Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Date of Report:
November 3, 2015
Date of Test:
Location of Test:
November 3, 2015
Boston, Massachusetts
Prepared for:
Phone Number:
Timothy Bickmore
Unknown
Email:
is4300f15@ccs.neu.edu
Prepared by:
Phone Number:
Email:
Mallory Loomis, Aekta Shah, Jeremy Stern, Yulia Zileeva, and Sean Holahan
Unknown
loomis.m@husky.neu.edu, shah.ae@husky.neu.edu, stern.je@husky.neu.edu,
zileeva.y@husky.neu.edu, holahan.s@husky.neu.edu
Executive Summary
The main goal of this study was to determine how the Dog Dating App user experience was
overall. The team had several users test the paper prototype application and see how long it
took for each user to complete three main tasks. We then asked several questions about how
the overall experience was and if there were ways we could improve our application. We also
verified that users were able to complete all tasks without having to ask for help or further
explanation. We had the users test our paper prototype in the library which allowed us to find
participants who were dog owners and varied in major/age. Aekta played the role of the
computer while Sean and Mallory spectated and took notes. All testers were able to complete
the three tasks assigned to them. One user had more questions than the others and the overall
trend was that finding the other dog owner on the map was the hardest task.
Methodology
Before the Experiment: Informed Consent and Briefing
Hi, were designing a new dog dating app, that will help you meet other dog owners, plan dog
related events, and ask for dog advice. We are conducting a study to find out what people think
about this. We will not record or publish any information with your name. This is for a course
were taking in Human-Computer Interaction from Prof. Bickmore in the College of Computer
and Information Science. Your participation is voluntary and you can stop anytime and ask that
your data not be used. It should take about 20 minutes... Can you help us out with this?
Great. As I mentioned, were working on a new dog dating app. The purpose of todays session
is for you to help us figure out how to make this web interface more user-friendly before we
finish developing it. But believe it or not, we arent going to use a computer. As youll see, weve
actually created paper versions of the screens, and our team member, here, will be playing the
computer.
Well give you some tasks that we think are representative of what people might do with our app
in real life, such as planning an event, request a dog play date, and ask for advice. Your job is to
tell us what makes sense, whats confusing, and whether it works the way youd expect it to.
The other members of the team will just be watching and quietly taking notes.
Keep in mind that were testing the interface--were not testing youso if you run into any
problems its not your fault and it means that theres something we need to change. Ill be sitting
next to you, and I can help you if you want.
The prototype still has some rough edgeswere still thinking through how it should work and
some parts of it are incomplete. Before we cast it in concrete, we want to get some feedback
about how well this design works.
Our team member, here, will be playing the computer. He/she may seem like a pretty smart
computer, but he/she has no speech recognition and no artificial intelligence. Since machines
cant talk, hes/shes not allowed to explain anything. If you want to do something, youll need to
interact with the prototype just as you would on a smartphone. Use your finger to click on
buttons. These labels indicate places where you can type something in, and heres your
keyboard (give pen). Its OK to write on this.
Please tell us what makes sense to you, whats confusing, and any other questions that come to
mind. Your questions are especially valuable, but I may not answer them right away because
our goal is to change the interface so it answers them.
Remember that were testing the interfacewere not testing you. Are you ready to start?
OK, heres the first thing wed like you to do. Take a minute to read this and let me know if it
makes sense. If so, then whenever youre ready please show us what you would do first.
Who We Tested (Demographics)
Three participants, having the following characteristics, evaluated the Dod Dating App in Snell
Library between 1:30 and 3pm on a desk using the paper prototypes we created.
Dog Owner
Technology Level
1-5 years
Lower Level
5-10 years
Average
10+ years
Advanced
TOTAL
(participants)
TOTAL
(participants)
Age
Gender
18-25
Women
26-39
Men
40-59
60-74
TOTAL
(participants)
TOTAL
(participants)
Never
Everyday
TOTAL
(participants)
Everyday
TOTAL
(participants)
House or Apt
House
1-5
Apt
5+
TOTAL
(participants)
TOTAL
(participants)
Suburbs or City
Suburbs
City
TOTAL
(participants)
Solutions
Statistical Measures
Age: Mean (20), standard deviation
Gender: Mode (female) & percent (66% girls)
Major: Mode (computer science)
Number of pets : Mode (1)
Number of Participants: 3
For each individual test case, % completed: 100%
Number of Participants
Success Rate
100%
Notes
-
Number of Participants
Success Rate
100%
Notes
-
Number of Participants
Success Rate
100%
Notes
- It seems share location is too hard to see
- He got confused as to what he was supposed to do when he should have invited
Mollie
- Should see people
helpful