,
it
is
expected
to
is
known as
make a
When
its
application
becomes
on roads.
The
is
application of cost-effective
measures on
existing roads as
a basis
for
accident reduction
principles
in
means
of accident
prevention can be established through road safety audit. Thus, the purpose of this audit
ensure that
all
means
is
to
that the
will
provide guidelines for conducting audit by qualified and experienced road safety auditors.
The Manual describes the concept of road safety audit, stages when the audit may be taken
up and the process for both new and existing roads. A section has been separately added
for rural roads with special reference to the PMGSY roads. Check Lists related to different
stages and various aspects of road safety have been added to facilitate the task of Road
Safety Audit.
The
draft of the
Manual, revised by the CRRI team, was considered by the Transport Planning,
it
it
The Highways
MORTH,
Specifications
Shri Nirma!
Jit
Singh.
IRC:SP:88~2010
GENERAL
1.1
Road Safety
India with
,05,725
fatalities
network
is
Situation In India
per
annum
The share
(in
total
of National
just
the National Highways, which constitute less than 2 percent of the total road network, account for
20 percent of total road accidents and 25 percent of total road traffic fatalities occurring on Indian
roads. Further, the severity of road traffic accidents on National Highways is more because of
There
is
economic cost
Year Plan
seems
proportion of
In addition,
logical
as
bicyclists
at
3 percent
of
GDP (Tenth
Five-
this class of
emergency
of road accidents in
Vol.11
Vulnerable
is
damage and
India.
This
On highways, the
VRU and other motor vehicle occupants are 32 percent and 68 percent respectively.
they sustain relatively more serious injuries even at low velocity crashes, unlike car
occupants who are protected by impact absorbing metallic body of the vehicles.
shows the worsening situation of road accident fatalities and injuries in India. Accident
prevention can be enhanced by the application of road safety audit over the road network at its
Table
1 .1
different
1.2
stages of development.
Accident Prevention
Accident reduction and accident prevention are the two main strategies
accident reduction,
to
in
to influence the
In
roads
Accident prevention
is
in
is
the
accident reduction.
IRC:SP:88-2010
Table
Number
Year
1 .1
Number
of Accidents
Total
\JlCll
Persons
of
KiIIpH
CllCll
In India
No. of
persons
IJUl
II
(Figures within
killed
brackets give
pel Ucl
per
100
accidents
llciyt;
of total)
2001
405,637
71,219(17.6)
80,888
405,216
19.9
2002
407,497
736,50(18.1)
84,674
408,711
20.8
2003
406,726
73,589(18.1)
85,998
435,122
21.1
2004
429,910
79,357(18.5)
92,618
464,521
21.5
2005
439,255
83,491(19.0)
94,968
465,282
21.6
2006(P)
460,920
93,917(20.4)
105,749
496,481
22.9
Bureau
of Health Intelligence
Accident prevention should be the objective of any highway authority to ensure that the roads are
safe.
A road
is
considered safe
observed during
its
is
in
all
If
many
In
is
which, by their very presence, or which, through their absence have contributed to the occurrence
of
occurrence of accidents
Table
1
is
presented
in
Table
contribution
(in
percentage)
Road User
in
Road Accidents
65.0
2.5
Vehicle
2.5
User,
24.0
Road
User,
the
Percentage
Element
Road
in
its
1 .2.
1 .2
4.5
1.5
mean, however,
in all
road
IRC:SP:88-2010
frequency of accidents.
On
the contrary,
it
demands
1 .3
Part of
risk is
that
we
into law-abiding
of 'forgiving' roads.
way
it
staff.
It
is
not necessary
accidents to occur before steps are taken to both reduce the likelihood of them occurring and
minimize their consequences. Road safety audit should be viewed as part of an overall strategy
to
reduce accident
risk.
Road
traffic
is built.
It
when
it
is
applied to a road or
changes to the ways road users will interact, either with each other or with their physical
environment. Purpose of the audit is to look at the accident potential and safety performance of
involves
the proposal.
effective,
training
it
It
is
it
What
audit
may
also be conducted on an
becomes
available to
is
Audit (RSA)
performance
in
maintenance
of existing roads.
its
An
Road Safety
However,
design team.
2
2.1
of the
is
a formal procedure
the provision of
for
for the
improvement and
systematic application can also ensure that a growing awareness about good road
safety principles
is
achieved throughout
in
it
is:
a)
A formal
b)
c)
Carried out by persons with appropriate expertise, experience and training, and
d)
IRC:SP:88"2010
is
ensure that
to
all
safely as
means that safety should be considered throughout the entire cycle of design,
and pre-opening of any project facility and also during operation & maintenance of
practicable. This
construction
RSA are
To minimize the
a)
and
to
i.e.,
risk of
accidents
likely to
To minimize the
b)
risk of
accidents
likely to
c)
of safety in
highway design
to
another.
d)
designs
a project
facility,
bearing
in
mind
that unsafe
e)
ail
those involved
in
Road
of
it
deficiencies.
2.2
a road
project.
It
is
a management process
in
the customer or client of the quality of those goods or services, without the customer or client
is
in
designed to ensure that agreed standards are met. Quality assurance procedures for the design
and implementation
into the design.
of
new road
the customer
is
is
is
designed and
built is
is
In
undertaken
for the
case of
whereas
highway authority
to
it
right
the
first
time'
is
the underlying
it
in
1RC:SP:88-2010
road, engineers
will
check the details of their own work. This regular checking includes checking safety aspects. This
type of assessment, however, is not 'road safety auditing' because is not done with a 'fresh pair
of eyes' and probably is not applying road safety engineering skills and experience required for
it
it
the task.
An independent road
is
is
of
all
disciplines at
can be applied
Traffic
engineers
Idea of
RSA
UK developed the
in
has become
In turn, quality
assurance
accident remedial
schemes on
and type
and How?
Start
idea of
in
momentum when
started to gather
positioning
it
UK
stages.
all
2.3
life
all
engineering advice to be input, for the benefit of the future road users. Presently,
practice of involving safety engineers during the
at
the
new
relatively
roads.
Common
mistakes
in
carriageway layout,
of street furniture,
cyclists
were being
repeated over and over. There was no feedback from the safety facilitators to the highway designers
and constructors
design process.
the
in
is
experience they had gained from the remedial work and design safety
The
Institution of
in
'safety checking',
which
in
The road
turn
safety audit
Many
road schemes.
have
is
a snapshot
in
of quality
assurance principles
if
the quality
to road
is
being
Why Road
2.4
new
the use of road safety audits has been helped by two facts namely, the
into
of the safety
projects.
use some
toll,
Safety Audit?
Road
safety audit must assess projects on the basis of road user knowledge, attributes
skills,
is
and
and an auditor may indicate road safety problems inherent in designs that conform to our road
standards. This is due to the fact that our road standards are an expression of a socio-economic
balance between road safety, accessibility, environment and economy.
The
maintenance
that
activities
any parameters
on
is
to
ensure that
existing roads
all
new road
projects
IRC:SP:88-2010
corrected
The
The
likelihood of accidents
The
Road
safety
traffic
engineers,
in
time.
is
in
The need
is
work
is
reduced, and
including accidents, disruption
and
minimized.
safety audit
is
IS
b)
Ensuring
that,
if
of the injury
is
minimized
distances) have
been met;
d)
Managing
than the
e)
risk of
is
less
Minimizing the
risk of
intersections) as well as
g)
risk of
f)
risks,
(particularly at
in
all
a)
A way of assessing
b)
c)
or rating a project as
good or
poor;
!RC:SP:88"2010
d)
An accident investigation;
e)
A redesign
of
f)
Something
to
project;
safety problems;
g)
h)
An
2.6
To be
Safety Audit?
In this
needs
way
be carried out by
to
auditors
will
specialists,
who
are independent of
been involved in their design. Road safety audit involves one set of
professionals checking the work of other professionals. Crucial factor is that auditors should be
independent and impartial. Road safety auditor must not question the justification for a project
but must bring to light its consequences on road safety and endeavour to ensure that the project
as presented in the brief is as safe as possible. Auditors need to be objective in their assessments,
yet sensitive to the fact that no one likes criticism. Designers and clients need to consider audit
recommendations objectively as brought out from the audit outcome.
distraction of having
in
engineering and
be able
to
any road
in
of:
management, and
traffic
construction techniques
skills.
human
This understanding
perception
is in
fact
is
also likely
a desirable
skill
because of the interactive nature of road user behaviour with the road environment. An audit
team leader must not only have knowledge and skills in road safety engineering, but also should
have received training and participated in a number of audits. It is expected that the safety
auditors
will
in
The Authority, which engage safety auditors should ensure that the team leader has:
It
is
engineering
Undertaken
field,
in
for the
and
at least three
etc.
An
audit of a
For large
team conducting an
low budget project, a road safety audit by more than two persons
projects, three
two persons
audit.
will
be required.
IRC:SP:88-2010
2.7
Organisations Involved
is
based on the
will
In
principle of
be involved
in
Public Private Partnership projects (PPP) the client would be both the Govt, and the
Concessionaire with
One fundamental
idea
is
that
as provided
in
So
is
it
an
interaction
between
different parties,
whose
roles
In India, for
large
client
may be
in
local
availability of land.
For roads
in
authorities etc.
