Professional Documents
Culture Documents
EPO/71
EPO/6
EPO/72
EPE/1
EPO/51
EPD/22
EPD/22
EPD/41
EPO/53
EPD/42
EPD/13
Volume 8 Pipelines
EPD/61
page
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
10
70
130
144
167
187
205
239
258
269
Volume 3
PETROPHYSICAL ENGINEERING
CONTENTS
1
1.1
1.1.1
1.1.2
1.2
10
10
10
11
12
1.3
Depth Checks and Calibration
1.3.1 Depth
1.3.2 Calibration
1.3.3 Depth Scales
1.3.4 Repeat Section
1.3.5 Statistical Checks
1.3.6 Tension Recording
1.3.7 Log Scales and Scale Changes
1.3.8 Computerised Service Unit (CSU) Filtering
1.3.9 Bottom Hole Temperatures
13
13
14
15
15
15
15
15
15
16
1.4
17
19
19
20
1.6
21
1.7
29
1.8
45
1.9
50
1.9.1
1.9.2
1.9.3
1.9.4
50
51
51
53
Petrophysical Engineering
1.10
55
1.10.1
56
57
57
59
60
1.11
61
1.11.1
1.11.2
61
65
1.12
65
70
2.1
70
2.1.1
2.1.1.1
2.1.1.2
2.1.1.3
2.1.1.4
2.1.1.5
2.1.2
2.1.2.1
2.1.2.2
2.1.2.3
2.1.3
2.1.4
2.1.4.1
2.1.4.2
2.1.4.3
2.1.4.4
2.1.5
2.1.6
2.1.7
2.1.8
2.1.9
2.1.10
2.1.11
70
70
70
71
71
71
71
71
72
72
73
73
73
74
74
74
75
75
76
77
78
80
82
Contents
2.2
83
2.2.1
2.2.2
2.2.3
2.2.3.1
2.2.3.2
2.2.4
84
85
94
94
99
2.2.5
2.2.6
116
124
124
130
3.1
Sidewall Samples
130
3.1.1
3.1.2
130
131
3.2
3.3
131
141
CORING
144
4.1
4.2
4.3
4.4
4.5
4.6
General
Coring Equipment
Coring Fluids, Hydraulics and Bits
Coring Criteria for Exploration and Appraisal Wells
Preparation for Coring
Instruction for Handling Cores for Petrophysical and Related
Analyses
144
144
147
148
149
4.6.1
4.6.2
4.6.3
4.6.3.1
4.6.3.2
151
151
158
158
161
4.7
4.8
Core Description
Petrophysical Core Analysis: Suggested Standard Programme
163
166
151
Petrophysical Engineering
167
5.1
5.2
167
169
5.2.1
5.2.2
5.2.3
5.2.4
5.2.5
5.2.6
169
169
171
172
173
173
5.3
5.4
5.5
5.6
174
176
177
177
5.6.1
5.6.2
5.6.3
5.6.4
5.6.5
5.6.6
Flowmeter
Gradiomanometer
High Resolution Thermometer (HRT)
Continuous Pressure Manometer
Through-Tubing Caliper
Tracer Ejector Tool
180
181
181
181
181
182
5.7
5.8
5.9
Continuous Flowmeter
Gradiomanometer
Thermometer
183
185
186
6
6.1
6.2
6.3
6.4
6.5
6.6
7
PERFORATING
187
General Preparations
Arming Guns
Entering the Well
Depth Control
Retrieving the Gun
Gun Characteristics
187
189
190
192
194
196
WELLSITE GEOLOGY
205
7.1
205
7.1.1
205
7.2
Hydrocarbon Detection
232
Contents
232
233
234
234
234
235
235
235
235
236
236
237
239
8.1
239
239
239
240
241
242
242
243
8.2
245
8.2.1
8.2.2
8.2.3
8.2.4
245
246
247
248
8.3
254
8.3.1
8.3.2
254
8.3.3
254
255
Petrophysical Engineering
258
9.1
9.2
Introduction
Compaction Prediction
258
259
9.2.1
9.2.1.1
9.2.1.2
9.2.1.3
9.2.2
9.2.3
Sandstone Reservoirs
Linear Compaction Model
Rate Type Compaction Model
Recommended Procedure
Compaction of Shales
Prediction of Compaction due to Pore Collapse in
High-Porosity Carbonate Reservoirs
9.2.3.1 The Trendline Model
9.2.3.2 Prediction of In-Situ Pore Collapse with the Trendline
Model
9.3
9.3.1
9.3.2
9.3.3
10
259
259
261
261
262
262
262
264
266
266
266
267
269
TABLES
Table 1.7-1
Table 1.7-2
Table 1.7-3
Table 1.8-1
Table 1.8-2
Table 1.8-3
Table 2.2-1
29
34
40
45
45
46
87
92
125
157
196
198
200
239
241
249
256
260
Petrophysical Engineering
FIGURES
Figure 1-1a
Figure 1-1b
Figure 1-1c
Figure 1-2a
Figure 1-2b
Figure 1-2c
Figure 1-2d
Figure 1-3a
Figure 1-3b
Figure 1-3c
Figure 1-3d
Figure 1-4
Figure 1-5
Figure 1.11-1
Figure 1.11-2
Figure 1.12-1
Figure 1.12-2
Figure 2.2-1
Figure 2.2-2a
Figure 2.2-2b
Figure 2.2-2c
Figure 2.2-3
Figure 2.2-4
Figure 2.2-5
Figure 2.2-6
Figure 2.2-7
Figure 2.2-8
Figure 2.2-9
Figure 2.2-10
Figure 2.2-11
Figure 2.2-12
Figure 2.2-13
Figure 2.2-14
Figure 2.2-15
Figure 2.2-16
31
32
33
36
37
38
39
41
42
43
44
48
49
62
63
66
68
86
89
90
91
93
95
96
97
102
103
104
105
106
106
107
108
109
110
111
114
115
118
119
123
127
128
129
132
133
135
137
142
154
155
156
160
162
168
170
179
206
last page
263
264
265
267
10
Petrophysical Engineering
11
12
Petrophysical Engineering
1.3.1 Depth
Log depths are standard reference for Shell Group Companies. All subsurface
maps and markers are established by reference to the gamma ray curve of the
gamma-ray density log, which is the REFERENCE SURVEY. The reference
survey must be correlated with the first tool run (Resistivity) and it is therefore
essential to determine depths accurately during the first run into the hole.
Depth below Derrick Floor (DF) will be determined as follows:
(a)
First Survey
Subsequent Surveys
Subsequent surveys over the same section must be related to the first survey in
the sequence. The mark at surface need be checked only roughly, and accurate
correlation with the first survey made during recording of the overlap survey. It is
perfectly normal, as a result of cable slack at surface, differences in tool weight,
cable stretch, etc. for the bell at TD to be displaced several feet from the
anticipated depth. If the discrepancy is excessive, the survey should be run by
correlation with the first survey, and the tool zero checked at surface at the end
of the survey. Provided the first survey was correctly recorded, both logs will then
be at true depth.
Major errors between surveys usually arise as a result of movement of the
travelling blocks, either when the driller moves the blocks for rig maintenance
during logging, or when the brake is not properly set. If a major discrepancy
occurs between surveys, it is wise to check that the blocks have not moved.
Surveys are normally taped, and can be played back on correct depth without
wasting further rig-time, but this can only be done if the correct depth is known.
13
14
Petrophysical Engineering
Tension Recording
All optical (film/print) surveys made using computerised units must be recorded with zero filtering (0.00). This will result in curves with minor deviations
15
from the smoothed surveys recorded using Standard Logging Units, or filtered
surveys from computerised units, but this presentation must be adhered to for
unitisation purposes.
1.3.9
Three maximum thermometers should be run on each trip in the hole during
open hole logging, the corresponding maximum bottom hole temperature to be
reported on the log heading, together with time elapsed since circulation.
16
Petrophysical Engineering
Description
1.
2.
3.
Location
Other Services
Permanent Datum
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
11.
12.
13.
14.
15.
16.
17.
18.
19.
20.
Remarks
17
Source of Sample
22.
23.
24.
Rm at BHT
25.
26.
27.
28.
29.
30.
31.
Equip.
Location
Recorded by
Witnessed by
Remarks
32.
33.
34.
35.
Run No.
C.D.
S.O.
Panel No.
36.
Cart. No.
37.
Sonde No.
18
Source (in mud system) of mud sample used for measurement of mud resistivity. This should always be the
flowline.
Resistivity of mud, mud filtrate, mud cake at measured
temperature.
Origin of sample used for resistivity determination,
usually filter PRESS. The use of a downhole sample
taken during a microtool run has now been discontinued.
Mud resistivity at measured bottom hole temperature,
estimated from charts.
Approximate time (in hours) since mud circulation
stopped.
Maximum temperature as recorded by three maximum
thermometers in this logging run.
Contractor's Logging Unit number.
Contractors base.
Logging Engineers name.
WSPEs name.
Use this space for any comments relating to surveying
problems which could conceivably affect interpretation
of the survey (overpulls, mud additives, lost circulation
intervals, tool faults/failures, depth errors).
Should be the same as item 7.
Centralising Device (Centraliser, Caliper).
Stand-off (Ex-centraliser, Induction stand-off).
Contractors serial number of equipment used for this
survey.
Contractor's cartridge number. The designation YELLOW TOOL etc. WILL NOT DO.
Contractors sonde number. The purpose of this item is
to track down the exact equipment used for a survey,
Sometimes years after a log was run.
Petrophysical Engineering
A. LOGGING ENGINEER
is responsible for all survey data.
He should supply:
1. Rough Print
2. Data Transmission
3. Field Prints
4. Sepias
5. Films
6. Tapes (CSU)
7. Service Order
19
1.5.2 Transmission
1. Data transmission is only required for open hole surveys, by formal request
from HO.
2. The Write ring must be removed from the Master tape before copying is
attempted, to ensure preservation of the recorded data.
3. The Master tape must be copied, and from the copy a Field Edit Tape
prepared for data transmission.
4. The Logging Company Engineer is responsible for transmission of data to
the Computer Centre. On termination of transmission, the Computer Centre
prepares an optical recording and confirms that the received data appear
normal.
5. The WSPE notifies the Duty Petrophysicist that data transmission has been
completed.
6. On receipt of log prints from the logging company's computer centre, the
responsible Petrophysicist will check the transmitted log against the Mufax
dispatched from the well-site, and subsequently against the 1:200 Field
Prints hand-carried from the Wellsite.
