Professional Documents
Culture Documents
EARTHQUAKE AFFECTED
BUILDINGS
WHAT IS RETROFITTING
IS 13935
To upgrade the earthquake resistence up to the level
of the level of the present day codes by approriate
techniques.
CEB 1995
Concepts including strengthening, repairing and
remoulding
Newman , 2001
It is an upgrading of certain building system, such as
mechanical, electrical, or structural, to improve
performance, function or appearance
•Seismic retrofitting is the modification of
existing structures to make them more resistant
to seismic activity, ground motion, or soil failure
due to earthquakes.
• CIRCUMSTANCES
– (i ) earthquake damaged buildings
– ( ii) earthquake vulnerable buildings.
WHY RETROFITTING
• This proves to be a better option catering
to the economic considerations and
immediate shelter problems rather than
replacement of buildings
RETROFIT PERFORMANCE OBJECTIVES
• With the development of Performance based earthquake
engineering (PBEE), several level of performance objectives are
gradually recognized:
• PUBLIC SAFETY ONLY. The goal is to protect human life, ensuring
that the structure will not collapse upon its occupants or passers
by, and that the structure can be safely exited. Under severe
seismic conditions the structure may be a total economic write‐off,
requiring tear‐down and replacement.
• STRUCTURE SURVIVABILITY. The goal is that the structure, while
remaining safe for exit, may require extensive repair (but not
replacement) before it is generally useful or considered safe for
occupation. This is typically the lowest level of retrofit applied to
bridges.
RETROFIT PERFORMANCE OBJECTIVES
• STRUCTURE FUNCTIONALITY. Primary structure
undamaged and the structure is undiminished in
utility for its primary application. A high level of
retrofit, this ensures that any required repairs are
only "cosmetic" ‐ for example, minor cracks in
plaster , drywall and stucco. This is the minimum
acceptable level of retrofit for hospitals.
• STRUCTURE UNAFFECTED. This level of retrofit is
preferred for historic structures of high cultural
significance.
NEED IN EARTHQUAKE VULNERABLE BUILDINGS
• (a) the buildings have been designed according to a seismic
code, but the code has been upgraded in later years;
•
• (b) buildings designed to meet the modern seismic codes,
but deficiencies exist in the design or construction;
• (c) essential buildings must be strengthened like hospitals
historical monuments and architectural buildings;
• (d) important buildings whose service is assumed to be
essential even just after an earthquake;
• (e) buildings the use of which has changed through the years;
• (f) buildings that are expanded, renovated or rebuilt.
SEISMIC EVALUATION OF BUILDINGS
• to assess the seismic capacity of earthquake
vulnerable buildings or earthquake damaged
buildings for the future use.
• helpful for degree of intervention required in
seismically deficient structure
• Methodologies
• (i) qualitative methods
• (ii) analytical methods
• QUALITATIVE METHODS
• based on the background information
available of the building and its
construction site
– architectural and structural drawings
– past performance of similar buildings under
severe earthquakes,
– visual inspection report,
– some non‐destructive test results.
• methods
– Field Evaluation Method,
– Rapid Visual Screening Method,
– ATC‐14 methodology etc.
ANALYTICAL METHOD
AN
ANALYTICAL METHOD
Based on the consideration of the capacity and ductility of
buildings on the basis of available drawings.
METHODS
– Capacity/Demand(C /D) method,
– Screening method,
– Pushover analysis,
– Nonlinear inelastic analysis etc.
Evaluation procedure should be very simple and immediate
based on synthetic information that can prove suitable for
risk evaluation on large populations.
Therefore, qualitative evaluation of the buildings is generally
being carried out.
COMPONENTS OF SEISMIC EVALUATION
METHODOLOGY
• 1.CONDITION ASSESSMENT based on
– (i) data collection or information gathering of
structures from architectural and structural
drawings
– (ii) performance characteristics of similar typeof
buildings in past earthquakes
– (iii) rapid evaluation of strength ,drift, materials,
structural components and structural details.
• used basically for undamaged existing
structures'
• 2. VISUAL INSPECTION/FIELD EVALUATION
– based on observed distress and damage in
structures.
– Visual inspection is more useful for damaged
structures however it may also be conducted for
undamaged structures.
• 3. NON‐DESTRUCTIVE EVALUATION (NDE)
– for quick estimation of materials strength,
– determination of the extent of deterioration
– to establish causes
– used for preparation of drawing in case of non‐
availability.