2.7.1
Designer
Role of designer
is
responsible for planning/designing the project. Designer bears the responsibility for
is
in
is
The designer
is
also
that
it
is
all
the
designer
is
thus
to:
Attend
recommendations and
to
meetings.
client
10
its
and
to avoid similar
!RC:SP:88~2010
Table
2.1
Main Functions
Key Player
Project
in
Owner
(Govt, and/or
Concessionaire)
Facilitates the
response
to the
at appropriate
recommendations
times
of audits
and
are accepted
Design Team
Attenus
Attends
proposea aessgn
Holds
2.7.2
Client
is
one who
client
is
roads.
to
and the
auditor.
client
in
this responsibility in
case
of existing
down
cover the whole range and scope of audit and for commissioning audits at appropriate stages.
The
2.7.3
Provide
Hold a
Role of auditor
Auditor's responsibility
light of
all
is
all
in its entirety, in
the
!RC:SP:88=2010
indicates
all
Review
Prepare a
Participate
all
reactions
What Type
2.8
Road
report,
in
in
of Projects should
all
be Audited?
Road
all
categories of roads
in
diverse as:
Some
Expressways,
Local area
Traffic
Approaches
traffic
and non-signalised
project roads,
management schemes
in
urban areas
rail
over/under bridges
Others require all projects, or a percentage of projects, above a set value to be audited.
to audit
all
projects at
all
It
is
unrealistic
12
IRC:SP:88-2010
ahead
of
any
on
projects,
effectively
the
which are
operate
like
'off-road',
earlier rather
than
later.
factor.
Choose a
in
in
in rural
some
stretches
to policy of land
should be effective. Chapter 7 describes the essential elements of such a process along with
safety aspects that
For
some schemes
it
may be
road agencies
design stage
traffic
management,
RSA
Scheme Type
PPR
at Different
feasibility
and
F+
1)
2)
Major Rehabilitation
3)
4)
Traffic
Management Schemes/
Traffic
Calming
Schemes
DPR
During
Pre-
Const.
Opening
Accident Remedial
Schemes
6)
Major Maintenance
Schemes
7)
Major Development
Schemes
8)
Minor Development
Schemes
9)
Source:
recommendations are
PPR+
DPR
5)
of
its
PPR
No
Major Schemes
F=Feasibility;
2.9
stages can be combined. Table 2.3 sets guidelines for organizing the road safety audit
system. There
SI.
itself.
PPR
in
Ways
of Organising a
of organizing
of
road safety auditor are that the person should be skilled and independent. Practically, two options
are there for conducting a road safety audit:
Audit by those within the original design team or by other road designers.
13
IRC:SP:88-2010
In
case
of audit
members should
of the project.
entity
not,
prior to
commencement of an audit, about how the audit findings and recommendations will be dealt
with. Someone has to consider the safety recommendations and resolve the inevitable
trade-offs
i.e.,
case
where an
audit
client with
a view to
its
acceptance
until
in
of the audit
team.
risk that
may be
or by the project
rationalized away,
may be
This approach
applicable
in
experience
has
its
in
for the
one
essential ingredient
It
may be
who
is(are)
effective
way
same
organisation also
it
to
own
is
will
the design to apply the 'fresh pair of eyes' needed to inquire into
A more
is
independence. But
details.
in
limitations.
design team
level of
is
to
engage
is vital
to
specialist auditor(s)
skills
and experience.
2.10.1
Qualifications
RSA
and background
in
investigation
traffic
in
one
or transportation engineering,
or
more areas
highway design
of
IRC:SP:88-2010
While
it
is
that auditors
possess an understanding
team
in
conducting audits,
of traffic engineering
it
is
very important
also
is
The desirable qualifications and background of the auditors at different stages of the Road Safety
Audit are as under:
a)
b)
any aspect
of proposal
of the
standards,
c)
familiarity in
traffic
scheme;
e.g.,
experience
in traffic
in
in
DPR,
signal control
geometric design
recommended,
Engineer
who
will
in
e.g.,
regulation of
be responsible
for
traffic;
maintenance
of the
scheme
with
Person
particularly
d)
Size of
RSA team
The most appropriate size of an audit team depends on the size of the audit task; there is no
optimum number of members in a team. Teams of more than four persons, at times, can be
unmanageable. Major projects require at least two persons. Experienced auditors often discourage
one-man teams.
Experience has shown that two persons carrying out a Safety Audit
safety issues than a single Safety Auditor. In
many
15
will identify
more
will
potential
be the Team
IRC:SP:88-2010
Leader with the second person being a team member.
individuals rather than
Ideally,
it
is
desirable to have a
team
of
a)
beneficial.
b)
The
c)
Therefore,
it
is
recommended
"pair of
that
2.1 0.3
Training
result
from discussions
is
helpful.
involved
and
in
training content
is
to retain
is
essential
in
credibility
can
vital,
if
and any Audit Team member should have attended recognized road safety engineering and
Safety Audit training courses. The situation in India, at present, is that there is no formal qualification
in Safety Audit or Road Safety Engineering. It is possible for staff with very little safety engineering
experience to produce audits that are at best a check on design standards. In the initial stages of
introduction of safety audit for road projects, the safety audit inputs may be provided by research/
academic institutions. Three groups of individuals need specific RSA training:
of the
process
to
to the audit
outcomes
(typically project
managers).
RSAandwhy itisneeded?
Thedefinitionof an
How
is
applied and
managed?
and
Interchange Design
in
Black-spot investigations
Road
side hazards
of crash barriers
IRC:SP:88-2010
It
Road work
Risk assessment/management
may be mentioned
tliat
sites
New Zealand
the Transit
has a
training
is first
Success Factors
2.11
It
is
understandable that
check on design
skills.
commitment from
some
design engineers
The success
may
process depends on
trust
and
2.12
Due to
is
only limited
documented information on
new project
(requiring
As design
costs can be
in
will
(total) to
the order of 2 to 3 percent of total implementation costs for projects, the increase
The
in total
project costs
early
in
is
insignificant.
depends on how
time.
An
1
3 projects
in
first
A study
in
not subject to
One
British
120 percent.
(Al
Masaeid, 1998)
17
in
casualty
IRC:SP:88-2010
The
improvements
in
a design to
More
explicit consideration of
Enhancement of road
Reduced whole
safety engineering.
road schemes.
life-costs of
Eliminating or avoiding
need
to modify
There are
(in
built.
is
low
the order of 0.1 percent of the total project cost). With such low costs and potential for high
is
(a)
(b) existing
and not an
enhance safety.
cost,
additional expense.
In
at
projects
As
It
stage
is
governments.
is
and on
On new roads,
safety audit
will
lead to
project
where there
roads.
is
audited,
a choice
it
safety problems, the designer should discuss these with auditors at the
audit shall
levels of
all
in
initial
stage.
The
known
safety
be carried out on road and traffic improvement projects. Safety audit during construction
for carrying
road safety
New
Construction
Stage
Stage 2 Audit
Completion
of Detailed
Completion
b)
Existing
On
Stage
3.1
Stage
1 is
Stage 4 Audit
of Construction (Pre-opening)
Stage 5 Audit
Roads
Existing
Roads
Monitoring
(Monitoring)
including
in
urban areas,
in
Audit
Stage 3 Audit
Design
18
IRC:SP:88"2010
study. Important subjects for
Choice
will
include:
of route options
on existing network
etc.
The road
involved
in
Stage
in
Fig. 3.1.
Stage
Analysis of Data
Audit
Selection of Design
For Existing
Standards
Roads
Preparation of Road/
Layout of Alternative
Alignments
Bridge Inventory
Information
Layout
EIRR check
for
For
viability of Project
of
Interchanges,
New
Junctions, etc.
Roads
Preparation of Road/
Bridge Inventory
Submission of
Feasibility Report
Information
for
Preparation of
Approval
Pavement Charts
EIRR check
for
Viability of Project
Submission of
Feasibility Report
Stage 2 Audit
of
Fig. 3.1
Approval
Return
Steps Involved
19
in
Stage
Audit
for
!RC:SP:88-2010
Stage 2 Audit (Completion of Preliminary Design)
3.2
Stage 2
is
recommended on completion
may be taken
still
slip
up.
of preliminary design, to
completed
i.e.,
stage are:
All
Project
Alignment
Cross-section
Arrangement of Junctions
Any
Interim
Measures
who have
If
in
special
of the adjoining
there
Audit
is
Fig. 3.2.
Stage 2 Audit
Detailed Design of
all
Elements
Obtain Additional Data for
Preparation of Final Drawings
Land Acquisition*
Stage 3 Audit
Fig. 3.2
Steps Involved
20
In
Stage 2 Audit
is
involved.
!RC:SP:88-2010
Stage 3 Audit (Completion of Detailed Design)
3.3
Stage 3
is
recommended on completion
documents,
to
assessment
is
of detailed design
all
limits of expropriation
have been
set,
Project
Detail
Design of geometries
Cross-fall
Side drains
Embankment slopes
Presence
Traffic Signals
Lighting
Interim
Design
of junctions
of clear
zone
Measures
until
in
in
been completed
in
Fig. 3.3.
3.4
Construction zone
flow
of contract
and
and safety
Zone'.
In rural
of
is
is
In this
is
acute as diversions
and which
affects traffic
context
In
it
sharing of road space by different categories of road users. Traffic control zone can be divided
major components
i.e..
for
users.
