Professional Documents
Culture Documents
8. Internal Relationship
There should be a proper flow of vertical and horizontal communication i.e.
between superiors and subordinates and between colleagues at the same level. A
free flow of ideas enables a healthy relationship between colleagues.
B. External Environment
External environment includes all those factors and forces which are external to the
business organization. These include factors such as economic, socio-cultural,
legal, demographic etc. These factors are beyond the control the company.
1. Demographic Environment
Demographic environment studies human population with reference to its size,
density, literacy rate, sex-ratio, age composition etc. These factors affect the
demand for good and services, quantity and quality of production, distribution etc.
e.g. a rapidly growing population indicates growing demand for many products.
2. Natural Environment
Business firms use natural resources like water, land, iron, crude oil etc. All
business units are directly or indirectly dependent upon natural environment.
Business firms are responsible for ecological imbalance. So they should take
necessary measures to control pollution. Business operations have caused
considerable changes in ecological balance and natural environment of the country.
The applications of modern technology in industry leads to rapid economic growth
at a huge social cost a measured by the deterioration of physical environment i.e.
air pollution, water pollution, noise pollution etc. So business enterprises has to
calculate net social cost of its venture.
3. Economic Environment
A business firm closely interact with its economic environment. Economic
environment is generally related to those external forces, which have direct
economic effect upon business. Economic environment is a sum total of
a. Economic conditions in the market
b. Economic policies of the government
c. Economic system of the country.
a. Economic conditions
ENVIRONMENTAL SCANNING
Environmental Scanning means an examination and study of the environment of a
business unit in order to identify its survival and prosperity chances. It means
observing the business environment both external and internal and understanding
its implications for business opportunities. It also involves knowing beforehand the
risks and uncertainties as well as threats to the business unit. As business
environment is dynamic in nature, it is always changing, environmental scanning
has to be quick and regular. It should not be one time act to scan the environment.
It is the constant telescoping of external environment and microscoping of internal
environment. Environmental Scanning provides a broader prospective to corporate
planners in formulating plans and strategies. In short , the process by which
organizations monitor their relevant environment to identify opportunities and
threats affecting their business is known as environmental scanning.
NEED FOR ENVIRONMENTAL SCANNING Environmental Scanning is
essential because of following reasons :
1) Prime Influence Environment is a prime influence on the effectiveness of
business strategies. If strategic planning is done without considering environment,
it is likely to be defective. Besides, the success of the implementation of the
strategy depends on the environmental factors.
2) A tool to anticipate Changes Environmental scanning is a very useful tool
not only to understand business surroundings, but also as a good instrument to
anticipate the changes and be prepared to face the challenges of such changes.
3) Time for adjustment A business unit cannot change the business activities
overnight. It needs time to adjust with the changing environment. If it has to face
the changed environment suddenly, it may be possible to make immediate changes
according to the demand of the changed environment. Environmental scanning
gives time to the company to get adjust to the changed environment.
4) Early Warning system - Environmental Scanning gives advance warning or
danger signals of the adverse changes in environment. It helps the company to
design defense mechanism to avoid future adverse effects of environment on the
business activities e.g. with the changing marketing environment, many companies
are adopting on-line marketing to survive in this competitive environment.
Obsolete facilities
Internal operating problems
Poor marketing skills etc.
Weaknesses is an inherent limitation, which creates a strategic disadvantage for the
organization e.g. limited finance.
Opportunities An opportunity is a favourable condition in the organizations
environment which enables it to strengthen its position.
Threats A threat is an unfavourable condition in the organizations environment
that creates a rise for or cause damage to the organization.
ROLE AND IMPORTANCE OF SWOT ANALYSIS
1. Identify strengths The analysis of the internal environment help to identify
the strengths of the firm. The internal environment refers to plans and policies of
the firm, its resources-physical, financial and human resources e.g. If company has
good relations with workers, the strength of the company can be identified through
the workers loyalty and dedication on the part of workers.
2. Identify weaknesses A firm may be strong in certain areas, whereas it may be
weak in some other areas. The firm should identify such weaknesses through
SWOT analysis so as to correct them as early as possible e.g. Lack of capital may
be a weakness of the company, but company should try to raise additional funds to
correct the weaknesses.
3. Identify Opportunities An analysis of the external environment helps the
business firms to identify the opportunities in the market. The business firm should
make every possible effort to grab the opportunities, as and when they come e.g.
4. Identify threats Business may be subject to threats from competitors and
others. Identification of threats at an earlier date is always beneficial to the firm as
it helps to defuse the same. For instance, a competitor may come up with
innovative product. This not only affects the firms business but also endanger its
survival, so business firm should take necessary steps to counter the strategy of the
competitors.
5. Effective Planning A proper study of environment helps a business firm to
plan its activities properly. Before planning, it is very much necessary to analysis
the internal as well as external environment. After SWOT analysis , the firm can
list out well-defined and time-bound objectives, which in turn help to frame proper
plans.
6. Facilitates Organising Resources Environment analysis not only helps in
organizing the resources of right type and quantity. A proper analysis of
environment enables a firm to know the demand potential in the market.
Accordingly, the firm can plan and organize the right amount of resources to
handle the activities of the organization.
7. Face Competition A study of business environment enable a firm to analyse
the competitors strengths and weaknesses. This would enable the firm to
incorporate the competitors strengths in its working. The firm may also try to
exploit the competitors weaknesses in its favour.
