Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Teacher
Subject
Topic/Focus
Overarching
Question
Learner
Considerations
Performance Task
Overview
Learner Outcomes
General
Outcomes
(listed at
beginning of
each lesson)
ELA General
Outcome 1
(Lesson 1 & 3)
Links to
Overarching
Question/
Specific Outcomes
subquestions
(listed at beginning
of each lesson)
ELA Specific
Outcome 1 (Lesson 1
& 3)
Assessment Criteria
Lesson 1 Exploring
Forces:
Lesson 2 Testing
Moving Forces:
Which
observations
stood out to you?
Lesson 3 Analyzing
Forces
What criteria do
you think is
important for me
to see in your
reflection?
What do you
know about
structure and
design when
building a
vehicle? What do
you want to
know?
When designing
a vehicle, what
are some
exit slips
modifications
that could be
made to help it
move more
efficiently and
safely?
ELA Specific
Outcome 2 (Lesson
3)
Lesson 1 Exploring
Forces:
Lesson 2 Testing
Moving Forces:
If you were to
build your
vehicle by
yourself, what
force would you
use to propel it
forward?
How does this
compare with
your hypothesis?
Lesson 3 Analyzing
Moving Forces:
Conversations between
students and the teacher
Group discussion about
findings
Entrance slip/graffiti
wall
discussion and
modification of the
rubric
Peer feedback and
suggestions
observing while students
are giving each other
feedback
modifications
that could be
made to help it
move more
efficiently and
safely?
Science General
Outcome 4-1
(Lesson 3)
Science Specific
Outcome 1 (Lesson 1
& 2)
Lesson 1 Exploring
Forces:
Lesson 2 Testing
Moving Forces:
If you were to
build your
vehicle by
yourself, what
force would you
use to propel it
forward?
Which
observations
stood out to you?
How does this
compare with
your hypothesis?
My Hypothesis and
Conclusion worksheet
Peer feedback and
suggestions about
conclusions
Teacher observation and
conversations with
students while they
construct conclusions
and give peer feedback
Lesson 3 Analyzing
Forces:
ICT General
Outcome C4
(Lesson 3)
ICT Specific
Outcome 2.3 (Lesson
3)
Math -
Which vehicles
moved the
farthest?
Using these
results, what
decisions can
you make about
building a
moving vehicle?
What other
factors might
have affected the
results of your
testing?
Lesson 3 Analyzing
Forces:
Lesson 2 Testing
Worksheet with
hypothesis and
conclusion
reflection booklet
performance task/digital
reflection
Statistics &
Probability
(Data Analysis)
General
Outcome 1
(Lesson 2)
Probability (Data
Analysis) - Specific
Outcome 1 (Lesson
2)
Moving Forces:
What do you
think it means in
terms of a
conclusion from
your data?
How does this
compare with
your hypothesis?
Was it close to
what you
originally
predicted?
Why/Why not?
Forces:
Lesson 3 Analyzing
Forces:
Lesson 3 Analyzing
Forces:
Level
Criteria
Insufficient /
Excellent
Proficient
Adequate
Limited *
Blank *
Digital reflection
Digital reflection
Digital reflection
Digital
No score is awarded
Analysis (out of
shows accurate
shows logical
shows reasonable
reflection is
4)
interpretation of
interpretation of
interpretation of
lacking
interpretation
shows precise
shows sufficient
shows basic
the requirements of
and shows
calculations.
calculations.
calculations.
because there is
insufficient evidence
of student
performance based on
limited
calculations.
Digital reflection
Digital reflection
Digital reflection
Digital
No score is awarded
Inferences and
recognizes
recognizes
recognizes
reflection
because there is
Conclusions
innovative
appropriate
limited external
recognizes
(x2 - out of 8)
external factors
external factors
irrelevant
and makes
and makes
simplistic
factors and
the requirements of
the assessment task.
Drawing
insightful
thoughtful
conclusions in
makes
conclusions in
conclusions in
relation to their
disconnected
relation to their
relation to their
data.
conclusions in
data.
data.
insufficient evidence
of student
performance based on
relation to their
data.