IRC:SP:88-2010
Stage 3 Audit
Amendments According
and
to Client Decision
Revised
BOQ
and Estimate
of
Project Cost
Approved Plans
Submission
Designs
Store Data
of Final Detailed
to Authorities
Invitation of
Tenders
Stage 4 Audit
Fig. 3.3
Steps Involved
in
Stage 3 Audit
Stage 4 Audit
Safety of
Workmen and
Safety of
Road Users
Steps Involved
22
in
Stage 4 Audits
IRC:SP:88"2010
Motorists need to
problems
work zones are attentiveness and speed. It is necessary to help the drivers to be more
attentive by using signages, rumble strips and any thing that brings alertness and gets them to
in
something
limits in
It
is
different
speed
limits in
flagman
to control
strips
in
3.5
Stage 5
recommended immediately
is
and
A final
truck. This
of
scheme,
opening
prior to
when
and
appropriate,
safety that
is
it
It
is
particularly important to
check
finished
daylight
and
in
one
Many schemes
phase.
facility in
an appropriate manner.
traffic
is
to
and
all
traffic
in
the
examination
in
darkness.
visibility of
Fig. 3.5.
Stage 5 Audit
Check
of
for visibility
all traffic
and effectiveness
control devices
i
Project Completion
Fig. 3.5
and Pre-opening
Steps Involved
23
in
Stage 5 Audit
first
in
in
is
to
be
place. This
IRC:SP:88-2010
Stage 6 Audit-Audit on Existing Roads and During Operation and
Maintenence of Concession Projects
3.6
is
of existing roads.
may have
the road after completion of construction as well as any hazardous conditions that
its
lifetime
An
traffic
of
of
conditions, etc.
determine whether or
include:
a)
Does the
b)
Are the
c)
d)
prevailing
visibility
and
speed correspond
to the
design speed?
still
satisfied?
to
Check the roadside furniture including road signs and markings damage
their shape or position, loss of retro-reflectivity
to
Street lighting
g)
h)
Bridges
What are
tlie
rutting, skidding,
at shoulders.
f)
3.7
any breach or
damage
e)
like
in electrical,
installations.
joints, etc.
in Different
Stages of
thie
Project?
There are
phases
at
same at all
On
3.B
different
be
stages. Table 3.1 details the safety issues that need to be focused at different stages
of the project.
case
will
at
it
It
BOT contracts would be most advantageous to all key players in the sector.
What are the Data Requirements
for
RSA?
environmental problems.
24
IRC:SP:88-2010
Table
Safety Focus
3.1
in Different
Focus
of the Audit
Feasibility
control,
number
of
Preliminary Project
Report (PPR)
and
emergency
vehicles, bus
traffic
control
Report (DPR)
traffic control
of specific
and
lighting, safety
road users
like elderly,
equestrian,
rail
Construction sites
During
Construction
Pre-opening
safety of
all
road users,
traffic
work zones.
Final
check
of
road users have been addressed and that there are no apparent
all
prior to
opening the
facility to
the day and the night on a bus, on a truck as well as a car. Should include
On
existing
and during
of
Roads
O&M
concessions
An
and walking.
audit of existing
roadway
to determine,
all
It
may have
may change
if
inadequate maintenance
measures. Points
and
to
of
road and
traffic control
of
roadway, roadside
truck laybyes,
needs
of
25
bus stops,
IRC:SP:88-2010
4
4.1
Audit of
New Roadway
Sections
Road Safety Audit is a relatively straightforward process. For smaller projects some of the steps
shown may be brief, but the sequence of the steps will still apply. Responsibility for the planning,
design and construction of the project always remains with the road authority and the
implementation team. On new roadway sections Stage 1 Audit to Stage 5 Audit will be applied
depending upon the stage of the project. The steps in the road safety audit process are illustrated
in flow chart in Fig. 4.1 The details of each step of the flow chart should be adapted to suit the
.
The
It
is
The Steps
client
independent advice
of....
Client or Designer
Designer
information
i
IHold a
Client
commencement
Designer &
meeting
Audit team
Audit team
Audit team
t
Audit team
Client
&
Designer
Client
& Designer
Client
&
Designer
arrived at
Fig. 4.1
Steps Involved
in
26
the form of
Ke^onMhviCty
in
!RC:SP:88-2010
decision
is
taken by the road authority on whether or not to adopt each of the safety measures
in
a)
b)
Obtaining
all
team
and
related
documents
Conducting a
d)
site inspection.
To carry out safety audit on new roadway sections scheme/rehabilitation scheme, the following
should be thoroughly cross-checked. The team should check planning, cross-sections,
alignment, road side furniture and
markings and
4.1 .9.
lighting
Some of the
a)
important considerations
Alignment inconsistency
in
is
described
in
Sections 4.1
.1
to
If
unavoidable, such stretch should have proper road signages and speed
management measures.
b)
no narrow sections.
If
unavoidable, they
d)
e)
f)
g)
h)
i)
j)
k)
Road
signs,
furniture
at
hazardous locations.
and crash
in
towns.
Traffic Control
Devices, roadside
barriers.
I)
Guard
m)
rails,
in
.1
The
team may comprise of two members for small projects and three members for
One of the team members should be nominated as Road Safety Audit Manager.
audit
projects.
27
large
IRC:SP:88-2010
Where
invited to
be
case
of
complex
projects,
a specialist can be
one essential ingredient in any road safety audit team is road safety engineering experience.
Selection of audit team for different stages of audit is presented in Section 2.1 0. The audit team
should
fulfill
a)
Is
b)
Is
Has the
traffic
engineering,
audit.
engineering,
traffic
in
Does the
problems from
4.1 .2
Enhancing
To see
potential safety
availability of skilled
personnel
to get
for
groomed
in
orders of Auditor/Employer.
4.1 .3
The
client
tfie
all
thie
in
a usable
a)
left
to the audit
The client should provide the auditor with the expected outcome from the audit.
This
may
proposed audit
b)
TOR
(Terms of Reference)
for the
of the project.
Project intent
This sets out the purpose of the project and the design standards adopted.
may
The
highlight,
28
IRC:SP:88-2010
c)
Site Data
Accident
'Ix
'II'
1)
If
a.'
'
history, including
2)
Classified Traffic
3)
unresolved
w
from
III orevious
V
audits
^
Safetv
issues
which
VV
IIIremain
III
\^ III
\^
*
^^^^ w<
^^^^A
4)
Design standards
5)
Environmental impacts
6)
'
II
relevant to safety
VcT
if
II
anv
%^l
enhancement
All
vertical
and
horizontal alignment
and other
3)
If
its
it
uses, which
may be affected
may induce.
the engineering designs and drawings for different parts of the project
after these
of the
Commencement meetings
4.1.4
Objective: To acquaint
relevant information
thie
auditor
witli tiie
with
to
client,
the audit team the project's purpose, any issues specific to the project and any particular problems
team
in
The audit
all traffic
or weather conditions, so
if
identify
will
particular
and
to
form
inspection, the
!RC:SP:88-2010
in
itself
The
audit
come
provide the road user with consistent treatments and they should be applied unless,
particular situation, they are unlikely to result in
4.1 .6
a satisfactory
level of safety
in
performance.
and
and
how the
conflicts,
with
its
is likely
to encounter.
it
The
it
is
at
Road
layouts
and devices
traffic
Road users may be unaware that they must adjust their behaviour due to the
new project, which often disrupts the existing traffic and pedestrian movement
patterns.
The
teams site visit leads to appreciate any future problems relating to the existing
arrangement and to visualise the proposals and their possible effects. The inspection should be
carried out from the point of view of all road user groups and not just motorists. The inspection for
audit
it
different user
entering the
4.1 .7
traffic
different types of
the road,
The
and
sound
report should contain the features of the project, deficiencies which involve hazards
corrective actions.
reflect
judgement of the audit team and should be backed with convincing reasons for appreciation by
30
IRC:SP:88-2010
the decision makers. Further, these recommendations
details of the solutions to
rest with the client.
On
improve
safety.
The
will
responsibility for
acceptance
will
designer.
The
report should
require remedial
measures/ treatment from the safety point of view. The recommendations should
be numbered or
identified in
in
is
and any safety problem, considered to have great potential danger should be identified as
'IMPORTANT'. In line with the need to maintain good communication with the designer and the
client, the audit team should share the draft Audit Report with them and endeavour to resolve any
uncertainties or misunderstandings by talking with the designer before drawing conclusions.
of
independence while
finalizing the
presented as under:
Project Information
is
being undertaken.
overall plan.
Background Information
list
available,
Names and
Information about
when
team
and conducted
members
assessment
their
Findings and
Recommendations
made
which was
brief
was
identified
as
enhancement:
in
the form of
Provide
photographs
appropriate.
31
where
considered
!RC:SP:88-2010
Formal Statement
Recommendations proposed
with
a forwarding
letter
by the Auditor
4.1.8
Objective: To discuss
This meeting
ttie
independence
and the
will
of the auditor
is
in
it
is
in
adopted. However,
it
is
it
is
and designer.
Efforts
should be
made to
Responding
4.1 .9
resolve misunderstandings
if
and tiow
recommendations of
ttie
When audit report is received, has to be acted upon so that safety is enhanced. A management
and monitoring control system may be kept in place to keep the track of audits. The client would
it
do well to respect the outcome of the safety audit. The objective is to deal with audit
recommendations in an effective and objective manner; to decide whether and how the
recommendations of the road safety audit should be implemented and, where
is decided
otherwise, to record the reasons in writing for such a decision; to put agreed audit
recommendations into effect.
it
4.1.10
Once the client has taken decision on the Audit Report and finalized the list of recommendations
that are accepted and agreed, they need to be implemented. The designer has to develop
design changes, which address the safety problems.
If
audit
problem
is
identified,
agreed solution
As a way
is
site.
