Professional Documents
Culture Documents
2 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
3 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
4 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
5 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
6 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
7 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Modeling and Simulating a Surface Marine Vehicle in an External Uniform Earth's Magnetic Field Using of...
8 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
9 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
I
10 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
11 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
12 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
13 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
26 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
27 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Identification of Offshore Jacket Damaged Members by Using Reduced Wavelet Component Energy
28 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
29 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Dynamic Coupled Analysis of Semi-Submersible Platform: Case Study Iran-Amirkabir
30 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
API
31 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
...
32 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
33 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
34 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
35 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
36 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
37 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
38 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
39 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
40 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Evaluation of CPT Cone Factor in South Pars Field, Persian Gulf
41 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
xx
42 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
59
43 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
44 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
""
45 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
46 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Epan
47 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
48 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
49 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
CFD
50 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
51 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
AUV
52 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
53 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
54 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
55 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
56 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
SES FSI
57 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
()VOF
58 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
59 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
60 ...
60 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
61 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
62 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
63 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
64 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
...
65 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
...
66 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Scale Effect on Form Drag of Small Waterplane Area Ships,With Oval Shape of Gondola
67 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
68 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Delft3D-Flow
69 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
70 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
(Wave Energy in Anzali Port (Iran
71 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Flow3D
72 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
73 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
PSO LM
74 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Design of Chamber and Wells Turbine for an Oscillating Column of Water for Extracting Wave Energy from ...
75 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Evaluation of Wave Energy Potentials in Chahbahar Port Using Two Methods of Water-Wind Model ...
76 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
77 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
78 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
79 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
80 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Numerical Comparison Between Diffraction Theory and Morison Equation in Predicting Wave Force - Case Study: ...
81 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Prediction of Wave Spectrum Using Artificial Neural Network
82 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
83 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
()VOF
84 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
85 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
86 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
87 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
88 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
The Effects of Bank and Shallow Water on The Flow Pattern Around Hull of LNG Carrier Using Cfd
89 . . . . . . . Adi Maimun - Mehdi Nakisa - Yit Siang Ang - Pauzi Ghani - Agoes Priyanto - Yasser Razak - Fatemeh Behrouzi
90 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
91 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
92 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
93 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
A Numerical Analysis of Hydrofoil Operation Near the Water Surface and Development of A Method to Calculate...
94 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
95 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
96 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
97 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
98 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
99 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
100 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
101 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
102 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Optimum Design of Crp Propeller Using Open-Prop Software
103 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
104 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
SES
105 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
( )
106 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
...
107 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
- PVL
108 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
109 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
110 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
111 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
CRP Azipod
112 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
CRP
113 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
114 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
115 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
116 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
117 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Air Cavity Ships
118 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
119 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
120 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
121 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
AUV
122 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
123 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
124 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
125 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
126 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
127 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
( )
128 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
DNV ABS
129 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
130 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
131 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
132 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Vibration Investigation of Cylindrical Pipes With Sigmoid, Power Law and Exponentially Graded Material
133 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
134 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
A-B517
135 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
136 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
5083 PEO
137 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
138 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
139 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
140 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
141 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
I
142 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
143 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
On The Effect of Substrates Type in Fracture Strength of Adhesively Bonded DCB Joints by a Cohesive Zone ...
144 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
145 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Numerical Analysis and Optimization of Top-Hat Stiffened Composite Plate Panels Used in GFRP Ship Structures...
146 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
147 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
PVC ...
148 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
PVC VIP
149 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
150 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
151 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
152 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
153 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
HSLA 100
154 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Study on Microstructure and Mechanical Properties of Rolled Alloy 5083 H112 After Heat Treating at ...
155 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
V
156 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
ASTM A517 AISI 316L ...
157 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
T
158 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
159 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
AUV
160 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
161 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
( )RCS
162 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
163 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
... FEMM
164 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
165 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
( :)
166 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
A New Plan for Marine Green Energy System; Gravity Buoyancy System in Deep Waters
167 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
168 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
169 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
170 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
5083 M-ARB
171 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
172 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
173 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
174 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
SMA
175 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
( )GMAW
176 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
177 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
2007
178 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
179 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
180 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
181 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
182 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
183 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
184 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
185 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
186 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
187 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
188 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
QuikSCAT
189 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
PSO
190 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
191 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
192 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
193 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
194 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
195 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
( AHP-FUZZY )
196 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
40
197 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
(( )AHP )
198 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
4 91 94
199 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
200 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
201 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
( : )
202 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
( )ANP ...
203 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
CMMS
204 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
205 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
206 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
HSE ()
207 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
208 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
209 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
210 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Electrical Installation Criteria for Bridge Navigational Watch Alarm System and Class Approval Requirements
211 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
212 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
: ...
213 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
214 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
215 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
216 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
()VAR
217 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
218 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
219 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
220 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
221 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
222 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
223 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
224 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
225 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
226 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
FMEA
227 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
( )B. dussumieri
228 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
229 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
( )CCA
230 . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
( )PAHs ...
231 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
...
232 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
OSIS
233 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
234 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
NOOA-HD
235 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
...
236 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
( )
237 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
238 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
239 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
()
240 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
( ) 44
241 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
( ) " " " ...
242 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
1 m.khaleghian@aut.ac.ir
2 ketabdar@aut.ac.ir
.
.
.
ABS API
.
.
1 navid7991@yahoo.com
2 panahi@rahiran.ir
.
.
.
.
1 tabeshpour@sharif.edu
2 akhavatmostafa@yahoo.com
.
.
.
.
.
: )1( 2
3
1 2
1 Kurosh.tafi@gmail.com
2 massood@gmail.com
3 Khedmati@aut.ac.ir
) (
.
150
.
. )
(
Ansys 12 .
1 2
1 seyedmorteza.motahari@yahoo.com
2 sayyaadi@sharif.ir
3 farhoodazi@gmail.com
.
.
. .
.
.
. .
.
.
1 2
1 abaiee.mohammad@aut.ac.ir
2 ketabdar@aut.ac.ir
3 babaiy@aut.ac.ir
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
:
1 matinnikoo@alumni.com
2 zeinoddini@kntu.ac.ir
) 1(IWA
.
2 .
.
3
.
.
) 3( ) (
.
:
Abstract
With recent advances in electromagnetic sensor technology, the war time
threat to shipping posed by electromagnetically triggered mines is becoming
more significant and consequently the need to understand, predict and reduce
the electromagnetic signature of ships is growing. The detection threat arising
from this induced magnetic signature has been known for many years, and
consequently, ships are generally fitted with degaussing coils. The main aim of
investigation of new methods for modeling magnetic signatures of marine
vehicles due to their moving in earth's magnetic field is the sophisticated
procedure of modeling the details of structure and then meshing the model. So
in this paper we will focus on a simple but practical model which fulfill our
expectations. The work presented in this study is concerned with the magnetic
signature resulting from the magnetization of the ferromagnetic material of a
marine vehicle. For our purpose, we are using the open source FEMM program.
FEMM is a suite of programs for solving low frequency electromagnetic
problems on two dimensional planar and axisymmetric domains. Whereas, our
case is to magnetostatic problem.
1 tabeshpour@sharif.edu
2 seif@sharif.edu
) (TLP .
.
.
.
.
.
MATLAB
.
SNATELP
.
10
I
2
1
1
hosseini@dena.kntu.ac.ir
2
Zeinoddini@kntu.ac.ir
I
.
.
.
I
. I
.
.
1.ABAQUS
11
1 mahmood_8c@yahoo.com
2 panahi@rahiran.ir
SVM
.
1961 .
.
SAP2000 .
6 2
5 %40.5
. )
(
.
: SVM
SAP2000
12
1 2
1 H.shiri@deltaoffshoregroup.com
2 Alireza.sadeghi@civil.uut.ac.ir
3 Hossein.hashemi@civil.uut.ac.ir
) (Touchdown Zone .
.
.
) (FEA
.
.
:
13
1 2 3
1 ketabdar@aut.ac.ir
2 farnoosh_shafi@aut.ac.ir
3 z.haghayeghi@aut.ac.ir
4 has.saghi@stu-mail.um.ac.ir
.
.
. .
.
.
.
.
14
Abstract
In many practical situations, the cylinders are found in a specific
arrangement
and
have
different
transverse
vibration
response
from
isolated cylinders. In the most simplified case one can consider two
rigid circular cylinders with the same diameter in tandem arrangement.