8. Flexibility in Operations The environmental factors are uncontrollable and a
business firm finds it difficult to influence the surrounding of its choice. A study of
environment will enable a firm to adjust its operations depending upon the
changing environmental situation.
Industry analysis helps a firm find answers to two questions basically:
Whatcharacteristics of the industry are important? And how can a manager
enhance performance given those characteristics?.
Industry characteristics that could impact a Firms Performance
The number of firms in the industry
The level and pattern of promotional expenditures
The rate and nature of technological competition
The relative size of firms
Consumer preferences for the product and for related products
The rate of demand growth
potential entrants and substitute products, all have the potential to impact the
market depending on the industry.
1) Threats of Entry: New entrants to an industry bring new capacity, the desire to
gain market share, and often substantial resources. Gaining entry is always not
easy as there are barriers to entry. (i) The economies of scale prohibit entry by
forcing the aspirant either to come in on a large scale or to accept a cost
disadvantage (ii) brand identification (product differentiation) creates a strong
barrier by forcing entrants to spend heavily to overcome customer loyalty
(remember lux, bournvita, vicks, good day) (iii) The need to invest large financial
resources in order to compete creates a barrier to entry (iv) Entrenched companies
many have cost advantages not available to potential rivals, no matter what their
size and attainable economies of scale. (vi) The government can limit or even
foreclose entry to industries, with such controls as license requirements, and limits
on access to raw material.
2) Powerful Supplier: This is a situation where suppliers can force buyers to pay
higher prices and thus affect their profitability. This would happen if the supplier
enjoys monopoly, where the switching cost of the buyer is substantially higher,
where the industry is not as important customer of the supplier group, where it sells
products having no substitutes etc.
3) Powerful buyers: Customers likewise can force down prices, demand higher
quality or more service and play competition against each other all at the expense
of industry profits. This can usually happen when buyers have choice of substitutes
or an alternative source of suppliers for the same product. Also, high buyer
concentration, threat of backward integration, and low switching costs add to the
power of buyers.
4) Substitute products: By placing a ceiling on the prices it can charge, substitute
products or services limit the potential of an industry. For example, Jute industry
suffered badly after facing competition from petro-chemical based packing
products. The demand for fibre glass suffered likewise when insulation substitutes
emerged in the form of cellulose rockwool and Styrofoam.
5) Intensity of Rivalry: There is competitive rivalry between firms on a continuing
basis, the various players in a particular sector or niche try to constantly jockey for
position and try new product and process innovation in order to develop a strategic
edge and hence a stronger position in the competitive space. Intense rivalry is
related to a number of factors; competitors are large in number and of comparable
sizes; industry growth is slow; the product or service has low switching costs; fixed
costs are high; the product is perishable; exist barriers are high etc.
McKinsey 7s model
McKinsey 7s model is a tool that analyzes firms organizational design by
looking at 7 key internal elements: strategy, structure, systems, shared values,
style, staff and skills, in order to identify if they are effectively aligned and allow
organization to achieve its objectives.
McKinsey 7s model was developed in 1980s by McKinsey consultants Tom Peters,
Robert Waterman and Julien Philips with a help from Richard Pascale and Anthony
G. Athos. Since the introduction, the model has been widely used by academics
and practitioners and remains one of the most popular strategic planning tools. It
sought to present an emphasis on human resources (Soft S), rather than the
traditional mass production tangibles of capital, infrastructure and equipment, as a
key to higher organizational performance. The goal of the model was to show how
7 elements of the company: Structure, Strategy, Skills, Staff, Style, Systems, and
Shared values, can be aligned together to achieve effectiveness in a company. The
key point of the model is that all the seven areas are interconnected and a change in
one area requires change in the rest of a firm for it to function effectively.
Below you can find the McKinsey model, which represents the connections
between seven areas and divides them into Soft Ss and Hard Ss. The shape of
the model emphasizes interconnectedness of the elements.
The model can be applied to many situations and is a valuable tool when
organizational design is at question. The most common uses of the framework are:
Hard S Soft S
Strategy Style
Structure Staff
Systems Skills
Shared Values
Strategy is a plan developed by a firm to achieve sustained competitive advantage
and successfully compete in the market. What does a well-aligned strategy mean in
7s McKinsey model? In general, a sound strategy is the one thats clearly
articulated, is long-term, helps to achieve competitive advantage and is reinforced
by strong vision, mission and values. But its hard to tell if such strategy is wellaligned with other elements when analyzed alone. So the key in 7s model is not to
look at your company to find the great strategy, structure, systems and etc. but to
look if its aligned with other elements. For example, short-term strategy is usually
a poor choice for a company but if its aligned with other 6 elements, then it may
provide strong results.
Structure represents the way business divisions and units are organized and
includes the information of who is accountable to whom. In other words, structure
is the organizational chart of the firm. It is also one of the most visible and easy to
change elements of the framework.
Systems are the processes and procedures of the company, which reveal business
daily activities and how decisions are made. Systems are the area of the firm that
determines how business is done and it should be the main focus for managers
during organizational change.
Skills are the abilities that firms employees perform very well. They also include
capabilities and competences. During organizational change, the question often
arises of what skills the company will really need to reinforce its new strategy or
new structure.
Staff element is concerned with what type and how many employees an
organization will need and how they will be recruited, trained, motivated and
rewarded.
Style represents the way the company is managed by top-level managers, how they
interact, what actions do they take and their symbolic value. In other words, it is
the management style of companys leaders.
Shared Values are at the core of McKinsey 7s model. They are the norms and
standards that guide employee behavior and company actions and thus, are the
foundation of every organization.