If
at the
a serious
may be needed
until
the
implemented.
knowledge from
audits, audited
32
IRC:SP:88"2010
valuable feedback to refine the audit procedures and
skill
enhancement
of the
members
comprising the Audit Team and sensitize the Road Agencies to not only encourage the system of
4.2
in
enhance implementation
of the
Roadway Sections
new roadway
It
provides a systematic
way
be
of being proactive in
reducing the future likelihood of accidents. Audits of existing roads involve a similar approach to
that for
in
in
site
field
studies
like
road inventory,
volume counts, speed survey and study of first information reports from police records
are essential. Ideally audits of an authority's existing road network should be done on a regular
basis. It may be several years between successive audits, but a rolling programme of audits
should be developed which covers every road in the network. As the road is already built, the
classified
As
Following completion of road, safety audit report for an existing road, the highway authority
will
to
It
report should highlight those problems, which are considered so urgent that they require
immediate
topography and
4.2.1
attention. Issues
Road
terrain,
inventory
Highway features determine road traffic safety, besides road capacity and economic traffic
operations. Highway features are visible elements of highway and consist of various components.
So, the safe and efficient operation of highway is governed by road geometric parameters, traffic
control devices, lighting system of the stretch, composition of traffic, drainage condition, junction
layout, parking facilities, cross drainage structures and the adjoining land use of the stretch.
33
!RC:SP:88-2010
like
embankment, sight distance, horizontal curvature, vertical curvature, etc. The traffic control devices
comprise signs, markings, delineators, crash barriers, guard rails, etc.
volume counts
Classified
4.2.2
The magnitude
of traffic
moving vehicles
moving vehicles
traffic
flow on
all
their variation
categories of roads.
has a decisive
effect
on the
of
MCV, HCV, 2-wheelers, 3-wheelers and slowetc. The available traffic data is to be analyzed
like cars,
cycle-rickshaws,
like bicycles,
and vehicle-wise
flow characteristics
traffic
and the
stretches should be determined based on classified volume counts and road inventory surveys
and analyzed
Speed surveys
4.2.3
Speed
is
one
of the
control of traffic
and
for
will
of traffic
is
and
its
a necessary input
be conducted
to
in
First
necessary
and
between speed
at selected points of
measurements can be
also.
4.2.4
this,
is
for regulation
done
measurement
Information Reports (FIR) should be collected from the concerned police stations on the
is
to
be created
for analysis of
in
identifying
Principles of
5.1
is
Road Safety
how road safety considerations are brought
proper time and how road safety is weighed against other
a formal process;
scheme design
at the
it
describes
The
When
Can
34
traffic
control
IRC:SP:88-2010
Can
it
create ambiguity?
insufficient information or too
much
information?
Does
Are there stretches where compromise on design standards has been made.
it
provide inadequate
visibility
or
cause obstructions
to vision?
answer is
'yes', to
of
Road users represent a broad cross-section of the public and there are limits what road users
can cope with when converting information - from the layout of the road, signs, markings, etc. into
their response and action. Road users overestimate their own abilities and misunderstand each
other's intentions when the situation becomes too complex, unclear or unusual to think and to
react.
It
is
installations
vital
task expected of the designers and road safety auditors to design out road
keeping
Guide the
Be forgiving
Similar situations
must be treated
in
similar
way;
it
is
better to avoid:
treatment
Insufficient or deficient
Exaggerated treatment
is
features.
To minimize the
risk of
35
IRC:SP:88-2010
To minimize the
a
result of
risk of
highway design
of safety in
of road users
and
to
conflict.
the network as
a scheme.
in
of
a road
project, bearing in
To improve the awareness about safe design practices among those involved
in
is better thian
Cure: While
efforts to
must be
accidents occurring as a
all
the different
Some special safety issues relating to road designs are brought out below. These illustrate that
safety
is
necessarily result
in
5.2.1
in
when
the
view.
Road Designs
like
trucks
Design speed
5.2.2
continue to
it.
and
If
activity. Fig.
in
hilly terrain,
5.3 depicts
how
36
should be
critical
(Fig. 5.4)
drivers are
and be appropriate
terrain.
results in accidents
IRC:SP:88-2010
Footways
Fig. 5.1
Lack of Pedestrian
on an Urban Road
Facilities
Fig. 5.3
front of
Critical
Location Requiring
37
Footpath
Speed Controls
in
IRC:SP:88-2010
Fig. 5.4
Fig. 5.5
5.2.3
in
Accidents
Design context
The safe designs are different for major and minor roads. Narrow sections or slow points may be
suitable on minor roads to slow down traffic and improve safety. However, on major roads such
squeeze points may well cause frustration and become accident blackspots. The function of a
road should be clear to its users and treatments should not give conflicting messages about this.
Functional grouping of roads
is
a necessary pre-requisite
38
for
5.6).
IRC:SP:88-2010
Fig. 5.6
and
Horizontal
5.2.4
vertical
of
Roads
curves
in
degree
of horizontal curvature
it
is
curves particularly
in
barrier lines.
of the
5.9). In
vertical curve,
5.2.5
may adopt a
terrain
and
attempting to maintain
of
Intersections
Priority
The
and layout
layout
and
control
arrangement
at
It
is
useful to
remember
that
is
usually expected
it
39
IRC:SP:88-2010
Fig. 5.7
Fig. 5.8
Fig. 5.7 to 5.9
Fig. 5.9
Visibility at Critical
Fig.
5.10
Fig.
Examples
5.10 and 5.11
of
Good
Priority
Practice
Fig. 5.11
Junctions (Give-way/Stop)
40
IRC:SP:88-2010
Visibility
Provide adequate
visibility
traffic;
distances with warrants for stop signs. Avoid creating obstructions by street
furniture or landscaping. Provide
adequate
visibility to
instance on crests and curves line marking and other devices can be hidden
yet they
need
improve
to
be
Use
line
to
channelisers
or traffic islands
Fig.
Elements to Improve
Road
Safety-Visibility
Safety Issues
Safer Practice
j*<
vumtt
Visibility
Fig.
5.13
41
-WS^
smmBs
8-
IRC:SP:88-2010
Fig.
Road Markings
to Assist Drivers
much
to cross traffic
Large
radii
a low speed,
radii,
is
and
5.16).
radii.
required.
On
a design vehicle
42
is
will result in
Balanced approach
Fig.
in
hitting kerbs.
IRC:SP:88-2010
Fig.
5.2.6
Access
control
At each point on the road system where vehicles have access to adjacent land, there
is
the
and accidents. Where service roads have been provided to separate through
traffic from local traffic movements, the spacing of breaks should not be reduced. Further,
there should be sufficient warning ahead of such breaks. The same is true for median
openings. Motorists need time to react at conflict points, particularly where traffic flows are
heavy (Fig. 5.1 7 and 5.1 8).
potential for conflict
Fig.
43
Fail
!RC:SP:88-2010
Fig.
in
5.2.7
Cross-section
Narrow lanes
There
is
larger
The
do not
tract.
These may be
satisfactory
when
wide lanes - proper lane width are used but they are unsatisfactory when narrow
lanes are adopted (Fig. 5.19).
Right-of-Way
0)
5
o
0)
Roadside
WM
Roadway
Roadway
Shoulder
Shoulder
Carriageway
Fig.
Median
M
Carriageway
44
Roadside
c
(0
IRC:SP:88-2010
Shoulder widths
There
is
a safety benefit
should not
It
in
is
in
create a hazard.
IRC:SP:88-2010
Fig.
who have
Strayed from
Median widths
In rural
wide.
In
of
median, subject to
in
Table
46
width
is
availability of
5.1
Markings
Fig.
safety advantages
is little
IRC:SP:88-2010
Table
5.1
Width of Median
Minimum Width
lypG OT oeciion
Plain
&
of
Rolling Terrain
median (m)
IVIOUOIainOLIS
ck
Steep Terrain
Depressed Median
Raised
Ont^n
will
ucuiintr\/
III y with
v^ijci poi
built-up
iQnlfltpH
louiciicvj
4.5
7.0
2.0
2.0
Not Applicable
2.0
4.5
Not Applicable
2.0
area
Built-up area
Approach
to
grade
separated structures
5.2.8
Trees
is
often deficient
on the
location
Fig.
Tree on Edge
of the
Edge
of
is built
and
is in
Road
of
and
2.25).
5.25 Plantation
47
1RC:SP:88-2010
Road
5.2.9
It
is
signs
in
an attempt to solve a
real or
an appropriate design
of road
traffic sign:
Demonstrate a need
Use a sound traffic engineering assessment to determine the need. Check the
warrants and appropriate uses in the standards or guidelines. If no standard
signs exist, ask why. Is one needed for this situation?
all
The
ability to
choose an
effective
it
Fig. 5.26
48
in
Confusion
!RC:SP:88-2010
Shsqpe is wrong
Fig.
Absence
of
and edge
Rumble
result In
of intersection
Fig.
Type of signs
Non-uniformity of signs
line
ahead
strips
on shoulder
to alert drivers
who have
Shape
Remarks
Example
Red
circles give
a negative Instruction
CautionaryA/Varning Signs
Informatory Signs
Fig.
5.29
Road Signs
49
a hazard
IRC:SP:88"2010
Fig.
its
Keep sign support structures away from the edge of the carriageway. Avoid or
protect sign supports on the outside of curves and other vulnerable places,
Ensure that signs or their supports do not obstruct visibility of other devices or
the view between conflicting road users.
5.2.10
Merges
Adequate
sight distance
is
required
in
advance
of
any merging
recognize and plan their merge. Inadequately or improperly designed merging areas can be a
cause
should not be
and
insufficient, otherwise,
it
5.32).
may
The
length of acceleration
In
addition
it
is
important to
provide a length of mutual sight to allow the gap to be selected for the merging manoeuvre.
left
Fig. 5.31
right to
50
!RC:SP:88=2010
Fig.
