Professional Documents
Culture Documents
There are three different groups of people in Rwanda and Burundi, The Hutu
Tutsi and the Twa. These different groups all had different types of economies
along with different types cultural backgrounds. All the groups have many
similarities however their rich history of a cast system and strong racial or
prejudice beliefs have caused conflict in the area. The groups all lived in close
proximity to one another and in some cased amongst each other. This review will
cover the economies and modes of production of the Hutu and the Tutsi, the social
and political structure of the two groups before and after colonization and under
their own control, and some of the key parts of their ideology and religion that
The to start we need to describe the the different groups. There are the Twa
who were the first group to inhabit this region, they only make up one percent of
the population. They are hunter gatherers and had no way of making a living they
only survived. The Hutu and the Tutsi make up the rest of the population in the
area. All the groups together as a whole are known as “Banyarwanda”. We will
focus on the Hutu and the Tutsi for the remainder of the paper because the Twa
have nothing to do with the focus of the conflict. The Hutu who came to the area a
long time after the Twa, and brought with them new ideas and a new way of life to
the area. They brought with them horticulture, as a way of subsistence, which
helped them reach the number of people that will eventually call themselves
Hutu. The Hutu people were able to feed every one in their tribe or group which
1
Research Paper Sec 1 Christopher Seifert
caused people to live longer and reproduce. Probably why the Twa have such a
small population. The Tutsi people brought with them the same type of
horticulture as the Hutu but were pastoralists and were able to overcome hunger
and other issues because of this. “Most reciently, pastoral peoples migrated into
and usually politically dominant segment of a mixed society.”(Eller 199) The new
Tutsi culture paved the way for the new way of life for the region. The Tutsi saw
their way of life to be dominant and they then started the prevailing economy. In
most cases it was not force that caused this, it was the capital that the Tutsi had
which made this transition possible. Most of the Tutsi had cattle or some sort of
live stock that produced either a larger crop or milk for their family, because they
came into the area already stronger and smarter farmers, it was natural for the
rest of the people of the area to follow and participate in what they could afford or
The Hutu people were generally stereotyped racially as “short and thick-set
with a big head, a jovial expression, a wide nose and enormous lips”(Eller 200)
The Tutsi were stereotyped racially as “very tall, 1.8 meters, at least, often 1.9
meters or more. He is very thin His features are very fine: a high brow, thin nose
and fine lips framing beautiful shining teeth.”(Eller 200) It is not the looks that
started the dominance that the Tutsi's had, they had thought of themselves as a
2
Research Paper Sec 1 Christopher Seifert
superior group for their entire existence. It was the different distinctions between
the groups that set themselves apart from each other. The Hutu were farmers and
planted crops to survive where as the Tutsi were pastoralists and did not have to
work as hard to get as much as the Hutu. This lack of effort cause the Tutsi to be,
economically, more rich because they did not have to give up as much or work as
hard to get the same amount. This sense of “better than the rest” spilled over into
the social structure of the Hutu and thus created a Caste system in the area, with
Tutsi people being at the top Hutu next and the, lone, Twa holding down the
bottom of society. With this new caste system in place it brought up new social
standards in the Hutu and the Tutsi. From the view of the Tutsi, you don't marry
Hutu person, and they say that it rarely happens but it occurs from time to time.
From the view of the Hutu, they say it is not looked down upon but marrying a
Tutsi is not the normal thing to do, and they say it happens frequently. As the
abundance of Hutu and Tutsi people grew the Name Tutsi or Hutu was not
necessarily specific to any one race as it was in the beginning. “A Tutsi, a Hutu, or
a Twa is a person who regarded himself, and was regarded by all those who knew
him, as a Tutsi, Hutu or Twa.”(Eller 202) This sense of class structure forced people
into a life in which they could not move to the next level of the caste system. One
way that people could move up to the level of Tutsi was to own cattle or some sort
of live stock, because the Tutsi were pastoralists, owning any sort of producing
animal would bump you up the ladder. Controversially just because you had cattle
or looked like a Tutsi did not mean that you are one. The culture through out the
3
Research Paper Sec 1 Christopher Seifert
region was decentralized at the least, some in the western world would even call
it anarchist. The Hutu or Tutsi were small groups that were, but not in all cases,
completely independent of each other. The decentralized chiefdom that the Hutu
were accustomed to forced themselves to stick with each other, weather it was
from their family or from the other group members, and the same thing applies to
the Tutsi as well. The chiefs made decisions that were best for the individual group
not what was best for the entire region, which is why the the two groups were
able to co-exist for such a long period of time with out large scale problems or
conflict. When one group retained enough power and tried to make decisions that
effected the entire region, we saw a conflict on the largest scale. The Tutsi saw
the Hutu as hardworking but not intelligent, Tutsi people even go as far as to say
that they are unmannerly and obedient. These views not only demonstrate the
social structure of the region but give an insight as to why these practices came
why the Hutu were oppressed, they really felt like they were less than the people
of the Tutsi group. This pattern of Hutu submitting to the Tutsi's continued and the
Hutu started working for Tutsi either for protection or out of fear.
They had different life styles and different activities that each enjoyed however
they did not differ to any extreme. Being that they occupied the same area it is
understandable that they would participate in activities that were the same in
4
Research Paper Sec 1 Christopher Seifert
nature. The differences came mostly in ideology. “In the past our proper name was
which means “servant” It's a name that the Tutsi gave us”(Eller 195) The
effect on the entire region. Both groups, or all groups, speak the same language
and look relatively similar. There are two things to consider when looking at the
Hutu and the Tutsi that distinguish them from most other indigenous groups;
because in the beginning all of the groups were called or called themselves
Tutsi?”(Eller 196) Secondly “The Banyarwanda are not limited to the territory of
Rwanda and Burundi but are found also in Zaire, Tanzania, and Uganda.”(Eller
197) This shows that the group identity is spread though out this entire area of
Africa and not just specific to one region, or one cultural difference. Since the
better or of a higher class than any one else in their Hutu or Tutsi group. The only
person in the group that had any sort of leadership or power was the chief. This
type of social structure continued on into the modern era of Rwanda, which
caused one of the biggest conflicts in Africa. The Hutu and the Tutsi had become
accustom to having one person in charge of the group, therefore, when it came
a king. As you can guess that king ended up being a Tutsi, which, because of past
history did not go over well with the majority of the population being Hutu.
5
Research Paper Sec 1 Christopher Seifert
This paper does not focus on the new era of the Hutu and the Tutsi, we are
leaving many parts of the story out. So far this paper has focused on the tribes as
they were in the beginning, or the people of the region as indigenous and not
what they have transitioned into over time. The Hutu and the Tutsi are so similar
in their ever day life that it is hard to characterize each. They started as the same
and grew apart rapidly, as the Tutsi became more and more powerful. Each of the
different tribes have the same language and can communicate with each other. It
is the deep sense of prejudice that the Tutsi have for any person that they feel is
below them in the social class that started the conflict and the resentment that
the Hutu have, for being disrespected through out their existence. With out
nature of the conflict we will discuss in the later stages of this paper. Over all the
biggest differences in the two groups is just race itself. It has become more and
more apparent that race plays the biggest role in conflict and their class system.
Through economics we can understand some of the reasons that the Tutsi thought
governing or the independence of each group that gives the Hutu and the Tutsi
their social structure, and it is their social differences that gives each group their
own ideology on how to live their lives and what they do together as a group.