SOURCE OF WEAKNESS IN RC FRAME
BUILDING
• (i) discontinuous load path/interrupted load
path/irregular load path
• (ii) lack of deformation compatibility of
structural members
• (iii) quality of workmanship and poor quality
of materials
CONCRETE RETROFITTING
BASIC CONCEPTS at (CEB, 1997):
• (a) up gradation of the lateral strength of the
structure;
• (b) increase in the ductility of structure;
• (c) increase in strength and ductility.
– understanding of mode of failure,
– structural behavior
– weak and strong design aspects
STRUCTURAL DAMAGE DUE TO
DISCONTINUOUS LOAD PATH
• seismic forces should be properly collected by
the horizontal framing system and properly
transferred into vertical lateral resisting
system
• discontinuity/irregularity in this load path or
load transfer may cause structural damage
during strong earthquakes.
SOURCE OF WEAKNESS IN RC FRAME
BUILDING
• (i) discontinuous load path/interrupted load
path/irregular load path
• (ii) lack of deformation compatibility of
structural members
• (iii) quality of workmanship and poor quality
of materials
STRUCTURAL DAMAGE DUE TO
DISCONTINUOUS LOAD PATH
• seismic forces should be properly collected by
the horizontal framing system and properly
transferred into vertical lateral resisting
system
• discontinuity/irregularity in this load path or
load transfer may cause structural damage
during strong earthquakes.
STRUCTURAL DAMAGE DUE TO LACK
OF DEFORMATION
• MAIN PROBLEMS
– limited amount of ductility and
– the inability to redistribute load in order to
safely withstand the deformations imposed upon
in response to seismic loads.
STRUCTURAL DAMAGE DUE TO LACK
OF DEFORMATION
• In reinforced concrete beams, the major
problems exist at the right end, considering
seismic forces left to right
• A brittle shear failure could occur due to
superposing of shear forces caused by
vertical loading and seismic loading.
Beam‐column joints
• in case of strong column‐weak beam
behaviour,
– the joint may be heavily stressed after beam
yielding and diagonal cracking may be formed in
the connection.
– Wide flexural cracks may develop at the beam end
– partially attributable to the slip of beam
reinforcement within the connection.
• Such shear cracking may reduce the stiffness
of a building.
Behavior of beams for vertical and
seismic loading
QUALITY OF WORKMANSHIP AND MATERIALS
• faulty construction practices
– lack of amount and detailing of reinforcement as per
requirement of code
– the end of lateral reinforcement is not bent by 135 degree
• lack of quality control
– of design material strength as specified,
– spalling of concrete by the corrosion of embedded reinforcing
bars,
– porous concrete,
– age of concrete,
– Proper maintenance etc
CLASSIFICATION
RETROFITTING STRATEGIES FOR RC
BUITDINGS
• Structural Level (or Global) Retrofit Methods
• Two approaches
– (i) conventional methods ……based on
increasing the seismic resistance of existing
structure
– (ii) non‐conventional methods ….basedon
reduction of seismic demands.
CONVENTIONAL METHODS
• ADDING NEW SHEAR WALLS
– Frequently used for retrofitting of non‐ductile
reinforced concrete frame buildings.
– The added elements can be either cast‐in‐place or
pre‐cast concrete elements.
– New elements preferably be placed at the exterior
of the building.
– Not preferred in the interior of the structure to
avoid interior mouldings.
• TECHNICAL CONSIDERATIONS:
– (a) determining the adequacy of existing floor and
roof slabs to carry the seismic forces;
– (b) transfer of diaphragm shear into the new shear
walls with dowels;
– (c) adding new collector and drag members to the
diaphragm;
– (d) increase in the weight and concentration of
shear by the addition of wall which may affect the
foundations
• CONSTRUCTIONAL CONSIDERATION
• to find locations where walls can be added and well located
which may align to the full height of the building to minimize
torsion
• desirable to locate walls adjacent to the beam between
columns so that only minimum slab demolition is required
with connections made to beam at the sides of columns
• The longitudinal reinforcement must be placed at the ends of
the wall running continuously through the entire height.
• the reinforcement has to pass through holes in slabs and
around the beams to avoid interference.
