A reflection on two artifacts for standard 1.a. Demonstrates "understanding of language as a system" a mini-lesson teaches a strategy to identify whether or not a basic sentence is complete. The lesson also demonstrates "the influence of the L1 on second language acquisition"
A reflection on two artifacts for standard 1.a. Demonstrates "understanding of language as a system" a mini-lesson teaches a strategy to identify whether or not a basic sentence is complete. The lesson also demonstrates "the influence of the L1 on second language acquisition"
A reflection on two artifacts for standard 1.a. Demonstrates "understanding of language as a system" a mini-lesson teaches a strategy to identify whether or not a basic sentence is complete. The lesson also demonstrates "the influence of the L1 on second language acquisition"
a Artifact 1 Reflection: ESC 757 Section 1 of Homework #4,
Topic: Semantic Concepts The first artifact for standard 1.a. is from the first section of Homework #4 from ESC 757, Linguistics. It required an analysis of semantic relationships between words, in order to provide examples of various relationships. The assignment demonstrates an understanding of language as a system, particularly semantics, and the inter-related aspects of the English language. During the process of finding examples of semantic relationships such as homophones and heteronyms, I thought about how my students might interpret the concepts. I anticipate there will be some confusion at first; but in the end, the exercise will help them develop a deeper understanding of English word relationships. Finding examples of heteronyms and polysemes was challenging at first, but became fun after a few tries. It made me think of how I could develop games for my students with similar themes. I could use the more commonly known relationships of antonyms and synonyms for LEP students and build up to the more complex relationships such as capitonyms and polysemes. For example, I could break the class up into teams and have each team complete a matching puzzle based on the sematic relationships. In the end, each team would present their puzzles and explain the relationships between the words. By asking the students to examine words more closely and think of how they relate to each other in meaning, sound, and spelling, such exercises can improve their metalinguistic awareness.
Standard 1.a. Artifact 2 Reflection: ESC 725, Grammar Mini-Lesson
The second artifact I chose for standard 1.a. is a mini-lesson I developed for ESC 725, Teaching Grammar. The objective of the lesson is to teach English Language Learners a strategy to identify whether or not a basic sentence is complete. The strategy requires a student to use YNQT (Yes/No Question Test), which is concrete and can be made accessible to all learners by using a variety of basic sentences. This artifact demonstrates my understanding of language as a system, including syntax, and that I understand the influence of the L1 on second language acquisition. When I taught this lesson, I had to consider how my students L1 would influence his comprehension of what a complete sentence looks and sounds like in English. By using a manipulative, I was better able to aid his understanding of the concept. My reflection of this mini-lesson also illustrates my thinking process when executing the lesson. I learned the importance of planning and using differentiation (using the manipulatives), and allowing the student ample time to engage with the activity. I would use this lesson again in the classroom and leave more time for getting it. Its more important that a student learn a concept, especially one that is crucial to literacy like recognizing what is a complete sentence, than to push through a lesson to keep a schedule.