SPACEAnalysis
SPACE Analysis is an analytical technique used in strategic
management and planning. SPACE is an acronym of Strategic
PositionandActionEvaluation.
SPACE Analysis is an analytical technique used in strategic
management and planning. SPACE is an acronym of Strategic
PositionandActionEvaluation.Theanalysisallowstocreateanidea
oftheappropriatebusinessstrategyfortheenterprise.Theanalysis
assessestheinternalandexternalenvironmentandallowstodesign
anappropriatestrategy.
Theanalysisdescribestheexternalenvironmentusingtwocriteria:
*EnvironmentalStability(ES)itisinfluencedbythefollowingsub
factors: technological change, inflation rate, demand volatility,
price range of competitive products, price elasticity of demand,
pressurefromthesubstitutes
*IndustryAttractiveness(IA)itisinfluencedbythefollowingsub
factors:growthpotential,profitpotential,financialstability,resource
utilization, complexity of entering the industry, labor productivity,
capacityutilization,bargainingpowerofmanufacturers
Theinsideenvironmentisalsodescribedbytwocriteria:
*Competitiveadvantage(CA)itisinfluencedbythefollowing
factors:marketshare,productquality,productlifecycle,innovation
cycle,customerloyalty,verticalintegration
*Financialstrength(FS)itisinfluencedbythefollowingindicators:
returnoninvestment,liquidity,debtratio,availableversusrequired
capital,cashflow,inventoryturnover
HowtousetheSPACEanalysisinpractice?
Spaceanalysismatrix
The strategic position of the company and alternatives of the
strategicbehaviorarefollowing:
*Aggressivepositionanattractiveandrelativelystableindustry,
thecompanyhasacompetitiveadvantageanditcanprotectit,a
critical factor is the possible entry of new competitors into the
industry, itmaybeconsiderednewacquisitions, increasingmarket
shareandfocusingoncompetitiveproducts
ValueChainAnalysis(VCA)
Avalue chainidentifies andisolatesthevariouseconomicvalueadding activities(suchas
differentiatingaproduct,loweringthecost,andmeetingcustomersneedsquickly)thatoccurin
somewayineveryfirm.Itportraysactivitiesrequiredtocreatevalueforcustomersofagiven
productorservice.Valuechainanalysis,thus,offersanexcellentmeansbywhichmanagers
canfindthestrengthsandweaknessesofeachactivityvisvisthefirmscompetitors.
Primaryactivities:operation,outboundlogistic,marketingandsales,service.
Supportactivities:HRM,Technologicaldevelopment,procurementetc.
ConductingaValueChainAnalysis
Identifyactivities:VCArequiresafirmtodivideitsoperationsintoprimaryandsupport
activity categories. Within each category a firm may typically perform a number of discrete
activities that may reflect its key strengths or weaknesses. At this stage managers should
desegregatewhatactuallygoesintovariousactivitiesinadetailedmanner.
Allocatecost:VCArequiresmanagertoassigncostsandassetstoeachactivity,whichis
totallydifferentfromwhatonefindsintraditionalcostaccountingmethod.
Identifyactivitiesthatdifferentiatethefirm:Heremanagersshouldtrytoidentifyseveral
sourcesofdifferentiationadvantagerelativetocompetitors.AlexMillerhaslistedsomeofthese
advantages.
Examinethevaluechain:Oncethevaluechainhasbeendescribed,managersshouldlist
theactivitiesthatareimportanttobuyersatisfactionandmarketsuccess.Keepingcostsunder
strictvigil,offeringvalueaddedserviceateachstage,doingthingsbetterthanrivalsareallpart
ofthisstrategy.
VCA is most effective when managers try to draw comparisons with key competitors and
improve the internal processes with a view to offer value for money kind of services to
customers.
Benchmarking
It is a popular tool of business management in corporate attempts to gain and maintain
competitiveadvantage.Thecentralessenceofbenchmarkingisaboutlearninghowtoimprove
businessactivity,processesandmanagement.However,benchmarkingasatermhasbeen
usedwidelytorefertomanydifferentactivities.Thereisawidevariationindefinitionsusedto
describebenchmarking.Someofthedefinitionsaregivenbelow:
Acontinuous systematicprocessfor evaluating theproducts,servicesandworkof
organizations that are recognized as representing best practices for the purpose of
organizationalimprovementSpendolini,1992.
Acontinuoussearchfor,andapplicationof,significantlybetterpracticesthatlead to
superiorcompetitiveperformanceWatson,1993.
A disciplined process that begins with a thorough search to identify bestpractice
organizations, continues with the careful study of ones own practices and performance ,
progressesthroughsystematicsitevisitsandinterviews,andconcludeswithananalysisof
results,developmentofrecommendationsandimplementationGravin,1993.
Thecharacteristicstoemergefromthesedefinitionsarethatbenchmarkingis:
measurementviacomparison
continuousimprovement
systematicprocedureincarryingoutbenchmarkingactivity
Theprocess:
Benchmarkinginvolveslookingoutsideaparticularbusiness,organization,industry,regionor
countrytoexaminehowothersachieveperformancelevelsandtounderstandtheprocesses
theyuse.Inthiswaybenchmarkinghelpsexplaintheprocessesbehindexcellentperformance.
Whenthelessonslearntfromabenchmarkingexerciseareappliedappropriately,theyfacilitate
improvedperformanceincriticalfunctionswithinanorganizationorinkeyareasofthebusiness
environment.
