Where We Have Been to

Where We Are Going

DATA OVERVIEW
JEFFERSON HIGH SCHOOL
WINTER 2015
FACULTY AND STAFF PRESENTATION

Show m
e
those
numbe
rs!

Purpose
The purpose of this presentation is to showcase data

gauging the effectiveness of programs and testing

present at Jefferson High School.
Sources of data mentioned in this presentation
include CCRPI scores from 2012, 2013, and 2014.

The Data Presented

What is CCRPI and what does it mean for our school?

The College and Career Ready Performance Index or CCRPI is a

comprehensive school improvement, accountability, and
communication platform for all educational stakeholders that will
promote college and career readiness for all Georgia public school
students (College and Career Ready Performance Index, 2015)
This index provides invaluable feedback in our efforts to reach our
school motto of Graduating Fully Functioning Adults

How is the CCRPI organized?

There are 19 indicators and descriptions of effective

practices included in the CCRPI school at the high school level

Ex: Indicator 1: Percent of students scoring at Meets or Exceeds on

Ninth-Grade Literature EOCT

This Presentation
In this presentation, multiple indicators will be

mentioned including both those in which we have

seen growth and those that need our attention.

Overall: Jefferson High School vs. State Scores

2012

State Average: 72.8

JHS Score: 84.5

2013

State Average: 71. 8

JHS Score: 81.3

2014

State Average: 68.4

JHS Score: 81.4

Overall CCPRI Scores

100

90
State Av erage
Jefferson High Schol
Ov erall80
Score out of 100

70

60
2012

2013

2014

Indicators 1-8: Content Mastery

1

Percent of students scoring at Meets or Exceeds on the Ninth Grade Literature

End of Course Test
2 Percent of students scoring at Meets or Exceeds on the American Literature End
of Course Test
3 Percent of students scoring at Meets or Exceeds on the Coordinate Algebra End of
Course Test
4 Percent of students scoring at Meets or Exceeds on the Analytic Geometry/GPS
Geometry/Mathematics II End of Course Test
5 Percent of students scoring at Meets or Exceeds on the Physical Science End of
Course Test
6 Percent of students scoring at Meets or Exceeds on the Biology End of Course Test
7 Percent of students scoring at Meets or Exceeds on the US History End of Course
Test
8 Percent of students scoring at Meets or Exceeds on the Economics End of Course
Test

Overview of JHS vs. State: Content Mastery (Indicators 1-8)

Content Mastery: JHS vs. State
70
68
66
64
62
T otal Points Out of 7 0

Jefferson High School

State

60
58
56
54
52
50
2012

2013

2014

Overview of JHS: Content Mastery (Indicators 1-8)

Out of a possible 70 points

2012: 63.5
2013: 61
2014: 60

JHS Overview: Content Mastery

70
68
66
64
62
T otal Ppoints Out of 7 0

Jefferson High School

60
58
56
54
52
50
2012

2013

2014

What initiatives/programs do we have in place at

JHS to increase content mastery in our Core subject

areas?

Indicators 9-16: Post High School Readiness

9

Percent of graduates completing a CTAE pathway, or an advanced academic pathway,

or a fine arts pathway, or a world language pathway within their program of study
10 Percent of CTAE Pathway Completers earning a national industry recognized
credential, or an IB Career-Related Certificate, or a passing score on a GaDOE recognized
end of pathway assessment (operational in 2014-2015)
11 Percent of graduates entering TCSG/USG not requiring remediation or learning
support courses; or scoring program ready on the Compass; or scoring at least 22 out of 36
on the composite ACT; or scoring at least 1550 out of 2400 on the combined SAT; or scoring
3 or higher on two or more AP exams; or scoring 4 or higher on two or more IB exams
12 Percent of graduates earning high school credit(s) for accelerated enrollment via
ACCEL, Dual HOPE Grant, Move On When Ready, Early College, Gateway to College,
Advanced Placement courses, or International Baccalaureate courses
13 Percent of students scoring at Meets or Exceeds on the Georgia High School Writing
Test
14 Percent of students achieving a Lexile measure greater than or equal to 1275 on the
American Literature EOCT
15 Percent of EOCT assessments scoring at the Exceeds level
16 Student Attendance Rate (%)

Overview of JHS vs. State: Post High School Readiness (Indicators 916)

Post High School Readiness: JHS vs. State

70
67
64
61
58
T otal Points Out of 7 0

Jefferson High School

State

55
52
49
46
43
40
2012

2013

2014

Overview of JHS: Post High School Readiness

(Indicators 9-16)
Out of a possible 70 points

2012: 54.9
2013: 54.6
2014: 57.4

JHS Overview: Post High School Readiness

70
68
66
64
62
T otal Points Out of 7 0

Jefferson High School

60
58
56
54
52
50
2012

2013

2014

What could be the reason for this spike in our Post High School

Readiness score? Does it show itself to be effective? In what

ways?