In this simple configuration the upstream cylinder is fixed and the
downstream cylinder is flexibly mounted. In the present study the cross
flow
and
inline
vibration
amplitudes
(of
the
downstream
tapered
15
1 2
1
a.golbaz@sina.kntu.ac.ir
2
h_golpour@yahoo.com
3
zeinoddini@kntu.ac.ir
.
.
... .
.
.
...
.
17 API
. API
RSR
.
:
16
1 2 3
1 hashemzare4927@gmail.com
2 said.mazaheri@gmail.com
3 mahmood.akbarpour@yahoo.com
4 arminaziminejad@gmail.com
. SACS 5.3
.
.
PLAXIS.3D FOUNDATION
.
. 1
) ( 2 3
.
: ...
1.Stress
2.Uplift or Settle
3.Displaciment
17
1 2
1 yeganeh@iust.ac.ir
2 mehdizdf@yahoo.com
3 meysam_baali@yahoo.com
.
.
.
7
.
.
18
1 2 3
1 hedayatimajid64@gmail.com
2 said.mazaheri@gmail.com
3 )( abasianhamid@yahoo.com
4 abbasimajid@yahoo.com
.
.
.
19
1 ketabdar@aut.ac.ir
2 saeed.barzegar.v@aut.ac.ir
.
.
.
.
.
.
:
1.FLUENT
20
Abstract
This paper presents the dynamic motion responses of a tension leg
platform (TLP) in regular sea waves obtained by applying three
methods in time domain using MATLAB software. Surge equation of
motion of TLP is highly nonlinear because of large displacement and it
should be solved with large perturbation parameter in time domain. In
this paper Homotopy perturbation technique (HPM) is used to solve
highly nonlinear differential equation of surge motion. Also numerical
method (MEM) is used for solving nonlinear equation of motion and
ordinary differential equation (ODE) is used for linear equation of
motion. Calculated responses by analytical HPM are compared with
those obtained from both linear and nonlinear equation of motion. The
platform was modelled as a rigid body restrained by mooring lines.
Linear
Airy
wave
theory
and
Morison
equation
were
used
for
calculating the wave forces on the platform. The results were obtained
as responses in surge are compared in time and frequency domain.
Achieved values represent good accordance between results of HPM
and numerical method.
21
1 2
1 gamirinia@yahoo.com
2 bagher@iust.ac.ir
3 said.mazaheri@gmail.com
.
.
.
.
.
) ( . ANSYS-AQWA
.
.
.
:
22
1 2
1 yeganeh@iust.ac.ir
2 mehdizdf@yahoo.com
3 meysam_baali@yahoo.com
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
23
1 2 3
1 seif@sharif.edu
2 mehdi@sharif.edu
3 tabeshpour@sharif.edu
4 dastan@mech.sharif.edu
.
.
.
.
. .
24
1 2
1 Msaybani@aut.ac.ir
2 Hasani@gmail.com
3 Aut.s.dehesh@gmail.com
.
.
.
25
Abstract
A simple system of VIVACE (Vortex Induced Vibration Aquatic
Clean Energy) was investigated based on the numerical modeling of
VIV
phenomenon.
To
this
end,
the
numerical
solution
of
two
Fourier
dimensional
Transformation)
amplitude
analysis
from which
the
was
done
main
period
on
of
the
non-
transverse
26
1 2
1 seyyedali_saaa@yahoo.com
2 shjavadm83@yahoo.com
3 phd.st_habibi@yahoo.com
.
.
. ) (ABAQUS
. 7075-T6 Wrought Aluminum 101 2
4
1/5
. 90
90 180 .
0/7 .
.
27
1 tabeshpour@sharif.ir
2 manigriffin@gmail.com
.
25 .
.
) (
.
.
.
.
28
Abstract
Identification of damage has become an evolving area of research in
last few decades. Damage in a system causes a change in the dynamic
properties of the system. The structural damage is typically a local
phenomenon, which tends to be captured by higher frequency signals.
Most of vibration-based damage detection methods require the modal
properties that are obtained from measured signals through the system
identification
techniques.
However,
the
modal
properties
such
as
natural frequencies and mode shapes are not such a good sensitive
indication
of
structural
damage.
Identification
of
damaged
jacket
signals
are
measured
from
the
finite
element
software
Then
by
eliminate
some
of
the
component
signals
energies
of
remained
signal
(detail
components)
are
calculated and used for damage assessment. This new method called
Detail Signal Energy Rate Index (DSERI). The results show that
reduced wavelet packet component energies are good candidate indices
which are sensitive to structural damage.
29
n.sharifinasab@mppc.ir
) (Offshore :
1 2 .
.
.
.
) Fusion Bonded Epoxy(FBE
FBE .
: FBE
1.Anti Corrosion Coating
2.Concrete Weight Coating
30
Abstract
Amir-Kabir platform is a GVA4000 type semi-submersible platform
installed in deep water part of Caspian Sea in order to extract its
hydrocarbon resources. In this study, the members of Amir-Kabir
platform are modeled by beam and shell elements. Morison and
diffraction theories are used to calculate the wave loads on these
members of platform considering relative geometry of them to the
wave length.
After verification of the developed model for a similar platform, the
frequency domain analysis is performed. The results are presented for
the
heave,
surge
and
pitch
motions
in
various
environmental
31
API
2
1
1
Mezzati@sina.kntu.ac.ir
Zeinoddini@Kntu.ac.ir
.
.
.
.
API
. X70 D/t =22
d/D =0/45 .
API
.
API
...
.
:
32
1 2 3
1 javad.emamgholizadeh@Gmail.com
2 mgharabaghi@sut.ac.ir
3 K_abedi@sut.ac.ir
4 Sedaaghi@sut.ac.ir
.
) (
. 2.37-5.06 1.0 0.5 0.2 0.0
2.0 . ) (1IP
.
)0.50.20.00
)2.01.0
.
) (CF2
. CF
1.0 2.0 ) (IL3
CF .
: 4
1.Image Processing
2.Cross-Flow
3.In-Line
4.Vortex Induced Vibrations
33
1
1
Mezzati@sina.kntu.ac.ir
2
Zeinoddini@Kntu.ac.ir
.
.
.
.
. X70
D/t =22 .
.
) ( ) (
.
.
34
1 saeid.tah@gmail.com
2 mgharabaghi@sut.ac.ir
.
1 Ansys . GVA4000
.
2 3
.
100 1000
) (RAO
. 400 1000
. 400 RAO
.
: RAOs
1.AQWA
2.Design Modeler
3.ANSYS Workbench
35
1 2
1 hedayatimajid64@gmail.com
2 stableboat.90@hotmail.com
3 aleshtar@yahoo.com
.
.
0/1 1
.
.
.
36
1 2 3 4
1 seif@sharif.edu
2 tabeshpour@sharif.edu
3 mehdi@sharif.edu
4 mohajernasab@mech.sharif.edu
5 dastan@mech.sharif.edu
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
:
37
1 tabatabai_civil@yahoo.com
2 hamidz@aut.ac.ir
50
.
.
20 .
1
.
.
.
1. Marina
38
1 a_lotfollahi@yahoo.com
2 jmaengineer@yahoo.com
)( .
.
.
)
( .
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
:
39
1 2 3
1 mehdi5arabi@yahoo.com
2 mahmood@sharif.ir
3 farhoodazi@gmail.com
4 panahi@rahiran.ir
.
FLOW3D.V.9.3 .
.
. )( .
.
M. Ram Babua & S. Narasimha Raob
. 2 1/5
30 0/084
. RNG .
100 .
5/76 .
: CFD
40
1 )( mojtabaghanbarian@yahoo.com
2 )( arsoltankoohi@gmail.com
.
.
:
.
.
:
41
Abstract
In the current study, the results of numerous piezocone penetration
tests performed in various locations of South Pars Gas & Oil field,
Persian Gulf, Iran, were used to evaluate undrained shear strength of
marine clay of the site using cone factors. Comparison of variation of
undrained shear strength and PCPT results in depth was shown that
cone factor can be a useful parameter to determine undrained shear
strength, indirectly, from cone tip resistance. It was observed that there
is a relatively strong correlation between undrained shear strength of
soil and cone tip resistance. With studying the variations of cone
factors in depth, an average value of Nk=18 and Nkt= 21 were proposed
for South Pars field. In addition, the results were demonstrated the
importance of taking the effect of pore water pressure into account for
determining cone factor. Moreover, it was showed that cone factor is
rather
dependent
consolidation
ratio
to
over-consolidation
increased
both
cone
ratio
of
factors
soil.
