Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Billings
ENGL
1010-410
Summary
Response
revision
Another
point
he
makes
is
the
affordability
of
fast
food.
When
speaking
about
fast
food
restaurants
Zinczenko
states,
Then
as
now,
these
were
the
only
available
options
for
an
American
kid
to
get
an
affordable
meal.
With
this
statement
he
is
saying
that
because
his
mother
worked
long
hours
and
was
not
home
to
cook
for
him,
not
only
was
fast
food
his
only
choice
for
meals,
but
also
the
only
ones
he
was
able
to
afford.
Because
these
were
his
only
options
his
weight
gain
was
inevitable.
In
his
article
Zinczenko
also
makes
the
argument
that
fast
food
restaurants
are
marketing
products
they
know
have
severe
health
consequences,
much
like
the
tobacco
industry
did.
However,
unlike
tobacco
products,
advertisements
for
fast
food
are
not
required
to
have
health
warnings.
Not
only
are
fast
food
restaurants
marketing
these
products,
they
also
make
it
difficult
to
obtain
accurate
nutritional
information
about
their
food.
He
observes:
There
are
no
calorie
information
charts
on
fast
food
packaging,
the
way
there
are
on
grocery
items.
Even
when
you
are
able
to
find
this
information,
often
only
by
request,
it
can
be
difficult
to
decipher.
Zinczenko
give
this
as
an
example,
one
companys
Web
site
list
its
chicken
salad
as
containing
150
calories;
the
almonds
and
noodles
that
come
with
it
(an
additional
190
calories)
are
listed
separately.
It
is
almost
impossible
to
know
how
unhealthy
the
food
they
are
eating
is,
or
to
accurately
calculate
the
calories
that
are
being
consumed.
I
question
some
of
the
statements
that
he
makes
in
his
article.
Are
these
really
the
only
options
that
American
kids
have
as
meal
choices?
I
dont
think
so.
I
understand
that
as
a
busy
parent,
especially
a
single
one,
it
is
not
always
possible
to
be
home
when
your
child
gets
home
to
cook
them
a
meal.
What
you
can
do
is
give
your
child
an
alternative
to
fast
food.
It
is
up
to
the
parent(s)
to
make
sure
that
your
child
has
other
options
easily
available
to
them.
Stock
the
pantry
with
healthy
food
and
snacks;
make
it
more
appealing
and
easier
to
eat
at
home
rather
then
going
out.
As
far
as
fast
food
being
the
only
affordable
option,
this
just
isnt
the
case.
It
is
fast
and
easy
to
give
your
teen
five
dollars
as
you
are
running
out
the
door,
and
tell
them
to
pick
something
up.
If
you
are
buying
two
meals
a
day,
that
gets
expensive.
For
the
same
ten
dollars
you
could
buy
a
whole-wheat
loaf
of
bread,
peanut
butter,
and
some
fruit.
In
the
long
run
this
turns
out
to
be
the
cheaper
option,
as
you
will
get
much
more
that
two
meals
out
of
it.
Instead
of
giving
them
money,
you
can
now
say
there
are
apples
and
celery
in
the
fridge
and
the
makings
for
sandwiches.
Here
is
where
David
Zinczenko
and
I
do
agree,
fast
food
restaurants
do
market
food
they
know
is
unhealthy,
and
nutritional
information
is
not
always
readily
available.
As
a
society,
we
have
taken
steps
in
assuring
that
the
tobacco
industry
is
severely
limited
in
their
advertising.
We
should
do
the
same
with
fast
food.
Also,
make
sure
that
those
advertisements
have
warnings
associated
with
them
as
well.
Another
crucial
advance
we
need
to
make
is
to
make
sure
that
the
consumer
is
aware
of
the
exact
amount
of
calories
and
fat
are
in
they
meal
they
are
eating.
Have
the
information
out
in
the
open
and
in
a
way
that
makes
it
easy
to
understand.
No
more
separating
all
the
ingredients
that
come
with
a
meal
to
try
to
make
it
seem
like
you
are
eating
fewer
calories.