Assessment Feedback Summative Student Name Programme Project Title Unit Title Project Leader Menswear 2: Innovation BA (Hons) Fashion Student ID Level Project Value Unit Code Unit Leader F108 1 Formative Assessment Criteria Excellent V Good Indicative Grading Good Satisfactory Basic Fail N / a a 2d or 3d realisation that shows: 1 evidence of their understanding of menswear markets and the impact that they have on the way that designers operate.
Assessment Feedback Summative Student Name Programme Project Title Unit Title Project Leader Menswear 2: Innovation BA (Hons) Fashion Student ID Level Project Value Unit Code Unit Leader F108 1 Formative Assessment Criteria Excellent V Good Indicative Grading Good Satisfactory Basic Fail N / a a 2d or 3d realisation that shows: 1 evidence of their understanding of menswear markets and the impact that they have on the way that designers operate.
Copyright:
Attribution Non-Commercial (BY-NC)
Available Formats
Download as DOC, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
Assessment Feedback Summative Student Name Programme Project Title Unit Title Project Leader Menswear 2: Innovation BA (Hons) Fashion Student ID Level Project Value Unit Code Unit Leader F108 1 Formative Assessment Criteria Excellent V Good Indicative Grading Good Satisfactory Basic Fail N / a a 2d or 3d realisation that shows: 1 evidence of their understanding of menswear markets and the impact that they have on the way that designers operate.
Copyright:
Attribution Non-Commercial (BY-NC)
Available Formats
Download as DOC, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
Project Title Project Value Unit Title Menswear 2: Innovation Unit Code F108 Project Leader Unit Leader
Assessment Criteria Indicative Grading
Excellent V Good Good Satisfactory Basic Fail N/A A 2D or 3D realisation that shows: 1 Evidence of their understanding of menswear markets and the impact that they have on the ways in which designers operate and on the garments and samples that they produce; (LO1) 2 Their ability to visually communicate ideas and create a product incorporating knowledge from theoretical and experiential sources; (LO4) 3 Evidence of innovation within the constraints of the project brief. (LO4) Research and development journal that shows: 4 Evidence of a critical review of key issues, with findings articulated and coherently summarised in a journal format; (LO2) 5 Identification and visual representation of appropriate designers within contemporary practice. (LO3) Note 1 - Unless specified in the Project Brief it is assumed that all assessment criteria are equally weighted
Overall comment including strengths and areas for improvement
Grade Banding Brief Grade Descriptor
A+ 90-100 High Excellent all round work or outstanding A 80-89 Medium performance Grade (where appropriate) A- 70-79 Low B+ 67-69 High High level achievement or very good level of B 64-66 Medium performance B- 60-63 Low C+ 57-59 High Good level of achievement or proficient C 54-56 Medium performance C- 50-53 Low D+ 47-49 High Satisfactory level of achievement or competent D 44-46 Medium performance D- 40-43 Low E 35-39 Marginal Elementary achievement or basic level of Note 2 - All summative grades are subject to ratification by the Examination Board Pass performance F+ 30-34 Marginal Does not achieve the learning outcomes but Fail may be some element of understanding or Please contact your Unit Leader about retrieval competence arrangements (where appropriate) Assessor(s) F < 30 Name: Fail No evidence of achievement or competence F- > 10 Poor Fail 0 0 no submission or special circumstances