You are on page 1of 3

Risk Assessment

Conducted By: Isaac McDermott


Date: March 2015
Subject: Chapel

Review Date: March 2016

Signed: Isaac McDermott


Hazard
1

Describe the hazard and


and how it may cause harm

Identify the individuals or


Groups of persons at risk
and
Explain how they might be
affected

Identify the existing control


Measures and explain how
They are intended to control
the
Risks (where information
Is not explicit you may make
reasonable assumptions, but
any assumptions you make
must be explained)

Give a risk rating, using the


Matrix provided

Justify your assessment of


The foreseeable severity of

Details
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.

Accident
Fire
Slips, trips, fall
Insurance
Security
Parking
Supervision

Performers and members of the


audience. They may trip up or be
electrocuted.
1. The college has an adequate
number of trained first aiders on
site and a robust policy in place.
2. The college has a fire detection
system installed which is
serviced and monitored 24/7.
3. The college carries out weekly
internal and external inspections
of its buildings to maintain a
safe environment
4. The college has public liability
insurance to the value of
5,000,000
5. All college external entrances
are fitted with access control
system
6. The college offers spaces for
visitors on bays 1 to 10 to the St
James car park
Severity
Likelihood
Overall
Rating
2/5
1/5
2/25
No further assessment due to control
measure in place

harm.
Include an evaluation of the
effectiveness of any control
measures
Justify your assessment of
the likelihood of harm.
Include an evaluation of the
effectiveness of any existing
control measures.

Consider any further control


measures required and
explain how they will reduce
the risk to an acceptable
level (so
far as is reasonably
practicable)

Give a final risk rating using


The matrix provided.

No further assessment due to control


measure in place

1. Should any accident occur on


site CNC staff will all for a first
aider to attend
2. CNC staff are aware of fire
evacuation procedures. 85 fire
marshals on site.
3. Robust maintenance reporting in
place through firefly tickets
4. No further action required.
5. Out sourced security guards on
site
6. Secure parking available
7. CNC staff also on site to
supervise pupils
Severity
Likelihood
Overall
Rating
2/5
1/5
2/25

Risk Assessment Matrix (Risk Rating)

Certai
n
(5)

Very
Likely
(4)

Likel
y
(3)

May
Happe
n
(2)

Unlike
ly
(1)

Death
(5)

25

20

15

10

Major Injury
(4)

20

16

12

Up to 3 day Injury
(3)

15

12

10

Minor Injury
(treatment
Off-site)
(2)
Minor Injury (FirstAid
On-site)
(1)

Scor
e
1- 4

Priority

Action

LOW

Action is required to reduce the risk, although low


priority.
Time, effort and cost should be proportional to the
risk.
Action required soon to control. Interim measures may
be
necessary in the short term.
Action required urgently to control risks. Further
resources
may be needed.

5-10

MEDIU
M

1125

HIGH

You might also like