As
decreased
overwith
descending rate.
42
xx
3
1 2
1 D_maleki90@yahoo.com
2 massood@gmail.com
3 Khedmati@aut.ac.ir
T, K, x, y
xx
.
ANSYS 12
,
. ) ( .
xx .
: xx
43
59
3
1 2
1 Yarehonar@Yahoo.com
2 S.K.Shariati@Gmail.com
3 Ahonaryar@Yahoo.com
. 59
50 .
1 2
3 .
4
.
.
5 .
:
1.GZ
2.Heel
3.Trim
4.Ballast
5.Paramarine
44
1 2 2 2 2
2
1 turbodesign.iut@gmail.com
2
3 fatemeh.ghomi92@gmail.com
1
2
.
.
.
80 ) 42 (
.
:
1.Planing
2.Jetsprint
45
""
1 2 3
1 ahadian@mecheng.iust.ac.ir
2 mkalantar@mecheng.iust.ac.ir
3 katayoun_hosseini@mecheng.iust.ac.ir
4 farzadsw@gmail.com
"" .
.
.
.
.
.
1
.
.
GPS+INS
MEMS GPS .
: INS GPS
1.Position and Heading Angle
46
1 2
1 h.zakerdoost@gmail.com
2 gasemi@aut.ac.ir
3 mghiasi@aut.ac.ir
.
ITTC-57
.
.
0/408
.
.
.
47
Epan
4
1 2 3
1 Moghadas14@gmail.com
2 Ebrahimi.amin@gmail.com
3 S.K.Shariati@gmail.com
4 Behzadzakeri04@gmail.com
.
.
Epan
Bladrunner 51 .
Maxsurf .
1300 .
20 knot .
52.7 cm ) 130cm(
. Epan
.
.
:
Bladrunner51
48
1
sajjad_ardeshiri@yahoo.com
.
.
) (
. .
2
.
1.Endurance
2.Paramarine
49
1 taghipoor@aut.ac.ir
2 mghiasi@aut.ac.ir
.
.
.
)(
. .
-
.
.
) (
.
.
.
:
50
CFD
1 2
1 mohsen.siahmansouri@gmail.com
2 khahani.somaye@gmail.com
3 a-ghanbari@tabrizu.ac.ir
.
.
.
.
1
.
2 .
CFD .
.
:
CFD
)1.Median and/or Paired Fin (MPF
2.Knife Fish
51
sajjad_ardeshiri@yahoo.com
.
.
.
1
.
1.Paramarine
52
AUV
3
1 2
1 aasoleimani86@gmail.com
2 hmousavi@aut.ac.ir
3 ar.mostofi@gmail.com
.
1
.
.
. 2 .
.
.
.
AUV .
: AUV
53
1 efroughifar@yahoo.com
2 seif@sharif.edu
.
:
) ( .
.
.
.
.
.
54
1 2
1 m.karimian@ut.ac.ir
2 aykoma@ut.ac.ir
3 p.karimi@ut.ac.ir
.
. .
.
.
.
.
.
.
55
1 m.bagherzadeh@aut.ac.ir
2 m.omidali@aut.ac.ir
) (2
. 1
.
. ) (
. 8 6 4 10
15 10 5 0 20 .
: 2
1.Fluent
56
1 2
1 aminzare62@gmail.com
2 ehsan_selahi@yahoo.com
3 iraj_rajabi@yahoo.com
.
. :
6 100 .3*106
.
.
.
.
57
SES
FSI
3
1 2
1 mahdirishehri@gmail.com
2 adnan.eghtesad@gmail.com
3 ali_dehghanian@yahoo.com
.
On-Cushion
.
.
... .
.
.
.
: SES ) (FSI CFX
58
)(VOF
2
1 Pooya.mech@gmail.com
2 Mohsengood@gmail.com
.
.
1VOF
.
.
40 .
.
20
.
:
1.Volume of Fluid
59
1 2
1 mo.mohammadi@aut.ac.ir
2 akbari.karim@aut.ac.ir
3 khedmati@aut.ac.ir
.
.
.
.
.
.
60
60
3
1 2
1 mahyar857447013@gmail.com
2 amin.rasooli.z@gmail.com
3 a.mostashfi@me.iut.ac.ir
.
.
.
60 1/5
0/11 0/33
.
.
.
61
1
1
ab_ebrahimi@cmu.ac.ir
2
ma_shahbakhsh@yahoo.com
.
) (
.
. .
1 .
.
2 3
.
4 5/5
.
.
62
1 2
1 gasemi@aut.ac.ir
2 ehsanyari_mechanical@yahoo.com
3
.
.
DTMB4119 HSP .
80
.
.
63
1 rezababakhani59@yahoo.com
2 jafarisaeed58@yahoo.com
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
64
1 jmz114@gmail.com
2 )( i.mabna@gmail.com
.
.
.
16 .
1.HYSUCAT
65
1 reza.mohammadzadeh@aut.ac.ir
2 shila.ariana@aut.ac.ir
.
.
100 .
1
1992/1/1 2003/9/31 .
2
3 . 4
5
.
.
:
1.Significant Wave Height
2.Gumbel
3.Weibull
4.Grouped Data
5.Ordered Data
66
1 2
1 a.jahanbakhsh@me.iut.ac.ir
2 azimian@cc.iut.ac.ir
3 arzamani@cc.iut.ac.ir
) (
) ( ) (
.
.
.
NACA2312 5
. NACA0009
0
NACA4412 NACA4415
0 .
.
: 1 2
1.Panel Method
2.Hydrodynamic Images
3.Vortex
67
Abstract
The first systematic model series of hulls with small waterplane area was
designed and tested in Krylov Shipbuilding Research Institute in the middle of
the 1980s.
We design new model series of hull with oval cross section shape and test it in
kowsar towing tank of shiraz. krylov series was intended to cover a broad range
of Froude numbers, hull aspect ratios, design drafts, and spacing between hulls.
In the present paper, these test results are analyzed by accounting for the scale
effect in the form drag.
Illustrative results are also given for the influence of the cross-section hull
shape and strut configuration on the residual resistance. Factors influencing the
residual resistance of ships of this type are discussed.
68
)( fazelinia_aa@yahoo.com
.
.
.
60
C B 0.8
.
.
.
. PLC
.
.
:
69
Delft3D-Flow
1 2
1 a_em_civil@yahoo.com
2 m.tajziehchi@yahoo.com
3 shaghaiegh.r@gmail.com
.
Delf3D- Flow .
.
28 6 .
.
.
500 25
0/33 .
.
: Delft3D-Flow
70
1 2
1 a_em_civil@yahoo.com
2 m.tajziehchi@yahoo.com
3 kgb.1357@yahoo.com
.
Delft3D-Flow .
.
1/36
6 .
.
.
.
: Delft3D-Flow
71
Abstract
Nowadays, renewable energy sources such as solar, wind and ocean energy,
without negative environmental impacts, are considered. Wave energy is a kind
of renewable energy resource with high power density considered especially in
coastal regions. In this study, a third generation spectral model, SWAN model,
has been used to simulate wave parameters that are required for the estimation
of wave energy in Anzali. For this purpose, QuikSCAT wind field was used as
the wind input in the SWAN model. The model results were calibrated and
verified with buoy recorded data. After verification of the model, wave
characteristics in the entire study region were produced. First, annual energy
was calculated in the study area; and second, the seasonal variations in this area
were investigated. It was found that the most energetic waves are occurred in
winter and its contribution to the total annual energy is 44%. Average wave
energy, its maximum value is about 1.2 kW/m, is different from the maximum
wave energy considerably. Furthermore, a linear regression was employed and
the relationship between the maximum and average wave energy for Anzali
domain was found.
72
Flow3D
2
1 mohammadhosainshafie@gmail.com
2 panahi@rahiran.ir
.
.
.
FLOW 3D 4 1
.
] [Xing-kaeding 2004 .
FLOW 3D
.
73
1 2
1 Mortezajazaeri@gmail.com
2 Katayoun_hosseini@mecheng.iust.ac.ir
3 Ashkan.ojaghi@gmail.com
1
. CFX
2 .
2
. 0/273 0/831
1 6 .
.
.
:
1.Shape Function
)2.VOF (Volume of Fluid
74
PSO LM
homayoon.ahmadvand@gmail.com
.
.
PSO LM .
2011
PSO .
. LM PSO
.
LM PSO.
: PSO LM
75
Abstract
Renewable
energies
such
as
wave
energy,
despite
rapid
are
explained.
