You are on page 1of 2

2015-16 NCAA Division I Mens Basketball

Officials Evaluation Form


Referee

Umpire 1

Umpire 2

Individuals Name
Game Information
Date:

vs.
Description
Difficulty of game to officiate

Time:

Rating
Average Difficult
Rating Codes
1 = Unsatisfactory

2 = Satisfactory

3 = Exceptional

Note: If you evaluate an official as UNSATISFACTORY in any category, please note any specifics in the comment section.
Evaluation
Description
1.
Fitness/mobility.
Official was fit enough to keep up with the pace of the game and get in good position to
observe and officiate plays in his area(s) of responsibility.
2.

3.

4.
5.

6.

7.

Official
Rating

Communication skills.
Communicates as needed; treats coaches, players and table personnel in a professional
manner.
Illegal contact/flow of the game.
Official found an acceptable balance between marginal contact, illegal contact and
reducing physical play.
Bench decorum/sportsmanship.
Official dealt properly with bench decorum and player sportsmanship issues.
Call accuracy throughout the game.
Based on the observations of the evaluator; assess the play calling accuracy of the
official.
Game management/mechanics.
Official was aware of and correctly handled all administrative, dead ball, time outs,
substitutions, scoring and timing and rules issues.
Use of monitor/end of game officiating.
Including authorized use of courtside monitor to end game correctly.

COMMENTS
Fitness/Mobility

Communication Skills

(over)

N/A

2015-16 NCAA Division I Mens Basketball


Officials Evaluation Form

Illegal Contact/Flow of the Game

Bench Decorum/Sportsmanship

Call Accuracy Throughout the Game

Game Management/Mechanics

Time of Plays for Review

Use of Monitor/End of Game Officiating

Summary

You might also like