Adequate use of
Digital reflection
Digital reflection
Digital reflection
Digital
No score is awarded
technology (out
is organized
is organized
is organized
reflection is
because there is
in a purposeful
in a logical
in a partially
unorganized
sequence
sequence
suitable sequence
sequence
and demonstrates
and demonstrates
and demonstrates
and
the requirements of
the assessment task.
of 4)
insightful
practical
reasonable
demonstrates
interaction with
interaction with
interaction with
minimal
technology.
technology.
technology.
interaction with
insufficient evidence
of student
performance based on
technology.
Applications to
everyday settings
(x2 - out of 8)
No score is awarded
Digital reflection
Digital reflection
Digital reflection
Digital
demonstrates
demonstrates
demonstrates
reflection
creative insights
practical insights
simplistic insights
demonstrates a
and meaningful
and realistic
and basic
lack of insight
connections to
connections to
connections to
and weak
the requirements of
connections to
everyday settings.
everyday settings.
everyday settings.
because there is
insufficient evidence
of student
performance based on
everyday
settings.
No score is awarded
(out of 4)
because there is
insufficient evidence
of student
performance based on
the requirements of
the assessment task.
graded on a total of 28 points. Should students meet the insufficient requirement, the teacher will work with them to scaffold
learning and complete the performance task according to standards.
Instead of having students simply learn about forces, the intent was for students to experience forces. This
experience helps develop concrete understandings about what forces really are, in action. The mini-unit
allows ample opportunity for students to become involved in their learning and become invested stakeholders
in it.
Our inquiry question for this mini-unit was How do our vehicles take us where we need to go?. This
question allows for cross-curricular exploration, because the movement of vehicles involves so many different
areas of education, including math and science. This inquiry question could be explored in a multitude of
ways, but this mini-unit focused on a hands-on approach. The key questions allow for active participation
from students, because it encourages them to apply their scaffolded learning and engage in experimental
procedures to extract results from these questions. It also encourages deeper thinking to be able to draw
accurate conclusions and be able to relate them to their importance in everyday life, possibly in ways that may
not be initially clear/obvious to students. Students can make connections to their life outside the classroom,
making their learning meaningful to them.
they discuss and receive feedback from their peers, giving students a chance to exchange new ideas that they
may not have discovered on their own. By giving students opportunity to represent their experiences, they can
do so in a way that is meaningful to them. Students are given the opportunity to strengthen their technological
skills through the use of technology in the performance task. Students also become further invested in their
learning by answering the guiding questions in a meaningful way with a technology of their choice. By
having choice, student need is accommodated for differentiated instruction. These reflective pieces can act as
documented evidence for the teacher of student learning which can be later referenced to assess what students
know and track student progress. The use of technology to create digital reflections gives opportunity to
expand what happens in the classroom beyond the walls of the school, and acts as a stepping stone in creating
a community of support for students.
Differentiation
The mini-unit addresses the diverse learning needs of students in the classroom, and accommodates
for the many different ways that students learn. By having students collaborate in group, students can
exchange and develop new and creative ideas with one another. The groups were designed to balance student
ability as well, with stronger students being able to help and be role models for students who may need more
assistance. The activities throughout the mini-unit allow for students of all learning styles to have a chance to
learn. The exploration of forces in the first lesson allows for visual learning. The testing of their vehicles in
the second lesson allows for kinesthetic learning. Lastly, the technological reflections allows for auditory
learning.
LESSON 1
Grade: 4
Goals/Key questions:
Overarching question: How do our vehicles take us where we need to go?
Students will develop an understanding of forces and apply it in a practical setting to the vehicles they interact
experiences.
ELA- Specific Outcome 1
use talk, notes, personal writing and representing to record and reflect on ideas, information and experiences
Science - Specific Outcome 1 (Building Devices & Vehicles That Move)
Use simple forces to power or propel a device; e.g., direct pushes, pulls, cranking, mechanisms, moving air,
Lab):
Force & Motion by Peter Lafferty
Move It: Motion, Forces, and You by Adrienne Mason & Claudia Davila
Motion, Forces, and Energy by Anthea Maton
Forces & Motion: A Question and Answer Book by Catherine A. Welch
Super Cool Forces and Motion Activities With Max Axiom by Agnieszka Biskup
Zombies and Forces and Motion by Mark Weakland
Pushes & Pulls by Anna Claybourne
Push & Pull by Robin Nelson
Amazing Rubber Band Cars by Mike Rigsby
Forces by Peter D. Riley
Graphic Organizer (provided below)
Teacher KSAs:
E, F, I, K, M
Content:
Introduction:
Exploration of
Resources on
example: push-pull/wind-water,
Forces
Time
estimation: 20
minutes
understanding of forces.
everyday settings.