Applicationofbenchmarkinginvolvesfourkeysteps:
i)Understandindetailexistingbusinessprocesses.
ii)Analyzethebusinessprocessesofothers
iii)Compareownbusinessperformancewiththatofothersanalyzed
iv)Implementthestepsnecessarytoclosetheperformancegap.
Benchmarkingshouldnotbeconsideredaoneoffexercise.Tobeeffective,itmustbecomean
ongoing,integralpartofanongoingimprovementprocesswiththegoalofkeepingabreastof
everimprovingbestpractice.
TypesofBenchmarking
(i) Strategic benchmarking: Where businesses need to improve overall performance by
examiningthelongtermstrategiesandgeneralapproachesthathaveenabledhighperformers
tosucceed.Itinvolvesconsideringhighlevelaspectssuchascorecompetencies,developing
newproductsandservicesandimprovingcapabilitiesfordealingwithchangesintheexternal
environment.Changesresultingfromthistypeofbenchmarkingmaybedifficulttocomplement
andtakealongtimetomaterialize.
(ii)Performanceorcompetitivebenchmarking:Businessesconsidertheirpositioninrelation
toperformancecharacteristicsofkeyproductsandservices.Benchmarkingpartnersaredrawn
fromthesamesector.Thistypeofanalysisisoftenundertakenthroughconsultantstoprotect
confidentiality.
(iii)Processbenchmarking:Focusesonimprovingspecificcriticalprocessesandoperations.
Benchmarkingpartnersaresoughtfrombestpracticeorganizationsthatperformsimilarworkor
deliversimilarservices.Processbenchmarkinginvariablyinvolvesproducingprocessmapsto
facilitatecomparisonandanalysis.Thistypeofbenchmarkinggenerallyresultsinshortterm
benefits.
(iv) Functional benchmarking: Businesses look to benchmark with partners drawn from
differentbusinesssectorsorareasofactivitytofindwaysofimprovingsimilarfunctionsorwork
processes.Thissortofbenchmarkingcanleadtoinnovationanddramaticimprovements.
(v)Internalbenchmarking: involvesbenchmarkingbusinessesoroperationsfromwithinthe
sameorganization.Theadvantageofinternalbenchmarkingisthataccesstosensitivedataand
informationiseasier;standardizeddataisoftenreadilyavailable;and,usuallylesstimeand
resourcesareneeded. Theremaybefewerbarrierstoimplementationaspracticesmaybe
relatively easy to transfer across the same organization. However, real innovation may be
lackingandbestinclassperformanceismorelikelytobefoundthroughexternalbenchmarking.
(vi)ExternalBenchmarking: Involvesanalyzingoutsideorganisationsthatareknowntobe
bestinclass.Externalbenchmarkingprovidesopportunitiesoflearningfromthosewhoareat
the leading edge. This type of benchmarking can take up significant time and resourceto
ensure the comparability of data and information the credibility of the findings and the
developmentofsoundrecommendations.
ValueChainAnalysis(VCA)
Primaryactivities:operation,outboundlogistic,marketingandsales,service.
Supportactivities:HRM,Technologicaldevelopment,procurementetc.
ConductingaValueChainAnalysis
Identifyactivities:VCArequiresafirmtodivideitsoperationsintoprimaryandsupport
activity categories. Within each category a firm may typically perform a number of discrete
activities that may reflect its key strengths or weaknesses. At this stage managers should
desegregatewhatactuallygoesintovariousactivitiesinadetailedmanner.
Allocatecost:VCArequiresmanagertoassigncostsandassetstoeachactivity,whichis
totallydifferentfromwhatonefindsintraditionalcostaccountingmethod.
Identifyactivitiesthatdifferentiatethefirm:Heremanagersshouldtrytoidentifyseveral
sourcesofdifferentiationadvantagerelativetocompetitors.AlexMillerhaslistedsomeofthese
advantages.
Examinethevaluechain:Oncethevaluechainhasbeendescribed,managersshouldlist
theactivitiesthatareimportanttobuyersatisfactionandmarketsuccess.Keepingcostsunder
strictvigil,offeringvalueaddedserviceateachstage,doingthingsbetterthanrivalsareallpart
ofthisstrategy.
VCA is most effective when managers try to draw comparisons with key competitors and
improve the internal processes with a view to offer value for money kind of services to
customers.
Benchmarking
Thecharacteristicstoemergefromthesedefinitionsarethatbenchmarkingis:
measurementviacomparison
continuousimprovement
systematicprocedureincarryingoutbenchmarkingactivity
Theprocess:
Benchmarkinginvolveslookingoutsideaparticularbusiness,organization,industry,regionor
countrytoexaminehowothersachieveperformancelevelsandtounderstandtheprocesses
theyuse.Inthiswaybenchmarkinghelpsexplaintheprocessesbehindexcellentperformance.
Whenthelessonslearntfromabenchmarkingexerciseareappliedappropriately,theyfacilitate
improvedperformanceincriticalfunctionswithinanorganizationorinkeyareasofthebusiness
environment.
Applicationofbenchmarkinginvolvesfourkeysteps:
i)Understandindetailexistingbusinessprocesses.
ii)Analyzethebusinessprocessesofothers
iii)Compareownbusinessperformancewiththatofothersanalyzed
iv)Implementthestepsnecessarytoclosetheperformancegap.
Benchmarkingshouldnotbeconsideredaoneoffexercise.Tobeeffective,itmustbecomean
ongoing,integralpartofanongoingimprovementprocesswiththegoalofkeepingabreastof
everimprovingbestpractice.