•
• Wall thickness also varies from 15 to 25 cm (6 to 10 inch) and
is normally placed externally
• LIMITATIONS:
• (i) increase in lateral resistance but it is concentrated at a few
places
• ( ii) increased overturning moment at foundation causes very high
uplifting that needs either new foundations or strengthening of the
existing foundations,
• (iii) increased dead load of the structure
• (iv) excessive destruction at each floor level results in functional
disability of the buildings
• (v) possibilities of adequate attachment between the new walls
and the existing structure,
• (vi) closing of formerly open spaces can have major negative
impact on the interior of the building or exterior appearance.
ADDING STEEL BRACINGS
• an effective solution when large openings are required.
• Potential advantage over other schemes for the
following reasons:
– higher strength and stiffness , can be proved,
– opening for natural light can be made easily,
– amount of work is less since foundation cost may be
minimized,
– the bracing system adds much less weight to the existing
structure,
– most of the retrofitting work can be performed with
prefabricated elements and disturbance to the occupants
may be minimized.
• TECHNICAL CONSIDERATIONS
• can be used for steel structures as well as
concrete structure.
• The effective slenderness ratio of brace kept
relatively low so that braces are effective in
compression as well as tension,
• suggested ratio are 80 to 60 or even lower
• Collector's members are recommended for
transferring forces between the frame and
bracing system.
• CONSTRUCTIONAL CONSIDERATION
• The available dead load of structure has to be
considered to
• determine the amount or number of bays of bracing
that can be mobilized to resist overturning
• uplift, as steel bracing is relatively light. Bracing bays
usually require vertical columns at ends
• to resist overturning forces to work vertically, as
chords of a cantilever truss are arranged
• horizontally at each floor level. It is to be connected to
the horizontal diaphragms by collectors
MEMBER LEVEL
RETROFITTING
JACKETING
•Most popular method for strengthening of building columns
•Steel jacket, reinforced concrete jacket, fibre reinforced polymer composite jacket
etc
•Purpose for jacketing:
1. To increase concrete confinement
2. To increase shear strength
3. To increase flexural strength
RECTANGULAR AND CIRCULAR CROSS SECTIONS
•Transverse fibre is wrapped along entire circumference of the members to
increase concrete confinement and shear strength‐member
•For square or rectangular cross‐sections, circular/oval/elliptical jackets are used
and the space between the jacket and column is filled with concrete.
•Multi‐shaped jackets provide a high degree of confinement ‐ more effective.
•Rectangular jackets typically lack the flexural stiffness needed to fully confine the
concrete.
•Circular and oval jackets is less desirable due to
1. Need of large space in the building
2.Oval or elliptical jacket ability to confine the concrete along the long
dimension‐is open to question.
TECHNICAL CONSIDERATIONS‐Jacketing
•Objective‐To increase the seismic capacity of framed structures.
•Jacketing of reinforced concrete columns yields better confinement than
that of concrete beams with slabs ‐slab causes hindrance
•Waffle slab‐ increased stiffness is obtained, jacketing columns and ribs.
• Foundation grids are strengthened and stiffened by jacketing their beams.
• Improve the lateral strength and ductility by confinement of compression
concrete
• Retrofitting of a few members might not be effective enough to improve
the overall behaviour of the structure, if the remaining members are not
ductile.
Jacketing of columns
•Concrete is added with longitudinal and transverse reinforcement around
the existing columns.
•Improves axial and shear strength of columns while the flexural strength of
column and strength of the beam‐column joints are same
• It improves the lateral load capacity of ductility
•Advantage‐Improves the lateral load capacity of the building in a distributed
way ‐ avoiding the concentration of stiffness unlike the case of shear wall.
• No major changes in the original geometry of the building
• The jacketing of columns is generally carried out by two methods:
•(i) reinforced concrete jacketing
•(ii) steel jacketing.
Reinforced concrete jacketing
• Damaged regions of the existing members should be repaired prior to their
jacketing
• There are two main purpose of jacketing of columns:
• (i) increase in shear capacity of columns strong column‐weak beam design)
•(ii) to improve the column’s flexural strength
•It is done by passing the longitudinal reinforcement through holes
drilled in the slab and placing new concrete in the beam column joints.
•Rehabilitated sections are designed in this way so that the flexural strength of
columns should be greater than that of the beams.
Details for reinforced concrete jacketing
Properties of jacket hMatch with the existing structure
hCompressive strength > existing structures by 5 N/mm²
(50 kg/cm²), or at least equal to that of the existing
structure.