Transition
considerations
Activity 1:
Class
Discussion
organizers.
minutes
Transition
considerations
explore.
analyzed)
Poster Board
Diagrams/
Word Drawings
Time Est:
15 minutes
word drawing.
http://thesciencepenguin.com/2013/12/sci
ence-solutions-vocabulary.html
Teacher circulates classroom to solidify
understandings, assist students and
ensure that students are making accurate
connections between the forces and
associated vehicles. These posters will be
displayed throughout the classroom for
future student reference. The poster
boards will be used as evidence of
student learning for formative assessment
(application of knowledge to individual
experiences).
Conclusion:
Exit Slip
about forces?
Give 2 examples of where these
resources.
Definition
seen it?
Push & Pull
Downhill Motion
& Slope
Wind-up
LESSON 2
Grade ______4__________
Goals/Key questions
Overarching Question: How do our vehicles take us where we need to go?
Goals:
Students will develop an understanding of forces and apply it in a practical setting to the vehicles they interact
A sheet of paper large enough for every student to write a maximum of two sentences on
Markers
toy cars, toy boats, wind up toys (or the small object that students have brought from home), enough so that
different devices (must fit ramps, water tubs, the students, etc)
masking tape
basic calculators (students should already have one of their own, but be prepared to provide extras)
KSAs
D, E, F, G, K
Content:
What is the teacher doing?
Introduction
SLIP / GRAFFITI
WALL
following question:
ENTRANCE
Time estimation: 10
minutes
Transition
considerations
their partner.
Activity 1
TESTING
DIFFERENT
VEHICLES USING
DIFFERENT
FORCES
Time est:
20 minutes
float
Transition
considerations
pencil.
Graphs
Time Est:
20 minutes
graph.
whole number.
Students then complete their bar
Calculate the average of these numbers:
5, 3, 8, 2
collaboration is encouraged).
Conclusion:
CLASS
DISCUSSION &
GRAFFITI WALL
Time estimation: 10
minutes
lessons.
Name: _____________________
Partners Name: _____________________
Hypothesis:
_______________________________________________________________________________________
_______________________________________________________________________________________
(When writing your hypothesis, think: which vehicle will move the farthest, and which force will allow it to
do so?)
Device 1. ___________________________ Forward Motion Force:_______________________________
Controlled Variable(s):
_______________________________________________________________________________________
_______________________________________________________________________________________
Manipulated Variable(s):
_______________________________________________________________________________________
_______________________________________________________________________________________
Responding Variable(s):
_______________________________________________________________________________________
_______________________________________________________________________________________
Trial 1
Trial 2
Trial 3
Distance (in
centimeters)
Trial 1
Trial 2
Distance (in
centimeters)
Trial 3
LESSON 3
Grade:
Goals/Key questions
ELA General Outcome 1- Students will listen, speak, read, write, view and represent to explore thoughts,
Pre-lesson Considerations
Lesson overview of main ideas to be learned and pre-learning required:
Materials needed:
Students will be grouped with the same people they were paired with for lesson one of this mini unit (to
will include:
instructions on what needs to be done for this digital reflection
a copy of the rubric that will be used to grade this assignment
a sheet/paper titled: What needs to be evident for excellent?
Teacher KSAs
E, F, J, K, P
Content:
Introduction :
Pass-Around
Activity
Time
estimation: 15
minutes
worksheet:
considerations
Introducing
and
Developing
Your Digital
Reflection
guiding questions:
Time est: 15
minutes
hypothesis?
What does this mean for
everyday life?
What results can you draw from
considerations
reflection rubric.
Discussion and
Improvement
of Rubric
classifications of student
include:
Time Est: 20
minutes
precise calculations.
Digital reflection recognizes innovative
Conclusion:
What Needs
To Be Evident
For
Excellent?
vehicles?
Name:______________
Questions to consider: Which vehicle moves the farthest? Was it close to what you originally
predicted? Why or why not?