TypesofBenchmarking
(i) Strategic benchmarking: Where businesses need to improve overall performance by
examiningthelongtermstrategiesandgeneralapproachesthathaveenabledhighperformers
tosucceed.Itinvolvesconsideringhighlevelaspectssuchascorecompetencies,developing
newproductsandservicesandimprovingcapabilitiesfordealingwithchangesintheexternal
environment.Changesresultingfromthistypeofbenchmarkingmaybedifficulttocomplement
andtakealongtimetomaterialize.
(ii)Performanceorcompetitivebenchmarking:Businessesconsidertheirpositioninrelation
toperformancecharacteristicsofkeyproductsandservices.Benchmarkingpartnersaredrawn
fromthesamesector.Thistypeofanalysisisoftenundertakenthroughconsultantstoprotect
confidentiality.
(iii)Processbenchmarking:Focusesonimprovingspecificcriticalprocessesandoperations.
Benchmarkingpartnersaresoughtfrombestpracticeorganizationsthatperformsimilarworkor
deliversimilarservices.Processbenchmarkinginvariablyinvolvesproducingprocessmapsto
facilitatecomparisonandanalysis.Thistypeofbenchmarkinggenerallyresultsinshortterm
benefits.
(iv) Functional benchmarking: Businesses look to benchmark with partners drawn from
differentbusinesssectorsorareasofactivitytofindwaysofimprovingsimilarfunctionsorwork
processes.Thissortofbenchmarkingcanleadtoinnovationanddramaticimprovements.
(v)Internalbenchmarking: involvesbenchmarkingbusinessesoroperationsfromwithinthe
sameorganization.Theadvantageofinternalbenchmarkingisthataccesstosensitivedataand
informationiseasier;standardizeddataisoftenreadilyavailable;and,usuallylesstimeand
resourcesareneeded. Theremaybefewerbarrierstoimplementationaspracticesmaybe
relatively easy to transfer across the same organization. However, real innovation may be
lackingandbestinclassperformanceismorelikelytobefoundthroughexternalbenchmarking.
(vi)ExternalBenchmarking: Involvesanalyzingoutsideorganisationsthatareknowntobe
bestinclass.Externalbenchmarkingprovidesopportunitiesoflearningfromthosewhoareat
the leading edge. This type of benchmarking can take up significant time and resourceto
ensure the comparability of data and information the credibility of the findings and the
developmentofsoundrecommendations.
(VCA)
Avalue chainidentifies andisolatesthevariouseconomicvalueadding activities(suchas
differentiatingaproduct,loweringthecost,andmeetingcustomersneedsquickly)thatoccurin
somewayineveryfirm.Itportraysactivitiesrequiredtocreatevalueforcustomersofagiven
productorservice.Valuechainanalysis,thus,offersanexcellentmeansbywhichmanagers
canfindthestrengthsandweaknessesofeachactivityvisvisthefirmscompetitors.
Primaryactivities:operation,outboundlogistic,marketingandsales,service.
Supportactivities:HRM,Technologicaldevelopment,procurementetc.
ConductingaValueChainAnalysis
Identifyactivities:VCArequiresafirmtodivideitsoperationsintoprimaryandsupport
activity categories. Within each category a firm may typically perform a number of discrete
activities that may reflect its key strengths or weaknesses. At this stage managers should
desegregatewhatactuallygoesintovariousactivitiesinadetailedmanner.
Allocatecost:VCArequiresmanagertoassigncostsandassetstoeachactivity,whichis
totallydifferentfromwhatonefindsintraditionalcostaccountingmethod.
Identifyactivitiesthatdifferentiatethefirm:Heremanagersshouldtrytoidentifyseveral
sourcesofdifferentiationadvantagerelativetocompetitors.AlexMillerhaslistedsomeofthese
advantages.
Examinethevaluechain:Oncethevaluechainhasbeendescribed,managersshouldlist
theactivitiesthatareimportanttobuyersatisfactionandmarketsuccess.Keepingcostsunder
strictvigil,offeringvalueaddedserviceateachstage,doingthingsbetterthanrivalsareallpart
ofthisstrategy.
VCA is most effective when managers try to draw comparisons with key competitors and
improve the internal processes with a view to offer value for money kind of services to
customers.
Benchmarking
It is a popular tool of business management in corporate attempts to gain and maintain
competitiveadvantage.Thecentralessenceofbenchmarkingisaboutlearninghowtoimprove
businessactivity,processesandmanagement.However,benchmarkingasatermhasbeen
usedwidelytorefertomanydifferentactivities.Thereisawidevariationindefinitionsusedto
describebenchmarking.Someofthedefinitionsaregivenbelow:
Acontinuous systematicprocessfor evaluating theproducts,servicesandworkof
organizations that are recognized as representing best practices for the purpose of
organizationalimprovementSpendolini,1992.
Acontinuoussearchfor,andapplicationof,significantlybetterpracticesthatlead to
superiorcompetitiveperformanceWatson,1993.
A disciplined process that begins with a thorough search to identify bestpractice
organizations, continues with the careful study of ones own practices and performance ,
progressesthroughsystematicsitevisitsandinterviews,andconcludeswithananalysisof
results,developmentofrecommendationsandimplementationGravin,1993.