Sight distance
5.2.11
The
5.2.12
Niglit visibility
Where minimum
is
usually
more
difficult at
width lanes are used or there are island to narrow the road, a high
light
In
Use
on Curves
of Retroflective
Tapes Increase
Night-time Safety
Fig.
51
!RC:SP:88-2010
Fig.
5.2.13
in
Tunnels
Parked vehicles
in
are run into or sideswiped, obstructions which cause sudden braking and nose-to-tail accidents,
obstructions which deflect vehicles into adjacent vehicle paths, hazards to passing vehicles from
opening doors, obstructions which hide pedestrians and obstructions which block
intersections
and access
relocate parking
in traffic
points. For
improvement schemes
visibility at
ideally avoid or
like intersection
remove/
treatments,
parking can influence well beyond the limits of the design plan. Parking on side streets close to
busy
arterial
roads can be a hazard to turning vehicles. Check the interaction of parked vehicles,
and any queued emerging vehicles in these locations (Fig. 5.35). Do not rely on
signs to eliminate parking in hazardous locations: enforcement will not always be
turning vehicles
parking control
available.
Fig.
5.35 Parking
52
IRC:SP:88"2010
SPECIFIC
in tine
a)
traffic
b)
Safety issues on
higli
6.1.1
Pedestrian walking
it
and
and detailed
attention.
Separation
India are:
facilities
significant
full
in
speed corridors
6.1
As pedestrians form a
pedestrians one given
it
is vital
for
enhancing
activity.
to
ensure that footpaths are not encroached upon and that the surfaces are comfortable to walk on.
On some stretches,
which
only
is
.0
the absolute
.5
m wide while at other places there is none; in most cases any constructed footway is the
in
a matter
of
is
line.
Footways
in
Where footways are not provided on highways, shoulders are used by the
for walking. These shoulders become un-walkable due to water logging (Fig. 6.2).
(Fig. 6.1 ).
Fig. 6.1
53
Facilities
to walking
pedestrians
IRC:SP:88-2010
Fig. 6.2
Water Logging
at
Shoulders
it
Pedestrian crossings
6.1.2
and suitable
provision must be designed to allow for it at appropriate locations. There is clearly a case for
increasing both the capacity and safety of the new upgraded road sections. When located and
used correctly, these can be effective in reducing pedestrian-vehicle traffic conflicts. Pedestrians
usually tend to take the shortest routes between any two points. If using a crossing imposes much
additional walking distance, or no perceived risk reduction (Fig. 6.3) then there will be a marked
There
is
reluctance to use
it.
Great care
is
for
needed, therefore,
in siting
all
along
it
is
than signals
rarely
found
in cities
if
54
IRC:SP:88"2010
Fig. 6.3
of
Subway
at
has also been observed that pedestrians often avoid using pedestrian bridges and
underpasses due to substantial differences in elevation, perceived lack of public safety in
underpasses, lack of maintenance and encroachments. Also, where pedestrian barriers have
been erected especially in front of the school gates, recreation grounds and footpaths,
It
pedestrians cross at any point along a length of road rather than be channelled to specially
risk of
be narrow
in
accident
is
becoming an
additional hazard.
need for special features to be constructed where pedestrians have to cross an open
drain or mount an embankment. It is observed that required pedestrian crossing facilities are not
being provided and in the absence of these, the local population devise their own unauthorized
ways to facilitate crossing the highways. This type of activity is more hazardous at many of the
road sections passing through the inhabited areas proposed on high embankments. Therefore,
is essential that for all highway upgradation projects, careful thought is given as to where
pedestrians may be allowed to cross and where they should be prohibited from crossing and
provision must be made to achieve the same.
There
is
it
Lay-byes/bus bays
6.1.3
in
traffic
principles:
a)
The bus stops shall be sited away from bridges and other important structures
and embankment sections more than 3 m high.
55
IRC:SP:88-2010
b)
c)
The
have good
location shall
visibility,
distance.
d)
The bus bays shall not be located too close to the road intersections. A gap of
300 m from the tangent point of intersections to start/end of the bus bay shall
be desirable. At minor intersections
of
60
m may be adopted.
right at
the intersection,
sufficiently
ahead
However,
it
is
a substantial volume
if
of
of the intersection
buses
shall
distance
is
to turn
be located
e)
on the
left
to the other,
it
number
of
might be desirable to
all
the bus
routes collectively.
In hilly
f)
and the
flat
visibility is
where
is possible
accommodating bus bays.
locations
g)
h)
of
is
buses
Sufficiently
ii)
Sufficiently
straight
be advisable to choose
bus bays
shall
for
be as under:
intersection.
as
and
well.
a need to design a facility to meet the needs of the waiting passengers and the number
(Fig. 6.4).
in
needs to be provided.
in
location of
i)
is
There
to
it
it
If
rain.
some
in
If
there
is
the shade
recognition
practice on
and importance by
all
off
all
main highways.
road agencies.
56
It
is
a safe location
become a standard
in
is
Many
is likely
to stop
a good development.
is
It
it
now
needs to
given due
IRC:SP:88-2010
7J5
Fig. 6.4
Absence
6.1.4
Bicyclists, ricl<sfia ws
The mixed
traffic
on Main Carriageway
Bus Bays
to Enter
of
in
carts
conditions and the wide variety of road users on highways create a safety
challenge of significant magnitude. These non-motorized road users are an important part of the
They deserve special consideration for their safety due to their different
characteristics of movement, poor conspicuity and vulnerability in the event of an accident. On
the highways, as they are exposed to motor vehicles travelling at much higher speed,
is
traffic
stream (Fig.
6.5).
it
much
lateral
An
is
a minimum
m wide shoulder fully paved along the highways (excepting where service roads exist) so that
move on a smooth
associated requirement
of
in relative safety.
of
is
roadway
surface with
some
Fig. 6.5
No
57
An
IRC:SP:88-2010
Safety issues on High Speed Corridors
6.2
In India,
rural
These
traffic
due
including non-motorised
in
India
traffic.
do not have
invisible
to
in
road
traffic
crashes on
intercity
it
is
not
highways are
encroachments.
In
facilities
on these
highways, truckers have a tendency to park their vehicles on service roads, thus negating the
benefits of service roads to these vulnerable road users (Fig. 6.6). In the
Fig. 6.6
In India,
benefits, there
is
will
such service
threatened.
width. While
it
is
locations, particularly in
is
of
absence
urban areas,
rural
will
at certain
unless location specific measures are taken to ensure that the speeds are restrained to an
appropriate level (Fig. 6.7).
It
is
recommended that an
appropriate speed
management strategy
upgraded highways should be developed as soon as possible and before they are open for
traffic. Such a speed management strategy should recognise the need for realistic speed limits
and for a differential in speeds between urban and rural areas. The changes in speed zones will
need to be well signed with duplicate speed signs at the commencement of a new zone and
repeater signs at agreed distances thereafter and physical measures on the carriageway.
for
calming measures are usually most effective if several different kinds are used in
combination and in a co-ordinated manner to slow down traffic in stages. They should be used
with care on any highway but will be particulariy relevant where there is a cross-section change
Traffic
from say
may
also be
highway and
carriageway or from
rural to
urban conditions.
58
at their
Traffic
calming
approaches
to the
!RC:SP:88-2010
Fig. 6.7
traffic
flows and
it
it
On
speed and main roads, efforts should be made to keep cyclists off the main carriageway
by providing them with separate continuous cycle tracks (Fig. 6.8). Cycle tracks must be
attractive to use, coherent and direct. They should be well-maintained and should be minimum
2.5 m wide. The slow-moving road users need segregation whenever possible from fast traffic
vehicles. Where animal drawn vehicles are common, provision of wider shoulders can act as a
high
pedestrians.
strips
(300
The
with devices
like,
and
rumble
mm in width) between the main carriageway and the shoulder. A provision of frequent
(at
the
same
level
to
The vehicular under/overpass structures should be provided at the intersection of the high traffic
density roads with all the National Highways and State Highways. The structure may be either an
underpass or an overpass depending upon the nature of terrain, vertical profile of road,
availability of
adequate
right of
way,
etc.
Following aspects
i)
The width
ii)
may be
kept
disabilities.
59
have provision
for
in
view
be less than 5 m.
movement
of
persons with
IRC:SP:88-2010
iii)
Underpasses
iv)
200
Whenever
feasible,
barrier or
edge
Highways
in rural
line
shall
be preferred
to
overpasses.
is
appropriate.
7.1
Rural roads are generally single lane with low design speeds and low volumes of
due
economic
uplift of rural
in
traffic
both
in
Because
some
is
also increasing at an
may
not be
in
accordance with the required geometric standards. These may then be prone to safety hazards
unless the driver
is alert.
At the
same
time,
some
60
!RC:SP:88-2010
7.2
Safety Aspects
in
Rural
Roads
rural
roads
projects
b)
Where
this
also
There should be
no compromise whatsoever on
will
in all rural
roads
and programmes.
the existing geometries of the road alignment are poor, efforts should
be made
to
is
limit
the
In
in
type),
rumble
strips
should be
Intersections
and junctions
of rural
ahead
of their
access
to agricultural fields
and ramps
Some
all-round
Head
of the
PIU
of
member or special
7.3
Safety Audit
7.3.1
Projects to
vehicles.
PMGSY
invitee to
initially in
respect of
7.3.2
The
be audited
may be considered
the state.
an
such committees.
remain with the concerned road agencies and the implementing teams.
rural
in
of
safety audit
because
In
case
basically
of rural roads,
same
to other
roads.