Minimum width of jacket h10 cm ‐concrete cast‐in‐place
4 cm ‐shotcrete.
hMonolithic behaviour
hNarrow gap ‐to prevent increases in flexural capacity.
Minimum area of longitudinalh3A/fy
hSpacing should not exceed 6 times the width of the jacket
h% of steel in the jacket w.r.t the jacket area should be
limited between 0.015 and 0.04.
Minimum area of transverse hDesigned and spaced
hMinimum bar dia used for ties is not less that 10mm
hThe ties should have 135‐degree hooks
hDue to the difficulty of manufacturing 135‐degree hooks
on the field, ties made up to multiple pieces, can be used
Shear stress in the interface hProvide adequate shear transfer mechanism to assured
monolithic behaviour.
hrelative movement between the jacket and the existing
element should be prevented.
hChipping the concrete cover of the original member and
roughening its surface may improve the bond between the
old and the new concrete.
hFour‐sided jacket‐ties should be used to confine
and for shear reinforcement in the composite element.
h1, 2, 3 side jackets‐ special reinforcement should be
provided to enhance a monolithic behaviour.
Steel Jacketing
Local strengthening of columns has been frequently accomplished by jacketing
with steel plates.
Details of steel jacketing
Steel plate thickness hAt least 6 mm
Height of jacket hFlexural columns‐ 1.2 to 1.5 times splice length
hshear columns‐full height of column
Shape of jackets h Rectangular jacketing, prefabricated two L‐
shaped panels
hThe use of rectangular jackets has been successful in
case of small size columns up to 36 inch width but
has been less successful on larger rectangular
columns.On larger columns, rectangular jackets
appear to be incapable to provide adequate
confinement.
Bottom clearance h38 mm (1.5 inch)
Gap between steel jacket h25mm (1 inch) fill with cementations grout.
And concrete column
Size of anchor bolt h25mm (1 inch) in diameter
hBolts were installed through pre‐drilled holes
on the steel jacket
Number of anchor bolts hTwo anchor bolts are intended to stiffen the steel
jacket and improve confinement of the splice.
FRP jacketing
The merits of this methods are:
(i) carbon fiber is flexible and can be made to contact the surface
tightly for a high degree of confinement
(ii) confinement is of high degree because carbon fibers is of high
strength and high modules of elasticity are used
(iii) the carbon fiber has light weight and rusting does not occur
Limitations: There are some disadvantages associated with the column
jacketing technique:
(i) in some cases the presence of beams may require majority of new
longitudinal bars to be bundled into the corners of the jacket;
(ii) with the presence of the existing column it is difficult to provide
cross ties for new longitudinal bars which are not at the corners of the
jackets;
(iii) jacketing is based mostly on engineering judgment as there is a
dearth of guidelines.
Beam jacketing
• It gives continuity to the columns and increases the strength and stiffness of
the structure.
• While jacketing, avoid the creation of a strong beam‐weak column system.
• In retrofitted structure, there could be change of mode of failure and
redistribution of forces as a result of jacketing of column
• The most common ways of jacketing are one‐sided jackets or 3‐ and 4‐sided
jackets
•The beam should be jacketed through its whole length.
•The reinforcement has also been added to increase beam flexural capacity
moderately
Reinforcement details of beam jackets
Minimum width for jacket 8 cm if concrete cast in place or 4 cm
for shotcrete
Longitudinal reinforcement % of steel on the jacket should
be limited to 50 of the total area of the
composite section.
Shear reinforcement Ignore the effect of existing shear
reinforcement
New reinforcement should have 135
hooks and at each corner of the tie
there must be at least one longitudinal
bar.
Beam‐column joint jacketing
• A joint may be defined as the part of the column that is located through the
depth of the beams and which intersect that column.
• This critical region should have enough confinement and shear capacity.
•Due to lack of space in the joint region it is difficult enough to provide an
adequate confinement
• Jacketing beam‐column joint has been effective in rehabilitating the joint as it
increases the strength
• It is very important to have a very strong column as compared to the beam to
avoid driving of the column or joint into significant inelastic behaviour.
Slab column connection
• The most critical structural damage is the slab column connection which
results in the punching shear failure due to the transfer of unbalance moments.
• Retrofitting ‐Prevention of punching shear failures
• Adding concrete capitals or steel plates on both sides of slab can prevent
punching shear failure
Foundations
•The repair and retrofitting of foundations is principally required due to two
types of problems:
(i) the change of loads on the foundation by strengthening the
structure
(ii) the failure of foundation itself.