Experimental
wave
measurements
from
Anzali port is used to design the system of OWC. Optimum sizes of the
OWC container and Wells turbine are derived for using the maximum
accessible wave energy in Anzali port.
76
Abstract
Renewable
energies
such
as
wave
energy,
despite
rapid
77
1 2
1 ketabdar@aut.ac.ir
2 shirafkan@aut.ac.ir
3 hmd.nazari@gmail.com
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
:
78
1
1
Reza_yousefi41@yahoo.com
2
Rshafaghat@nit.ac.ir
.
) (
.
1
.
.
K
.
.
:
1.Ansys Fluent
79
1 Faranak.akbari@gmail.com
2 Info@am-arasteh.com
.
2 .
6.3.26
3 . .
1390
.
0/1 0/4 .
.
:
1.Fluent
2.CFD : Computational Fluid Dynamics
3.VOF : Volume of Fluid
80
1 )( stableboat.90@hotmail.com
2 mcmory@gmail.com
.
.
) (Marou .
.
10 RHIB .
.
) (
.
.
.
81
Abstract
Evaluating hydrodynamic forces on marine structures is so important
to design safe and reliable structure. One of the most important forces
is wave force that should be considered in both constructing sequence
and
after
construction
stability
analysis.
Wave
force
on
slender
members can be calculated using Morison equation but when the size
of a structural body or member is sufficiently large diffraction theory
should be used. In this paper wave forces on cylindrical members of the
Persian Gulf Bridge are evaluated using both Morrison equation and
diffraction theory and results are compared. This paper also describes
numerical method adopted in developing a program for modeling wave
force on cylindrical members. The total wave forces are calculated with
linear segments, but without the curve fitting technique. Numerical
program written in MATLAB language is used for this purpose.
Results show that diffraction theory predicts wave forces larger than
Morison equation (even 30% larger), because Morison equation ignores
the convective acceleration component in the inertia force calculation.
It also ignores lift forces, slam forces, and axial Froude-Krylov forces.
82
Abstract
Hindcasting of wave parameters is necessary for many applications in
coastal and offshore engineering and is generally made with the help of
sophisticated numerical models. Different forecasting methodologies have been
developed using the wind and wave characteristics. In this paper, artificial
neural network (ANN) is used to forecast the wave spectram in the
southeastern part of Caspian Sea. To determine the effective parameters,
different models with various combinations of input parameters were
considered. By sensitivity analysis was found that wind speed, wave period
were to be the best inputs. Furthermore, results also indicated that using the
difference between wave and wind directions didnt show better performance.
Furthermore, Comparison between wave spectrum of ANN with ISSC and
Neumann spectras showed that the ISSC spectrum with little deviation is more
appropriate than Neumann spectrum. Finally, wave parameters were calculated
by ISSC spectrum.
83
1 2
1 milad.zabihi88@yahoo.com
2 yeganeh@iust.ac.ir
3 mkazeminezhad@inio.ac.ir
.
.
1 .
' M5
.
.
: ' M5
1.Wave Reflection
84
)(VOF
2
1 Pooya.mech@gmail.com
2 Mohsengood@gmail.com
.
.
VOF1
.
.
.
.
.
.
:
1.Volume of Fluid
85
1 h.ardalan@wri.ac.ir
2 a.shanehsazzadeh@eng.ui.ac.ir
.
15
. 8 25 .
.
1/8
4 6 . 82 0/5
.
.
.
86
1 m.bagherzadeh@aut.ac.ir
2 gasemi@aut.ac.ir
30
. 3104
. RNG k-
.
.
.
.
:
1.Strohal Number
87
1 2
1 ahmadi_m@civileng.iust.ac.ir
2 meysam_bali@civileng.iust.ac.ir
3 zabihi@civileng.iust.ac.ir
. .
.
. .
) (M5
.
.
.
:
M5
88
1 amin_ghelbash@mecheng.iust.ac.ir
2 mnouri@iust.ac.ir
180 0/7 .
.
.
.
.
.
.
89
Mech. Eng. Faculty, University Technology Malaysia, 81310 Skudai, Johor Bahru, Malaysia
Abstract
Liquefied Natural Gas (LNG) tanker often travels through shallow waters
with visible banks for its operations.
Manoeuvring of vessel in restricted water is relatively difficult and exposed to
higher risk level. Asymmetric flows around the ship when the ship travel close
to bank may results in sway force and yaw moment on ship and because of the
changing the velocity and pressure contours around the hull, lead to potentially
dangerous situations. This research work will consider to behaviour of a LNG
carrier in confined water taking into account the ship bank interaction effects.
Hull hydrodynamic forces and moments and ship-bank interaction affected on
wake pattern around and behind the ship hull is investigated using
computational fluid dynamic (CFD) and further validate by model test
experiment that they have been performed in towing tank of Marine Lab. in
University Technology Malaysia.
Keywords: Bank Effect, Shallow Water, Flow Pattern, LNG Carrier, CFD
90
1 zamanirad@sharif.edu
2 seif@sharif.edu
.
.
.. 1
.
.
.
.
.
.
1.CFX
91
1 2
1
2
3 ehsan_rajabiani@yahoo.com
LS-DYNA
. MMALE1
.
.
.
: ALE
92
1 2
1
iranjvs@yahoo.com
2 torabi_us@yahoo.com
3 mrrovvati2000@yahoo.com
.
21 .
2011
.
2011
0/2 m/s 0/4 m/s .
.
: 21
93
1 2
1 abbpor@sharif.edu
2 seif@sharif.edu
3 ali_ahmadi@mech.sharif.ir
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
:
94
Abstract
In this paper, after studying different Drag reduction technologies
and HYSUCAT development necessity, a research has been done to
attain
method
for
predicting
hydrodynamic
performance
of
the
foil
calculations
and
95
1 mrfathi.k@gmail.com
2 seif@sharif.edu
. IMO
.
.
.
.
.
4/6
.
.
96
1 2
1 mrfathi.k@gmail.com
2 seif@sharif.edu
3 panahi@rahiran.ir
....
.
.
.
97
1 2 3
1 a.bolghasi@aut.ac.ir
2 pghadimi@aut.ac.ir
3 shr_mirhosseini@aut.ac.ir
4 fayzi@aut.ac.ir
. .
1 .
.
.
.
.
. .
1.Broaching
98
1 2 3
1 mrfathi.k@gmail.com
2 sahar.jafari@gmail.com
3 seif@sharif.edu
4 ali_dehghanian@yahoo.com
.
.
. .
.
.
99
1 m.bagherzadeh@aut.ac.ir
2 gasemi@aut.ac.ir
1
.
2 .
.
3
4 .
1.Interceptor
2.Lift
3.Heave
4.Proposing
100
1 2
1 mo.mohammadi@aut.ac.ir
2 khedmati@aut.ac.ir
3 akbari.karim@aut.ac.ir
.
.
DDS-079 .
GZ-
.
.
.
101
1 sm.mahdavi@aut.ac.ir
2 hmousavi@aut.ac.ir
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
102
1 am_javan@yahoo.com
2 hmd.aero@gmail.com
1 .
.
.
.
.
ANSYS-CFX
.
:
1.Routing Factor
103
Abstract
Common practice in marine vessels such as surface ship and submersible
vehicle is utilizing the propeller and motor to generate the trust. The
performance of the vehicle is directly influenced by propulsion system
efficiency. To increase the efficiency of propulsion system, the propeller design
must be taking into consideration.
This paper presented the CRP propeller design based of Propeller Vortex lifting
Line theory. The propeller is designed for a surface ship according to
parameters in Benjamin-Y.-H.-Chen. After the code is validated with forward
propeller hydrodynamic parameters, the after propeller will be designed. Also
the parametric design methodology is used to choose the best revolution speed
and diameter for propellers.
104
1 m.ashourian@aut.ac.ir
2 gasemi@aut.ac.ir
.
2 ... .
.
. 20
10 .
.
.
.
: 3
105
SES
2
1 m.bagherzadeh@aut.ac.ir
2 gasemi@aut.ac.ir
SES .
.
SES 2/91 20
. ) 1:16
(
.
: SES
106
) (
4
1 2 3
1 iea852@yahoo.com
2 gasemi@aut.ac.ir
3 mghiasi@aut.ac.ir
4 saman.tarbiat@gmail.com
1926
.
.
1 2
.
.
.
.
.
:
1.Wicker
2.Fehlner
107
1 2
1 h.khatamnejhad@desa.ir
2 b.jafari@desa.ir
3 Mohammad.eftari@gmail.com
.