*) Type of facsimile data transmission
20
Petrophysical Engineering
Company
Service
AC
ACBL
ACL
ACT
AIS
ASL(SDT)
WA
WA
WA
SL
BPB
SL
BCS
BGL(BGT)
BGN
BGS
BHC
BHT
BHTV
BHTV
BO
BP
BP
HLS
SL
BPB
BPB
SL
BPB
SL
WA
SL
BPB
SL
C/O
WA
CAC
CAL
CAL
CAST
CAV
CBL(CBT)
CBL-VDL
WA
BPB
SL
HLS
HLS
SL
SL
CBL/PET
CBL/VDL/CCL
CCAT
CCL
CCL
CCL
CDL
HLS
BPB
HLS
BPB
HLS
SL
WA
Multiparameter Spectroscopy
Instrument Continuous Carbon/
Oxygen Log
Circumferential Acoustilog
Caliper
Caliper
Circumferential Acoustic Scanning Tool
Compensated Acoustic Velocity Tool
Cement Bond Log
Cement Bond Log Variable Density
Log
Cement Bond Tool
Cement Bond Log
Compensated Cement Attenuation Tool
Casing Collar Locator
Casing Collar Locator Tool
Casing Collar Locator
Compensated Densilog
21
Code
Company
Service (continued)
CDR
CDS
CDT
CEL(CET)
CFM
CFS
CHAR
SL
BPB
HLS
SL
SL
SL
HLS
CIC
CIS
CIT
CLAM
CNL(CNT)
CNL
CNS
CNT
CORA
CPL(PCT)
CSNG
HLS
SL
HLS
HLS
SL
WA
BPB
HLS
HLS
HLS
HLS
CSS
CST
BPB
SL
Directional Services-Continuous
Compensated Density
Compensated Density Tool (CDT-A)
Cement Evaluation Log
Flowmeter-Continuous
Continuous Flowmeter Sonde
Cased Hole Analysis and reservoir
Monitoring
Casing Inspection Caliper Tool
Customer Instrument Service
Casing Inspection Tool
Clay and Matrix Analysis
Compensated Neutron Log
Compensated Neutron Log
Compensated Neutron
Compensated Neutron Tool (CNT-K)
Complex Reservoir Analysis
Combination Production Log
Compensated Spectral Natural Gamma
Tool
Compensated Sonic Sonde
Continuous Sample Taker
DCL
DCL
DD
DEN
DGL
DIFL
DIL
DIL
DIL
DILB
DILT
DIS
DLL
DLL
DLL
DLLT
HLS
WA
SL
HLS
HLS
WA
HLS
SL
SL
HLS
HLS
BPB
HLS
SL
WA
HLS
22
Petrophysical Engineering
Code
Company
Service (continued)
DLS
DNLL
DNLL
DPL
DSEN
DSN
DSN2
BPB
WA
WA
SL
HLS
HLS
HLS
DSNC
DTEMP
HLS
BPB
Dual Laterolog
Dual Detector Neutron Lifetime Log
Neutron Lifetime Log (Dual Detector)
Deep Propagation Log
Dual Spaced Epithermal Neutron Tool
Dual Spaced Neutron Tool
Dual Spaced Neutron/Model DSNT-A
Tool
Comprobe Dual Neutron Tool
Differential Temperature
EL
ENVR
EPT/PCD
EPT/PCD
ETT
HLS
HLS
SL
SL
SL
FAC
FACT
FBS
FDC
FDL
FDS
FED
FFS
BPB
HLS
SL
SL
HLS
BPB
HLS
BPB
FIT
FLOLOG
FMS
FMT
FMT
FPI
FPT/BO
FS
FTL
FWS
SL
WA
SL
WA
WA
WA
BPB
SL
HLS
HLS
GCT
GEN
SL
HLS
23
Code
Company
Service (continued)
GEOP
GMS
GR
GR
GR
GR-N
GRD
GRN
GRVL
GST
GTEM
HLS
SL
BPB
HLS
SL
WA
HLS
HLS
HLS
SL
HLS
Geophone
Gradiomanometer
Gamma Ray
Gamma Ray Tool
Gamma Ray Log
Gamma Ray Neutron Log
Guard Tool
Gamma Ray Neutron Tool
Gravel Pack Tool
Gamma Ray Spectroscopy Log
Gradiomanometer Temperature Tool
HDD
HDT
HMS
HMST
HRDIP
HRI
HTT
HLS
SL
SL
HLS
WA
HLS
SL
IEL
IEL
IELT
IFS
IL
HLS
WA
HLS
BPB
SL
JC
WA
Junk Catcher
LCS
LDL(LDT)
LFD
LIDA
LL
LL
LSAV
LSS
LSS
BPB
SL
HLS
HLS
HLS
WA
HLS
HLS
SL
MEL
HLS
Microelectric Tool
24
Petrophysical Engineering
Code
Company
Service (continued)
METT
SL
MFC
MFD
MGL
MGL
ML
ML
ML
MLL
MLL
MLL
MSCT
MSFL
SL
SL
HLS
WA
BPB
HLS
WA
BPB
HLS
WA
SL
SL
MSFL
MSG
MSI C/O
MTS
MWP
HLS
HLS
WA
SL
SL
Multifrequency Electromagnetic
Thickness Log
Multi Finger Caliper Log
Modular Formation Tester
Microguard Tool
Casing Thickness Log
Micro Log
MicroLog Tool
Mini-log
Micro Laterolog
Microlaterolog Tool
Micro Laterolog
Mechanical Sidewall Coring Tool
Microspherically Focused Resistivity
Log
Microspherically Focused Tool
Micro-Seismogram Frac-Finder Tool
Carbon/Oxygen Log
Manometer Temperature Sonde
Measurements While Perforating
NCS
BPB
NEU
NFD
NGS(NGT)
NL
NLL
NML
HLS
SL
SL
WA
WA
SL
OBD
OBDT
BPB
WA
PAL
PDC
PDK-100
PDS
PET
PFC
SL
SL
WA
BPB
HLS
WA
25
Code
Company
Service (continued)
PFM
PI
PL
PL
PL
PLA
PLS
PML
PSD
PSGT
PTS
PTS
PTT
SL
SL
HLS
SL
SL
HLS
BPB
WA
BPB
HLS
BPB
SL
BPB
Flowmeter-Packer
Phasor Induction
Production Log
Production Logs/Flow Profiles
PL/Transient Pressure and Flow Tests
Production Log Analysis
Production Logging
Proximity-Minilog
Precision Strata Dip Meter
Pulsed Spectral Gamma Tool
Pressure Temperature Sonde
Pressure Temperature Sonde
Temperature (Production Logging)
QPG
BPB
RFS
RFT
RFT
RSCT
RSFE
BPB
HLS
SL
HLS
BPB
SASH
SCG
SDL
SED
SFE
SFT
SFT
SGP
HLS
BPB
HLS
HLS
BPB
HLS
WA
BPB
SGR
SGS
SHDT
HLS
BPB
SL
SHDT
SIT
SIT/FPIT
SL
SL
SL
26
Petrophysical Engineering
Code
Company
Service (continued)
SLD
HLS
SNL
SP
SP
SP
SP
SPEC
SPIN
SPL
SW
SWC
SWC
SWN
SWN
WA
BPB
HLS
SL
WA
WA
HLS
WA
BPB
HLS
WA
HLS
WA
TAC
TBP
TCS
TDS
TDT
TEMP
TL
TMD
TRL
TVD
BPB
WA
SL
BPB
SL
HLS
WA
HLS
WA
HLS
UCC
UGD
UHF
SL
BPB
HLS
VCST
VDL
HLS
SL
WSS/SAS/DSAS
(WST/SAT/DSAT)
WSS/SAS/DSAT
(WST/SAT/DSAT)
WSS/SAS/DSAS
(WST/SAT/DSAT)
SL
SL
SL
27
Code
Company
Service (continued)
WTPS
SL
XYC
HLS
Z-Density
WA
Compensated Z-Densilog
28
Petrophysical Engineering
29
30
Petrophysical Engineering
31
32
Petrophysical Engineering
33
34
Petrophysical Engineering
35
36
Petrophysical Engineering
37
38
Petrophysical Engineering
39
40
Petrophysical Engineering
41
42
Petrophysical Engineering
43
44
Petrophysical Engineering
45
46
Petrophysical Engineering
47
48
Petrophysical Engineering
49
50
Petrophysical Engineering
51
52
Petrophysical Engineering
(g) Run logging tool down inside the drill pipe as fast as possible without
causing any drop in cable tension. The pipe should not be reciprocated
as the tool approaches the guide shoe.
(h) As soon as the tool is descending in open hole, move the pipe again if
there is any risk of sticking.
(i) Log from the lowest depth reached. Continue circulating mud until tool is
inside drill pipe.
(j) Stop moving pipe when tool approaches the guide shoe.
(k) Depending on the maximum depth reached, it may be necessary to add
some more stands to the drill string and set the guide shoe about one
hundred metres deeper before the next attempt is made to get the tool
down to total depth.
If difficulty is encountered when re-entering the drill pipe after logging, very slow
rotation of the pipe should allow re-entry.
A disadvantage of slim hole tools is the reduced accuracy of the porosity
measurement (by 23%) and resistivity measurement due to the larger borehole
effects.
1.9.4
To overcome the problems with slim hole tools and to be able to log nearhorizontal holes, two systems have been developed as described below:
(a) Logging Horizontal Wells by the SIMPHOR System
The Institut Franais du Ptrole and Elf Aquitaine have developed and used this
method to log horizontal boreholes.
Standard open and cased hole Schlumberger logging and perforating (4" carrier)
tools have been lowered into the hole inside a protective housing on the bottom
of the drill-pipe string. When this string reaches the shoe of the last casing, a 7
conductor electric transmission cable connected to a sinkerbar and female
electrical connector system is lowered inside the drill pipe, until it locks
mechanically into the logging sonde and makes the electrical connection. The
logging cable is brought outside the drill string via a side entry sub. Further
adding of drill pipe brings the logging tool in the open hole and logging can
commence after power is applied to the cable.
Some 500 m of near-horizontal 81/2" hole have been logged in this manner with
standard 3 to 4 OD tools using the 5" OD SIMPHOR system.
A 3" SIMPHOR is available for running tools without a protective housing.
53
Logs recorded to-date using this method are: induction, spherically focussed,
dual laterolog, gamma ray, neutron, BHC sonic, 4 arm-caliper, CBL, CCL and 4"
perforating gun for perforating 7" liner (9 m length).
(b) Logging Deviated Holes over 65
A prototype has been built by Schlumberger of a tool system to lower standard
size logging tools in a steel envelope with a stinger on the bottom of the drill pipe.
A locomotive brings an 8-conductor cable down through the drill pipe and first
connects the stinger and then makes the electrical connection with the tool.
Further pumping brings the tool out of the steel envelope into the open hole, and
logging can commence.
54
Petrophysical Engineering
1.10
55
1.10.1
(a) If tool is stuck on bottom, pull to maximum safe tension and hold it.
(b) If tool is stuck during logging, try to go down. If tool is free to descend,
attempt to pass bridge. If tool is not free to descend, tool or cable is
stuck. Pull to maximum safe tension and hold it.
(c) If the tool fails to come free after working the cable for 30-40 min, the
cut-and-thread technique should normally be attempted. The cable will
hold the tool in a centralised position and serve as a guide for the
overshot.
(d) On no account should an attempt be made to break the weak point
unless clear instructions have been given from base to do so.
(e) Sharp edges and abrasive formations will cause wear during working
the stuck cable. The weak point above the tool is therefore no longer the
weakest point necessarily. Even if successful, breaking the weak point
considerably reduces the chance of recovering the tool.
(f)
(g) NEVER break the weak point when a radioactive tool is stuck. Cutting
and threading is obligatory.
(h) Never SUDDENLY release tension on a cable. This causes 'bird cages'
and broken cables. Tension should be released slowly and should not
drop below half the 'normal logging tension.
(i)
Know the cable weight, the allowed overpull and hence the maximum
safe pull which can be applied at all times.
(j)
Never pull more than 8,000 lb on a normal cable (break point 16,000 lb).
Check the type and age of the cable.
(k)
Never pull more than 2,500 lb on a small cable (break point 5,100 lb).
(I)
(m) Never pull more than 4,500 lb on the standard weak point unless breaking is intended (and only on clear instructions from Base).
56
Petrophysical Engineering
(n) Never pull more than 1,500 lb on the weak point of a small cable
unless breaking it is intended. Safe pull is 1,125 + (0.08 x depth in feet) lb.
57
(c) Cut the cable a few metres (1.5-2 m) from the T-bar and make up the
Bowen spear to the logging unit end and socket to the tool end.
(d) Rig down Wave Compensator (floating rigs). Attach upper wireline
sheave to main cross-member of derrick with special chain to leave
blocks free to run pipe. Ensure that the wireline tension device cable is
carefully trained around the outside of the derrick to avoid damage
during drill floor operations.
Threading Cable Through Drill Pipe:
(e) Make up correct fishing guide and grapple assembly for fishing neck of
stuck tool. Use correct skirt for hole size. Feed socket on cable end
through fishing assembly.
(f) Thread overshot spear through first stand of pipe and stab into socket.
(g) Take tension on wireline, check overshot assembly. Remove T-bar.
Make up first stand to fishing assembly.
(h) Run first stand into hole, set slips.
(i)
Place C-clamp over top of drill pipe, lower cable assembly to catch lower
rope socket on C-clamp, disconnect spear.
(j)
Pick up next stand of drill pipe, thread overshot spear through pipe, stab
into rope socket, take cable tension with winch, remove C-clamp.
(k) Lower stand, watching cable tension carefully, and stopping if cable
tension increases. DO NOT ROTATE PIPE while lowering, to avoid
possibility of cutting cable.