My Hypothesis:
My Conclusion:
Peer Suggestions:
This task is to be done individually and will be completed in class. You may choose the type of
technology that you will use for this task. Some examples include:
-
Video
Animation
Audio recording
PowerPoint
MindMap
Digital book/magazine
If you have another idea for a way in which you can represent the answers to these questions, you
must speak to me first in order for it to be approved.
Your digital reflection can either be presented to the class, or just to me individually. If you are
comfortable with presenting, please talk to me and we can set up a time for you to present when
you feel ready to do so.
This Digital Reflection will be due one week from now, and you will have plenty of class time to
work on it. If you feel like the class time provided will not be enough, dont be afraid to ask for
more time to work on it.
2. What results can you draw from your bar graph? How does it compare to your original
hypothesis?
3. Using these results, what decisions can you make about building a moving vehicle?
5. What other factors might have affected the results of your testing?
Excellent
Proficient
Adequate
Limited *
Data and
Graph
Analysis
(out of 4)
Digital
reflection shows
accurate
interpretation of
the bar graph
and shows
precise
calculations.
Digital
reflection shows
logical
interpretation of
the bar graph
and shows
sufficient
calculations.
Digital
reflection
shows
reasonable
interpretation
of the bar
graph and
shows basic
calculations.
Digital reflection
is lacking
interpretation of
the bar graph and
shows limited
calculations.
No score is awarded
because there is
insufficient evidence of
student performance
based on the
requirements of the
assessment task.
Drawing
Inferences
and
Conclusion
s
(x2- out of
8)
Digital reflection
recognizes
innovative
external factors
and makes
insightful
conclusions in
relation to their
data.
Digital
reflection
recognizes
appropriate
external factors
and makes
thoughtful
conclusions in
relation to their
data.
Digital
reflection
recognizes
limited
external factors
and makes
simplistic
conclusions in
relation to their
data.
Digital reflection
recognizes
irrelevant factors
and makes
disconnected
conclusions in
relation to their
data.
No score is awarded
because there is
insufficient evidence of
student performance
based on the
requirements of the
assessment task.
Adequate
use of
technology
(out of 4)
Digital reflection
is organized
in a purposeful
sequence
Digital
reflection is
organized
in a logical
Digital
reflection is
organized
in a partially
Digital reflection
is unorganized
sequence
and demonstrates
No score is awarded
because there is
insufficient evidence of
student performance
based on the
Level
Criteria
Application
s to
everyday
settings
(x2- out of
8)
and demonstrates
insightful
interaction with
technology.
sequence
and
demonstrates
practical
interaction with
technology.
suitable
sequence
and
demonstrates
reasonable
interaction
with
technology.
a basic interaction
with technology.
requirements of the
assessment task.
Digital reflection
demonstrates
creative insights
and meaningful
connections to
everyday
settings.
Digital
reflection
demonstrates
practical
insights and
realistic
connections to
everyday
settings.
Digital
reflection
demonstrates
simplistic
insights and
basic
connections to
everyday
settings.
Digital reflection
demonstrates a
lack of insight
and weak
connections to
everyday settings.
No score is awarded
because there is
insufficient evidence of
student performance
based on the
requirements of the
assessment task.
No score is awarded
because there is
insufficient evidence of
student performance
based on the
requirements of the
assessment task.
Each lesson allows for scaffolded learning, because each lesson builds upon the other. Key concepts and
understandings developed in each lesson correspond and build upon the next lesson. For example, in Lesson
1, students learned what forces are responsible for forward motion and were able to apply them to a static
drawing of a vehicle. These understandings of forces scaffolded Lesson 2, where students had to take that
knowledge they developed and physically test it with their vehicles. This ties in to how this mini-unit
displayed a variety of instruction styles in the classroom, allowing for differentiated instruction to meet the
needs of every type of learner. The use of collaborative and hands-on learning was key in developing this
unit, and we felt that it encouraged student-directed learning and exploration, where students were able to
create meaning for themselves and take responsibility for their learning. According to Roscoe, students
exhibit a wide range of learning needs and characteristics, which can only be met with a variety of
strategies. The important question for teachers is not what is the right strategy, but what is the right mix of
strategies in your classroom. By having students work in groups or pairs for collaboration, have whole class
discussions, and have hands-on activities, it allowed for a mix of strategies throughout the mini-unit, with
collaboration and feedback from peers creating a positive learning environment.