Indicators 17-19: Graduation Rate

17 Year Cohort Graduation Rate (%)
18 5-Year Extended Cohort Graduation Rate (%)

Overview of JHS vs. State: Graduation Rate (Indicators 17-19)

Graduation Rate: JHS vs. State
10
9.6
9.2
8.8
8.4
T otal Points Out of 10

Jefferson High School

State

8
7 .6
7 .2
6.8
6.4
6
2012

2013

2014

Overview of JHS: Graduation Rate

(Indicators 17-19)
Out of a possible 10 points

2012: 9.1
2013: 9
2014: 8.7

JHS Overview: Graduation Rate

10
9.8
9.6
9.4
JHS Ov erv iew: Gradution
Rate

9.2
T otal points out of 10

9
8.8
8.6
8.4
8.2
8
2012

2013

2014

What programs do we have in place at JHS to encourage

graduation? What may be causing the decrease?

JHS Overall: Performance by Subgroups

2012

Retrieved from: http://ccrpi.gadoe.org/2012/

JHS Overall: Performance by Subgroups

2013

Retrieved from: http://ccrpi.gadoe.org/2013/ccrpi2013.aspx

JHS Overall: Performance by Subgroups

2014

Retrieved from: http://ccrpi.gadoe.org/2014/ccrpi2014.aspx

Observations of Performance Flags

Jefferson is quickly gaining a more diverse population.

How do we modify instruction to meet these students

needs?

This is based on the fact that there are less n/a grey flags as we
move into the 2014 data than the two previous years.
These subgroups must be closely monitored for progress in order for
us to best meet their academic needs.

Red flags are increasing in the content area of Algebra.

What are possible reasons for this?

There are more SWD students taking Core classes that are
in a yellow flagged subgroup. How is our instruction
modified/varied to help these students reach a green flag?

Observations Continued
These subgroups began with no red flags and have

increased their number of these flags. What are the

possible reasons for this? How is JHS working to
remediate and push these student groups to a green
flag?

Black
Economically disabled
Students with disabilities

School Climate
This element of CCRPI was added in the 2013-2014

school year so there is only one year of data available

to measure.

2014 Score: 83.4 out of 100 earning us FOUR STARS

(A score of 82.5-88.5 receives four out of five stars)

Conclusion
This data is meant to help inform and guide our growth as a

school.
With this information, we can implement and track programs and
progress towards goals to making our school the very best it can
be!
As teachers, we play an irreplaceable role in our students
academic success.
Please join me in continuing to look at this data and keep
ourselves accountable to giving our students the best to live out
our motto Graduating Fully Functioning Adults.
If you would like to look at all of this data in more detail, please be
sure to visit the sites listed on the last page of this presentation.

Take Action!
Please review this presentation and the answers you

provided to the questions presented in previous

slides.
Take an active role in shaping the educational
experience our students have at JHS by tracking this
data with me. Let us make strides to celebrate our
successes found in the data and work diligently to
implement learning strategies to support where we
want to see improvement!

Sources
College and Career Ready Performance Index. (2015). Retrieved

November 14, 2015, from https://

www.georgiastandards.org/ccrpi/pages/ccrpi.aspx
GA DOE CCRPI 2012. (n.d.). Retrieved November 14, 2015, from

http://ccrpi.gadoe.org/2012/http://ccrpi.gadoe.org/2012 /
GA DOE CCRPI 2013. (n.d.). Retrieved November 14, 2015, from

http://ccrpi.gadoe.org/2013/ccrpi2013.aspx
GA DOE CCRPI 2014. (n.d.). Retrieved November 14, 2015, from

http://ccrpi.gadoe.org/2014/ccrpi2014.aspx