Professional Documents
Culture Documents
ewoldtk@unlv.nevada.edu
Abstract
Reading
Background
Online education at the K-12 level is a relatively
new phenomenon, which has seen tremendous
growth. Enrollment in statewide virtual schools
has grown by more than 200% (Watson, Murin,
Vashaw, Gemin, & Rapp, 2010; Watson, Pape,
Murin, Gemin, & Vashaw, 2014) and K-12 online
course availability has expanded from 27 states
and the District of Columbia to all 50 states and
the District of Columbia (Watson et al., 2010;
Watson et al., 2014).
Researchers have theorized several benefits of
K-12 online learning. Districts are able to expand
course offerings (Beck, Egalite, & Maranto, 2014),
provide access to specialty courses (Hashey &
Stahl, 2014; Thompson, Ferdig, & Black, 2012;
Vasquez & Slocum, 2012), reduce overall costs
(Smith & Meyen, 2003; Vasquez & Serriani,
2012), and offer credit retrieval courses
(Thompson, et.al., 2012; Vasquez & Serriani,
2012). Teachers are able to individualize
instruction (Beck et al., 2014; Vasquez & Serriani,
2012), to provide timely corrective feedback
(Allday & Allday, 2011), and to present content in
multiple ways (Hashey & Stahl, 2014). Students
have flexible pacing (Allday & Allday, 2011; Beck
et al., 2014; Thompson et al., 2012; Vasquez &
Serriani, 2012), increased opportunities to
respond (Allday & Allday, 2011), a flexible
schedule (Allday & Allday, 2011), greater control
over their learning (Beck et al., 2014), and
continuity of education despite health limitations
(Beck et al., 2014).
Written Expression
Math
Behavior
higaj@unlv.nevada.edu
References
Allday, C. M., & Allday, R. A. (2012). Effects of
pacing options on final grades of students with
disabilities in virtual school. Quarterly Review of
Distance Education, 12, 223-243. Retrieved from
http://www.infoagepub.com/quarterly-review-ofdistance-education.html
Beck, D., Egalite, A., & Maranto, R. (2014). Why
they choose and how it goes: Comparing special
education and general education cyber student
perceptions. Computers & Education, 76, 70-79.
Retrieved from http://www.journals.elsevier.com/
computers-and-education
Hashey, A. I., & Stahl, S. (2014). Making online
learning accessible for students with disabilities.
Teaching Exceptional Children, 46(5), 70-78. doi:
10.11770040059914528329
Smith, S. J., & Meyen, E. L. (2003). Applications
of online instruction: An overview for teachers,
students with mild disabilities, and their parents.
Focus on Exceptional Children, 35(6), 1-15.
Thompson, L. A., Ferdig, R., & Black, E. (2012).
Online schools and children with special health
and educational needs: Comparison with
performance in traditional schools. Journal of
Medical Internet Research, 14, e62. doi: 10.2196/
jmir.1947
Vasquez, E., III, & Slocum, T. A. (2012).
Evaluation of synchronous online tutoring for
students at risk of reading failure. Exceptional
Children, 78, 221-235. Retrieved from http://
journals.cec.sped.org/ec/
Watson, J., Murin, A., Vashaw, L., Gemin, B., &
Rapp, C., (2010). Keeping pace with K-12 online
learning: An annual review of policy and practice.
Report of the Evergreen Education Group.
Retrieved from http://www.kpk12.com/
Watson, J., Pape, L., Murin, A., Gemin, G., &
Vashaw, L. (2014). Keeping pace with K-12 digital
learning: An annual review of policy and practice.
Report of the Evergreen Education Group.
Retrieved from http://www.kpk12.com/