Professional Documents
Culture Documents
ewoldtk@unlv.nevada.edu
Background
Literature Review
Introduction
Nevada has one of the fastest growing English
language learner (ELL) populations in the United
States (Ruark, 2010). ELL students consistently
lag behind their general education peers and
perform poorly on standardized assessments
(Ruark, 2010). Teachers must possess specific
skills and strategies in order to effectively meet
the needs of this diverse population.
Overview of Studies
process
Roy-Campbell ,(2013): (a) more formal
Resources
professional development
Tllez & Manthey ,(2015): (a) teachers
who work in a school with a positive
climate believe that instruction for ELLs is
strong
In an urban school with a high percentage of English Language Learners (ELLs), few
teachers held an ELL endorsement. Monthly reading achievement results remained low
despite intensive instruction, while math scores increased. An investigation yielding high
levels of student and teacher motivation and high-quality instruction led to further inquiry.
Using the four key aspects leading to ELL academic success identified by Parish et al.
(2006), two recommendations were made to school administration: (a) school wide focus
on English language development, and (b) shared priorities and expectations of ELL
education. A professional development session designed to increase awareness of
language acquisition, oral language development strategies, and resources for further
information was developed.
mciner12@unlv.nevada.edu
QR to this poster
QR to website
resources
References
August, D., Shanahan, T. (Eds.). (2005). Executive summary.
Developing literacy in second-language learners: A report of the
national literacy panel on language-minority children and youth.
Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
Batt, E. G., & , (2008). Teachers' perceptions of ell education: Potential
solutions to overcome the greatest challenges. Multicultural Education,
15(3), 39-43.
Morgan, P. L., & Fuchs, D. (2007). Is there a bidirectional relationship
between children's reading skills and reading motivation?. Exceptional
Children, 73(2), 165-183.
Parrish, T., Merickel, A., Prez, M., Linguanti, R., Socias, M., Spain, A.,
& Delancey, D. (2006). Effects of the implementation of Proposition 227
on the education of English learners, K-12: Findings from a five-year
evaluation. Washington, DC: American Institutes for Research.
Roy-Campbell, Z. M. (2013). Who educates teacher educators about
english language learners?. Reading Horizons, 52(3), 255-280.
Ruark, M. (2010). Executive summary. English language learners and
immigration: A case study Clark and Washoe counties, Nevada.
Washington, DC: Federation for American Immigration Reform.
Smith, S. U. (2014). Frameworks shaping an onlind professional
development program for k-12 teachers of ells: Toward supporting the
sharing of ideas for empowering classroom teachers online. TEOSL,
5(3), 444-464.
Tllez, K., & Manthey, G. (2015). Teachers' perceptions of effective
school-wide programs and strategies for English language learners.
Learning Environ Res, 18, 111-127. doi: 10.1007/s10984-015-9173-6
Overview
Standards-based instruction
Recommendations
In-service training with the following goals:
1. Teachers will explain three of the following
second language acquisition characteristics: BICS,
CALP, pobrecito, collective ability, and
simultaneous content & language acquisition.
2. Teachers will incorporate at least one strategy
for teaching ELLs daily: Visual literacy, realia,
student discourse, comprehensible inputs
(understandable messages), consistent routines,
identification of cognates (highlight
commonalities).
3. Teachers will access at least one the provided
website resources for further information (see QR
Code)
OLD = Oral Language Development HQ = High Quality