Thecharacteristicstoemergefromthesedefinitionsarethatbenchmarkingis:
measurementviacomparison
continuousimprovement
systematicprocedureincarryingoutbenchmarkingactivity
Theprocess:
Benchmarkinginvolveslookingoutsideaparticularbusiness,organization,industry,regionor
countrytoexaminehowothersachieveperformancelevelsandtounderstandtheprocesses
theyuse.Inthiswaybenchmarkinghelpsexplaintheprocessesbehindexcellentperformance.
Whenthelessonslearntfromabenchmarkingexerciseareappliedappropriately,theyfacilitate
improvedperformanceincriticalfunctionswithinanorganizationorinkeyareasofthebusiness
environment.
Applicationofbenchmarkinginvolvesfourkeysteps:
i)Understandindetailexistingbusinessprocesses.
ii)Analyzethebusinessprocessesofothers
iii)Compareownbusinessperformancewiththatofothersanalyzed
iv)Implementthestepsnecessarytoclosetheperformancegap.
Benchmarkingshouldnotbeconsideredaoneoffexercise.Tobeeffective,itmustbecomean
ongoing,integralpartofanongoingimprovementprocesswiththegoalofkeepingabreastof
everimprovingbestpractice.
TypesofBenchmarking
(i) Strategic benchmarking: Where businesses need to improve overall performance by
examiningthelongtermstrategiesandgeneralapproachesthathaveenabledhighperformers
tosucceed.Itinvolvesconsideringhighlevelaspectssuchascorecompetencies,developing
newproductsandservicesandimprovingcapabilitiesfordealingwithchangesintheexternal
environment.Changesresultingfromthistypeofbenchmarkingmaybedifficulttocomplement
andtakealongtimetomaterialize.
(ii)Performanceorcompetitivebenchmarking:Businessesconsidertheirpositioninrelation
toperformancecharacteristicsofkeyproductsandservices.Benchmarkingpartnersaredrawn
fromthesamesector.Thistypeofanalysisisoftenundertakenthroughconsultantstoprotect
confidentiality.
(iii)Processbenchmarking:Focusesonimprovingspecificcriticalprocessesandoperations.
Benchmarkingpartnersaresoughtfrombestpracticeorganizationsthatperformsimilarworkor
deliversimilarservices.Processbenchmarkinginvariablyinvolvesproducingprocessmapsto
facilitatecomparisonandanalysis.Thistypeofbenchmarkinggenerallyresultsinshortterm
benefits.
(iv) Functional benchmarking: Businesses look to benchmark with partners drawn from
differentbusinesssectorsorareasofactivitytofindwaysofimprovingsimilarfunctionsorwork
processes.Thissortofbenchmarkingcanleadtoinnovationanddramaticimprovements.
(v)Internalbenchmarking: involvesbenchmarkingbusinessesoroperationsfromwithinthe
sameorganization.Theadvantageofinternalbenchmarkingisthataccesstosensitivedataand
informationiseasier;standardizeddataisoftenreadilyavailable;and,usuallylesstimeand
resourcesareneeded. Theremaybefewerbarrierstoimplementationaspracticesmaybe
relatively easy to transfer across the same organization. However, real innovation may be
lackingandbestinclassperformanceismorelikelytobefoundthroughexternalbenchmarking.
(vi)ExternalBenchmarking: Involvesanalyzingoutsideorganisationsthatareknowntobe
bestinclass.Externalbenchmarkingprovidesopportunitiesoflearningfromthosewhoareat
the leading edge. This type of benchmarking can take up significant time and resourceto
ensure the comparability of data and information the credibility of the findings and the
developmentofsoundrecommendations.
(VCA)
Avalue chainidentifies andisolatesthevariouseconomicvalueadding activities(suchas
differentiatingaproduct,loweringthecost,andmeetingcustomersneedsquickly)thatoccurin
somewayineveryfirm.Itportraysactivitiesrequiredtocreatevalueforcustomersofagiven
productorservice.Valuechainanalysis,thus,offersanexcellentmeansbywhichmanagers
canfindthestrengthsandweaknessesofeachactivityvisvisthefirmscompetitors.
Primaryactivities:operation,outboundlogistic,marketingandsales,service.
Supportactivities:HRM,Technologicaldevelopment,procurementetc.
ConductingaValueChainAnalysis
Identifyactivities:VCArequiresafirmtodivideitsoperationsintoprimaryandsupport
activity categories. Within each category a firm may typically perform a number of discrete
activities that may reflect its key strengths or weaknesses. At this stage managers should
desegregatewhatactuallygoesintovariousactivitiesinadetailedmanner.
Allocatecost:VCArequiresmanagertoassigncostsandassetstoeachactivity,whichis
totallydifferentfromwhatonefindsintraditionalcostaccountingmethod.
Identifyactivitiesthatdifferentiatethefirm:Heremanagersshouldtrytoidentifyseveral
sourcesofdifferentiationadvantagerelativetocompetitors.AlexMillerhaslistedsomeofthese
advantages.
Examinethevaluechain:Oncethevaluechainhasbeendescribed,managersshouldlist
theactivitiesthatareimportanttobuyersatisfactionandmarketsuccess.Keepingcostsunder
strictvigil,offeringvalueaddedserviceateachstage,doingthingsbetterthanrivalsareallpart
ofthisstrategy.
VCA is most effective when managers try to draw comparisons with key competitors and
improve the internal processes with a view to offer value for money kind of services to
customers.
