Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Introduction (2)
Description of
Interdisciplinary
Team (5)
Not
Discussed
Missing
introduction
(0)
Not
discussed (0)
Analysis of Team
/ Conflict (6)
Not
discussed (0)
Discussion (6)
-depth of
reflectiveness
-clarity of
expression
Application of
Course
Concepts (6)
Not
discussed (0)
Not
discussed (0)
Organization (3)
Sequence of
information is
difficult to
follow. (0)
Conclusion (2)
Additional
Resources (4)
Spelling /
Grammar (3)
Presentation
-proper format
-length (3)
Out of 40
Reader has
difficulty
following work
(jumps around)
(1)
Missing
conclusion
(0)
No additional
resources (0)
Brief conclusion
(1)
Four or more
spelling
errors and/or
grammatical
errors.(0)
Three
misspellings
and/or
grammatical
errors. (1)
Unacceptable
presentation /
too short
(0)
Poor
presentation /
too short
(1)
1-2 resources;
somewhat
properly used
(1-2)
Meets
Expectations
Good
introduction
(1.5)
Good
description of
interdisciplinary
team / conflict
(3-4)
Good analysis
of conflict
(3-4)
Good
discussion
(3-4)
Good use of
course
concepts
(3-4)
Student
presents
information in
logical
sequence
(easy to follow)
(2)
Good
conclusion
(1.5)
3-4 resources;
properly used
(3)
No more than
two
misspellings
and/or
grammatical
errors. (2)
Good
presentation /
proper length
(2)
Exceeds
Expectations
Exceptional
introduction (2)
Thorough,
appropriate
description of
interdisciplinary
team / conflict
(5)
Thorough,
appropriate
analysis of
team / conflict
(5-6)
Thorough,
appropriate
discussion
(5-6)
Concepts
applied
appropriately /
thoroughly
(5-6)
Information in
logical,
interesting
sequence
(easy to follow)
(3)
Exceptional
conclusion (2)
More than 4
resources;
properly used
(4)
No
misspellings or
grammatical
errors. (3)
Proper format /
proper length
(3)