Professional Documents
Culture Documents
The Discourse of Stance and Argument Regarding Bilingual Education in the U.S.
Krista M. Boddy
Colorado State University
Abstract
Stance and argument are popular topics of study in the field of discourse analysis. Specifically,
the issue of bilingual education in the U.S. is an on-going heated debate that ends up in the news
frequently. The following paper aims to analyze the discourse of stance and argument of
proponents and antagonists on the two sides of the bilingual education debate. Using recent
periodical editorials, this paper reviews the arguments for and against bilingual education in the
U.S. Researching this topic is relevant to the field of ESL, as instructors should critically explore
the evidence of studies regarding bilingual education, particularly with regard to stance and
argument.
Keywords: stance, argument, discourse analysis, bilingual education
The Discourse of Stance and Argument Regarding Bilingual Education in the U.S.
Bilingual education has been a hot political topic for many decades in the United States,
and is a debate that doesnt seem to have an end. There is a considerable amount of interest as
well as multiple opinions about the advantages and disadvantages of bilingual education.
Numerous experienced educators have strong opinions about bilingualism in schools in the
recent rapidly growing population of non-English speaking students across the United States. I
will compare two recent (this year) editorial articles, one for and one against bilingual education,
analyzing the authors stance and arguments. This issue directly affects the vocation of ESL
teaching and the need for teachers who are bilingual and/or who know how to teach second
language learners. In this study of opposing stances regarding bilingual education in America, I
hope to gain insight from the current discourse among educators and citizens alike so that I may
incorporate this knowledge into my teaching philosophy.
I will begin my discussion, with a summary of definitions relative to argument and
stance. Rybacki and Rybacki (1996) define argumentation as a form of instrumental
communication relying on reasoning and proof to influence belief or behavior through the use of
spoken or written messages (p. 2). By this definition, the authors relate one can understand
argumentations purpose, targets, methods, and relationship to persuasion (p.2). They further
explain, Argumentation is a set of concepts or ideas used to understand how we reason and how
we convey that reasoning to others for the purpose of influencing them (p. 2).
Another facet of argumentation that the authors highlight is, Argumentation is always
characterized by controversy either the controversy of opposing views or the controversy of
what is the most correct answer. As arguers, we want our views to prevail, so argumentation is
3
11
12
14
15
16
19
21