Audit team
The safety audit team should comprise two members. One member should have adequate traffic
61
IRC:SP:88-2010
engineering and
experience
7.3.3
in
traffic
b)
For
PMGSY roads, the safety audit may be confined to the following stages:
design and estimate preparation stage
1)
Completion
of
2)
Completion
of construction,
3)
On completed
pre-opening stage
projects
in
para 3.3
may be
SRRDA
Team
c)
STA and
the
based on the
The
at this
on completion
staff.
in
para 3.5
of construction.
in
It
may be
in
local site
a non-motorised
in
Such
audits
amy be
needs
of
all
para 3.6
in
cyclists,
if
the
animals
and animal drawn carts are being met. Findings of the Audit Team and
measurers recommended by it should be discussed with the SRRDA
Headquarters. Final decision on measures recommended should rest with the
SRRDA. The SRRDA may keep NRRDA informed of such decisions.
7.3.4
Audit process
The steps
in
For
in
Chapter
4.
PMGSY roads, the designer may be either in-house staff of PIU or outsourced consultant.
Team
62
is
IRC:SP:88"2010
7.3.5
Check
The following
lists
PMGSY projects.
Check
Stage
SI.No.
List
NO.
1)
Completion
2)
5,8,9,10,11,12
3)
Completed projects
6,8,9,10,11,12
of
PMGSY projects.
For example,
necessary. Similarly,
auditors
specific
in
check
in
check
check
list
5,
item no. 8, 1 0, 1
3,
list
7,
may
lists in
8 and 20 to 32
view
for the
may
not be
CHECKLISTS
8
8.1
lists
3,8,9,10,11,12
General
can
These
for
Stage
to
Stage
6.
These
checklists
will
and
and
cross-section, junctions, link road, traffic signs, road markings, road lighting, roadside hazards,
road side furniture, vulnerable road users, cross-drainage structures etc. These checklists should
be used as a guide
to focus audit
When
is
different
and
will
reviewing each of the points, the team should consider that the road user
at night
and
in
also.
The safety audit team should visit the site for identifying the deficiencies from safety angle of the
stretch and should suggest remedial measures. The team should check planning,
cross-sections, alignment, roadside furniture and facilities available, junctions, facilities for
vulnerable road users, signs, marking and lighting and also road side hazards as suggested in
the previous paragraph. Some sort of questionnaire should be prepared for each kilometre. The
questionnaire should include various aspects covered under the methodology of the safety
audit.
8.2
Purpose of Checklists
Road Safety Audit checklists are presented in Annex A. These checklists have been designed
as a prompt. They are not a subvStitute for knowledge of local conditions and experience: they are
an aid for the application of that knowledge and experience. The checklists are to help an auditor
not to overlook something important.
will
It
is
need
be referred
63
to,
and
their
is
proper use
makes a good
IRC:SP:88-2010
any design. The written audit report should contain sufficient explanation of its
recommendations, without any need to refer to notes on checklists. Designers can make use of
the checklists to help them identify potential safety problems and cover the solutions in their
starting point with
designs.
When
8.3
use Checklists
to
audit
when
in particular,
when
being examined
inspecting the
fit
site.
At this point,
is
important to visualise
how the
project
will
it
have been
addressed
These
new
traffic
schemes,
may cover
roads, roadwork
How to use
8.4
Checklists
of checklists
in
is
needed.
It
these checklists.
will
ITS
SUCCESS
its
assessing the designs and drawings and a detailed inspection of the project.
audit report
each
in
due diligence
A good safety
A good
report
some
blame game.
the
initial
stages, good
it
its
intended purpose.
64
IRC:SP:88-2010
10
IN
of
order to ensure safety conscious planning, design, construction and maintenance and operation
development
of
it
is
paramount
that the
for
experience from those countries which have undertaken Road Safety Audits of their roads and
road projects reveal, positive benefits towards enhancement of road safety, the top
actions for
it
management
initiating
in
engineering organisations
are outlined
in
Fig.
0.1
It
is
not
'audit'
it
and
To
training in
65
process of
RSA
IRC:S P:88-2010
Road Safety
as
Policy
Governing Body
a
Ireatnient
Strategies
Programmes (Black
to
2.
RSA
Tackle Important
1.
RSA
Persons
and routine
Policies
&
and cooperation of
awareness
Increasing
How
to
incorporate
RSA
into
design
or
design/construction contracts?
'
Get
experienced
National/International
Procedure
&
RSA to
to deal
with recommendations of
designs
programme
Use
Routinely use
What
improve designs
RSA
to
to reduce potential
hazards
Get feedback from Designers, Auditors and Project Managers. Modify the process with experience and feedback
to
RSA on some
Feedback
Give feedback to governing body and senior executive about RSA & Progress in organisation and way
to extend and improve RSA process. Document the benefits and other experiences
Fig. 10.1
Suggested Model
for Initiating
66
RSA
in
an Organisation
IRC:SP:88-2010
ANNEX A
(Clause 8.4)
CHECKLISTS FOR CARRYING OUT ROAD SAFETY AUDIT FOR DIFFERENT STAGES
OF THE PROJECT
Checklists have been prepared to assist the
members
of the Audit
describe the problems and situations that can affect the road safety of selected types of project
of audit are
Checklist
presented hereunder:
Stage
Audit
Checklist 2
Stage 2 Audit
Checklist 3
Stage 3 Audit
Checklist 4
Stage 4 Audit
Checklist 5
Staae 5 Audit
Checklist 6
Stace 6 Audit
Checklist 7
Plannina
Checklist 8
Alignment
Checklist 9
Cross Section
Checklist 10
Intersections
Checklist 11
Road Signs
Checklist 12
Road Markings
Checklist 13
Lighting
Checklists
Roadside Hazards
Checklist 15
Roadside
Checklist 16
Vulnerable
Checklist 17
Development Proposals
Checklist 18
Maintenance Work
67
II
III
and Interchanges
Facilities
Road Users
IRC:SP:88-2010
CHECKLIST
1 )
1 -
What
STAGE
is
the category of road for which the feasibility study has been carried out e.g.,
2)
Is
3)
What kind
of traffic
is likely
Do
and
traffic
needs only?
or for
more general
the chosen type of road and the standards, alignment and cross-section offer
traffic
Does the
traffic
all
groups
combination with
is
it
a 'green
field project'
effects of this?
6)
Check whether appropriate design standards have been used having regard
scope of the project, and its function in relation to the traffic mix.
to the
7)
traffic
of the
characteristics.
8)
Has access
9)
Will the
control
been proposed?
of conjoining road
sections?
be
10)
Will there
1 1 )
b)
Impact on the surrounding, adjacent and/or off-loaded road network (does the
project simply
c)
12)
new road?
a)
move
of the
present problems?)?
vertical
visibility
4)
5)
16)
Has
lighting
and
at junctions?
been planned?
have any
If
so,
effect
does the
lighting offer
maximum safety,
both on links
for vulnerable
68
road-users and
if
so,
do these
IRC:SP:88~2010
1
7)
Do the
available accident data for the existing/adjacent road network give reason to
8)
Whether non-motorised
9)
What
20)
Do
likely
Check any
STAGE
1 )
2)
Is
4)
If
why not?
not,
the desired speed compatible with the cross-section and other design elements
and
3)
CHECKLIST
in
fit
matter, which
22)
and
21)
is
traffic is
in
is
Cross-section:
a)
Has
b)
Is
c)
Is
Horizontal
a)
and
Vertical alignment
visibility:
Can
in
visibility at
junctions
and
on free sections?
parapets, buildings,
c)
and
b)
all
been proposed?
rigid
be blocked by
traffic
risk,
especially
in
in
the future)
combination
peaks
(e.g.
hills
plus
traffic
signals)?
5)
Are the lane widths, shoulders, medians and other cross-section features
accordance with standard design and adequate
6)
variations
in
in
road?
cross-section design.
Check
cross-falls,
have been
utilized,
safety, particularly
to abutting properties.
7)
Check the safety aspects of shoulder provision, including the provision of paved and
earthen shoulders, the width and treatment on embankments and cross-fall of
shoulders? Are the shoulders
likely to
69
!RC:SP:88-2010
8)
9)
for
Junctions, interchanges
a)
turning lanes
approaching a
and ramps
all
conflict
be able to see
lines,
stop lines,
clearly visible?
matched
c)
Will
b)
in hilly
Do
to the
new road
(without sharp
seem
clear for
all
directions
and manoeuvres?
there sufficient space for
d)
Is
e)
all
facilities for
all
manoeuvres?
traffic
adequate
and safe?
f)
Can
g)
In
old,
unremoved section
of road
they
road.
optical
directions.
11)
2)
a)
Are
b)
c)
adequate?
all
be
traffic
is
visible?
b)
c)
of
alignment?
mitigate
in
and
standards and
alignment?
:
13)
Are existing junctions and intersections adjusted and matched to the new road
appropriately (without sharp
70
IRC:SP:88"2010
1
4)
adequate
at the critical
5)
Will
overtaking be prevented at
making
1
6)
is
difficult to
cross-fall
and any
flooding?
it
spots?
risk of
critical
drain
is
prohibited)?
If
a)
b)
Has the
quantity of information
7)
If
8)
Is
9)
Will there
will
level?
so;
Is
will
guardrails or
breakaway safety
Has
21)
Will
it
it
been proposed
be possible
etc.) safely
22)
Is
to carry out
of
bends?
or seasonal growth?