.
.
%58
. %58
.
:
108
PVL
1 2
1 gasemi@aut.ac.ir
2 farzamallafchi@yahoo.com
3 ehsanyari11@gmail.com
PVL1 .
) (VLM2 .
PVL PRVL3
.
.
.
.
PRVL
.
VLM PVL :
109
1 2
1 yousefifard@aut.ac.ir
2 pghadimi@aut.ac.ir
3 mirsalim@csr.ir
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
110
1 2 3 4
1 iea852@yahoo.com
2 gasemi@aut.ac.ir
3 mghiasi@aut.ac.ir
4 hajizadeh@mech.sharif.edu
5 sina-2823711@aut.ac.ir
1926
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
: )( )(
111
1 2
1 shamsi@aut.ac.ir
2 gasemi@aut.ac.ir
3 mazinanimm@gmail.com
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
112
CRP Azipod 1
3
1 2
1 delkhosh3292@gmail.com
2 mghasab@gmail.com
3 )( hashemi.ahmad@gmail.com
CRP Azipod .
.
.
CRP
Azipod . CRP Azipod
.
. .
.
CRP Azipod .
: CRP Azipod
113
CRP
4
1 2 3
1 mnouri@iust.ac.ir
2 smohamadi@iust.ac.ir
3 mkalantar@mecheng.iust.ac.ir
4 rasool_ra@yahoo.com
CRP .
CRP .
.
.
.
.
.
.
Solid Work Fluent
.
: CRP
114
1 2 3
1 moslem_seddighi@yahoo.com
2 Fazeli@ISA.ir
3 Kheradmand @mut-es.ac.ir
4 ffarhadzadeh@yahoo.com
.
.
.
.
.
.
:
115
1 2
1 svch_2020@yahoo.com
2 shirzadi@mut-es.ac.ir
3 h-behbahani@mut-es.ac.ir
.
.
.
DC
.
.
.
.
... .
:
HTS
116
1 2 3
1 a_saghafi@dinamotors.com
2 541354@gmail.com
3 a_nasiri@dinamotors.com
4 mscmechanic@hotmail.com
.
.
.
117
1 2 2
1 ramezani_mojtaba@yahoo.com
2
.
.
.
.
118
1 2
1 meysamshariat@yahoo.com
2 vnejati@yahoo.com
3 bzafarmand1@yahoo.com
.
.
.
.
.
119
1 arashonline65@aut.a.ir
2 ketabdar@aut.ac.ir
) (VG
. VG
. VG
) ( ) (FVM .
VG
VG
.
) (ST .
VG VG VG
) (ST . VG
.
:
120
1 2
1 m_moonesun@yahoo.com
2 hamid_ameri_122@yahoo.com
3 mehrshad.mj@gmail.com
.
.
.
12 .
.
.
15
.
.
) ( .
.
.
.
121
1 2 3
1 samankermani@yahoo.com
2 pghadimi@aut.ac.ir
3 msaybani@aut.ac.ir
4 reza.jeddi@gmail.com
)( )
( .
.
NACA-2412 5
0 25 .
. 20
.
.
41/3 .
.
.
:
122
AUV1
4
1 2 3
1 mnouri@iust.ac.ir
2 robab_bahadori@yahoo.com
3 mostafapour@iust.ac.ir
4 m.kamran66@yahoo.com
.
.
.
.
2 .
.
3 4
.
.
:
1.Autonomous Underwater Vehicle
2.Sting Mount
3.Pure Pitching
4.Pure Heaving
123
1 2 3
1 mnouri@iust.ac.ir
2 mnavid@iust.ac.ir
3 saeed_foshat@mecheng.ac.ir
4 mohamad_rastan@mecheng.ac.ir
.
.
.
.
.
.
%41.681
.
.
.
124
1
2
1 m.bagherzadeh@aut.ac.ir
2 gasemi@aut.ac.ir
.
.
2
3
.
1.Interceptor
2.Lift
3.Drag
125
1 A.zareinezhad@gmail.com
2 F.pourfattah@mut-es.ac.ir
Clark
.
SimpleC
Quick .
Spalart .
.
.
) (h/c 0/2 1 .
.
: Clark
126
1 2
1 m.omidali@aut.ac.ir
2 khedmati@aut.ac.ir
3 rhgoudarzi@aut.ac.ir
.
.
.
.
.
) (CZM
. T
7/25 .
.
: T
127
1 2 3
1 mahmood_rafie@yahoo.com
2 hessam.mohammadi@yahoo.com
3 )( Vshahramfar@yahoo.com
4 )( A_zeylabpour@yahoo.com
.
.
.
.
.
Ansys
)
( .
.
.
128
) (
2
1 a.marandi@ics.org.ir
2 rahbar@aut.ac.ir
.
.
. )(
.
129
DNV ABS
2
1 raalashti@nit.ac.ir
2 ali_ahmadi1366@yahoo.com
.
.
.
.
.
DNV ABS
.
DNV .
130
1 2 3
1
milad.noorabadi@ymail.com
2
m.najafi85@yahoo.com
3
a_nobakhi@inio.ac.ir
eskandari@mut.ac.ir
) ( )
( .
.
.
.
. .
131
1 mrzarei@cmu.ac.ir
2 Daniel.nematy@yahoo.com
. .
.
.
1
.
. 10 100 .
.
2 .
.
:
1.Superstructure
2.ANSYS
132
1 2 3
1 hamed.hoss@gmail.com
2 rahbar@aut.ac.ir
3 abbpor@sharif.edu
4 Farhood.Azarsina@mun.ca
.
.
DNV
1
.
.
1.Wagner
133
Abstract
Functionally
graded
materials
have
different
attractive
properties
such as high strength and high stiffness. Thus they have attracted much
attention in aerospace, automotive and marine industries. In this paper
free vibration of a functionally graded cylindrical shell composed of
stainless steel and nickel has been studied. The influence of the volume
fraction, the influence of the FGM configuration and the effects of
geometric parameters on the frequency characteristics for P-FGM, SFGM and E-FGM cylindrical shells are studied. The analysis was
carried out with Loves shell theory and Rayleigh-Ritz method. The
study shows that for all P-FGM, S-FGM and E-FGM shells and for all
construction of constituent materials the frequency characteristics are
similar to homogeneous isotropic cylindrical shell and the natural
frequencies lie between those for a stainless steel and nickel cylindrical
shells. To validate the analysis, results for simply supported cylindrical
shells are compared with an article. The comparisons show that the
present results agreed well with those in the paper.
Keywords:
Vibration,
Functionally
Graded
Pipes,
Sigmoid
134
1 2
1 pouria_bahrami@aut.ac.ir
2 khedmati@aut.ac.ir
3 fadavie@aut.ac.ir
. ) (
.
.
.
.
.
.
,
.
:
135
A517-B
1 2
1 - ali_yuve@yahoo.com
2 Mohsen_khb@yahoo.com
3 hopo51@yahoo.com
A517-B . A517-B
.
.
.
.
806 811 722 748.
.
32 110 .
689
0/46 0/58
ASME .
.
) ,PT,UT,RTMT (VT
.
: A517-B
136
1 saedrezvani@gmail.com
2 )( shahroozmasoomi@yahoo.com
.
.
.
9
200 .
.
.
: ABAQUS
137
5083 PEO
5
1 2 3 4
1 ali_yuve@yahoo.com
2 jafarnia_v62@yahoo.com
3 Tangsiri_ali@yahoo.com
4 payman.poufarzaneh@gmail.com
5 a_jahandideh@yahoo.com
1
Al5083
.
10-30 0/07 50-1500
15 3
Al5083 .
.
-Al2O3 .
.
600 .
: PEO
138
1
3
1 2
1 Ashkan.babazadeh@gmail.com
2 Fadavie@aut.ac.ir
3 dehghanian@aut.ac.ir
.
.
.
. ASTM-D412-a98
.
Instron 8802
.
.
.
.
.
:
1.Skirt
139
jahanmard.vr@gmail.com
.
.
.
.
.
.
140
1 2
1 jalili@yazduni.ac.ir
2 mim.mohsen@yahoo.com
3 mosal@yazduni.ac.ir
.
.
.
.
GL
.
.
141
1 2 3
1 sh_abtahi@aut.ac.ir
2 pghadimi@aut.ac.ir
3 shr_mirhosseini@aut.ac.ir
4 fayzi@aut.ac.ir
. .
.
.
.
.
.