• In the first case, reinforced concrete jacketing of basement beams and the
addition of new piles are done.
CASE STUDIES
CASE STUDY 1: SEISMIC RETROFITTING OF RC BUILDING WITH
JACKETING AND SHEAR WALLS
Typical Features of the Building
●Number of Stories – eight stories with basement
●Lateral load resisting system – reinforced concrete frames
●Floor system – two – way slab with beam
●Foundation – grid foundation with retaining walls around the
perimeter
Features of Damages in Mexico Earthquake, 1979
●Minor cracks in beams and columns
Retrofitting Techniques Employed after Mexico Earthquake, 1979
●Addition of concrete shear wall in axis 2 and A
●Addition of masonry wall in axis 5
Behaviour of Retrofitted Building in Mexico Earthquake, 1985
●Spalling of the concrete cover and buckled bar at the interface of the walls
and beam‐column joints
●Main reinforcement in the columns buckled
●Damaged columns were the columns adjacent to the added walls
●Damage attributed to the inadequate connection between the added walls
and original frame connection
Retrofitting Techniques Employed after Mexico Earthquake, 1985
●Minor cracks – Repaired by injecting epoxy resins
●Buckled longitudinal reinforcement, broken ties and crushed concrete –
Replacement of new reinforcement welded with the existing bars and new
closed ties were placed.
●Severely damaged columns adjacent to added walls – Retrofitted with
encasing in concrete with longitudinal and transverse reinforcements. The
surface was cleaned and moistened before the new concrete was placed.
●Other columns – Retrofitted with wire mesh
●Damaged concrete wall added – Demolished and replaced with new concrete
walls with 200 mm in thickness
●Wall with slight damage –injecting epoxy resins and by
increasing their thickness to 200 mm
Expected Performance
Typical Features of the Building
●Number of stories – twelve
●Lateral load resisting systems – non‐ductile reinforced concrete frames
●Floor system – cast‐in‐place concrete joist beam construction with 2.5‐inch slab
●Foundation system – mat foundation (2.4 m thick) on concrete friction piles
Features of Damages in Mexico Earthquake, 1979
●Extensive damage to first four stories in transverse direction
●The spandrel beams and columns in Frame 1 and 5 experienced diagonal
cracking over much of their length in the first floor.
●The medium column in the fourth storey of Frame 3 suffered cracking and
crushing
●The foundation performed well
Retrofitting Techniques Employed
●Cracked beams and columns – Repaired with epoxy injection
●The columns of Frames 1 and 5 – Encased in steel through the forth storey
level
●Frame 1 and 5 – Braced steel frames were attached on the outside of the
building in E‐W direction.
Expected Performance
Results indicate that the steel braced
frames attached to the building strengthened
and they stiffened the structure, moving its
natural period away from the predominant
ground period of 2.0 sec
CASE STUDY 3: SEISMIC RETROFITTING OF RC BUILDING WITH STEEL
BRACING
Typical Features of the Building
●Number of stories –12‐storey reinforced concrete apartment building
●Lateral load resisting systems – moment resisting RC frames
●Floor system – waffle slab 5 cm thick with 35 cm deep ribs
●Foundation system – mat foundation (15 cm thick) underlain by deep, slender
stiffening beams (140 cm x 40 cm N‐S and 140 cm x 30 cm E‐W) located along the
column lines.
Features of Damages to Mexico Earthquake, 1979
●The building suffered extensive damage at the fourth storey columns due to
pounding against an adjacent four‐storey building located approximately 5 cm
north of this building
●The building also experienced large inter‐storey deformations of its frame:
resulting in damage to the exterior walls (both longitudinal and transverse).
The longitudinal and transverse partition walls were badly cracked at several
levels
●No indications of the foundation failure were observed.
