Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Students from
Batangas State
University about the
K to 12 Program
Balbastro, Charlene Mae C.
Ducay, Ma. Angela Denice D.
Ongria, Melody I.
Reyes, Princes Almira E.
Introduction
Rationale
As said by Bro. Armin C. Luistro, No one will be
left behind. It is not just about attaining the
twelve (12) years of education but to be
knowledgeable enough about it. The purpose of
this study is to inform as well as to test on what
level of knowledge the students of Batangas
State University-Rosario have about the new
education program. Through this, we can assess
students understanding about the K-12
education program. We can also be informed
about what improvement we can conceptualize in
the implementation of the said program.
General Objective
1. To deepen the understanding of
students from Batangas State
University-Rosario about the K to
12 Education Program.
Specific Objectives
1. To evaluate the learning of students from
Batangas State University about the
advantages and disadvantages of K to 12
education program.
2. To analyze the information the students from
Batangas State University-Rosario have
regarding the K to12 program.
3. To determine the number of students that is
well informed of the K to 12 Basic Education
Program.
Preparation
The questionnaires were prepared by the
researchers themselves after doing a lot of
research and group brainstorming.
Validation
The first drafted questionnaire was prepared
and showed to the research adviser for
correction. Revision of each item, deleting
irrelative ones and adding information on
items was done. After revisions, second draft
was presented again to the adviser for
comments and suggestions.
Administrations
A request letter for the dean of each department
noted by the adviser was handed. As soon as the
permission was granted, distribution of the
questionnaires will be administered by the
researchers. Then it will be returned to the
researchers properly fulfilled.
Scoring
After the questionnaire was sent back to the
researchers, explanation and interpretations of each
items is made. The respondents were graded
according to the equivalent of their score. The
respondents were scored using and obtaining the
rubrics.
Score
5/5
4/5
3/5
2-0/5
Equivalent grade
Excellent
Good
Fair
Poor
Score
15-19/19
10-14/19
5-9/19
4-0/19
Equivalent grade
Excellent
Good
Fair
Poor
CTE
4% 7%
Fair
Poor
Good
Excellent
89%
54%
42%
Fair
Poor
Good
Excellent
33%
67%
Fair
Poor
Good
Excellent
33%
67%
Fair
Poor
Good
Excellent
Fair
Poor
Good
Excellent
100%
Fair
Poor
Good
Excellent
100%
Good; 100%
50%
50%
Fair
Poor
Good
Excellent
CABEIHM
50%
50%
Fair
Poor
Good
Excellent
8%
42%
50%
Fair
Poor
Good
Excellent
17%
83%
Fair
Poor
Good
Excellent
50%
50%
Fair
Poor
Good
Excellent
20%
80%
Fair
Poor
Good
Excellent
25%
75%
Fair
Poor
Good
Excellent
Fair
Poor
Good
Excellent
100%
CIT
Fair
Poor
Good
Excellent
100%
Fair
Poor
Good
Excellent
25%
75%
11%
89%
Fair
Poor
Good
Excellent
Fair
Poor
Good
Excellent
11%
89%
30%
40%
30%
Fair
Poor
Good
Excellent
30%
35%
35%
Fair
Poor
Good
Excellent
Fair
Poor
Good
Excellent
100%
33%
34%
33%
Fair
Poor
Good
Excellent
GE
30%
40%
30%
Fair
Poor
Good
Excellent
20%
10%
70%
Fair
Poor
Good
Excellent
22%
11%
67%
Fair
Poor
Good
Excellent
11%
89%
Fair
Poor
Good
Excellent
Findings
From the results gathered in the questionnaires distributed
among the students of Batangas State University- Rosario
Campus. We come up with these findings:
Conclusions
Recommendations
THANK YOU