:
1.ANSYS
142
I
2
1 88130017@aut.ac.ir
2 rahbar@aut.ac.ir
.
I .
I
.
.
I
.
: 1 I 2
1.Lateral-Torsional Buckling
2.I-Girder
3.Corrugated Webs
143
1 khedmati@aut.ac.ir
2 mdtafty@aut.ac.ir
1
.
.
.
2 .
.
.
.
:
1.Orthotropic
2.Ansys
144
Abstract
A debonding comparative study between Adhesively Bonded Composite
Joints and single material joints and software convergence using predetermined crack growth fracture mechanics based Continuous/Discrete
Cohesive Zone Model (CZM) is performed using ANSYS commercial
software. A nonlinear spring element is first introduced and then by means of
mode I cohesive law (Mode I is an opening mode where the loadings are
normal to the crack) cohesive strength C, fracture energy GIC and cohesive
stiffness KIP are calculated for the mentioned nonlinear spring element. This
spring serves as the adhesion of the joints.
Composite Joints are the joints that are made between two different materials,
(here Aluminum-Steel, Aluminum-Composite and Steel-Composite) whereas
single material joint are simply joints made between similar materials.
Similar adhesive fracture energy is considered for different joints to examine
resistance of joints against opening normal to the crack, flexural rigidity of
substrates shows direct influence of on the required force to open substrates.
145
1 2
1 Mosb.zebardast@aut.ac.ir
2 Fmorshed@aut.ac.ir
3 Khedmati@aut.ac.ir
.
.
.
. 2 3
. ] [4
.
146
Abstract
The top-hat stiffened plate panels used in Glass Fiber Reinforced
Plastics (GFRP) marine structures have attracted considerable attention
due to their advantageous properties over traditional stiffened plate
panels. However, the anisotropic properties of composite materials also
make the top-hat stiffened plate panels performance more complex to
analyze. This paper aims at developing a Finite Element (FE) model for
top-hat stiffened plate panels in order to optimize the design of these
structures. The analysis is carried out using ANSYS finite element
software and structural response of the top-hat stiffened plate panels
under uniform pressure loading is determined. An optimization study
for the structural response is carried out by changing the lamination of
the top-hat stiffeners and patch size. The method was then validated by
comparing the FE model with previous experimental results of top-hat
stiffened
plate
panels.
The
correspondence
between
the
predicted
147
1 Amir.Sajedi021@aut.ac.ir
2 Mojtaba@aut.ac.ir
40
.
... .
.
.
.
1/2
.
:
148
PVC VARTM
1 2 3 4
1 tangsiri_ali@yahoo.com
2 Halimi-fa@yahoo.com
3 ali_yuve@yahoo.com
4 Mohamadkhani_me@yahoo.com
5 payman.pourfarzaneh@gmail.com
.
.
.
.
VARTM
.
.
.
: 1VARTM
149
PVC VIP
5
1 2 3 4
1 tangsiri_ali@yahoo.com
2 Asadi_pa61@yahoo.com
3 hopo51@yahoo.com
4 Mohsen_khb@yahoo.com
5 Sh1391yf6@yahoo.com
.
.
.
.
VIP
. VIP
.
.
.
: 1VIP
150
1 sshabani@cc.iut.ac.ir
2 shamsi862620@gmail.com
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
CATIA V5
ANSYS
.
.
:
151
1 2
1 kiasat@aut.ac.ir
2 s.modaber@aut.ac.ir
3 fadavie@aut.ac.ir
.
.
.
C .
E
.
.
.
:
152
1 2
1 kiasat@aut.ac.ir
2 s.modaber@aut.ac.ir
3 fadavie@aut.ac.ir
.
.
.
.
.
.
153
Behzadi52@yahoo.com
.
.
.
1.Cycle of Life
2.Recycling
154
HSLA 100
4
1 2 3
1 m1mirzaei@gmail.com
2 a_yazdipour@yahoo.com
3 zangenek@yahoo.com
3 hamid_arabi20@yahoo.com
P-GMAW1 HSLA100 .
10Cm/min 15Cm/min 50Hz
100Hz .
.
50Hz .
10Cm/min
41J 50Hz 20J .
50 Hz HAZ.
: P-GMAW HSLA100
155
Abstract
Generally control of micro structure for improvement of material properties
is very important. Hence, several researches have been done to improve
structure and mechanical behavior of materials in sub-micron grain size at
recent years. Grain atomizing is an effective and economical method to
improve the mechanical properties of materials. In this study a thickness
reduction of about 85% was applied on Aluminum 5083 H112 sheet by cold
rolling. Then samples were heat treated at different temperatures. The micro
structure changes were tested by optical microscopes. In order to analyze the
mechanical properties; the samples were applied to mono-axis tensile, hardness
and wear tests. Also the investigation of fracture surface of samples after
tensile tests and microstructure was done by SEM.The results showed that the
critical temperature in micro-structure changes is 250 c. Also at this
temperature a static recrystalization takes place which starts at 200c.The result
of wear test showed that friction coefficient near to static recrystalization
process increase slightly which in accordance with temperature increase it
starts to decrease. Samples hardness by effect of heat treatment at 250c,
increase then it starts to decrease. Also the fracture surface results show that a
mixture of tear ductile dimples at recrystalization temperature leads to rupture.
156
V
2
1
1
E_Moayerifar@Yahoo.com
2
ESMM_1648@Yahoo.com
.
.
V
. V
.
.
V .
: V
157
ASTM A517 AISI 316L
3
1 2
1 payman.shayanfar@yahoo.com
2 M.shamanian@gmail.com
3 M.kasiri@pmt.ac.ir
ASTM A517 AISI 316L
.
ER 309MoL .
.
.
25
A517 316L .
158
T
3
1 2
1 Imehdi@aut.ac.ir
2 Azadnavid@aut.ac.ir
3 Zabihpoor@yahoo.com
.
.
) (GAMW1 T
.
Ansys
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
T .
:
1.Gas Metal Arc Welding
159
1 ehsan_rajabiani@yahoo.com
2
TNT 178
.
Ls-Prepost 2.4 LS-DYNA ALE
.
.
: LS-DYNA
160
AUV
mmahdavikhah@yahoo.com
.
.
.
.
.
: AUV
161
mmahdavikhah@yahoo.com
.
.
.
%10 .
.
162
) 1(RCS
sajjad_ardeshiri@yahoo.com
. ) (RCS
. RCS
.
RCS . RCS
RCS
.
: ) (RCS
163
1 sanadgolnezami@gmail.com
2 Hsahami15@gmail.com
.
.
.
.
.
AHP
.
164
FEMM
1 2
1 Azareei@Alum.Sharif.edu
2 Sayyaadi@Sharif.edu
3 Mehdi@Sharif.ir
. Degaussing
.
.
.
.
) ( .
Degaussing .
.
.
Degaussing .
.
:
165
Mohammadamin64@yahoo.com
.
.
.
.
.
166
) : (
3
1 2
1 Samira.Babaei@aut.ac.ir
2 ttaghikhany@aut.ac.ir
3 Shila.Ariana@aut.ac.ir
1
. SACS
.
2 3 .
Matlab
.
4 .
LQG5
.
:
LQG
1.SATMD: Semi Active Tuned Mass Damper
2.Passive Tuned Mass Damper
3.MR: Magneto Rheological
4.Ground Acceleration Record
5.Linear Quadratic Gaussian
167
Abstract
This essay is about an innovative plan for generating electric energy by gravitybuoyancy (GB) method. This plan is based on the positive and negative buoyancy
principle. This principle is discussed here.
This plan is a backup and reserve system beside other new energy generation
systems such as wind, tide, solar and sea wave system. This system can be
combined as an efficient unit for energy generation. GB method can generate
electric energy by using the depth of water in sea, lake or water well. For
assessment and approval the application of this system, a small prototype has been
built in laboratory and its specification has been presented here. In this paper
provided results from energy produced by laboratory sample with the presented
specific and effective parameters in system efficiency was surveyed by numerical
analysis methods.
This system has a buoyant volume, ballast tank and two vertical rods for vertical
ascent and descent. There are some installation for diving and surfacing such as
high pressure air system and solenoid valves.
The buoyant volume has negative buoyancy when dives and has positive buoyancy
when surfaces. Vertical movement of this volume causes rotation of two circular
devices that result in rotation the axis of an electric generator. This generator
produces electric energy. Concept of this method is dive by downward gravity
force and ascent by upward buoyancy force. On the other hand, if the system has
negative buoyancy (weight more than buoyancy) will dive to the depth and if the
system has positive buoyancy (weight less than buoyancy) it will ascent to the
surface of water.