Approaching and Engaging the Fish:
(I) When the grapple is one joint above the tool, install circulating sub, circulate
slowly to clean top of tool. Continue circulation while lowering pipe and
engaging fish in overshot. Note increase in pumping pressure and cable
tension as tool head enters overshot. Stop circulation. (While circulating, the
cable is held onto the circulating sub by a special bushing.)
Breaking the Weak Point:
(m) Ensure that fishing head is engaged in grapple, set pipe in slips. Attach
T-bar to cable (below socket), pick up T-bar with travelling blocks.
(n)
58
Petrophysical Engineering
(a) Remove Bowen spear overshot and rope socket, knot logging cable, take
cable tension with logging unit winch, remove T-bar.
(p) Spool cable on logging unit.
(q) Pull pipe out of hole slowly. DO NOT ROTATE. Close BOPs as soon as
tool is safely through.
(r) Ensure that complete tool has been recovered.
Grapples, guides, skirts and circulating sub are supplied by the Wireline Logging
Contractor.
In deviated wells ( > 25) it is almost invariably safer to strip over the cable to
recover both tool and cable. If the cable breaks at a dogleg, it will still be retained
inside the drill pipe.
The procedure to be followed in this case is given above.
1.10.2.2
Cased Hole
It should not normally be necessary to strip over the cable to recover a tool stuck
inside a vertical casing. In this case it is far quicker, easier and cheaper to break
the weak point and fish for the tool with the cable removed from the hole.
Nevertheless, the decision to follow this course must be made by Base.
Procedure in vertical casing when strip over is NOT required is as follows:
(a) Clamp the T-bar to the cable above the rotary table.
(b) Rig down Wave Compensator (floating rigs). Attach upper wire line
sheave to main cross-member of derrick with special chain to leave
blocks free.
(c) Pick up T-bar in travelling blocks, pull up and break weak point.
(d) Lower blocks, take cable tension with logging unit, remove T-bar, spool
cable on logging unit,
(e) Rig down wire line.
(f) Make up fishing assembly with correct fishing guide, skirt and grapple for
casing size and tool fishing neck.
(g) Run in to top fish, carefully engage fish.
(h) When fish is securely engaged, pull out slowly. DO NOT ROTATE.
59
1. When a tool gets stuck either in or below tubing, the only remedy in most
cases is to pull tubing to recover the fish. It is not unknown for a fish to be
retrieved by pumping it out, using reverse circulation (down the tubing/ casing
annulus, up the tubing).
2. Fishing can be attempted on piano wire. The technique can only be successful if the tool is free, e.g. it has dropped off the end of the logging cable.
Fishing for a stuck tool using piano wire will almost invariably aggravate the
problem.
3. Equipment required for fishing on piano wire is supplied and maintained by the
piano wireline contractor.
60
Petrophysical Engineering
61
62
Petrophysical Engineering
63
Write out for the Driller the four instructions for the measurements
viz:
(i) Pull pipe up to Mark No. 2. Take reading.
(ii) Release tension in pipe, go down below Mark No. 1 and pull back up
to Mark No. 1.
(iii) Drop in the slips without moving the pipe if possible. (If not using a
kelly).
Apply the required torque. Work down the torque using tongs preferably on a convenient tool joint to prevent the pipe from rotating.
Pull up to Mark No. 1 before taking the measurement. Keep all nonessential personnel off the drill floor during this operation.
(iv) Release the torque. Report the number of turns that come out of the
pipe. Work the pipe to remove all torque. Pull back up to Mark
No. 1.
Notes:
1. It is essential that the pipe is pulled up to the marks to avoid problems due
to pipe friction in the hole.
2. It is essential when measuring stretch that there is no torque in the drill pipe, and
vice versa.
3. When taking the readings the Logging Engineer should refer to each instruction by
number. This avoids any confusion and ensures that the operations are properly
repeated.
(g) Run the SIT down to + 60 m above the expected stuck point where it is
certain that the pipe is free. Take the stretch measurement first, followed
by the torque measurement. Check the readings to confirm that the SIT is
not slipping or that the torque has worked itself down.
(h) Measure stretch and torque below the stuck point, as close as possible.
(i) Take further measurements between the lowest free point and the highest stuck point. Take as many measurements as possible around the
stuck point.
(j) The PE and TP should co-ordinate the operations of the Driller and the
Logging Engineer.
Example: Rasau-6X (see also Figure 1.11-2).
Driller's Instructions:
1. Pull pipe up to Mark No. 2 (185,000 lb).
2. Release pipe to 145,000 lb and pull up to Mark No. 1 (165,000 lb).
3. Drop pipe in slips, work in 5 turns RH torque
4. Release torque.
Situation: 31/2 15.5 lb/ft drill pipe stuck at 10,586 ft.
64
Petrophysical Engineering
65
66
Petrophysical Engineering
Wheel C will move upwards a distance h, and a length of cable equal to h will
pass around wheel C and also around wheel A, which is fixed relative to C. Since
the other end of the cable is attached to A, the extra cable is taken up by
movement of wheel B downwards through a distance h/2 relative to A. Wheel B
has therefore moved upwards by h/2 with respect to the wellhead and mean sea
level (MSL).
Now consider the logging cable. The upper sheave wheel U is attached to B, and
has moved upwards h/2. The lower sheave wheel L has moved upwards a
distance h. A length of cable h/2 therefore passes over U, equal to the upward
distance moved by U; the logging tool therefore remains at exactly the same
place relative to the wellhead and MSL.
Notes:
1.Distance WC must exceed the maximum tide/wave movement expected
throughout the logging operation.
2. The rucker system to the wellhead must be operational when the wave compensator is
in use.
3. State of the tide (above mean sea level) must be taken into account during the first
logging run when the magnetic mark is caught at the rotary table with the tool at casing
shoe.
Thereafter, the tool zero and mark are checked roughly at surface, and the surveys are
tied in to the first run.
4. Do not attempt to free a stuck tool with the Wave Compensator in use. Clamp off the
logging cable with a T-bar and rig up with the upper logging wheel U in the travelling
blocks.
67
68
Petrophysical Engineering
The lower sheave L, which is attached to the derrick floor, moves DOWN a
distance h. If the upper sheave sheel U were fixed (relative to the seabed), the
logging tool would have to rise through the same distance, h. But the upper
sheave wheel U has descended by a distance h/2, allowing the tool to descend
h/2 + h/2 = h. The net result is that the logging tool remains at a fixed depth
relative to the top of the marine riser.
Notes:
1. The compensating device (tensioner) D must have sufficient travel to cope with
maximum tide/wave movement expected during the logging operation.
2. State of the tide above mean sea level must be taken into account during the first
logging run (as in Note 3 above).
3. Attempts may be made to free a stuck tool with the wave compensator operating.
69
70
Petrophysical Engineering
2.1.1.3 On Bottom
(a) Check depth.
(b) Make repeat section.
(c) Check scales, look for obvious anomalies, check light intensity of film
Check memorisation and applied corrections.
(d) Run survey.
2.1.1.4 Surveying
(a) Check lift-off point. Restart if footage is missed.
(b) Check readings to ensure they make sense.
(c) Make sure that film canisters are turning.
(d) Make sure Bell remains on depth.
(e) Cable Tension. When using standard weak point on normal cable, this
must not exceed 3,0001b overpull without permission from HO. The weak
point is designed to break at about 5,000 lb overpull. Monocable heads
(and monocables used for perforating) use weak points with considerably reduced breaking strength.
(f) Logging Speed. See individual tools for maximum speed.
(g) Correlate with previous logs.
(h) Record 30 m past casing shoe, or overlap with previous logs.
2.1.1.5 After Survey
(a) Check that repeat section repeats.
(b) Record downhole calibration after survey, and check that both calibrations are correct.
(c) Check that logging speed is correct. Note that the speed is indicated on
the film by breaks in the left hand margin of track one. The distance
between two breaks is the distance recorded in one minute.
(d) Be satisfied with the log before laying down tools.
(e) Check head, bridle, torpedo of the tool for damage as soon as the tool is
out of the hole.
(f) Make surface calibration after survey.
2.1.2
71
(b) Speed
(As Induction) 1800 m/h (limited by GR requirements).
(c) Calibration
Recording not required.
(d) Common Faults.
(i) Noise. This is frequently caused by welding on the rig, storms and rig
generator faults.
(ii) Oscillation. Caused by magnetisation of drum, winch chain or spooler.
(iii) Galvo drifts off track.
2.1.2.2 Spherically Focused Resistivity
(a) Scale
Logarithmic 0.2 to 2000 - m.
(b) Speed
1800 m/h (but limited by GR requirements)
(c) Calibration
Note:
Look out for noise 'spikes caused by poor contacts in tool or electrodes, or wear on
commutator.
SFL cannot be run in oil-base mud.
2.1.2.3 Induction
(a) Scale
Logarithmic 0.2 to 2000 .m.
(b) Speed
1800 m/h (but limited by GR requirements)
(c) Calibration
72
Petrophysical Engineering
Notes;
1. Ensure that Induction has been correctly memorised.
2. Induction survey should repeat exactly.
1
3. Ensure that 1 /2" standoffs are used.
2.1.3
Dual Laterolog
(a) Scale
0.2 to 2000 .m logarithmic.
(b) Speed
1200 m/h (limited by speed of MSFL or GR when run in combination).
(c) Calibration
(i) SU
Calibration recorded downhole before and after survey, should
match exactly. Crucial reading is 31.6 m (last step).
(ii) CSU
2.1.4
Micro Tools
1. Pad tools will rarely repeat exactly, but any discrepancy between runs should
be minor. If in doubt, ask for extra repeats. In any case, check condition of
pads before and after survey.
2. Always make a short piece of film into the foot of the casing, and check the
resistivity readings and caliper.
3. Always run caliper with Microtools as it is essential for interpretation.
2.1.4.1
Micro-SFL
(a) Scale
Logarithmic 0.2 to 2000 . m.
(b) Speed
600 m/h.
(c) Calibration
(i) SU
Calibration before and after survey should match exactly. Check low
reading (2 . m) and high reading (1000 . m).
(ii) CSU
73
Before Survey:
After Survey:
Tolerance:
Zero
0
Plus
1000mS/m
+2
+ 20mS/m
Note:
2.1.4.3 Microlaterolog
As for Proximity, except the most common fault is running the log with the
cartridge in Proximity position. This results in a survey with the resistivities too
high ( 0.6 to get true reading).
2.1.4.4 Microlog
(a) Scale
O to 10 .m
(b) Speed
600 m/h.
(c) Calibration
Calibrations before and after survey should match exactly.
Notes:
1. Reject a survey with negative readings.
2. One or both resistivity curves may read incorrectly often caused by faulty pad wiring.
74
Petrophysical Engineering
75
(c) Calibration
Before and after survey calibration checks of response of long and short
spacing detectors should be as closely identical as statistical variations
on calibration time constant will allow. Shop (master) calibration should
be less than one month old. Checks include panel computation. Calibration film readings should correspond with legend on calibration tail, and
observed count rates during calibration should match shop-recorded
counts within 5%.
Notes:
1. Correction: Unless the mud weight is excessive, correction magnitude is close
to zero. Treat any survey with significant (0.05 g/cm3) and fairly constant
correction in porous intervals with suspicion.
2. Repeat: Repeat Section will not match main survey exactly, but differences
should be within statistical variation.
3. Check survey against logs from nearby wells, if possible.
4. Recording of caliper is essential for interpretation.
5. Record tension on 1:200 throughout survey.
6. Observe all safety precautions relating to handling and use of radioactive
sources.
76
Petrophysical Engineering
Notes:
1. Check that hole size correction switch is properly set.
2. Check that correct time constant (= 2) is being used.
3. Check that memorisation depth is accurate.
4. Check for cross-talk.
5. Erroneous readings. Ensure that repeat section and main survey are basically
identical. Then check against logs in nearby wells.
6. Recording of caliper is essential to interpretation of CNT when surveyed in open hole.
The CNL normally makes use of the FDC caliper. When CNL is recorded alone a
specially modified FDC caliper is run in conjunction for this purpose.
7. Record tension on 1:200 scale.
8. Observe all safety precautions relating to handling and use of radioactive sources.
77
2.1.9
Dipmeter/Diplog
(a) Scale
Resistivity scale selection is based on the principle that curves have ample
variation, without saturation. Scales may be changed during the course of the
operation.
