Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Introduction
In order to improve education, critics have begun looking globally
for solutions and suggestions. In recent years, nations such as Sweden,
Denmark and Finland have been highlighted as educational success
stories. However, in the case of Denmark, these reports have
presented a basic and incomplete depiction. In order to truly learn from
the Danish system, a comprehensive investigation, based on a
combination of research and interviews, is needed to reveal details and
nuances, as it is only by looking at the Danish system through this
close lens that the American system can truly learn from it.
To gain this insight, several key steps were taken. This paper will
detail the specific interview questions used and explain their selection,
establish the protocol used to schedule and conduct interviews,
introduce the candidates selected for participation, synthesize results,
and suggest future steps for inquiry.
Our synthesis will first examine how in the Danish system,
educational ideals are not sustained throughout the educational
experience. Two stark examples of this are the abrupt shift from
individualization to standardization, and the emphasis on testing which
undermines life-long learning. Next, it will detail issues with
professional development which reveal that the technology integration
while both encouraged and presenthas been slow, despite the
available infrastructure, due to cultural norms that reward homogeny
achieve?
Rationale: One driving force advocating for the
integration of technology in American schools is the testing
industry. Technology has been used to track student data
traditional subjects?
If not, do you anticipate technology ever being
Biographical Questions:
Follow-Up Questions
During the Skype interview, several additional questions were
added to the interview to follow up on salient points and ensure the
flow of the conversation. These questions were based on the following
examples; however, they were modified to best fit into the interview
conversation.
efforts?
Are there any struggles that you have encountered while
integrating technology?
Question Rationale: These questions were used to clarify
if technology integration is mandatory and to ascertain if it
is supported both technically and professionally.
technology?
Question Rationale: This set helps gain more insight into
professional development in Danish schools.
competitive mindset?
If so, do you think this has affected leadership?
Question Rationale: These questions aim to examine the
cultural norms in Denmark and how they could potentially
affect the integration of technology in schools.
In America, new teachers are often the ones who feel most
comfortable with technology usage.
schools?
Question Rationale: The concept of embedding
citizenship in the responsibilities of schools is different.
Therefore, this question was used to see if this was a
national or international trend.
Interview Volunteers
The Interview Synthesis is based on information from the
following three educators who represent a wide range of experiences in
the Danish Educational System.
Bodil Kristensen (Facebook Interview, Personal Introduction via
Facebook)
10
11
12
Interview Protocol:
The interview process began first by researching the Danish
system. This review of academic material formed the foundation to the
cover letter that was drafted (attached in Appendix A). In order to
connect with educators in Denmark, several modes of digital
communication were used. First, emails were sent to a wide-range of
educators and researchers at the university level; emails were also
sent to the Ministry of Education (attached in Appendix B). These
leaders were contacted in hopes of attaining more insight into the
country-wide trends of education and technology integration.
Since many educators are currently on vacation, social media
was the next form of communication used to help access volunteers for
the interview process. The cover letter was posted on to the discussion
board of the Global Education Conference. Following its publishing, the
discussion was tweeted with the hashtag, #GlobalEd.
13
14
Interview Synthesis
One theme that emerged over the course of the interviews was
that educational ideals are not sustained throughout the educational
experience. This is first seen through an examination of the drastic
change in academic expectations from the primary to secondary levels.
While at the lower levels teachers are expected to use results of
evaluations to prepare annual written student plans for all students at
all levels (Mortimore, 2009, p, 54), these individualized plans are
customary for the primary schools only (Sandvad, personal
communication, July 21, 2015). As students get older, it becomes
more academic (Sandvad, personal communication, July 21, 2015)
and the expectations become more rigid.
This shift from a highly individualized educational experience to a
standardized classroom where learning is demonstrated according to
rigid, non-differentiated, examinations highlights the first inconsistent
application of an instructional philosophy throughout the educational
system.
This change is echoed in the way students respond to learning.
As they enter the secondary level, Exams are a big dealthe students
are very concerned about that. When the teacher introduces them to
15
something new, they will ask, How can we use this for the exam?
(Sandvad, personal communication, July 21, 2015). This shift towards
learning to pass a test not only encourages low levels of learning, but
also encourages students to learn how to go to school instead of
learning something they could use in real life (Sandvad, personal
communication, July 21, 2015). It is also clear that students shape their
learning strategies based upon these exams, prioritizing information
based on its level of use during the tests (Sandvad, personal
communication, July 21, 2015).