The main ideology focused upon in this mini-unit is the Learner Centred Ideology. This is because our
lesson promoted critical thinking and self-analysis for our students, not simply memorization of information.
Students were given the opportunity to take the information they learned, physically apply it, and analyze
their data critically to draw their own conclusions. Throughout the mini-unit, the emphasis was placed on
students creating meaning for themselves as well. Our lessons also gave students choices: they could choose
the type of the vehicle that interested them and they thought was important. Each child is unique and learns
at different rates, and focus is placed on the needs of individuals. We felt, because of this, it was appropriate
to create pre-determined pairs and groups of students that will allow for balanced student ability and
collaboration. Lastly, emphasis was placed on formative assessment as a way to have insight into student
learning. Throughout every lesson, students were given multiple opportunities to show the teacher what they
know and understand.
Rationale: Assessment
Lesson 1: Exploring and Defining Moving Forces
Lesson Description:
of forces for the students as they continue to fill out their graphic organizer. Pairs
of students complete Word Drawings of forces responsible for forward motion on
a drawing of a vehicle of their choice. Lastly, students complete an exit slip about
what they learned in class and what they still may wonder about.
The overarching theme of this mini-unit is forward motion. In order for students to
properly understand forward motion, they need to have a grasp on what forces
are responsible and play a role in forward motion. The performance task allows
students to analyze data they collected (in Lesson 2) and make inferences about
how forces may have affected the forward motion of their vehicle, and why some
forces are more effective for forward motion than others. This lesson scaffolds the
performance task by providing students with the foundational knowledge of forces
that they will need to analyze their data and make accurate conclusions about it.
Lesson Outcome:
Students will develop an understanding of forces and apply it in a practical setting
to the vehicles they interact with in everyday settings.
Students will be able to extract information from resources and identify its
connections to everyday applications.
What formative
assessment techniques
will you be using? What
information will you be
collecting? How will you
use that information?
While students explore resources and fill out their graphic organizers, the
teacher will circulate the classroom and observe students as they collect
information. As they work, the teacher formatively assesses students through
observation and conversation, to determine whether students understand and
internalize the information in the resources and are able to apply the knowledge
to identify examples in everyday settings. Class discussion about student
findings also gives the teacher opportunity to formatively assess what the
students took away from the resources they explored, and tells the teacher
whether or not students need some more instruction or clarification about
forces. The teacher can use this information for when he/she talks to the class
about the different types of forces and the definitions of these forces, and
whether or not he/she needs to go into more detail about them. Similarly, when
the students work on their Word Drawings of forces, the teacher can circulate
the classroom, observe, and have conversations with students about their
choices with their Word Drawings. The poster boards will be displayed
throughout the classroom for future student reference, and will also be used as
evidence of student learning and students application of knowledge to
individual experiences. Like the class discussion, it lets the teacher see if
he/she needs to touch on a topic again with the students to clear up any
misconceptions and make sure the students grasp the material. The Word
Drawings also act as evidence of student learning that the teacher can look
back upon. Lastly, the exit slip gives students the opportunity to show the
teacher what they took away from the lesson, as well as something they are still
curious about. This assessment lets the teacher see what the students took
away from the lesson, and helps direct planning for the following lesson. This
helps students solidify their new knowledge and gives the teacher an
opportunity to relate this lessons exploration to future learning.
Description of what
teacher is doing:
classroom for future student reference. The teacher distributes an exit slip for
the students to complete before they finish the class. The teacher will collect
the exit slips and use it to assess whether or not he/she can move onto new
concepts in the next lesson, or go over material to solidify understandings.
Description of what
students are doing:
Sequence of key
questions:
Evidence of Lesson
Components (opening,
closing, content, timeline)
Rationale Assessment
Lesson 2: Testing Moving Forces
Lesson Description:
First, the teacher asks the students to start a graffiti wall and write one
concept that they remembered from last class. After students gather their
materials for testing, the teacher then explains that the students will be
experiencing the forces they chose by testing their vehicles with their partner.
Students, with their partners, develop a hypothesis for their tests and determine
the different types of variables involved. Students test their vehicle and their
partners vehicle at the corresponding stations, doing 3 trials for each. The
teacher explains the concepts of calculating averages and constructing bar
graphs, and students do so with the data they collected from their tests on their
data collection sheet. The teacher collects these data sheets at the end of class
for formative assessment. The teacher opens a class discussion about their
observations and inquiry questions, in which students may volunteer their
answers and what they think about the questions. Lastly, the students are
asked to write something they took away from the lesson on the graffiti wall
they started at the beginning of class.