Caliper scales
Normally 6" 16" (may be changed to suit hole size)
(b) Speed
730 m/h maximum.
(c) Calibration
Before survey only. After panel calibration has been recorded, a check is made
of:
(i) Caliper calibration
(ii) Deviation
(iii) Azimuth and Relative Bearing correct and tracking.
(iv) Pads connected correctly, and no cross-talk.
(d) Notes
(i) This is one of the easiest tools for ensuring a good survey.
78
Petrophysical Engineering
Caliper
Inside casing, both calipers should be virtually identical and equal to
ID of casing. Over limestone/sandstone intervals calipers should be
similar and about bit size.
In shales the calipers may be considerably different, depending on
the ovality of the hole. Calipers with stair-steps are not acceptable.
The angle of dip will vary considerably depending on hole size an
accurate caliper is essential for accurate interpretation.
If one caliper indicates a very large hole, one or both resistivity
curves associated with that caliper may appear 'dead. This is simply
because the pad is not against the hole wall, and there is not much
that can be done about it.
Resistivity
Resistivity curves will all indicate about the same deflection from
zero at the same depth. Ensure that the intensity of the current is
continuously adjusted by the operator on the CSU unit so that all the
curves are lively without too much saturation. Scales can be changed
while logging without affecting the value of the survey. A mechanical
zero shift is unimportant. If one or more curves go dead', check the
hole size from the corresponding caliper if the hole is too big the
pads may not be touching the wall.
Angles
First check the deviation (solid trace). This should indicate the deviation known from surveys made while drilling. The curve is quite
smooth, since it has a long time constant, but it will be affected by
changes in resistivity scale. This need not cause concern, as rapid
variations are discounted in interpretation. Note where deviation is
less than 1/2, since this will affect the behaviour of the Relative Bearing.
Next, check the Azimuth (solid trace). Have available the exact co-ordinates of
the reference point used for the survey. If not, note precisely which fixed point
was used for future checks. As a result of the cable characteristics, the tool
rotates clockwise as it is pulled from the hole. When a low-angle dipmeter
cartridge is being used, the azimuth of # (No.) 1 electrode moves from 1 division
of Track 1 to the right hand edge of Track 1, then jumps back to repeat the
movement, as the tool rotates. In an oval hole the tool may even rotate a few
degrees counter-clockwise.
79
80
Petrophysical Engineering
81
82
83
Petrophysical Engineering
The selection of the approach to log evaluation depends on the time frame
and the knowledge available. A short description is given below:
TECHNIQUE
REMARKS
ACCURACY
Quick Look
Wellsite use
LOW
Preliminary Evaluation
FAIR
Final Evaluation
HIGH
Field Review
HIGH
84
85
Petrophysical Engineering
The porosity can be derived from density, neutron and sonic logs. For single
mineral rocks one porosity log suffices, for two mineral rocks a crossplot of
two porosity logs is required, while for triple mineral rocks three different
porosity logs are required as each porosity log will produce a different response at a given porosity for a different lithology.
The importance of proper matrix identification before translating a single
porosity log into porosity values is illustrated in Figure 2.2.-1.
On this RESISTIVITY versus DENSITY plot, the three points A, B, C are plotted according to, e.g. the Laterolog, and to the density log values at the corresponding
levels.
Figure 2.2-1
86
*) Approximate values
87
Petrophysical Engineering
For two-mineral rocks the FDC-CNL and/or the SONIC-CNL crossplots shown
in Figure 2.2-2 a, b and c respectively, can be used to determine the lithology
and porosity as the readings of the FDC, neutron and sonic log depend on
lithology, porosity and fluid content.
The porosity can be calculated from the formation density, sonic and neutron
logs (see Table 2.2-2). The equation relating porosity with log readings from
the density and sonic logs is as follows:
Xma Xlog
=
Xma - Xfl
where:
ma stands for matrix
fI stands for fluid
X = , g/cm3 (for the density log)
X = t, sec/ft (for the sonic log)
The neutron log is calibrated in apparent limestone porosity units (%) and
corrections are required for non-limestone lithologies.
Standard parameters for some lithologies are given below:
Matrix
Rock Type
Sandstones
Limestones
Dolomites
Fluid Type
Salt water
Fresh water
Oil
Density
(g/cm3)
Transit Time
(s/ft)
2.65
2.71
2.87
55.5--51.2
47.6--43.5
43.8--38.5
1.1
1.00
0.8
189
189
189
The variation of density for water and NaCI solutions with temperature and
pressure is given in Figure 2.2-3.
The FDC tool correction for mud cake varies with logging companies, depending on the principle of the tool. A limit must be fixed above which this
correction becomes meaningless.
88
Borehole Corrections are necessary for the FDC and neutron logs (see
Schlumberger Log Interpretation Charts 1979).
In many areas the Formation Density Log is considered the best porosity log
and is also used as the standard depth reference log.
FRESH WATER, LIQUID-FILLED HOLES
Figure 2.2-2a Porosity and lithology determination from formation density log and
compensated neutron log (CNL*)
(By courtesy of Schlumberger)
89
Petrophysical Engineering
Figure 2.2-2b Porosity and lithology determination from formation density log and
compensated neutron log (CNL*)
(By courtesy of Schlumberger)
90
Figure 2.2-2c Porosity and lithology determination from sonic log and compensated
neutron log (CNL*)
(By courtesy of Schlumberger)
91
Petrophysical Engineering
REMARKS: Subscripts `ma' and fl stand for matrix and fluid. They refer to theoretical
log readings in:
-- zero porosity context (matrix)
= 100% porosity context (fluid)
92
Groups of curves plotted versus pressure are shown for Distilled Water, and for NaCI
solutions of five different salinities. Use the 70 bar lines to estimate the density at the
given salinity and temperature. Then estimate the pressure correction on the basis of
the separation between the 70 bar and 480 bar lines.
Curves for temperatures above 100 C are derived from data given by Ellis and Golding, American Journal of Science, Vol. 261, pp. 47-60 (Jan. 1963).
Figure 2.2-3 Density of water and NaCI solutions
(By courtesy of Schlumberger)
93
Petrophysical Engineering
2.2.3
Hydrocarbon Saturation
(1)
Archie relates the formation factor (F) and the porosity () as follows:
F = -m
(2)
where:
= porosity fraction
m = porosity exponent.
Figures 2.2-4 and 5 give the equations and their derivation, while Figures 2.2-6
(a. to d.) gives average values for the lithological exponent.
In hydrocarbon bearing rock the volume of water, usually expressed as the water
saturation (Sw) in fractions of the pore volume, is less than in 100% water bearing
rock of the same porosity. The measured resistivity (Rt) is then higher than the
100% water-bearing rock resistivity (Ro). The ratio between Rt and Ro is called
the resistivity index I = Rt / Ro.
The results of many laboratory measurements on partially saturated sandstones can be expressed by a simple power relationship between saturation
and the resistivity index according to Archie:
Rt / Ro.= I = Sw -n
where:
Sw = fraction of pore space filled with water
n = saturation exponent
For sandstone samples the average n and m values measured on 579 samples are 1.95 and 1.82 respectively (see Figures 2.2-6 (a. and b.)). For Rotliegendes sandstones and other sandstones with very rough grain surfaces
n-values significantly lower than their m-values are measured.
94
95
Petrophysical Engineering
96
97
Petrophysical Engineering
98
In Figure 2.2-6 (c. and d.) histograms are given of the n- and m-values of
limestone and dolomite samples, respectively. The wide spread of the m- and nvalues and the limited number of data currently available prohibit general
conclusions except perhaps for the saturation exponent of limestones, which on
average appear to be significantly lower than 2.0 ( 1.8).
It should be borne in mind that certain carbonates with poorly connected vuggy
oomoldic porosity usually exhibit abnormally high m-values (which may range
from 2 to 5) whereas their saturation exponent is normal, say 1.8.
Calculation of Sw
The calculation of the hydrocarbon saturation Sh = 1 Sw is presented in Figures
2.2-7 and 8. A significant parameter is the formation water resistivity, which can
be calculated from the spontaneous potential (see 2.2.4), derived from water
bearing sands using the equation Ro= -m . Rw or obtained from production tests.
Figure 2.2-9 gives the plot resistivity vs. temperature for various NaCI concentrations.
Quick look Hydrocarbon Evaluation
For a quick evaluation, a crossplot of resistivity (Rt) vs. porosity is made (see
Figure 2.2-10). The points representing water bearing layers should fall on a
straight line representing the 100% waterline (Sw = 1.0), while hydrocarbon
bearing layers are represented by points to the right of this line (see also Figure
2.2-1 for the importance of lithology determination).
2.2.3.2 Shaly Sands
Laboratory observations on shaly water bearing sands indicate for the major part
a straight-line relationship between core conductivity and water conductivity. This
straight line does not cross the origin, due to the contribution of the conductance
of the clay (Ce). See Figure 2.2-11 for the Waxman-Smits Shaly Sand Model. For
comparison, the Archie Clean Sand Model is given in Figure 2.2-12. The
equations are described in terms of conductivity (= 1/ resistivity).
The clay does contribute to rock conductance due to the presence of positive
ions near the clay surfaces in the water, compensating for negative charges
in the clay crystal lattice. The concentration of these ions in the pore water is
99
Petrophysical Engineering
Cw + Ce
Co
Cwe
Co
where:
Cw is the conductivity of the formation water
Cwe is the equivalent bulk water conductivity of a shaly formation
Ce = BQv and
Co is the measured bulk conductivity.
The shaly sand formation factor and the total porosity are related as follows:
F* = m*
where:
m* = shale corrected lithological exponent.
Note: Porosity is determined (KSEPL) after drying the sample at 105C. This, supposedly
expels all the water from the sample. The measurement, therefore, correspond to the
TOTAL POROSITY, i.e. the sum of EFFECTIVE POROSITY + INTERSTITIAL/BOUND
WATER.
Figures 2.2-15 and 16 give the core conductivity 100% saturated with water and
shaly sands formation factor-resistivity relationships respectively.
In hydrocarbon bearing rock the counter-ions concentration in the water will be
increased proportionally to the space taken up by the oil. Therefore, relative to
the water phase, the effective counter-ions concentration will be Qv/Sw
The relation between the measured resistivity (Ct) and the conductivity of the
formation water (Cw) at water saturation below 100% can be expressed as
follows:
100
101
Petrophysical Engineering
102
103
Petrophysical Engineering
104
105
Petrophysical Engineering
106
107
Petrophysical Engineering
108
109
Petrophysical Engineering
110
111
Petrophysical Engineering
112
113
Petrophysical Engineering
114
115
Petrophysical Engineering
2.2.4
116
117
Petrophysical Engineering
118
119
Petrophysical Engineering
120
121
Petrophysical Engineering
Note: Pm is the alkalinity (OH- and CO- -) of the treated mud filtrate using 0.02 molar HCL and
phenolphthalein indicator.
Figure 2.2-21
122
123
Petrophysical Engineering
124
125
Petrophysical Engineering
126
127
Petrophysical Engineering
128
129
130
Petrophysical Engineering
more than one bullet from the gun at a time leads to confusion and
errors.
11. Ensure that all relevant data (company name, well number, sample
depth, sample number) are noted on sample container. Scratch sample
number on container lid. Indentify SWSs which have been misfired, lost
and recovered.
12. Payment for cores is normally on the basis of full payment for any core
over 1.25cm in length, half payment for any core over 0.6 cm but less
than 1.25 cm in length.
13. Examination and handling of sidewall samples.
(a) Palaeontological samples. Limit description to assessment of shale,
silt or sandstone. Describe colour.
(b) Petrophysical samples. Determine lithology (i.e. sand, shale, etc;
grainsize/sorting; roundness, etc.; intergranular cement, etc.) and
hydrocarbon indications.
3.1.2 Sidewall Coring Tool
Description and operation of Gearhart's Hard Rock Coring Tool.
At a chosen depth a small electro-motor driven coring bit is turned horizontal
and ejected from a hole in the side of the tool. While coring, an arm on the
opposite side of the tool gives support. After 2.5 to 11 minutes, depending on
the formation, a 15/16 diameter plug of 13/4" length is cut. By a slight vertical
movement the sample is separated from the formation. When withdrawing
the bit into the tool, it is tilted vertical again and a rod pushes the sample into
a receiver tube. The samples are not compacted and give reliable core
analysis results. Up to 30 samples can be taken with one run in the hole.