In addition to squelching the quest for learning, the shift away
from the principle of individualization toward standardization is also
detrimental to the learning of students with special needs or with
differing abilities. The majority of testing is comprised of two parts, a
written and an oral exam (Sandvad, personal communication, July 21,
2015). To complete the exams, students may use laptops that have
been blocked from the internet (Sandvad, personal communication,
July 21, 2015). Unfortunately, students with disabilities face great
difficulties displaying their understanding on these types of tests
(Nielsen, personal communication, July 12, 2015). And, while there is a
small opening for alternative exam types (Sandvad, personal
communication, July 21, 2015), the lack of individualization at the
secondary level has caused it to be unlikely that technology will be
16
17
18
The next struggle for the Danish education system is the lack of
professional leadership to support technology integration. While
technology integration is still dependent on the specific teacher, it is
the goal (Sandvad, personal communication, July 21, 2015), and it has
been at the heart of many reforms within the last few years
(Kristensen, 2015). This usage has been supported by the government,
which has provided funding for technology and infrastructure
(Kristensen, personal communication, July 18, 2015). Nielsen (personal
communication, July 12, 2015) listed computers, SMARTboards, Google
Apps for Education and blogging as examples of technology used in his
school; Kristensen (personal communication, July 18, 2015) included
personal computers, projectors, screens, internet and subject-specific
software as additional tools.
However, despite these applications, The school is actually
behind the society when it comes to technologyand there is a lot of
support for it (Sandvad, personal communication, July 21, 2015).
Nielsen echoed these sentiments stating, The greatest challenge is
probably to get teachers to think differently and integrate IT as a tool
in everyday life (personal communication, July 12, 2015). Yet, despite
Danish cultural norms that would seem to encourage sharing
information, co-constructing knowledge and professionally developing
with peers, Danish educators seem stymied by a lack of leadership.
Building off ideas proposed in an OECD Review claiming that Danish
19
20
Further Investigations
This sampling of Danish educators provides a window into the
educational system in Denmark; however, further investigations are
necessary to provide a more nuanced understanding. First, it is
necessary to continue to track Danish reforms, as their system seems
very transient. With a new government recently elected, it is likely that
the educational system will see more changes that could easily alter
the results of this interview. Additionally, more thorough research
regarding the social norms and their effects on leadership is required
to determine if that is a valid factor in the slow integration of
technology. Finally, as technology does begin to be more integrated
into the Danish educational system, it will be interesting to see if social
citizenship becomes less national and more global.
21
Conclusion
This analysis of the Danish education system and the integration
of technology reveals several factors that can be used to better the
American school system. First, Danish schools highlight the need for
consistency in differentiation and individualization throughout a
students educational experience. As the American system deals with
its own questions regarding standardization and state-wide testing, it is
important to consider the impact that examinations have had on
students in Denmark. Americans should be wary of testing culture, as it
not only stifles learning but also taints the learning strategies used by
students, encouraging learning to pass examinations opposed to
lifelong-learning.
While the competitive nature of American school systems
contains other issues, it should be noted that leadership may be reliant
upon a certain degree of individualization. Therefore, while American
schools seek to encourage community and equity among their
teachers, they should also highlight the unique strengths of individuals
in order to foster an environment of progress.
Finally, the American system should adopt a social citizenship
program that aligns more closely with the Danish program. Since all
American students are required to attend school, our systems should
foster the formation not only of citizens but also of responsible,
engaged humans. The concept of formation, while applied informally in
22
23
24
Appendix A
Cover Letter
25
-In his article, Mortimore (2009) explained that student achievement data, with
the exception of national figures, are kept confidential and there is no right of
public access to the information (p. 53). Is this still the policy? Are these figures
kept digitally by the government? Furthermore, how do schools use this data to
help students achieve?
-According to my personal friends, the Danish system prides itself on the use
deep, challenging examinations to determine mastery of a subject. Is there a
technological component to any of these examinations--both in the fields of
26
Thank you so much, in advance, for your time and consideration. If you are
willing to conduct an interview, please feel free to contact me using the mode that is
easiest for you. I believe that the American educational system has many lessons to
learn from Denmark. It is my hope to bring these lessons to light, as I continue on my
path to be an educational leader. I will be working on this project until July 28, 2015.
Therefore, if you are interested in working together, please let me know as soon as
possible so that we can get started.
Sincerely,
References:
Andersen, K. (2013). Danish youth education en route to digital literacy. Scandinavian
Library Quarterly. 46(1). Retrieved from http://slq.nu/?article=volume-46-no-12013-12
Mortimore, P. (2009). Danish and English education systems: what lessons can we
learn. Education Review. 21(2).47-59.
27
Appendix B
Emails
Emails exchanged to arrange Skype Interview with Marie
Sandvad.
28
29
30
Appendix C
Facebook
31
32
Unsuccessful
Facebook
Attempts
Appendix D
33
34