This method is very efficient in compared to other systems because it is
independent from the geographical location, season and weather. The more depth
of water causes greater efficiency in this method.
168
1 2 3
1 Sahar.jafari@gmail.com
2 c.shifte@yahoo.com
3 behnam.sadeghzadeh@gmail.com
4 Seif@sharif.edu
.
... .
.
.
...
.
...
.
:
169
1 2 3
1 m.fallahpour@stu.ac.ir
2 bakhshi@nit.ac.ir
3 raalashti@nit.ac.ir
4 hamidgorji@nit.ac.ir
1
2 .
. AIP 3.
.
4 .
5
.
.
: ) (AIP
)1.Air Independent Propulsion (AIP
2.Snorkeling
)3.Proton Exchange Membrane Fuel Cell (PEMFC
4.Liquid Oxygen
5.ABAQUS 6.10
170
1 2
1 Negahdari@cmu.ac.ir
2 shafizadeh@cmu.ac.ir
3 amirenayat90@gmail.com
.
.
.
... .
) 1(MHD .
2
.
.
.
: MHD MHD
MHD
1.MAGNETOHYDRODYNAMIC
2.Maxwell Theory
171
5083 M-ARB
4
1 2 3
1 s_a_metallug@yahoo.com
2 Ali.saghayan@gmail.com
3 tahvilian2008@yahoo.com
4 b_movahedy@yahoo.com
) (M-ARB
) (
. M-ARB 6 ) (4/8
5083 . ./25
) (ODF .
5083 3/5
.
. M-ARB S
M-ARB .
.
.
.
: 5083
172
1 2
1 maryam_rad1362@yahoo.com
2 k_lari@iau-tnb.ac.ir
3 info@am-arasteh.com
5 1992 1996
Woods Hole 26
34/4
21/4 .
. 10 20
150 500
. 600
20 %6 .
1000
60 .
.
173
1 2 3
1
e_moayerifar@yahoo.com
2
shoja_R@yahoo.com
esmm_1648@yahoo.com
gh.zirehpour@gmail.com
.
.
.
.
174
1 2 3
1 amir.givkay@gmail.com
2 shabakhty@yahoo.com
3 farhoodazi@gmail.com
4
. 110 70 150
.
SACS
ANSYS
.
70
110 150
.
:
175
SMA
1 2 3
1 amir.givkay@gmail.com
2 shabakhty@yahoo.com
3 farhoodazi@gmail.com
4
SMA .
150 K
SMA .
ANSYS
.
SMA
)(
.
SMA
) (
.
:
SMA
176
) (GMAW
2
1 mmhossein@gmail.com
2 mm.keshavarzi@aut.ac.ir
.
.
.
.
)( .
)(
.
1/5
2
.
: GMAW
177
1 2
1 Majidmeh.119@gmail.com
2 a_izadi@aut.ac.ir
3 behrouzmahdipour@yahoo.com
.
.
.
.
.
.
178
2007
2
1
1
Hossein.behnam@gmail.com
2 Fhb@sci.ui.ac.ir
.
. 2007
52/8 -56/5 26/5 -27/3
.
.
% 85
.
12
.
179
1 abbpor@sharif.ir
2 p.taaeb@gmail.com
.
. ""
" "1
. 3/89
0/49
.
.
.
:
180
1 yoosefabad@gmail.com
2 IT saeeid@gmail.com
.
) ( .
) (
.
.
.
100
.
.
30 .
:
181
1 2 3 4
1 narges_nazemiyeh@yahoo.com
2 afshinma2000@yahoo.com
3 elnaz_pashmi_83@yahoo.com
4 iman.jamaatlou@gmail.com
5 )( rsoheilifar@ee.kntu.ac.ir
.
.
.
.
ORTRAN MATLAB
.
.
182
1 2
1 mehdi.nazari83@yahoo.com
2 .gasemi@aut.ac.ir
3 mghiasi@aut.ac.ir
3 6
.
40 .
80
.
.
183
1 2
1 m.karimi66@aut.ac.ir
2 hmousavi@aut.ac.ir
3 msaybani@aut.ac.ir
...
.
.
.
.
Mike 7369.7
425
.
:
184
1 2
1 mostapha_solgi@yahoo.com
2 torabi_us@yahoo.com
3 k_lary@yahoo.com
.
.
.
Mike21 SW HD .
12 ) 1992
(2003 ) ( .
Mike Zero
.
30
.
.
: 21 HD
185
1 esmaeili@cmu.ac.ir
2 sazarmsa@gmail.com
.
.
.
.
. MT
.
.
6/9 0/95
.
:
186
1 2
1 hrmoradi@modares.ac.ir
2 sobhesaleh@yahoo.com
3 m.majidynik@yahoo.com
.
.
.
CTD 15
.
.
187
) ( maziargholami@yahoo.com
)(
.
0/25 0/5
2006 -2010
.
0/25 .
.
) 0/8 ( .
.
.
:
1.QuikSCAT : NASA Quick Scatterometer
188
1 2 3
1 Boshra_vafaie@yahoo.com
2 Sanatgaran2@yahoo.com
3 Torabi_us@yahoo.com
4 v_chegini@inco.ac.ir
.
. CTD
23 .
Excel Surfer
.
.
.
189
QuikSCAT
1 2 3
1
Jafari65_ebrahim@yahoo.com
2
Mhmoeini@gmail.com
Majid.jandaghi@gmail.com
Babak.akbarzade@gmail.com
.
.
QuikSCAT .
12 0/250/25 .
.
SWAN .
Topex GFO-1
.
.
: SWAN
GFO-1 Topex QuikSCAT
190
PSO
3
1 2
1 hsaiedy@yahoo.com
2
3
.
.
) 1(MCPP
) (
. NP_hard
) 2(IPSO 10
100 1500
3 .
191
1 2 3
1 banihashemi.seyyedali@gmail.com
2 a.amin135555@yahoo.com
3 S_ghasemei99@yahoo.com
4 amirsyousefi@yahoo.com
.
.
.
.
.
192
1 2 3
1 n.saidi@kmsu.ac.ir
2
3 razmjooei@kmsu.ac.ir
4
.
.
.
.
.
)
(
.
:
193
1 razmjooei@kmsu.ac.ir
2
.
.
.
.
" "
" "
.
.
194
a.sadrzadeh@ine.uut.ac.ir
"
" ) 1(MCP )
( 2
.
. 9
100 2000 .
.
2000
.
195
1 2
1 razmjooei@kmsu.ac.ir
2 n.saidi@kmsu.ac.ir
3 hassanport53@yahoo.com
.
.
.
. )(
.
196
AHP-FUZZY
) (
2
1 )( m.nemati.m@gmail.com
2 )( hasan.savalan56@gmail.com
.
.
) ( F-AHP .
.
.
: F- AHP
197
40
3
1 2
1 m_moonesun@yahoo.com
2 hamid_baziyan@yahoo.com
3 sakontmnt@gmail.com
.
40 .
.
.
.
. .
.
. .
:
198
)) (AHP (
1 2
1 mohammad_izadi2006@yahoo.com
2
3 MBA
.
.
.
.
.
.
AHP .
. AHP
.
:
199
4 91 94
1
Mohsen_hj@yahoo.com
4 ) 87 (90
4 .
1 2ARIMA .
ARIMA
5 6 .
.
. 7
8
.
91 94 .
. . .
.
: PACF ACF ARIMA
1.Times Series Method
2.Autoregressive Integrated Moving Average
3.Trend Analysis & Decomposition
4.Holt Winters' Method
5.Trend Component
6.Seasonal Component
)7.Autocorrelation Function (ACF
)8.Partial Autocorrelation Function (PACF
200
1 Ir_khodadadi@yahoo.com
2 mehrvash_alidoosti@yahoo.com
.
.
.
.
.
201
1 2
1 b.jafari@desa.ir
2 h.khatamnejhad@desa.ir
3 Mohammad.eftari@gmail.com
.
.
.
.
.
) (
.
202
) : (
2
1 Moradi.narjes@gmail.com
2 Ghasemi.a@stpc.ir
.
.
.
1380 1389
120 .
.
. .
:
203
) (ANP
) : (
2
1 m.hasanzadeh2@yahoo.com
2
a_danehkar@yahoo.com
.
.
.
.
.
BOCR .
. 0/1
" "" " "
" " "" " " "
.
.
.
