Professional Documents
Culture Documents
For ethnomathematicians, fairness is linked to equity. This understanding brings a focus on the need
to address social disparity by improving access to quality mathematics, and by improving the
achievement of historically marginalized students (Lunney Borden, 2010). The concern for protecting
students from marginalization is at heart in the way that Alberta Education understands the connection
between fairness and equity. In essence, Alberta Education wants students to participate in the dominant
culture, without being required to deny their identity (Lunney Borden, 2010). To inspire this ideal
education for its citizens, the Alberta Education enacts fairness by: (a) giving equal opportunity to
students to access supportive instructional programs that will lead to higher achievement, (b) creating
culturally inclusive learning environments, and (c) by giving freedom to students to choose what learning
methods and models are appropriate to their needs (Government of Alberta, 2010). In this way, the
understanding of fairness that is implied in the education system is specifically measured in terms of
equity. We might wonder how this understanding of fairness has entered into mainstream education in
Alberta.
It helps to give a brief history of how the idea of equity and fairness developed in Western
political thought. Equity and fairness in Western political thought is derived from earlier notions of
equality. The ancient Greeks thought equality meant the proportionate distribution of power among the
privileged citizens of the state was intrinsic to any notion of social justice (Clifford, 2008). Equality
formerly belonged only to privileged individuals until the Early-modern era and the contributions of
Naturalist philosophers like Hobbes, Locke, and Paine (Clifford, 2008). Their understanding of equality
helped to develop a rights-based framework for individuals to assert and defend their natural rights in
both a legal and political way (Clifford, 2008). This framework became problematic in the Twentieth
century because an individuals natural right to equality was based on the political-legal system
acknowledging an individuals humanity. It was Dewey who contended that equality only had democratic
credentials when individuals were recognized as having the same entitlement to develop their natural
capacities, whether they be large or small (Clifford, 2008). This understanding has undoubtedly worked
its way into the application of fairness in mainstream educational systems. However, a more refined
understanding of this sense of fairness came with the advent of human rights declarations wherein
concerns for protecting the universal dignity of human beings was articulated as the focus of equality
rights (Clifford, 2008). Thus, our current Western understanding of fairness comes from how the idea of
equity has developed from our emerging thinking about equality rights.
Mathematics education in Alberta follows this same vein of Western thinking about equality.
The understanding that fairness means equity is prominently reflected in the current beliefs about
students mathematics learning in Alberta. Alberta Education believes that students construct meaning
about mathematical ideas by relying on a variety of contexts and connections to their own personal
experience and cultural backgrounds (Alberta Learning, 2000). Therefore, fairness is an important value
that Alberta Education embraces in order to protect students human and cultural dignity. In order to play
the game of mainstream mathematics education, Alberta students are not required to deny their identities
(Lunney Borden, 2010).
Extending the Discussion
It is interesting to consider how this understanding that fairness means equity is conveyed to students
as they develop meanings for fraction concepts. We teach children from an early age to discern that
fairness is determined by creating identical portions that can be shared equally. This is unequivocally the
dominant meaning attached to the partitive notion of fractions, or the idea that fractions involve a partpart-whole relationship. This presentation of fairness is either insufficient and/or trivial when presented to
students whose personal experience and cultural background tell them that equality is determined by
need, rather than identical portions (Babb & Davis, 2014). Since it is not true that mainstream
mathematics are emptied of all Western cultural values (Babb & Davis, 2014), we make the case that
some students may be marginalized if we dont offer meaningful explanations that are consonant with
their cultural values. From an ethnomathematics perspective, we fail to protect human and cultural dignity
if we cant attend to alternative meanings for mathematical concepts (Lunney Borden, 2010).
An example of how a non-Eurocentric understanding of fairness contributes to protecting
human and cultural dignity. Other ways of understanding fairness can be presented without
compromising the equity that is so much implied in Albertas education system. Teachers can learn from
students home languages in order to more firmly root mathematics learning in students identities
(Lunney Borden, 2010). In the case of fractions, the connection between language and learning is
especially pronounced for Aboriginal students. As an example, we can take the Mikmaq word pukwe,
which means a piece or a part of something (Lunney Borden, 2010). In a Mikmaw students home, you
might hear someone say pukwe iknumi kandiamul or, give me a piece of candy, (Lunney Borden,
2010, p. 14-15). This meaning of pukwe is linked to the partitive concept of fractions. Interestingly, it
does not imply the requirement that a piece of candy is defined in terms of identical portions.
Mathematical reasoning skills need to develop from the way that students experience a real world
need for learning that skill (Lunney Borden, 2010). An Aboriginal students understanding of fairness
might mean having enough for survival, and then sharing what is leftover (Lunney Borden, 2010). In this
case, the mainstream Western idea that fairness means identical portions is problematic and just doesnt
make sense. At the same time, the Aboriginal students understanding doesnt compromise the idea that
fairness means equity. In fact, equity is maybe even more refined in understandings other than the
dominant Western understanding. Learning that fairness means sharing whatever one does not need for
ones own survival sounds like an effective way of protecting human rights and cultural dignity. We
might consider the ways that Albertas education system can be enhanced by continuing to advocate for
the inclusion of alternative epistemological grounds for examining the nature of mathematical knowledge
(Lunney Borden, 2010).
Exploring Beyond the Discussion
At this point on the program, we want to conclude with a reading from the academic literature on
mathematics education. As always, we try to reflect on a passage that is relevant to the theme of todays
discussion. Today we will recount a story shared by Lisa Lunney Borden that demonstrates how
mathematical reasoning emerges when students experience a real need develop these skills (Lunney
Borden, 2010). We ask listeners to reflect on what happens to children who are asked to understand
mathematics [when it is] devoid of such needs and [contextual] experiences, (Lunney Borden, 2010, p.
References
Alberta Learning. (2000). Mathematics Program of Study. Available online at:
http://education.alberta.ca/teachers/program/math.aspx
Babb, A. P. P., & Davis, B. (2014). Elementary Mathematics Instruction and Student Diversity. Diversity
Education: Understanding and Addressing Student Diversity, 1, 393.
Clifford, J. (2008). Locating Equality: from Historical Philosophical Thought to Modern Legal Norms.
The Equal Rights Review, 1, 12-19. Retrieved from,
http://www.equalrightstrust.org/ertdocumentbank/LocatingEquality.pdf