Benchmarking
It is a popular tool of business management in corporate attempts to gain and maintain
competitiveadvantage.Thecentralessenceofbenchmarkingisaboutlearninghowtoimprove
businessactivity,processesandmanagement.However,benchmarkingasatermhasbeen
usedwidelytorefertomanydifferentactivities.Thereisawidevariationindefinitionsusedto
describebenchmarking.Someofthedefinitionsaregivenbelow:
Acontinuous systematicprocessfor evaluating theproducts,servicesandworkof
organizations that are recognized as representing best practices for the purpose of
organizationalimprovementSpendolini,1992.
Acontinuoussearchfor,andapplicationof,significantlybetterpracticesthatlead to
superiorcompetitiveperformanceWatson,1993.
A disciplined process that begins with a thorough search to identify bestpractice
organizations, continues with the careful study of ones own practices and performance ,
progressesthroughsystematicsitevisitsandinterviews,andconcludeswithananalysisof
results,developmentofrecommendationsandimplementationGravin,1993.
Thecharacteristicstoemergefromthesedefinitionsarethatbenchmarkingis:
measurementviacomparison
continuousimprovement
systematicprocedureincarryingoutbenchmarkingactivity
Theprocess:
Benchmarkinginvolveslookingoutsideaparticularbusiness,organization,industry,regionor
countrytoexaminehowothersachieveperformancelevelsandtounderstandtheprocesses
theyuse.Inthiswaybenchmarkinghelpsexplaintheprocessesbehindexcellentperformance.
Whenthelessonslearntfromabenchmarkingexerciseareappliedappropriately,theyfacilitate
improvedperformanceincriticalfunctionswithinanorganizationorinkeyareasofthebusiness
environment.
Applicationofbenchmarkinginvolvesfourkeysteps:
i)Understandindetailexistingbusinessprocesses.
ii)Analyzethebusinessprocessesofothers
iii)Compareownbusinessperformancewiththatofothersanalyzed
iv)Implementthestepsnecessarytoclosetheperformancegap.
Benchmarkingshouldnotbeconsideredaoneoffexercise.Tobeeffective,itmustbecomean
ongoing,integralpartofanongoingimprovementprocesswiththegoalofkeepingabreastof
everimprovingbestpractice.
TypesofBenchmarking
(i) Strategic benchmarking: Where businesses need to improve overall performance by
examiningthelongtermstrategiesandgeneralapproachesthathaveenabledhighperformers
tosucceed.Itinvolvesconsideringhighlevelaspectssuchascorecompetencies,developing
newproductsandservicesandimprovingcapabilitiesfordealingwithchangesintheexternal
environment.Changesresultingfromthistypeofbenchmarkingmaybedifficulttocomplement
andtakealongtimetomaterialize.
(ii)Performanceorcompetitivebenchmarking:Businessesconsidertheirpositioninrelation
toperformancecharacteristicsofkeyproductsandservices.Benchmarkingpartnersaredrawn
fromthesamesector.Thistypeofanalysisisoftenundertakenthroughconsultantstoprotect
confidentiality.
(iii)Processbenchmarking:Focusesonimprovingspecificcriticalprocessesandoperations.
Benchmarkingpartnersaresoughtfrombestpracticeorganizationsthatperformsimilarworkor
deliversimilarservices.Processbenchmarkinginvariablyinvolvesproducingprocessmapsto
facilitatecomparisonandanalysis.Thistypeofbenchmarkinggenerallyresultsinshortterm
benefits.
(iv) Functional benchmarking: Businesses look to benchmark with partners drawn from
differentbusinesssectorsorareasofactivitytofindwaysofimprovingsimilarfunctionsorwork
processes.Thissortofbenchmarkingcanleadtoinnovationanddramaticimprovements.
(v)Internalbenchmarking: involvesbenchmarkingbusinessesoroperationsfromwithinthe
sameorganization.Theadvantageofinternalbenchmarkingisthataccesstosensitivedataand
informationiseasier;standardizeddataisoftenreadilyavailable;and,usuallylesstimeand
resourcesareneeded. Theremaybefewerbarrierstoimplementationaspracticesmaybe
relatively easy to transfer across the same organization. However, real innovation may be
lackingandbestinclassperformanceismorelikelytobefoundthroughexternalbenchmarking.
(vi)ExternalBenchmarking: Involvesanalyzingoutsideorganisationsthatareknowntobe
bestinclass.Externalbenchmarkingprovidesopportunitiesoflearningfromthosewhoareat
the leading edge. This type of benchmarking can take up significant time and resourceto
ensure the comparability of data and information the credibility of the findings and the
developmentofsoundrecommendations.
observation that a company's business units can be classified into four categories
based on combinations of market growth and market share relative to the largest
competitor, hence the name "growth-share". Market growth serves as a proxy for
industry attractiveness, and relative market share serves as a proxy for competitive
advantage. The growth-share matrix thus maps the business unit positions within
these two important determinants of profitability.
This framework assumes that an increase in relative market share will result in an
increase in the generation of cash. This assumption often is true because of the
experience curve; increased relative market share implies that the firm is moving
forward on the experience curve relative to its competitors, thus developing a cost
advantage. A second assumption is that a growing market requires investment in
assets to increase capacity and therefore results in the consumption of cash. Thus
the position of a business on the growth-share matrix provides an indication of its
cash generation and its cash consumption.
Henderson reasoned that the cash required by rapidly growing business units could
be obtained from the firm's other business units that were at a more mature stage
and generating significant cash. By investing to become the market share leader in
a rapidly growing market, the business unit could move along the experience curve
and develop a cost advantage. From this reasoning, the BCG Growth-Share Matrix
was born.