Tool specifications:
capacity
length including GR
minimum borehole diameter
tool diameter
maximum temperature
maximum pressure
:12 or 30 samples
:17 ft
: 63/4 inch
: 47/8 inch
: 148 C
: 20,000 psi.
131
132
Petrophysical Engineering
133
134
Petrophysical Engineering
135
sampling depth and the pre-test completed. The larger sample chamber is
filled first, then the smaller chamber is filled at the same depth. The contents
of the smaller chamber form the segregated sample to be used for analysis.
See Figure 3-3 for an indication of possible arrangements for sample chambers and Amerada adaptor.
Multiple Pressure Testing
1. Discuss RFT pressure testing operation with reservoir engineer/petrophysicist beforehand so that reason for taking the measurements is fully
understood.
2. Use gamma ray for depth control. Check CCL if job is in casing in order to
ensure that depth chosen does not correspond to a collar.
3. Calibration and Tool Check
(i) A shop calibration not more than two months old forms part of the
survey. This should include pressures up to 345 bar (5,000 psi) taken
at ambient and 3 different temperatures between 77C and 121C, plus
a zero pressure offset' reading taken at a low temperature.
(ii) At the wellsite, the electronics is calibrated with zero' and calibrate'
(9,995 psi) values, and the Offset' calibrated rheostat is set at the zero
pressure offset' reading in Step (i). With the tool hanging in the derrick, the pressure indicated should now be equivalent to the zero
pressure' indication on the shop calibration chart at the prevailing
temperature an the rig. The equipment will not necessarily read zero
pressure.
(iii) Once the surface equipment has been set up, no alterations to panel
settings should be made during a sequence of pressure tests.
(iv) It is advisable to carry out a dry test in the casing to check if the tool
packers are all right.
4. Measurements should always be taken from bottom to top to minimise
depth errors and the chances of the tool becoming stuck. This requires
that the tool be shop calibrated with decreasing rather than increasing
pressures.
5. Switching tool to calibrate position removes power and the sensor cools.
Once calibrated, switch back to measure', wait 10 minutes for temperature stabilisation, leave surface panel settings for the sequence of
tests.
6. Plot stabilised mud and formation pressure measurements against depth
(ahbdf and TVDSS). Check that mud pressures lie on a straight line, and
check the gradient against reported mud weight. Ensure that formation
pressures are less than mud pressure. Compare pressures from other
wells in same reservoir (see Figure 3-4).
7. On completion of measurements, select three arbitrary depths and repeat
136
Petrophysical Engineering
137
138
Petrophysical Engineering
139
140
Petrophysical Engineering
141
142
Petrophysical Engineering
emulsion/filtrate is kept separate from the oil/condensate. This is particularly important if the reverse firing technique has been used. If the
sample is from a water zone, it should be recovered on the rig floor. In
this case, ensure that the mud (last to come over since the tool is vertical)
is not mixed up with the formation water/filtrate. Recover the mud in a
different container at first sight through the transparent hose.
13. Note the reading on the gas meter - the pointer revolves completely for
each unit stated under the dial.
14. Measure the volume of liquid in the separator bottle.
15. Measure volume of all other liquids/solids recovered.
16. Determine the density of the oil/condensate (note the temperature) and
the salinity of the water.
17. Complete the formation test report forms and calculate fill of the chamber
in order to check for discrepancies.
Note: if mercury is used for transferring the sample, make sure that there is no
spillage and that the operator is not exposed to vapours.
143
Coring
4 CORING
4.1 General
It is sometimes argued that with the ever increasing quality of wireline logs and
log interpretation methods, coring should become less necessary. However,
cores will remain invaluable for geological control, wireline log calibration, fluid
flow properties, rock strength and other measurements of rock and fluid
properties. The increased interest in secondary recovery has led to coring in
partially depleted reservoirs. For residual oil saturation determination in depleted
reservoirs, special coring techniques are being applied.
The present policy is to core the hydrocarbon bearing reservoir section in the first
exploration well. Spot cores of a length of 9-18 m can provide geological control
where required. When a prospect is entered and found to be hydrocarbon
bearing, it is highly recommended that the prospect and part of the water leg are
fully cored. This will aid considerably in wireline log calibration, in detecting
differential diagenesis between hydrocarbon and water bearing reservoirs and in
measuring aquifer flow and compaction properties. For strike and dip control
orientated coring can give acceptable results, although this technique is not yet
fully proven due to an unacceptable failure rate of magnetic multishot equipment
available from the various survey companies.
144
Petrophysical Engineering
145
Coring
provides more accurate oil saturation data for enhanced oil recovery operations
at a relatively low cost for reasonably consolidated sandstones and carbonates.
The principle of the sponge coring technique is to collect the fluids expelled from
the core, as the core is brought to the surface, in a polyurethane sponge. This
sponge is fitted in an aluminium liner placed in the inner barrel of a conventional
core barrel (77/8" x 3.25"). This 'oil wet lining of polyurethane has a porosity of
70% and a permeability of 2 darcy and is designed to absorb up to 300% of the
oil bleeding capacity of most cores. In the laboratory the sponge and the core are
analysed foot by foot. The oil from the sponge is reconstituted into the porosity of
the rock, resulting in a higher and more accurate oil saturation figure. A 51/4" x
21/2" core barrel is also available for this technique.
For each of these coring techniques the instructions for tool operations issued by
the contractor should be followed. KSEPL has also issued instructions for coring
146
Petrophysical Engineering
147
Coring
148
Petrophysical Engineering
Quantity
4
1
1
1000
500
12
149
Coring
150
Petrophysical Engineering
Before actual recovery of the core, prepare boxes and labels as far as possible.
With the latest type of core boxes (1m long), 20 boxes per 18 m core are
sufficient. Make arrangements for cleaning and laying out the cores in a relatively
quiet and spacious place. Prepare the trays or boxes to collect the core from the
core barrel on the derrick floor.
151
Coring
such that seen from the bottom end of the core the red line is to the right.
The standard procedures indicated in Figure 4-1 are to be followed. It is
recommended (although in principle not necessary) that all cores be sealed in
polyethylene sleeves1) immediately after removal from the core barrel. This
relatively simple procedure will protect the cores for more detailed
measurements as and when required.
A possibly even better method is to put the cores in shrink sleeves, wrap them
in aluminium foil and pour peel coat over this. Gaps caused by the removal of
samples should be labelled and stuffed with rags. Make sure that the cores
cannot move inside the core boxes to avoid mechanical damage during
transport. Prevent freezing of cores, e.g. in high altitude transport, and
generally avoid exposure to extreme temperatures.
In case of sponge coring, the 5' aluminium liners with sponge and core are,
after a quick description of the ends or removing a chip from the end for later
description, wrapped in heavy duty cling film and aluminium foil before they are
put in P.V.C. shipping tubes. The remaining space is filled with brine before the
tubes are closed to reduce evaporations losses. If cores are to be stored long
before they are analysed, freezing is necessary for accurate determination of
remaining oil saturation. In case of high water saturations, freezing might
damage the pore system.
When taking sections of the core at the wellsite for special analysis, they must
be cleaned as described in Figure 4-1 and then packed and sealed,
immediately, either in tightly wrapped polyethylene sleeves or in shrink sleeves
as above. This will avoid oxidation by air entrapped inside the sleeve and/or
evaporation punctures of the sleeve. The sections should be packed
separately in tins or plastic containers. Each core section should be properly
marked (depth, top/bottom) and be given a code number. This code number
should also be indicated at the proper location inside the core box. Examples
of outer and inner core box labels are shown in Figure 4-2.
The reboxing must be done so that the original derrick floor box No. 1 (core
bottom) is the last box of the final boxes, e.g. DF Box No. 1 becomes final Box
No. 20. If recovery is not 100%, decide which part is missing and state the
reason in the report. If there is no way of telling, it is assumed that the bottom
part is missing. All depths should be reported in feet and decimal parts of feet
Labels, inserted in small plastic bags, giving the following information
must be securely fixed to the top and bottom rim of the core boxes: box
152
Petrophysical Engineering
number, well number, core number, depth (of box, not core), total percentage recovery. For addresses, interior and exterior of the boxes, see
Figure 4-2. Do not use damaged boxes.
2. Make a core description as in Figure 4-3 and take a few evenly spread
small samples for hydrocarbon tests on the rig.
The following information is required by the laboratory for analysis:
interval of each core and each core section2)
core recovery2)
salinity or resistivity of formation water and mud filtrate
type of mud
composition of formation water
logs: for correlation of Gramper results a LDT is essential
Notes:
1
) Polyethylene sleeving is available in rolls from Plastic Verkoop Kantoor, Bussum,
the Netherlands in two sizes:
flat width 20 cm, diameter 12.5 cm, thickness 0.25 mm and
flat width 15 cm, diameter 9.5 cm, thickness 0.20 mm.
2
) To avoid confusion when data on outside of box are illegible it is necessary that
these data are present inside each core box (see also Figure 4-2). A more detailed
core recovery and sampling record should be enclosed with the core (see Table
4-1).
153
Coring
154
Petrophysical Engineering
155
Coring
156
Petrophysical Engineering
157
Coring
158
Petrophysical Engineering
Note: The use of Staedtler Glass Chrome pencils is recommended for marking the rubber
sleeve since the standard felt marker pens are almost invisible on the rubber sleeve.
(c) Remove the core from the half-shell pipe by rolling, without bending onto
a flat table
(d) Sections of sleeve not filled with formation material (as identified
by feel) should be cut out.
(e) Starting at the top, cut the core into sections of three feet length each,
and a remaining section of not more than 2 feet long (if recovery is
100%), with the aid of a hacksaw (see Figure 4-4).
(f) The core material showing at the sawn surfaces should be inspected as
to its degree of consolidation and samples taken at this point.
A small sample every three feet is sufficient for indications and
lithology determination.
If the inspection in Step (f) indicates that the material is unconsolidated, i.e. not
able to be sampled without disintegration, freezing the core at the wellsite should
be considered as a means of preventing gross disturbance of the sand during
shipment. This needs be done only on samples where mechanical formation
properties are to be measured. The cores can be frozen in thermally insulated
shipping containers packed with dry ice. The cores must be firmly supported and
must be kept frozen until arrival at the laboratory.
If freezing is not practical, the cores must be firmly packed in a shockproof
manner to prevent bending, and gentle handling must be ensured during
packing and shipment.
If the material appears to be sufficiently consolidated to allow sampling without
disintegrating, freezing should be avoided during shipment, since it may
disintegrate the sand. In this case, the same care in packing and handling as
above should be exercised.
(g) Cap the ends of each core section with rubber caps supplied by Christensen and
seal off with oil-resistant tape.
(h) Any punctures or perforations in the rubber sleeve should be closed with
oil-resistant tape.
(i) Indicate on each section the well number, and core number.
(j) Place each section in a plastic pipe halve ensuring empty space is filled
with waste paper, rags etc. Place the other plastic half on top and secure
with three straps of tape. Place core, packed in plastic pipe halves, in
159
Coring
160
Petrophysical Engineering
cardboard core boxes so that it cannot move. Use rags, paper waste, etc
as insulating material.
(k) Mark core boxes as outlined for conventional cores. Indicate on lid any
sections removed and whether they were gas filled (empty) or mud-filled.
5. Estimate core recovery and reconcile this figure and depth cored with
drilling personnel.
Note: Remember to include effect of tide.
161
Coring
162
Petrophysical Engineering
163
Coring
For a clay-claystone:
It is recommended that the term 'hard' should be used for rocks which can only
be broken with a hammer; 'very hard' when this can only be achieved with
difficulty.
D. Fracture
The fracture should be described from a freshly broken piece. Do not describe from a fracture plane caused by bedding or tectonic influences.
For fracture description use expressions as:
shell shape, irregular, angular and splintery.
E. Grain Size and Shape
Permeability and porosity are depending of those two properties and thus
very important. Also the grain size is to some extend already expressed in
the rock name, e.g. fine sand, coarse sand, fine and coarse crystalline limestones. A sticky clay is more finely grained than a lean non sticky clay. For
sands also the sorting is mentioned, e.g. poorly sorted, well sorted.