In the performance task, students are asked to make conclusions from the data
they collected in their tests, and relate those conclusions back to the forces
involved in forward motion that they explored in Lesson 1. By having students
test vehicles of their choice that they find interesting, it enables them to make
connections to everyday life that is meaningful for them. These connections to
everyday life are also part of the performance task. Lastly, by having students
calculate the averages of their tests and place those averages in a bar graph,
students learn how to visually represent data in a way in which they can
compare the results of their vehicles to that of their partners, and draw
conclusions from those results. These conclusions are the key component of
the performance task.
According to Gareis & Grant, learning occurs through multiple steps, not simply
instruction and a final assessment. Learning needs to provoke personal
thought and reflection. Simply giving students summative assessments offers
little cognitive demand for students. Gareis & Grant go on to say that teachers
need to assess students in different ways than simply memorizing think about
Blooms taxonomy and giving students meaningful questions to assess their
learning. More in-depth assessment helps students relate to what they are
learning and think deeply and critically about it, while also creating meaning for
students. I feel that the assessment choices in Lesson 2 reflect this idea of
giving students meaningful questions and tasks to challenge students to think
deeply while also giving the teacher an opportunity to assess student learning.
In this lesson, the teacher provides opportunity through the hands-on activity
and key questions for students to understand, apply, analyze, and evaluate
their learning and make meaningful connections. It gives the teacher an
opportunity to have more insight into what students are learning and whether or
not they are making meaningful connections. This lesson also applies what
Davies calls Assessment for learning. This involves checking to see what
students have learned (entrance/exit slips) and what needs to be learned next,
and also providing descriptive feedback that is focused on improvement (data
collection sheets and conversations with students). It also is used in this lesson
to collect information that will inform the teachers next teaching steps and the
students next learning steps. This lesson displays differentiated instruction and
assessment in the classroom. By assessing students in multiple ways all while
students are engaged in differentiated instruction, it gives every type of learner
an opportunity to show you what they know in a way that best suites them.
Lastly, this lesson shows triangulation of evidence for valid and reliable
assessment (see Lesson 1 description).
Lesson outcome:
What formative
assessment techniques
will you be using? What
information will you be
collecting? How will you
use that information?
The first formative assessment technique used in this lesson was the graffiti
wall as an entrance slip for the class. Students each write one thing they learned
from the previous lesson. This reintroduces the topic from the last lesson,
connects prior learning, and excites the students about what is in store for them
for the remainder of the lesson. This information tells the teacher what students
remember for the last lesson, and whether or not he/she needs to cover that
material once again to make connections for students. While the students are
performing their tests with their vehicles, the teacher will be circulating to each
station, observing students as they test their vehicles. When discussing how to
construct bar graphs with the students as a way to visually represent their data,
the teacher circulates throughout the classroom after each step is explained,
answering questions and formatively assessing through observation to determine
whether students have grasped an understanding of how to construct bar graphs.
This information tells the teacher whether or not he/she needs to reintroduce bar
graphs in the next lesson or repeat steps. It also gives the teacher an opportunity
to give constructive and timely feedback to students while they build their bar
graphs. The teacher opens a class discussion to debrief with the students what
they explored today with their tests, and have them think more deeply about what
they observed and how it compares to their hypothesis. This tells the teacher if
students are thinking deeply about what they did today, and if some students are
having trouble making connections between their data, hypothesis, and
conclusion. The teacher will collect data sheets as a method of formative
assessment at the end of the lesson (these sheets will be returned to students at
the beginning of the next lesson). These data collection sheets help the teacher
see a number of things: student hypotheses, types of variables they identified,
data they collected in their tests, if they calculated averages properly, and how
well they constructed a bar graph. All this information tells the teacher whether or
not students were able to apply their prior knowledge of the scientific procedure to
this lesson, and whether or not student grasped the concepts of averages and bar
graphs. If students did not seem to grasp these concepts, the teacher can hand
back the data collection sheet next class, reintroduce averages and bar graphs,
and have students try again. Lastly, the graffiti wall acts as an exit slip by giving
students the opportunity to write something they took away from this lesson. This
gives students the opportunity to show the teacher what they learned, and tells
the teacher what students took away from the lesson.