23)
that lighting
Is
likely to
Are there arrangements for safe access by emergency vehicles? Check the design of
medians and
barriers,
and the
ability of
emergency vehicles
to stop without
24)
Pedestrians
a)
b)
If
is
d)
Is
maximum use?
at
grade?
e)
Has
specific provision
been made
school crossings
or pedestrian signals?
25)
f)
g)
Whether needs
Have the needs of public transport users been considered? Are bus stops
for safety?
71
positioned
IRC:SP:88-2010
26)
Is lighting
envisaged
in
to the
work
in their
site available?
27)
Is
28)
Are there any factors requiring specific road safety provision, including maintenance?
29)
traffic
management
features, which
Other checks
made at discretion
full
operation?
of auditor or client.
Have
all
not,
reasons
visibility
If
thereof?
2)
Visibility,
a)
sight distance
vertical
requirements?
b)
appropriate for the ruling design speed and for any unusual
c)
traffic
design
is
mix.
Safety fences
Boundary fences
Street furniture
Parking
facilities
Signs
Landscaping
Bridge abutments
d)
Check whether railway crossings, bridges and other hazards are conspicuous.
e)
3)
Check whether the design standards are appropriate for all the new requirements of
the proposed project and check for consistency of general standards and guidelines
such as lane widths, camber and cross-fall.
4)
Cross-sections:
a)
b)
Is
is
IRC:SP:88-2010
Lighting columns, traffic signals, sign standards, etc:
a)
to
observed?
b)
or such like
been proposed?
b)
Is
c)
d)
e)
Will signs
mask each
in
other or
traffic
plans for
your assessment)?
all
distances/visibility
any way?
of kerb
Lighting:
a)
Is
there any risk that the lighting can be optically misleading and
detrimental effects on
b)
c)
Will
d)
Are
unlit
traffic
signals
will
have any
and signs?
it
unlit
road?
cross)?
e)
Will
Will
turning lanes
b)
approaching a
conflict
be able to see
lines,
stop
lines,
all
Do
(without sharp
seem
clear for
all
directions
and manoeuvres?
d)
Is
73
all
manoeuvres?
1RC:SP:88-2010
e)
facilities for
traffic
adequate
and safe?
In
f)
Can
g)
old,
who
they prevent
unremoved section
of road
optical
directions.
1
1 )
a)
Are
b)
c)
all
2)
be
traffic
is
visible?
adequate?
b)
c)
of
alignment?
mitigate
in
and
standards and
alignment?
13)
14)
Guardrails,
hedges and
a)
Are
b)
Are bridge
all
to the
new road
railings:
where
necessary?
c)
to prevent pedestrians
from
crossing?
15)
enough?
d)
e)
Road
"light"
surface:
a)
b)
Will
of surface
been chosen?
74
IRC:SP:88-2010
c)
end
of central reserve)
a)
Is
b)
Are
c)
d)
Is
there continuity of
in
edge markings?
For two-lane sections prepared for expansion to four lanes with central reserve
(e.g.
a)
expressways
Will
built
as "semi-motorways")
road users be clear everywhere that they are not on a one-way, two-lane
carriageway?
be
b)
c)
Is
d)
of signs
overtaking prevented at
ail
points
of extra high
standard?
where prevention
is
necessary?
a view
to future
expansion?
will
be necessary
for
(airfield,
In this
context consider:
a)
Is
b)
Have
c)
Be sure
all
signs
etc.,
facilities
and measures.
Landscaping:
a)
Is
Has
pedestrian
b)
Will
visibility
maintenance
and
of soft
visibility
requirements?
potential obstructions to
become
collision objects?
landscaping be safe?
Plantations:
a)
Will plantations
obscure
b)
Are plantations
likely to
visibility
encroach on markings or
75
lighting?
IRC:SP:88-2010
Will fully-grown trees constitute
c)
to rigid obstacles
22)
be observed?)?
d)
out safely?
Lay byes:
a)
b)
Is
in
the section?
it
is
vehicles?
c)
Is
there any
that
(if
need modification)?
Are advance warning signs and markings properly guiding the driver about the
d)
lay-bye?
e)
23)
Is
Check
and
24)
Are median barhers necessary and have they been properly detailed? Are there any
design features such as end conditions which require special attention?
25)
Are there any poles located adjacent to moving traffic which could be sited elsewhere?
26)
Have
27)
Is
28)
frangible or
accommodate
lighting
poles?
mitigated or relocated?
properly detailed?
29)
Is
30)
Check whether access to structures and road furniture is safe. Check that the road or
utilities in the road reserve can be maintained safely. Both road users and
is
it
Check
safety
measures needed
for
management
and
out from the safety point of view including the transition from the existing
arrangements
can be effected
32)
Check
for the
site to
the
final
layout
safely.
arrangement
for
traffic
control devices,
33)
34)
Other checks
made at discretion
of
persons with
of auditor or client.
76
disabilities.
IRC:SP:88-2010
CHECKLIST 4
1 )
STAGE
4 AUDIT (DURING
CONSTRUCTION STAGE)
!f
not,
why not?
2)
Whether information regarding the construction zone approaching has been provided
well in advance or not?
3)
4)
site of
clearly laid
out?
5)
of the lanes
is
works
area?
6)
Whether sight and stopping distances adequate at site of works and at intersections?
7)
Whether bus stops appropriately located with adequate clearance from the traffic lane
for safety and visibility.
8)
site is
safe at night?
Check the
devices.
9)
Check
for
0)
in
creating
site
operators and
for
For clear and sufficient information to the road user, advance warning signs installed
or not?
11)
Is
12)
Whether
suitable
to control driver
behaviour?
13)
Check
for the
adequacy
4)
at
view.
1
5)
16)
Check
for
traffic at
construction sites.
1
7)
77
disabilities.
IRC:SP:88-2010
1
8)
9)
management
traffic
necessary attention
places? Check
at the appropriate
for
work
site
and
to roadside safety.
20)
21)
Whether the
Traffic
proper
Management
with the
22)
Is
23)
Whether arrangements
of First Aid
management plan?
traffic
exist for
persons
getting injured.
24)
25)
Other checks
CHECKLIST
made at discretion
STAGE
work zones.
of auditor or client.
1)
Have
2)
3)
all
at
traffic
control devices as
in
5)
6)
7)
Check that
8)
9)
Check that all signs and other traffic control devices are correctly
they are
0)
provision for
facility
likely to
remain
visible at
all
installed
have
of debris.
lighting operating is effective
1 )
2)
recognised under
and function
likely
correctly
is
in
in
safe?
place.
place.
Check that
times.
13)
not?
existing roads.
delineators and
why
4)
road
not,
of the
If
of the
installed or overlooked.
road and
operating conditions.
78
its traffic
management
are easily
IRC:SP:88-2010
1
4)
5)
Other checks
CHECKLIST
made at discretion
STAGE
signing, etc,
of auditor or client.
MANAGEMENT)
1 )
Carryout inspection
and relevant
Does the
3)
4)
classification?
3,
its
intended function?
limits?
its
function,
speed
level
and
relevant.)
5)
6)
Do
7)
8)
Are there any signs that road users drive over islands or kerbs or that the routes taken
plantations obscure
visibility
constitute hazards?
good condition?
10)
to rigid obstacles
maintained for
all
groups
of road
users?
1 1 )
of
adequate width
seem hazardous to
2)
3)
4)
5)
6)
Are bus stops and bus bays safely located with adequate
the
for
pedestrians?
more
persons with
visibility
disabilities?
and clearance
to
traffic lane.
7)
Any
8)
Are
temporary
traffic
in relation to traffic
79
no longer required?
IRC:SP:88-2010
1
9)
Are overtaking opportunities available for heavy vehicles where volunnes are high?
20)
21
Is
of
any
are
activities that
likely to distract
drivers?
the location of rest areas and truck parking areas along the route appropriate and
adequate?
22)
Is sufficient
advance of breaks
using multilane highway?
warning provided
traffic
Other checks
CHECKLIST 7
1 )
calming measures
built
made at discretion
PLANNING
conform
if
so,
does the
to this?
Is
in
of auditor or client.
in relation to
3)
Does the
route
fit
4)
Does the
5)
Is
in
the forecast
traffic
volumes,
traffic
traffic in
the frequency of junctions and their type appropriate for the function of the road and
design speed?
its
7)
up areas?
characteristics
6)
in
in
Is
project
2)
in
Does
fit
in
changes
problems
at the
Does the
any harmful
connections
effects
will
in traffic
(Check
for potential
it
have
CHECKLIST 8 - ALIGNMENT
1)
2)
Is
the proposed design speed appropriate to the function of the road, the mix of traffic
likely to
use
different
design speeds?).
If
the speed
it,
is
not up to the
mark
of
different sections
need
Does the alignment (horizontal and vertical) give sufficient forward visibility
selected design speed? (Check for inadequate stopping sight distances)
4)
Check
for
Do
for the
is
80
fit
IRC:SP:88-2010
combinations, such as a sharp bend immediately after a summit curve, and sag curve
a bend).
within
6)
it
avoid creating
(neither clearly
if
any,
Does the vertical alignment pose excessive demands on the power of heavy vehicles?
Has been designed so those maximum grades are interspersed with recovery
it
to
heavy vehicles?
9)
Is
i.e.,
safely?
CHECKLIST
1)
CROSS-SECTION
medians
traffic likely to
use
(if
of the road
in
it?
Check whether bridges have footpaths and they have proper gradients/crash
barriers.
3)
Note any location where the cross-section standard changes abruptly along the route
or
4)
is
Identify
of the
roadway
is
restricted
and note
side slopes
been designed
to
Have
been designed
to
Is
the transition between the project road and the existing road(s) handled safely?