Grain shapes are described in terms of:
rounded, subrounded, subangular and angular.
For limestones:
crystalline, granular.
Also include colour appearance, e.g. transparent, translucent, opaque.
F. Porosity
Mostly an indication of porosity can be determined by eye. Sands can be
described as: not porous, slightly porous, moderately porous, porous. With
limestones distinguish between primary and secondary porosity. The former is
intergranular, the latter owing to fissures and cavities etc. Primary porosity of
clayey rocks is practically nil.
Note: Porosity is referred to in relative and not in absolute terms, i.e. whether or not the
rock could be a reservoir rock.
G. Bedding
True bedding is caused by differences in composition of the various layers.
Descriptions are:
1. Bedding: well bedded, slightly bedded, non-bedded;
2. Bedding plane: wavy irregular;
3. Average thickness of the individual layers and
4. To which phenomena the bedding must be attributed, e.g. more or less
sandy.
Bedding planes are not always parallel, but in groups from different angles
164
Petrophysical Engineering
with respect to other groups. This is called a cross bedding. Clayey rocks which
appear cleavable parallel to the bedding are called shales; marls and sands can
thus be shaly.
H. Accessories
All components which only make up a small fraction of the rock. Commonly
occurring: fossils (shell fragments, foraminifera etc.), carbonised plant remains,
minerals (mica, pyrites, siderites, clay ironstone, calcite, gypsum, anhydrite,
glauconite).
It is wrong to attempt to identify more fossils and details than can be justified. It is
better to write shell fragments', when the reported ammonites were in fact
gastropodae. Furthermore the occurrence of accessories in the rocks is noted,
e.g. scattered, on bedding planes in particular, concentrated in certain layers.
For minerals: veins, nodules, lumps etc. Also details as sandiness, clayeyness
etc. which are not important enough to be included in the actual rock name, can
be mentioned here.
I. Tectonic Influences
Natural fault planes, veins and scratches*) are signs of tectonic influences. The
dip of the fracture plane and their shape is noted, e.g. flat, wavy, irregular.
*) Scratches on the outside of the core can easily be caused by the core barrel. Also
breaks in the rocks are often of core mechanical origin.
True tectonical breaks are seldom open; minerals have filled the crack in general.
J. Dip
The dip of the rock is determined from the main primary bedding with respect to
the axis of the core which is considered vertical.
K. Oil and Gas Indications
Oil smell, oil traces, gas bubbles, general hydrocarbon test results are mentioned in the appropriate column on the core description form.
165
Coring
166
167
Petrophysical Engineering
168
(g) When the riser and HGT have been pressure tested at the commencement of a series of operations, it is not necessary to retest before every
run.
5.2.2 Testing BOPs
(a) BOPs are to be laboratory tested to rated test pressure 690 bar
(10,000 psi) every six months. A metal band indicating the date and test
pressure is to be attached to the BOP, and a copy of the Test Certificate
169
Petrophysical Engineering
retained at the Logging Company's workshop. Only double BOPs adapted for grease seal injection between rams may be used.
(b) When the BOPs have arrived on the rig, they should be tested as soon as
possible to ensure no damage has occurred during transportation.
Thereafter, they must be tested before each set of operations against
pressure. If practical, testing of the BOPs should be carried out on the test
rig (see Figure 5-2). If not practical, they may be tested during rig-up (as in
(d)).
(C) Mount the BOPs on the test stand so that hydraulic pressure can be
applied from below. Insert a 7/32" or 5/16" (depending on cable size) I'
shaped polished test rod between the lower rams of the BOPs. Ensure
that the test rod is chained down to prevent movement during pressure
operation. Ensure that BOPs are filled with water, close rams, and apply
345 bar (450 bar for gas wells) with a hand or electrically-driven hydraulic
pump. If the lower rams held pressure, insert the test rod between the
upper rams, tie down test rod and again apply test pressure. See also
Section Wireline Blowout Preventer-Pressure testing' in Volume Production Operations'.
(d) Chain down the test rod. Open the manifold across the lower BOP rams
and close the manifold on the upper BOPs. Ensure that the BOPs have
been manually closed following hydraulic operation.
Slowly apply pressure from the cement unit and bleed off air from the
BOP manifold. When the system is full, close the manifold outlet and
apply test pressure to the top BOP. Test for 15 minutes.
Close manifold on the lower BOP. Bleed off pressure from the top BOP
manifold - pressure should remain constant. Test for 15 minutes.
170
Bleed off pressure from the system and remove the rod. Open the BOPs.
The BOPs and their manifolds are now tested. No further tests are necessary during the operation.
(e) When this test has been personally witnessed with the Well Services'
Supervisor, a signed label should be attached to the BOPs giving the date
and test pressure. These BOPs may then be used for an uninterrupted
sequence of operations.
(c) Close the Upper Master Gate Valve (UMGV), open the Kill Wing Valve
(KWV) and Swab Valve (SWABV). Start pumping test fluid from the cement unit very slowly until all air has been evacuated from the lubricator
assembly. The test fluid is to be water for water wells and water/glycol
mixture in 50:50 proportion for oil or gas wells.
Note: Grease injection must not be activated at this stage.
The lubricator is full when test fluid is observed coming from the exhaust
hose on the HGT.
Note: Pumping must be done very slowly. Normally pressures should not exceed
69 bar (1,000 psi) before the old grease is removed from the flow tubes/hoses. The
stuffing box must be closed to prevent the tool being lifted into the tool catcher. The
tool catcher is a safety device which is activated when well pressure is applied.
Minimum pressure required for activation is 20-28 bar (300-400 psi).
A tool allowed to enter the tool catcher whilst equalising the riser pressure will therefore not be released until the pressure is reduced to
zero.
171
Petrophysical Engineering
(d) If CITHP is less than the anticipated CITHP during the operation (i.e. after
perforating), test to 35 bar (500 psi) above the anticipated CITHP. Activate
grease injection before testing.
Note: Weight of Schlumberger tools should be enough to balance the expected
CITHP, but may not be enough to balance test pressure.
(e) Equalise the lubricator pressure to existing CITHP at the cement unit or
BOP manifold. Close KWV then open UMGV.
Release the stuffing box. Lower the tool into the well.
(f) Throughout all wireline runs against pressure, inject glycol at the wellhead at a rate of 25 dm3/h.
WARNING:
At high production/injection rates fluid movement along the logging cable creates very large forces, which can lift the tool up the tubing (production) or break the cable (injection). Since these forces are still not
quantifiable, production/injection rates during wireline logging must be
strictly controlled as specified in the logging programme. Production/
injection must be stopped immediately if uncontrolled movement of the
tool is observed.
Note: The CCL tension and spinner must be monitored during bean up in high
3
flow rate wells (i.e. above 3000 m /d fluid).
Communication to the wireline unit must be established and personnel must be on
standby to reduce the flow rate in case of any movement.
172
173
Petrophysical Engineering
Collars appear as distortions on both amplitude and t logs. Use this phenomenon to check the logging engineer's assessment of corrected collar
depths.
4. Absolute saturation value will vary depending on several factors but would
normally be between 40 and 80 mVs for a polarised sonde.
5. Repeat survey should be exact.
174
175
Petrophysical Engineering
(d) Preparations
(i) TDT should always be run with well on production, to prevent settling and dispersion of fluids from the well-bore into arbitrary intervals.
176
5.5
(a) Scale
0-360o phase shift.
(b) Speed
1000 m/h.
(c) Calibration
Calibration before and after survey should be similar-a small change is
not important.
Notes:
1. The ETT cannot be considered a quantitative tool. With new casing in faultless
condition, each joint indicates a fairly uniform - but different - phase shift.
Generally speaking, it is useless to run an ETT in the hope of detecting corrosion unless a reference survey was made shortly after completing the well.
Comparison against a reference survey will readily indicate corroded areas.
2. Ensure that the correct diameter tool is used for the size of casing being
measured.
3. Run a junk catcher until it comes up clean before running the ETT.
4. The ETT is not a very robust tool. If the reading is constant, change the sensor
and re-run.
5.6
The Production Logging Tool (PLT) allows logging of several downhole parameters simultaneously during production control services in production,
monitoring and injection wells.
It can simultaneously record flow rate, fluid density, temperature, pressure,
caliper, casing collars and gamma ray.
It can be combined with additional sensors for tracer surveys and highprecision pressure recordings.
177
Petrophysical Engineering
The basic sensors are the flowmeter, gradiomanometer, thermometer, manometer and caliper. In addition to the CCL, a gamma ray detector can be added
to aid in correlation. Figure 5-3 shows the tool configuration with the main
sensors, including the two types of manometers which are available for use in the
PLT combination
To measure low flow rates and to detect fluid flow behind the casing a Tracer
Ejector Tool (TET) can be combined with the PLT string.
A PLT survey can be recorded with the tool moving up or down, and measurements can be made versus time with the tool stationary. Usually in a
production well the down logs are most relevant and generally one pass gives an
idea of what is happening over the producing interval. Conversely, in injection
wells the up logs generally show the features most clearly. For every flow rate
and at shut-in conditions several passes are made. During each pass all
parameters are measured simultaneously and the CSU system puts the readings
on depth by compensating for the different positions of the sensors. If an in-situ
flowmeter calibration has already been made with the well shut-in, then a single
run gives the necessary information to calculate flow rates and water cut under
flowing conditions.
The following notes are intended as a general guide for any engineer supervising a programme of production logging.
(a) Make sure the well is clean by running a dummy CCL or sinker bar (if
necessary, run a junk-basket) before starting production surveys. Flowmeter spinners have been clogged by bits of wire, remnants of ceramic
capsule, or congealed mud.
(b) Determine the location of the non-flowing sump early in the sequence of
surveys, and avoid running the flowmeter into the junk and debris at the
bottom of the hole.
(c) During logging operations the PLT must not be allowed to approach
closer than 20 feet to the tubing foot (or bottom of the tailpipe).
(d) Before opening the well or changing the flow rate for further production
logging ensure that the films of the logging surveys just completed are
developed and checked. If there is any doubt regarding reliability or
repeatability, re-run the respective logs.
(e)During any flow rate changes the PLT is to be left stationary in the well
at a point which is not directly opposite any perforations. Provided there
is enough space between perforated intervals, the tool should preferably
be placed between two of the lowermost intervals, just below a collar, but
178
179
Petrophysical Engineering
above the top of the sump. Watch the CCL carefully during the rate change.
If the tool starts to float the collar should be clearly observable. In this case
close the well in at once.
After opening the well or changing the flow rate, allow well production to
stabilise at the selected rate before commencing production logging. This
can take an hour, often longer.
Any changes to flowrate are to be made very slowly and carefully to avoid
excessive forces on tool and cable.
(f) Ensure that the survey date of any production survey is included on the
FRONT of the heading after the witness' name. Although the date also
appears as part of the survey statistics, including it in the front of the
heading is very useful for retrieving the correct log from our files.
Special Note: Maximum Flow Rates
When production logging is carried out inside a 5" casing or liner, special care
must be taken in observing the tension of the logging cable. If there is any
indication of upward movement of the PLT due to the force of the gas/oil flow the
well is to be closed in immediately.
Do not carry out any production logging at flow rates exceeding 1.1 106 m3/ d.
When logging inside 5" casing, check with base on the maximum flow rate to be
used.
Work is currently in progress to determine the maximum oil flow rates permissible during production logging, and these will be reported to the field as soon
as possible.
The PLT incorporates several logging sensors in one sonde. Before entering the
well, check the positions of each sensor in relation to the CCL, as the exact tool
configuration is quite variable. The sensors are briefly described below.
5.6.1 Flowmeter
Two spinner-type velocimeters are available to give a continuous flow profile
versus depth and to determine relative contributions of each zone to total
well production:
(a) CFM
This is a standard 1 11/16" diameter flowmeter, which is affected by turbulence, and has better sensitivity and discrimination than the FBS: in high
production or injection rate wells this flowmeter should normally be
chosen.
180
(b) FBS
The full-bore spinner is less sensitive than the CFM, and appears to damp
down the effects of turbulence. It should only be selected when its response characteristics are essential for the operation planned, as in biphasic flow.