Assessment for learning is involved through the entrance/exit slip graffiti wall, as
well as through the data collection sheet and conversations with students. This
allows the teacher insight into what students have learned and directs the next
teaching steps of the teacher. It also gives the teacher an opportunity to provide
descriptive and timely feedback to students about their work. By having students
complete a task that they enjoy while also challenging them with thoughtful
questions, the teacher can observe and have conversations with students that
reveal whether or not students are thinking critically, understanding, applying, and
evaluating their learning. The teacher has more insight into student learning to
see if they are making meaningful connections through observation of student
work and conversations with students through a class discussion after they
completed their tests. Students will be learning through many different ways in
this lesson (differentiated instruction), such as the hands-on tests, thoughtful
questions, and constructing bar graphs. This gives every type of learning an
opportunity to show the teacher what they know. Lastly, this lesson shows
triangulation of evidence for valid and reliable assessment through observation of
students as they perform their tests, conversations with students after they
perform their tests, and collection of products of the data they collected and the
graphs they created.
Description of what
teacher is doing:
Description of what
students are doing:
Sequence of key
questions:
Evidence of Lesson
Components (opening,
closing, content, timeline)
To begin, students once again contribute to their graffiti wall to reintroduce the
topic, connect their prior learning and excite the students. Students then
individually write hypotheses based on their exploration of forces and collaborate
with their peers. Students then work in pairs to begin testing their vehicles through
multiple trials and record their data. Students are asked to identify a variety of
variables (this can be done while students are waiting to use other stations). Once
finished, students receive instruction regarding how to turn their data into
calculations and graphs, completing their work individually (collaboration
encouraged). Prior to the end of the lesson, students are asked to again
contribute to the graffiti wall by writing something that they took away from the
lesson.
If you were to build your vehicle by yourself, what moving force would you use to
propel it forward? Which observation stood out to you? What do you think it
means in terms of a conclusion from your data? How does this compare with your
hypothesis? It should be noted that some students can simply state that they
dont know what it means? What was your biggest takeaway from todays lesson?
Opening - entrance slip graffiti wall
Closing - exit slip on the same graffiti wall
Content - students perform their tests with their vehicles, then take the data they
collected and create a corresponding bar graph.
Rationale: Assessment
Lesson 3: Analyzing Moving Forces
Lesson Description:
Students work to develop their ideas regarding the scientific procedure of their
previous explorations/experiments of forces (developed in lessons 1 & 2).
These ideas will then be presented in a digital reflection of their choice
(performance task). They then assist in adjusting the criteria for the assignment
and adding their own contributions. Students are given adequate time to
complete this assignment in future lessons.
In this lesson, students are taking what they have learned in the past two
lessons to draw their own conclusions from their collected data. These
conclusions are the key component of the performance task. Included in these
conclusions is the connections students make to everyday life, creating
meaning for themselves outside the classroom. By having the students critique
and adjust the assessment criteria laid out in the rubric, students are becoming
actively involved in the assessment of their performance task, and it allows
them to have deeper understanding of what is expected of them with the
performance task because they helped design the rubric. This activity is to
Lesson Outcome:
Students demonstrate a comprehensive understanding of data analysis.
Students demonstrate their ability to draw appropriate inferences from data.
Students demonstrate the ability to provide appropriate suggestions and feedback
when constructing criteria.
What formative
assessment techniques
will you be using? What
information will you be
collecting? How will you
use that information?