The four categories are:
Dogs - Dogs have low market share and a low growth rate and thus neither
generate nor consume a large amount of cash. However, dogs are cash traps
because of the money tied up in a business that has little potential. Such
businesses are candidates for divestiture.
Question marks - Question marks are growing rapidly and thus consume
large amounts of cash, but because they have low market shares they do not
generate much cash. The result is a large net cash comsumption. A question
mark (also known as a "problem child") has the potential to gain market share
and become a star, and eventually a cash cow when the market growth
slows. If the question mark does not succeed in becoming the market leader,
then after perhaps years of cash consumption it will degenerate into a dog
when the market growth declines. Question marks must be analyzed carefully
in order to determine whether they are worth the investment required to
grow market share.
Stars - Stars generate large amounts of cash because of their strong relative
market share, but also consume large amounts of cash because of their high
growth rate; therefore the cash in each direction approximately nets out. If a
star can maintain its large market share, it will become a cash cow when the
market growth rate declines. The portfolio of a diversified company always
should have stars that will become the next cash cows and ensure future
cash generation.
Under the growth-share matrix model, as an industry matures and its growth rate
declines, a business unit will become either a cash cow or a dog, determined soley
by whether it had become the market leader during the period of high growth.
While originally developed as a model for resource allocation among the various
business units in a corporation, the growth-share matrix also can be used for
resource allocation among products within a single business unit. Its simplicity is its
strength - the relative positions of the firm's entire business portfolio can be
displayed in a single diagram.
Limitations
The growth-share matrix once was used widely, but has since faded from popularity
as more comprehensive models have been developed. Some of its weaknesses are:
Market growth rate is only one factor in industry attractiveness, and relative
market share is only one factor in competitive advantage. The growth-share
matrix overlooks many other factors in these two important determinants of
profitability.
The framework assumes that each business unit is independent of the others.
In some cases, a business unit that is a "dog" may be helping other business
units gain a competitive advantage.
The matrix depends heavily upon the breadth of the definition of the market.
A business unit may dominate its small niche, but have very low market share
in the overall industry. In such a case, the definition of the market can make
the difference between a dog and a cash cow.
While its importance has diminished, the BCG matrix still can serve as a simple tool
for viewing a corporation's business portfolio at a glance, and may serve as a
starting point for discussing resource allocation among strategic business units.
GE / McKinsey Matrix
In consulting engagements with General Electric in the 1970's, McKinsey & Company
developed a nine-cell portfolio matrix as a tool for screening GE's large portfolio of
strategic business units (SBU). This business screen became known as the
GE/McKinsey Matrix and is shown below:
GE / McKinsey Matrix
The GE / McKinsey matrix is similar to the BCG growth-share matrix in that it maps
strategic business units on a grid of the industry and the SBU's position in the industry.
The GE matrix however, attempts to improve upon the BCG matrix in the following two
ways:
The GE matrix has nine cells vs. four cells in the BCG matrix.
Industry attractiveness and business unit strength are calculated by first identifying
criteria for each, determining the value of each parameter in the criteria, and multiplying
that value by a weighting factor. The result is a quantitative measure of industry
attractiveness and the business unit's relative performance in that industry.
Industry Attractiveness
The vertical axis of the GE / McKinsey matrix is industry attractiveness, which is
determined by factors such as the following:
The GE / McKinsey matrix is similar to the BCG growth-share matrix in that it maps
strategic business units on a grid of the industry and the SBU's position in the industry.
The GE matrix however, attempts to improve upon the BCG matrix in the following two
ways:
The GE matrix generalizes the axes as "Industry Attractiveness" and "Business
Unit Strength" whereas the BCG matrix uses the market growth rate as a proxy
for industry attractiveness and relative market share as a proxy for the strength of
the business unit.
The GE matrix has nine cells vs. four cells in the BCG matrix.
Industry attractiveness and business unit strength are calculated by first identifying
criteria for each, determining the value of each parameter in the criteria, and multiplying
that value by a weighting factor. The result is a quantitative measure of industry
attractiveness and the business unit's relative performance in that industry.
Industry Attractiveness
The vertical axis of the GE / McKinsey matrix is industry attractiveness, which is
determined by factors such as the following:
Demand variability
Industry profitability
Industry rivalry
Global opportunities
Macroenvironmental factors (PEST)
Each factor is assigned a weighting that is appropriate for the industry. The industry
attractiveness then is calculated as follows:
Industry attractiveness
Market share
Growth in market share
Brand equity
Distribution channel access
Production capacity
Profit margins relative to competitors
The business unit strength index can be calculated by multiplying the estimated value of
each factor by the factor's weighting, as done for industry attractiveness.
The shading of the above circle indicates a 38% market share for the strategic business
unit. The arrow in the upward left direction indicates that the business unit is projected
to gain strength relative to competitors, and that the business unit is in an industry that
is projected to become more attractive. The tip of the arrow indicates the future position
of the center point of the circle.
Strategic Implications
Resource allocation recommendations can be made to grow, hold, or harvest a strategic
business unit based on its position on the matrix as follows:
There are strategy variations within these three groups. For example, within the harvest
group the firm would be inclined to quickly divest itself of a weak business in an
unattractive industry, whereas it might perform a phased harvest of an average
business unit in the same industry.
While the GE business screen represents an improvement over the more simple BCG
growth-share matrix, it still presents a somewhat limited view by not considering
interactions among the business units and by neglecting to address the core
competencies leading to value creation. Rather than serving as the primary tool for
resource allocation, portfolio matrices are better suited to displaying a quick synopsis of
the strategic business units.