5.6.2 Gradiomanometer
The gradiomanometer measures the pressure gradient between two
membrane-type pressure sensors two feet apart, in relative density units.
5.6.3 High Resolution Thermometer (HRT)
The high resolution thermometer is a highly sensitive recorder capable of
detecting temperature anomalies as small as 0.5F. The device incorporates an
electrical bridge system using an exposed temperature-sensitive resistor as one
arm of the bridge. Although the tool is primarily used for locating fluid entries and
determining the lowest depth of production, other applications include
identification of tubing leaks and determination of geothermal gradients.
5.6.4 Continuous Pressure Manometer
These are of two types:
(a) A Hewlett-Packard quartz strain gauge. This is very sensitive to temperature, the corrections for which are cumbersome but significant. The HP
pressure sensor is recommended for comparison of downhole pressure
between wells.
(b) A Schlumberger RFT type strain gauge. This offers the pressure accuracy
of the RFT, without large temperature effects. This option should be
selected when continuous and accurate downhole pressures are required.
5.6.5 Through-Tubing Caliper
The Through-Tubing Caliper has three bow-spring arms, movement of which is
converted into movement of a linear potentiometer. This tool is useful for
measuring hole sizes up to 12" diameter in barefoot wells. It is rarely of value in
cased/lined wells.
181
Petrophysical Engineering
182
183
Petrophysical Engineering
Actual Speed
15.15
= 7.575 m/min
2
30.30
= 15.150 m/min
2
184
5.8 Gradiomanometer
(a) Scale
0-1 g/cm2 per cm track
(b) Speed
2000 ft/hr ( 600 m/h)
(c) Calibration
Calibration is made at surface using air (0) and water (1). Before and after
survey calibrations should repeat.
Notes:
1. Most common problem is punctured bellows, which gives decreased readings.
2. Repeat section will be similar, but probably not exact.
3. Survey should be made twice, once with well flow, once against.
4. In gas wells, gradiomanometer should be run first, to determine liquid level at
bottom of well. This sump should be avoided in subsequent flowmeter runs.
(e) Interpretation
Friction and kinetic effects alter the gradiomanometer reading in a f lowing well, but these effects are usually spurious and unquantifiable.
The recorded pressure gradient is also reduced by well deviation. If is
the deviation angle from vertical, g is the gradiomanometer reading and
f is the correct fluid density, then:
g = f cos
Care must be taken to ensure that deviation changes are not misinterpreted as alterations in wellbore fluid density.
185
Petrophysical Engineering
5.9 Thermometer
(a) Scale
As required: Temperature scale may be changed while logging.
(b) Speed
1800 m/h.
(c) Calibration
Downhole calibration, before and after survey should repeat.
Notes:
1. Lack of character/sensitivity may be caused by broken sensor.
2. Always run three maximum reading thermometers with HRT to check absolute
value of readings.
3. Temperature survey should always be made running into the hole to avoid
disturbance of temperature readings by passage of the tool and cable.
4. Basically, temperature will increase from surface to TD on the basis of the
geothermal gradient. However, this will be affected by
- length of time since cementation of casing
- production rate
- length of time shut in
- gas production.
5. Ensure that a FULL history of anything which could possibly affect the interpretation of a temperature survey is added to the heading, e.g. an account of the
well production history.
186
Perforating
PERFORATING
187
Petrophysical Engineering
188
Perforating
189
Petrophysical Engineering
13. When attaching head to gun, all personnel must be out of the line of fire.
Non-essential personnel must REMAIN out of the line of fire until the gun is
safely in the well.
3. Close upper master gate valve (UMGV), open kill wing valve (KWV)/swab
valve (SWABV). Slowly pressure up lubricator to anticipated CITHP using
water/glycol from cement unit, and check for leaks. If CITHP is less than
pressure expected during the operation (as a result of perforation), test to 35
bar above anticipated CITHP.
4. Equalise lubricator pressure to existing THP at cement unit. Close KWV.
Ensure tool catcher/trap is closed, then open UMGV. When both SWABV
and UMGV are fully open, release tool from tool catcher or open tool trap and
lower gun into well.
5. Ensure magnetic marks are boosted near surface and add extra marks for
close control when pulling out. Switch on cable safety device when gun is
below the seabed.
6. Speed
A. Carrier Guns
After the first trip in the hole, carrier guns can be run and pulled out at
any speed consistent with limitations of personnel and well safety and
winch mechanics. However, remember that stuffing boxes and high
cable speeds are not compatible.
B. Unijets
In casing, speed should not exceed 3000 m/h.
In tubing, even 3000 m/h may be too fast. Always drive flexible guns
down tubing, watching tension and CCL indication closely and stopping at the first sign of hang-up.
190
Perforating
C. General
Speed through wireline entry guide, tubing landing nipples, other
tubing accessories and SSSV, should not exceed 1000 m/h for
both descending and ascending.
7. When descending to perforate trigger interval, run gun down to 150 m above
top packer. Open KWV. Pressure up tubing so as to get a 20 bar drawdown
of the formation, using water/glycol and cement pump. Close KWV.
8. Continue down, checking depths of all tubing accessories such as landing
nipple, ball valve nipple, etc. the packer and tailpipe and any pup joints in the
casing string below the packer. Any large depth discrepancy may necessitate
the running of a completely new GR/CCL log to be recorrelated with the
original FDC-GR.
9. Always pull up slowly when entering tubing shoe.
10. In highly deviated wells, gun weight may not be sufficient to overcome
combined cable friction and wellhead pressure forces. In this case the
possibility of pumping guns down may be considered. Do not attempt to pump
down a gun which has stuck. The reason for this is very simple. Should the
obstruction be overcome, the cable will be subject to high drag forces
downwards, while at the stuffing box, pump pressure tends to push the cable
upwards. The net result is that the cable will part just below the stuffing box.
11. Avoid running capsule guns on to obstruction in the well bore such as
cement plugs, bridge plugs, etc.
191
Petrophysical Engineering
192
Perforating
All possible checks should be made to ensure that the gun is at the correct
depth before shooting. Rectifying an incorrectly located set of perforations is
costly and time-consuming and almost certainly involves rig-work.
7. During the detonation look for indications that gun has fired, e.g. changes in
cable tension or galvanometer reading. After firing capsules, leave gun for
around three minutes to allow gun debris to fall before pulling up. This
precaution is not necessary with carrier guns. Record on film the casing
collars (at least three) immediately above the perforated zone before pulling
tool into tubing.
8. When shooting multiple intervals, it is good practice to start from the lowest
zone and work upwards. This minimises the possibility of debris blocking
intervals not yet perforated, particularly when perforating with capsules. This
procedure is not necessary with carrier guns.
193
Petrophysical Engineering
Pull gun into lubricator. Ensure that passage of CCL into lubricator is
observed on hand-held magnetic mark detector at rig-floor.
10. Take care when head is approaching stuffing box. Weak points have been
broken by accidentally engaging the wrong gear in the wireline unit when gun
was inside lubricator. ENSURE that gun is in the top of the lubricator
BEFORE closing main valve.
11. Close BOPs.
12. Bleed off pressure in riser.
13. Disconnect riser. If the quick-joint is difficult to unscrew, BEWARE
of pressure in the riser.
194
Perforating
195
196
197
198
199
Petrophysical Engineering
200
Perforating
201
Petrophysical Engineering
202
Perforating
203
Petrophysical Engineering
204
Wellsite Geology
7 WELLSITE GEOLOGY
7.1 Lithological Description of Sedimentary Rocks
The Wellsite Petroleum Engineer is responsible for keeping up-to-date a
continuous cuttings log, which includes the description of cores and sidewall
samples.
This log, called the `mud' log, should contain the following information:
(a) Penetration rate
(b) Well depth
(c) Lithology described as per Tapeworm
(d) Lithology interpretation
(e) Total gas readings and gas chromatograph
(f) Hydrocarbon detection (see 7.2)
(g) Mud data
(h) Bit data
(i) Deviation data
(j) Casing data
(k) Remarks on losses, gains, oil in mud and H2S indications.
7.1.1 Description and Coding of Rock Compositions
A complete lithological description taken from the EP Standard Legend
(1976) showing the symbols and abbreviations describing rock samples and
hydrocarbon indications is given as Figure 7.1-1 (next 26 pages). It is also
available from SIPM as a fold-out for field use (Reference: Guide for Lithological Descriptions of Sedimentary Rocks ['TAPEWORM] by E.H.K. Kempter; revised by E.D. Benjamins, Shell-Gabon, Port Gentil, September
1981).
205
Petrophysical Engineering
206
Wellsite Geology
207
Petrophysical Engineering
208
Wellsite Geology
209
Petrophysical Engineering
210
Wellsite Geology
211
Petrophysical Engineering
212
Wellsite Geology
213
Petrophysical Engineering
214
Wellsite Geology
215
Petrophysical Engineering
216
Wellsite Geology
217
Petrophysical Engineering
Wellsite Geology
218
219
Petrophysical Engineering
220
Wellsite Geology
221
Petrophysical Engineering
222
Wellsite Geology
223
Petrophysical Engineering
224
Wellsite Geology
225
Petrophysical Engineering
226
Wellsite Geology
227
Petrophysical Engineering
228
Wellsite Geology
229
Petrophysical Engineering
230
Wellsite Geology
231
Petrophysical Engineering
232
Wellsite Geology
emulsified or when the formation samples have not been cleaned sufficiently.
7.2.2
Solvent Cuts
The cut is the coloration observed with the naked eye imparted to a colourless solvent by the hydrocarbons (crude oils, etc.) bearing sample.The colour
of the cut is reported. The heavier oils usually give stronger cuts than light
oils for a given concentration, but oils of equal gravity show appreciable
differences according to their chemical composition. Naphthenic (asphaltic)
oils generally show darker cuts than alkanid (paraffinic) oils. Condensate will
give a light to very light cut. In addition to the cut, an oil ring can often be
observed on the side of the test tube or watch-glass after evaporation of the
solvent.
Place 3cm of dried and crushed sample in a 10cm3 test tube and add
solvent (Chlorothene or chloroform, etc.) up to 1 cm above the sample. Shake
well for 3 to 4 min and leave the sample to stand for about 15 min. Hold the
tube against a sheet of white paper and note the discoloration. See Figure
7.2-1, shown on the inside of the back cover, for oil detection in rock specimens.
Chlorothene is the recommended solvent (especially for heavy hydrocarbons) as it is non-flammable and relatively non-toxic. It is the registered trade
mark of a chlorohydrocarbon containing methylchloroform. Trichloroethane,
ether, chloroform, petroleum ether and acetone are other solvents commonly
used (carbon tetrachloride used to be the most popular solvent for both
light and heavy hydrocarbons until it was discovered that it is a cumulative
poison particularly dangerous in enclosed spaces).
Ether is the strongest solvent, but is not selective between oil-like substances
and the oxygen-containing compounds derived from vegetable matter. In
addition it is a potential fire hazard.
Chloroform is also a good solvent (for heavy hydrocarbons), but is also not
very selective and it can be dangerous in enclosed spaces.
Petroleum ether is a relatively selective solvent for all hydrocarbons.
233
Petrophysical Engineering
234
Wellsite Geology
7.2.6 Odour
The smell of a freshly broken core is distinguishable and should be noted, i.e.
petroliferous, sulphurous, etc. Smells from cuttings are often apparent during the drying process.
7.2.7 Gas Detection Analysis
When an air-combustible gas mixture is passed over the hot detector filament
of the gas detector wire, combustion of the gas occurs, causing the detecting
filament temperature to be higher than when air or non-combustible gases
are passed over the filament. The higher temperature increases the electrical resistance of the filament wire, which is one branch of a Wheatstone
bridge. The increased resistance of the filament branch and the amount of
unbalance is shown on a galvanometer. At high voltages all the combustible
gases burn; at a specified lower voltage all the gases except methane burn.
By recording the readings at both voltage settings, qualitative indications of
the amount of total gas and of gas heavier than methane can be obtained. For
even more refined determinations in special cases the gas detector can be
connected up to a chromatographic unit.