:
204
CMMS
4
1 2 3
1 mosaybiali@yahoo.com
2 a_nasiri@dinamotors.com
3 v_hosseini@dinamotors.com
4 m_mojoudy@dinamotors.com
)(CMMS
. CMMS
) (
.
CMMS
.
.
.
.
: CMMS
205
1 esmaeili.m@aut.ac.ir
2 imehdi@aut.ac.ir
.
.
.
.
.
.
206
1 2
1
2 nikfarjam1400@yahoo.com
3
.
.
.
.
.
207
HSE
)(
3
1 2
1 sedighehhejri@yahoo.com
2
n_jaafarzadeh@yahoo.com
3 shahryar_gholizadeh@yahoo.com
HSE SWOT .
SWOT
HSE .
. 10
) ( 10 ) (
.
.
: HSE QSPM SWOT
208
kohansal@pgu.ac.ir
. .
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
:
.
.
:
209
1 2
1 amin.gashmardi@gmail.com
2 aharandi@gmail.com
3 panahi@rahiran.ir
.
.
AHP .
210
1 bardharari@yahoo.com
2 panahi@rahiran.ir
)(
) ( .
.
.
.
.
211
Abstract
The
purpose
of
Bridge
Navigational
Watch
Alarm
System
to
categories
the
of
electrical
ships
installation
including
new
criteria
ships
of
and
BNWAS
existing
for
ships.
all
The
A.694
and
(17),
A.813
MSC/Circ.982
(19),
their
regarding
associated
guidelines
for
international
ergonomic
criteria for bridge equipment and layout while the BNWAS Drawing
Approval shall includes; BNWAS Type Approval, BNWAS interfacing
with
other
equipments,
arrangement
of
BNWAS
components
and
212
1 2
1 )(1384-1389 Mottaki.ir@gmail.com
2 Morteza.Sabziyan@gmail.com
3 Hadi.Sabziyan@gmail.com
1958
. 1982
101 1982
. 1988
.
1851
.
.
.
:
213
:
z.madani@inio.ac.ir
.
.
.
.
.
.
:
214
1 )( hmousavi_atu@yahoo.com
2 )( zmostaani@gmail.com
.
.
.
.
.
.
215
sh.madani@inio.ac.ir
.
.
20
. .
.
.
.
216
1 parisabazdar@yahoo.com
2 pejmanzad@rahiran.ir
.
1350 1389 .
.
.
.
217
) (VAR1
Rezaeear@yahoo.com
.
) (VAR 1370-89 .
.
1 0/64 .
1
0/36 .
0/29 .
1 0/29
.
:
218
efroughifar@yahoo.com
.
.
.
.
Pvelit
.
Catia .
219
malbdr@cc.iut.ac.ir
.
.
.
1FMECA 2FMEA
.
.
.
220
1 e_razavi@irisl.net
2 ezzati@irisl.net
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
. )( .
.
.
.
:
221
HSE masoud3508@yahoo.com
1
2 .
.
) (
.
:
1.SMS
2.ISM Code
222
1 2
1 yaghoobi.khy@gmail.com
2 hossein_shahmirzaee@yahoo.com
3 hemmatdar_m@yahoo.com
.
.
.
.
.
223
1 2
1 mafi@civileng.iust.ac.ir
2 yeganeh@iust.ac.ir
3 mkazeminezhad@iust.ac.ir
.
.
.
.
.
1
2 .
1.Bayram et al
2.Inman and Bagnold
224
hossein_talebnezhad@yahoo.com
.
) ( .
.
" " 16%
34% .
.
" "
.
1
. "
" .
:
)1.Under Keel Clearance (UKC
225
1 2
1 Hadi.sabziyan@gmail.com
2 Dr_m.sabzian@yahoo.com
3 Z_sabzian@yahoo.com
.
.
.
.
.
226
1 2 3
1 Masoudtarahomi@gmail.com
2 Msayebani@aut.ac.ir
3
4 Aut.s.dehesh@gmail.com
.
...
.
.
.
: marine salvage
227
FMEA
eng_enayati @yahoo.com
FMEA .
. CFT
.
.
.
.
.
.
: FMEA RPN
228
) (B. dussumieri
2
1 oceanography.sina@gmail.com
2 ash35552@ yahoo.com
) (PAHs
. 1390
) (Mudskipper:Boleophthalmus dussumieri
) ( .
PAHs HPLC . PAHs
3384/34-113/50ng g-1 dw 46/64-3/99 ng g-1dw.
.
PAHs
.
.
PAHs . B. dussumieri
PAHs.
229
1 2 3 4 5
7
1 hnsaravi@yahoo.com
2 najafpour_s@yahoo.com
3 n_pourang@yahoo.com
4 r_pourgholam@yahoo.com
5 maryam_rezaei_83@yahoo.com
6 asieh_makhlough@yahoo.com
7 mafraei@yahoo.com
1389
) 50 10 100(
.
50 100 .
.
100 100 75 .
) (ISQG .
) (ISQG.
:
230
)(CCA
1 2 3 4
7
5 6
1 hnsaravi@yahoo.com
2 najafpour_s@yahoo.com
3 n_pourang@yahoo.com
4 soly_abd@yahoo.com
5 younesipourh@yahoo.com
6 asieh_makhlough@yahoo.com
7 maryam_rezaei_83@yahoo.com
24 ) (
1388 .
) (20m ) (>50m
.
) (sand .
.
:
231
)(PAHs
3
1 2
1 parisa_pyracantha@yahoo.com
2 ghasemi.m45@gmail.com
3 ghobakhlo@pmo.ir
.
) 16 (EPA ) (PAHs .
16 ) (PAHs
. 1388 10
-20 .
.
8 .
1 2 .
) (PAHs 70 . 8
6 ) (PAHs .
PAHs
. tPAHs
.
:
232
) (
CMECS
SWOT )(GIS
4
1 2 3
1 - maryamnoory2003@yahoo.com
2 MBA nory_noshin@yahoo.com
3 samanenoory@yahoo.com
4 f_owfi@yahoo.com
) (
. ) (CMECS
) SWOT
( .
CMECS
) GIS ( .
22 20
CMECS III .
) ( .
:
) ( ) (CMECS
SWOT )(GIS
233
OSIS
3
1 2
1 Javad.Rezvandoost@gmail.com
2 Shafiee@modares.ac.ir
3 Pooya.Ranjbar@gmail.com
.
.
.
.
OSIS1
.
.
OSIS
. .
:
OSIS
1.Oil Spill Information System
234
1 2
1 farahani_pilot@yahoo.com
2 masumejahanpanah@yahoo.com
3 savari53@yahoo.com
.
5 )
( .
%4 .
0/8
3 .
63 . 11
12 12 5
.
.
.
32 )
( 27142327 20
.
235
NOOA-HD
4
1 2 3
1 f_owfi@yahoo.com
2 ma_rabbani2002@yahoo.com
3 sheyda.dadashi@yahoo.com
4 saraordo@yahoo.com
)
( ) TPH (Total Petroleum Hydrocarbons
) PAH (Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons
)
( . 4
) (1386-88
) (138890 NOOA-HD GIS .
) (
.
236
" : "
3
1 2
1 mo_bolouke@yahoo.com
2
3
90
.
.
.
. .
.
.
. .
.
:
237
) (
alimanidari@aut.ac.ir
.
.
TOWS1
.
.
: TOWS
238
1 2 3
1 nasser-saeidi@yahoo.com
2 hassanport53@yahoo.com
3 khodabakhshi.abd@pmo.ir
4 mousavi.jorf@gmail.com
.
.
.
239
1 2
1 Amirkh@shahroodut.ac.ir
2 Adjami@shahroodut.ac.ir
.
.
.
) (
.
.
SAP2000 .
.
.
: SAP2000
240
)(
2
1 2
1 Behrouz.khosheghbal@gmail.com
2
.
. -
.
.
) (MADM
)(AHP
.
44/96 %45
.
) 33/38 (%33 ) 21/66 (%22
.
:
241
) (
44
4
1 2 3
1 MBA kouhsari@anzaliport.ir
2 dr_nopasand@yahoo.com
3 m_dostar@yahoo.com
4 amin.ghafarzadeh2010@gmail.com
1 .
. .
.
.
.
95
.
:
1.BOT
242
) ( " "
" " " "
4
1 2 3
1 .mostafa.malaki@ymail.com
2 dr.edalatian@yahoo.de
3 sohrabi.sohrabi@yahoo.com
4 amin.ghafarzadeh2010@gmail.com
.
.