The first technique used in lesson 3 is peer feedback. Students will receive
peer feedback and suggestions about the conclusions that they drew from their
hypothesis and data. This feedback gives the students a chance to self-assess
their work and made adequate corrections and changes. During this time, the
teacher will circulate and offer possible suggestions or comments to students
who are struggling to contribute. The teacher will then ask the students to
consider these peer suggestions as they move to work on building their
reflection. These peer reflections have a double purpose: it allows the students
to reflect back on their work, and it also gives the teacher an opportunity to
assess student learning and participation through observations and
conversations. This information will help the teacher see if students are making
accurate connections and conclusions, if they are receiving helpful peer
feedback, and if they need to receive more feedback and suggestions from the
teacher. The teacher can also assess students by having the class discussion
about the performance task criteria. By discussing the criteria of the rubric and
having students give suggestions about what they think is important, it helps
the teacher personalize the rubric to the needs of his/her class according to
where they are at with their learning. This information also tells the teacher
how they can assess students in the future because he/she knows what
students feel they should be evaluated on and what is fair in accordance to
their level of learning. By circulating the classroom as students start to work on
their Digital Reflection booklet, the teacher can collect evidence through
observation and conversation of student learning, identifying students who may
need more assistance or students who may need more of a challenge. Lastly,
the exit slip that connects to the next mini-unit of study helps the teacher see
Description of what
teacher is doing:
Description of what
students are doing:
Students receive feedback to guide their learning during the pass around
activity, where their peers give them feedback and suggestions about the
conclusions they made from their data and hypothesis. These suggestions,
along with suggestions from the teacher, gives them an opportunity to selfassess and re-evaluate their conclusions. Students are also involved in the
assessment criteria of their Digital Reflection. The teacher will allow students to
decide whether or not the criteria in the rubric should be altered and possible
suggestions to make improvements. Students are also given the opportunity to
suggest other possible criteria that should be placed on the rubric. This gives
the students the opportunity to become actively involved in classroom
assessment and allows for student ownership of their work, because they are
the ones deciding what is expected of them. Students can then create goals of
achievement for themselves. The formative assessment techniques throughout
the lesson and the exit slip allow the teacher to alter future instruction based on
student knowledge. This assessment bridges gaps for students so they can
create meaningful connections. Lastly, there is evidence of triangulation
throughout the lesson. The teacher observes and has conversations with
students while they give peer feedback and work in their digital reflection
booklets. The teacher has conversations also during the time of exchanging
peer feedback and also through the discussion of the performance task
criteria. The teacher collects evidence of learning through the My Hypothesis
and Conclusion worksheet, as well as the Digital Reflection booklet.
Because the students dont actually build the digital reflection (performance
task) in this lesson, the teacher allows the students to develop individual ideas
that will later be included in the reflection. The teacher explains that in a future
lesson, the students will be creating their choice of digital reflection (includes
selections such as video, animation, audio recording, powerPoint, mindmap or
digital book/magazine. Additional choices may be pre-approved by the teacher.
This engages students by allowing them a choice, while still strengthening their
technological skills. We do not think the students will be able to complete their
sheets within the specified time constraints, but the lesson could be adjusted so
that students who have completed their idea sheets can start working with
their technology of choice.
Students will be taking their analyzed and collected data and analyzing it
and creating their own conclusions. These students will be represented in a
visual and meaningful way through the use of technology in the
performance task. By using technology in this task, it allows them to
enhance their experience and skills with technology and use software to
best represent their data and conclusions in a way that is meaningful to
Sequence of key
questions:
Which vehicle moves the farthest? Was it close to what you originally predicted?
Why/Why not? What was your original hypothesis? What does this mean for
everyday life? What results can you draw from your bar graph and how does it
compare to your original hypothesis? Using these results, what decisions can
you make about building a moving vehicle? What other factors might have
affected the results of your testing? When designing a vehicle, what are some
modifications that could be made to help it move more efficiently and safely?
Evidence of Lesson
Components (opening,
closing, content, timeline)
Rationale: Ed Technology
Lesson 3 - Analyzing Moving Forces
Lesson
Overview:
Description:
Students work to develop their
ideas regarding the scientific
procedure of their previous
explorations/experiments of
forces (developed in lessons 1
& 2). These ideas will then be
presented in a digital
reflection of their choice
(performance task). They then
assist in adjusting the criteria
for the assignment and adding
their own contributions.
Students are given adequate
Lesson
Outcomes &
Goals:
Instructional
Processes
Key
Questions:
Lesson
Components
Opening
Content:
Conclusion:
Time
estimation:
Lesson Outcome:
Goals:
Students will develop an understanding of
forces and apply it in a practical setting to
the vehicles they interact with in everyday
settings.
Students will collect data from trials and
present it in a meaningful visual way.
Objective (connected to PofS, this
lesson only):
Science - Specific Outcome 2:
Use simple forces to power or propel a
device; e.g., direct pushes, pulls, cranking
mechanisms, moving air, moving water
and downhill motion.