7.2.8 Irridescence
Irridescence may occur with oil of any colour or gravity but is more likely to be
observed with the lighter, more colourless oils, where oil staining may be
absent. Irridescence maybe observed in the wet sample tray or in the mud
stream. Irridescence without oil coloration or staining may indicate the presence of light oil or condensate. When oil emulsion or oil-base muds are
used, irridescence from the mud occurs and should not be mistaken for
formation hydrocarbons.
7.2.9 Acid Test
The presence of oil in calcareous cuttings can often be detected by dropping
them into weak acid (10% HCL). The reaction of the acid on an even faintly
stained cutting may form relatively large bubbles, which adhere to the cutting
and cause it to rise to the surface. Sometimes the bubbles burst and the
cutting falls again with a characteristic bouncing motion.
235
Petrophysical Engineering
236
Wellsite Geology
(c) Solvent Fluorescence: To be reported the same way as for Natural Fluorescence (intensity).
3 = Bright (good)
2 = Dull (fair)
1 = Pale (weak)
0 = None
(d) Acetone Reaction: Report numerically as follows:
4 = Milky (good)
3 = Opaque white (fair)
2 = Translucent white (weak)
1 = Traces (faint)
0 = Nil (clear)
(e) If applicable, results of visible staining and bleeding, odour, gas detector
analysis, irridescence and acid test should be reported in this standard
order, using the following symbols:
P = Positive
N = Negative
Q = Questionable
7.2.10.2 Reporting Procedure Example
When reporting indications, either the depth (corrected for time lag) from
which the cuttings originate, or in the case of the same results for more than
one sample in sequence, the interval should be mentioned first, followed by
the alphabetical and numerical symbols in a standard sequence as shown in
the following example.
A cutting sample exhibiting shows' should be reported as follows:
237
Petrophysical Engineering
238
The logging engineer is responsible for the supervision of all work involving
radioactive sources. He must be at the work site when sources are handled and
he is responsible for compliance with legislation, Company and Contractor
guidelines and procedures and for safety in general.
Only the logging engineer, or the operators under his direct instructions are
authorised to handle carrying shields containing the radioactive sources used in
logging operations. Only the logging engineer is authorised to remove the
sources from their carrying shields.
239
Petrophysical Engineering
240
The maximum permitted radiation level outside (above, below, at the sides) of
the storage container or outside a fence errected around the storage container
are:
241
Petrophysical Engineering
242
243
Petrophysical Engineering
Class 3
Detonators must be handled, transported and stored with extreme care. They
must be kept at all times free from shocks, heat and sources of electrical power
including radio transmitters and lightning discharges. Stringent regulations apply
to their transport, and these must be scrupulously observed.
A separate storage cabinet remote from all other explosives, accommodation and
working areas is supplied on each rig/platform. Contents of this store must be
limited to blasting caps required for immediately foreseeable jobs.
Keys to this store are held by the TP and Wireline Engineer and access is also
permitted to the WSPE by permission of the TP.
Explosives-on-Board Log
A log of explosives on board the rig/plafform is to be maintained by the WSPE.
The explosive log should show the following:
(a) Charge type, e.g. 2" Unijets, 7" cutter, primacord
(b) Date of stock change (IN/OUT)
(c) Number of charges added to/withdrawn from store
(d) Quantity currently in stock.
244
245
Petrophysical Engineering
246
When everything else has failed, a separate plugging back programme will be
issued.
8.2.3 Explosives Operating Safety
The following general safety precautions should be taken at all times when
operating with electrically-fired perforating guns and charges:
(a) Work involving the use of explosives should be carried out only by
specialist personnel but never when electrical storms are in the vicinity.
(b) During any job involving the use of explosives, the number of authorised
personnel employed should be kept to a minimum. All other persons
should be excluded from the danger area (e.g. walkway and derrick floor)
throughout the operation.
(c) Warning signs should be placed on access routes to the danger area to
prevent access of unauthorised persons.
(d) Electric Arc Welding can cause unacceptable voltage differences be
tween different parts of the rig, or even create dangerous EM radiation
levels. All arc welding should be stopped before electrical blasting caps
are connected to the gun, and remain shut down until the gun is more than
60 m below the sea bed.
(e) Radio Transmissions have the potential to fire blasting caps and/or igniters. Warning signs should be placed in the radio room to advise personnel of radio shut-down (see 8.2.4 on radio silence).
(f) Faulty Rig Wiring has been known to set off guns at the surface. Check the
rig wiring for loose wires or hanging cables, particularly in the vicinity of
the derrick V adjacent to the cat-walk.
(g) Casing and rig must be electrically bonded together, and stray voltage
between them reduced to less than 0.25 V. The Service Company supplies a voltage monitor which should be checked frequently. If the potential difference exceeds the limit at any time throughout the perforating
operation, all sources of electrical energy must be switched off (Note:
This may preclude perforating at night). The WSPE is to witness the earth
testing of the equipment.
(h) The Logging Unit includes a safety switch which isolates the logging
cable from internal circuits and grounds the cable conductors through
5000 ohm resistors. Before attaching an explosive device to the cable
head, and whenever the device (whether fired or not) is less than 60 m
from the surface, the logging unit safety key must be removed and in the
Logging Engineers possession.
247
Petrophysical Engineering
(i) Pre-armed guns must be properly capped until attachment to the cable
head.
(j) The cable head should always be checked for stray voltages before
attachment to the gun.
(k) All non-essential personnel must be moved to a safe distance before the
head is attached to the gun, until the gun is safely in the well.
(I) A gun which has been lowered into the well should always be treated as live
and dangerous until observation outside the lubricator confirms a successful
firing.
8.2.4 Radio Silence
In certain operations there must be radio silence for the following reasons:
Radio Silence is a general term which covers all precautions taken to reduce or
eliminate potential sources of stray currents and radio induced voltages, which
could detonate explosives prematurely (see Table 8.2.4-1).
During Radio Silence the rig platform status will remain Normal'.
Stray Currents are eliminated by stopping all electric welding, shutting down
electrical equipment which may cause stray currents in the rig structure, isolating
cathodic protection and fitting grounding straps between critical areas such as
the casing, rig structure and wire line logging unit.
Radio Induced Voltages are reduced to insignificant levels by ensuring radio and
radar transmissions from the installation are controlled by a radio shutdown. The
area in which transmissions are controlled will also include all vessels within 500
m of the installation. (Outside 500 m the standby boat will warn vessels of the
radio shut-down area). Essential radio links for production and pipeline control
operations may remain operational, when on-site electromagnetic field
measurements have shown that the fields generated by these radio links will not
detonate the explosives prematurely.
Radio Silence is enforced whenever operations involving the use of electroexplosive detonators are being carried out. This comprises perforating, side wall
sampling, formation interval testing (FIT), explosive backing-off (string shot) and
explosive cutting, wireline set packers or bridge plugs. The WSPE must inform
the TP when Radio Silence is required.
On installations where an OIM (Offshore Installation Manager) is present notice
of the need for Radio Silence should be given at least 24 hours in advance to the
OIM. This should also apply to cancellation of the intended
248
Radio Silence if required. The OIM will act as co-ordinator for the Radio Silence
procedure.
Table 8.2.4-1 Radio shut-down during operations with explosives applicable to
installations and vessels within 500 metres
249
Petrophysical Engineering
Alert Conditions
In the event of a platform Yellow Alert status being raised while explosives are
being made up prior into going in the well, the explosives must be made safe and
the operation suspended until the platform is returned to Normal'
250
status. When live explosives are in the well they should be lowered to more than
75 m below the sea bed and the operations suspended until the platform is
returned to Normal status.
In the case of a Red Hazard' status the operation must be suspended as for the
'Yellow Alert but in addition the well must be secured by closing the BOPs
around the logging cable. The nature of the emergency should be established
BEFORE operating shear rams/cutting the cable (when using explosives in a
drilling well) or before closing the Xmas tree/SSSV (when using explosives in a
completed well).
251
Petrophysical Engineering
252
253
Petrophysical Engineering
254
brown or black even with traces of H2S. The sulphide content is then estimated
by comparison of the test paper colour with a standard colour chart.
Apparatus
Sample bottle (35 mm diameter, 100 mm high) with perforated plastic
cap
Hydrogen sulphide test papers
Drop bottle with antifoam (NF-1 Bayer Entsch.)
Graduated colour chart
10% wt. hydrochloric acid
Stripping tablets, e.g. Alka Seltzer.
Procedure
1. Place 25 mL mud in sample bottle.
2. Place piece of test paper inside plastic cap.
3. Add 5 7 drops of antifoam to sample and mix carefully.
4. Add 7 mL HCI 10% to sample and IMMEDIATELY snap the cap containing the
test paper on the bottle.
5. Shake carefully, taking care that liquid does not touch the test paper.
6. After the acid is spent (appr. 5 min) remove test paper and compare with
standard colour chart.
Note:
If the colour of the test paper is too dark for proper comparison, the sample may be diluted with water
and the result corrected for dilution. When a high dilution is required, it may be necessary to add an
Alka Seltzer tablet to strip the H2S from the liquid.
255
Petrophysical Engineering
The apparatus can also be used for H2S determination in the free air above
mudpits, on the drill floor, etc.
Determination
The Drger apparatus equipped with the correct tube (see Table 8.3.3-1) is
placed inside the bottle so that the lower tip of the tube reaches half-way down
the sampling bottle. For the actual H2S determination both tips of the tube should
be broken off with an eye attached near the chain of the pump.
Make the required number of strokes by pushing in the pump completely and
wait till the chain is fully stretched again.
The amount of H2S can then be determined directly from the colour change in the
tube.
256
257
Compaction
258
Petrophysical Engineering
In which:
h is the amount of compaction as a result the increase in effective
stress.
cm,o is the uniaxial compressibility in 10-5 bar
-1
or in 10-7 psi-1
259
Compaction
260
Petrephysical Engineering
261
Compaction
With this procedure a maximum case' prediction of compaction and subsidence can be made. Based on this, and depending on the circumstances,
data gathering can be planned to monitor field behaviour. When field data
become available, uncertainties can be reduced and the original prediction can be updated and refined. Due to the potentially far reaching implications of subsidence, expert advise from KSEPL may be sought in an
early stage.
9.2.2 Compaction of Shales
When shales are present within the actual reservoir intervals as relatively
thin intervals (thicknesses as a few of feet or less), the pressure depletion in
the shales is virtually equal to that in the pay zones. Compaction of these
shales can be calculated with the compaction models generally applied for
sandstones (Section 9.2.1) as follows:
- Compaction of thin interbedded shale laminations can be taken into account in the total compaction of the sand-shale sequence using laboratory
compressibility data on representative shale-laminated (sandstone) samples.
- Compaction of a 100%-shale interval (of small thickness) is evaluated from
the relevant shale thickness and the laboratory uniaxial compressibility.
When core compressibility data are not available, a first estimate of
cm,o (shale) can be obtained from Table 9.2-1, using the appropriate total
porosity range.
In low-permeable (thick) shale layers, which are located adjacent to the
reservoir, pressure lags may occur that can give rise to non-linear (time
delayed) compaction of these shales.
9.2.3 Prediction of Compaction Due to Pore Collapse in High-Porosity
Carbonate Reservoirs
9.2.3.1 The Trendline Model
In general the bulk compressibilities of carbonates are much lower than
those of sandstones of comparab!e porosity. Field cases of considerable
reservoir compaction and surface subsidence due to hydrocarbon production from carbonate reservoirs are therefore rare. In high-porosity carbonates however, the phenomenon of pore collapse can occur in the pressure
regime prevailing during production (Refs. 6, 7 and 8). These carbonates,
which are usually well consolidated, exhibit a low compressibility up to a
certain stress level (elastic deformation regime), but strong compaction at
262
Petrephysical Engineering
263
Compaction
264
Petrophysical Engineering
265
Compaction
266
Petrophysical Engineering
less than 0.2, subsidence is vitually equal to reservoir compaction, irrespective of the depth of the basement. This plot has been calculated for an average Poisson's ratio of overburden and reservoir equal to 0.25. (Given the
minor influence of Poisson's ratio, Figure 9.3-1 can also be applied for other
values of .)
267
Compaction
268
Petrophysical Engineering
269
270
Petrophysical Engineering
271
272
273