Check whether
in
standards).
Road
disabilities:
a)
b)
Bicyclists:
Pedestrians:
Segregated areas
significant
81
(e.g.
IRC:SP:88-2010
CHECKLSST
10
JUNCTIONS
a)
General
1 )
Is
the genera! layout of junction caters safely for all road users including disabled road
approaching drivers
cyclists
2)
will
it.
Check
etc.)
traffic
volume, the
Check whether
3)
it.
all
Is
it
traffic
movements
safest alternative?
permitted vehicular
types of vehicles?
4)
Will the
in
time?
its
layout
and the
priority rules
be recognised by
Is
Does the
give way
layout
lines
and other
critical
at
Y and skew
to stop/
junctions,
lines at
to stop/give
Is
lighting
way
lines
and other
critical
there adequate provision for channelising the different streams of traffic? (Check
the provision for right turn lanes, deceleration lanes and acceleration lanes?)
8)
Is
9)
Is
10)
Are junction(s)
for pedestrians
not
and studs
to
avoid
accidents?
b)
Roundabouts
11)
Is
the geometry simple and easily understood? (Pay attention to roundabouts which
2)
awkward
entry paths).
many entries for safe efficient operation? Are they sufficiently separated
3)
82
positioning).
IRC:SP:88-2010
Is
there
visibility for
entering
traffic
adequate? (Check
too good,
visibility is
if
if
the
been designed
provision
Does
Island
to
be forgiving
to errant vehicles?
make
of the junction?
of cyclists
the signing
adequate?
traffic
must giveway
to
circulating traffic).
Signal-Controlled Junction
Does
the signal
sequence conform
to the
standards?
Do the signals clearly indicate which movements are allowed at any one time? Are the
timings of various phases of signal cycle adequate?
Are the signal heads positioned so that drivers can see them
easily,
and
in
time to
Are
traffic for
all
visible only to
right turning
Does the
in
movements
signing; marking
it
clear to drivers
to
these
crossings?
Are the pedestrian signals positioned so those pedestrians can see them?
Whether the pedestrian crossing signal controls are provided where appropriate? If
so, there is a need for the crossing movements to be fully protected from conflicting
traffic movements for example where there will be serious conflicts with turning traffic.
Vegetation and Plantation
Is
than 600
mm
in
the
traffic
level for
a length
of
15
dividers?
Is
enough back
traffic to
the
driver?
of trees projecting
m?
83
IRC:SP:88-2010
CHECKLIST
1)
Is
11
ROAD SIGNS
the provision for road signs (regulatory, warning and informatory signs and
adequate and
delineators)
Check
for
in
size,
etc.)
any unauthorized
traffic
shape).
3)
4)
b)
Note
all traffic
if
to
each other
signs are clearly visible and are prominently displayed for the
bearing
6)
in
Determine effectiveness
legibility of
of vehicles
the information on
of traffic signs
traffic
signs
is
inadequate,
of information displayed.
by observing them
at night
and
identify
any
lack of reflectivity.
7)
Examine type
of sign posts
a fixed roadside hazard or where the use of frangible sign posts should be
considered.
8)
Are there any situations where traffic signs themselves are obstructing essential
of Sight' for drivers
9)
10)
'Line
and pedestrians.
b)
Informatory signs
a)
Has
signing been
logical
b)
Are
all
it
is
of unfamiliar driver?
information sign
c)
done on a systematic
and
84
to
1RC:SP:88-2010
Find instances of poor
d)
legibility
on
of information
signs.
Overhead signs
e)
size,
message
IRC
standards.
CHECKLIST
1)
12
ROAD MARKINGS
visibility of
in
in
line,
edge
line
etc.)?
3)
4)
Is
situations
5)
where
road markings?
for laying
in
the delineation of
'through' traffic
at junctions
into auxiliary
and
and mid-blocks
including
turn lanes?
of the sections
6)
Is
7)
Are the directional arrows marked on the pavement guiding the driver or creating
confusion to the driver?
8)
9)
Have
medians and
retro-reflective
is
a lack
of 'Hazard markings' at
approach end
of
0)
If
installed,
of
markers been
used?
CHECKLIST
1)
Is
13
LIGHTING
(particularly
to
be
lighted at night
where there are pedestrians and parking along the road) important
it,
lighting
scheme and
toll
plazas?
illumination levels of
an appropriate standard,
consistent with the needs of the location, pedestrian and other factors?
85
IRC:SP:88-2010
3)
where
street lighting
may
conflict
Does the
enhance as
confuse the
of poles
6)
Has
7)
hazard to
8)
1)
all
locations
poles protects
if
and
correctly installed
poles
lighting
in
ROADSIDE HAZARDS
Is
for
traffic?
CHECKLIST 14
lighting or
used
in
Is
the appropriate
treatment or projection provided for any objects within the clear zone?
2)
If
not,
to
moving
traffic?
If
so,
volume
4)
of traffic warrants
5)
6)
them?
a safe design?
Are there any poles or columns along the road and comment on whether some or any
of
Is
there a degree of hazard associated with large trees, boulders, etc. and whether
less
hazardous positions
etc.
Do
'fixed
traffic
Is
sight lines,
in
which
operation?
and pedestrian
terms
Comment on
of road safety?
there an existence of roadside stalls and other roadside business activities within
the right of
IRC:SP:88-2010
1
0)
11)
for the
purpose?
the length of crash barrier at each installation adequate? Are the crash barrier
installed correctly?
2)
Is
3)
Is
4)
Are there any thorny bushes by the roadside, whose branches are
in
likely to hurt
the
5)
Is
pavement
to
of vegetation
far
time
in
if
of the
should run across the road from behind or within the vegetation?
1
6)
median crash
collision or
7)
18)
on the
case
cyclist in
of
ends
barriers or
to hurt
village
name boards
a passenger
in
Bridges/Canal crossings: Are the open spaces by the side of ends of Parapets
canal?
1
9)
Have the roadside trees close to edge of berms, which cannot be removed for want of
permission of tree authority been
pasting reflective tape on
20)
Is
made
visible at night
them?
in
complete
visibility to
in
median
60 cm
for
at junctions or for
a length
of
m to afford
drivers?
cm on curves?
Is
22)
Is
the median clear of any trees with trunks with girth greater than 30
21
20
U Turns
in
cm?
If
not,
are
Are
Are entrances
to
off?
is
smooth and
!RC:SP:88-2010
CHECKLIST
1 )
15
ROADSIDE FACILITIES
Do the cross-section,
village
and maintain
it
at
is
it
down).
2)
Is
it?
(Check
channelled by guardrail
3)
traffic
7)
situation in the
for junction
Is
and safety
of
made? Also
is
buses
to stand
passengers?
there any need for overtaking opportunities along the route at regular intervals on
where
for rest
traffic
CHECKLIST 16
of
in hilly
terrain?
'unofficial'
places
2)
Will there
disabled
1)
vehicle
traffic
improvements,
for
scenic view points, wayside picnic areas etc, and note any current
3)
town
Are bus stop locations safe and proper and whether the provision
clear of
6)
and safe?
villages through
access
5)
of roadside parking
Has the opportunity been taken to improve the traffic and parking
and
busy places?)
4)
in
movements
walk
shoulders and
traffic to
check whether
it
in
is
at
all
embankments).
88
been
junctions
it
will
have
IRC:SP:88-2010
4)
Is
the provision for pedestrians and non-motorised vehicles at bridges and narrow
sections adequate
in relation
to pedestrian
and vehicular
traffic
volumes and
traffic
speeds?
5)
Have measures been taken to reduce the accident risk for children going to and from
roadside schools (Pedestrian guardrail may be needed to prevent children from
running out into the road)?
6)
Have the need of cyclists and other non-motorised vehicles been provided for (Check
shoulder width - check the need and feasibility of segregated cycle/cycle rickshaw
lanes, especially
in
towns)?
7)
8)
9)
0)
drainage
pits
where necessary?
towns).
Are bus stops appropriately located with adequate clearance from the
safety
at
and
Where
traffic
lane for
visibility?
necessary,
is
or overpasses?
CHECKLIST 17
1)
3)
4)
DEVELOPMENT PROPOSALS
Horizontal Alignment:
a)
Is visibility
satisfactory at
b)
Are curve
radii
c)
2)
and forward
visibilities
satisfactory?
,,
..
v-^ r'
Vertical Alignment:
a)
b)
Parking Provision:
parking adequate to minimise on street parking and associated risks?
a)
Is off-site
b)
Servicing Facilities:
a)
Are
b)
c)
Is
off street
large vehicles?
facilities?
IRC:SP:88-2010
5)
6)
Landscaping:
a)
Does landscaping
b)
Is
Traffic
a)
Have necessary
tree planting
traffic
likely to
development?
7)
rails, etc.
8)
Others
be area-wide
on other roads?
a)
Will there
b)
Will
c)
d)
e)
f)
Is
g)
h)
effect
to
adequate?
points?
Is
j)
Are truck
k)
Are
CHECKLIST 18
1)
Is
it
byes required?
MAINTENANCE WORK
speed
and diversions?
Are temporary traffic signals or road markings adequate and does the message reach
all
3)
toll
lay
limits
2)
i)
road users?
limit
is
it
proper?
!RC:SP:88-2010
Will the unaffected
Is
Will
it
be necessary to illuminate
Will the
work
Will there
Has a
site,
be safe access
safety
points?
critical
to the
rigid
obstacle?
work place?
91
is
to
it
all
adequate?
groups
which