Retrofitting Techniques
Employed
●Diagonal steel
bracing was added to
the central bay of
frames 1, 2 and 3 in the
transverse direction
●Insertion of new
reinforced concrete
infill walls of 4 cm
thickness to all bays of
the exterior longitudinal
frames
Expected Performance
●The retrofitted building performed well and it suffered only minor structural
damage during the 1985 Mexico earthquake, even though the intensity of
shaking was much greater than in 1979
CASE STUDY 4: SEISMIC RETROFITTING OF RC BUILDING BY JACKETING OF
FRAMES
Typical Features of the Building
●Number of stories – four stories with basement, ground floor and three upper
floors
●Year of construction – 1959
●Lateral load resisting system – reinforced concrete frames
●Floor system – two – way slab with beam
●Foundation – mat foundation with retaining walls around the perimeter
Features of Damages in Mexico Earthquake,
1985
●Severe damage at second floor level
columns
●Damage consists of cracks more than
1 mm in width, loss of material and buckled
bars
●The facade walls suffered extensive
cracking
●Short column effect
Retrofitting Techniques Employed
●Concrete Jacketing – Both beams and
columns
Expected Performance
●Retrofitted building was analyzed with the
assumption of monolithic behaviour
between the old and the new material.
CASE STUDY 5: SEISMIC RETROFITTING OF RC BUILDING WITH SHEAR WALLS
AND JACKETING
Typical Features of the Building
●Number of stories – Eight‐storey reinforced concrete apartment building
●Building dimension – floor area 245 m² and storey height is 3.0 m above the
foundation level, including penthouse
●Design and construction – 1984
●Lateral load resisting systems – moment resisting RC frames. A structural wall
around the elevator
●Floor system – concrete slabs in the first stories and just slabs in the top two
stories
●Foundation system – strip foundation in both the direction.
Features of Damages in Adana – Ceyhan (Turkey) Earthquake, 1998
●Building under moderate damage category
●Extensive damage was observed in beams especially between the first and fifth
floors
Retrofitting Techniques Employed
●Infilling of appropriate frame bays by in‐situ reinforced concrete shear walls with
h t th i ti f d i d f th h ll
●Damaged columns or columns lacking required vertical load carrying
capacity are jacketed. Where feasible, use of composite reinforced polymer
fabric is recommended
Expected Performance
●After adding the shear walls, vibration periods have reduced.
●Naturally, the reduction in natural vibration periods after seismic retrofit is
due to increase in the stiffness of buildings.
CASE STUDY 6: SEISMIC RETROFITTING OF RC BUILDING BY ADDING
FRAMES
Typical Features of the building
●Number of stories – eight stories consisting of ground floor with seven
upper floors
●Typical features – soft storey, mixed construction masonry with reinforced
concrete
●Year of construction – 1979
●Lateral load resisting systems – masonry bearing walls except at the ground
floor.Columns are only at the ground floor
●Floor system – waffle slab at the first level and beam – block slab at the
other levels
●Foundation system – grid and slab with friction piles located under each
column
●Typical floor plan and elevation
Features of Damages in Mexico Earthquake, 1985
●Severe damage occurred in masonry walls
●Foundation of the columns at the first level suffered no damage
●Principal failure direction was east – west due to irregularities in plan
and insufficient area of walls in east – west direction.
Retrofitting Techniques Employed
●Adding of reinforced concrete frames over the existing column in the
ground floor along axis 1,3, 4 and 6
●Adding two concrete shear walls from first level to the upper storey were
placed in axis 3 and 4
●The existing masonry walls were retrofitted using wire mesh and 30 mm
of mortar
●The cover of the existing columns was removed to permit the continuity
of the new longitudinal reinforcement. The dimensions of the existing
columns were increased
●The monolithic behaviour between the new frames and the floor system
was provided by eliminating part of the floor system so that the new
reinforcement of the frame was cast together with slab
●Foundation – The foundation grid was encased to permit the anchorage
to the new longitudinal reinforcement
Expected Performance
●Four new concrete frames with concrete
walls were analyzed by taking into account the
torsional effect
●Retrofitted building was analyzed with the
assumption of monolithic behaviour between
old and new material
●The results indicate that the bearing capacity
of the existing foundation was considered
sufficient to resist the forces induced by the
new structure.
CASE STUDY 7: SEISMIC RETROFITTING OF RC BUILDING BY STEEL
BRACING AND INFILL WALLS
Typical features of the building
●Number of stories –six stories consisting of a basement, ground level
with five upper floors
●Lateral load resisting systems – reinforced concrete frames
●Floor system – waffle slab
●Foundation system – mat foundation with retaining walls around the
perimeter, friction piles were placed under the mat foundation
Features of Damages in Mexico Earthquake, 1985
No significant damage during the earthquake. Only minor damage to
non‐structural walls foundation performed well.
Retrofitting Techniques Employed
●Although there is no significant damage
retrofitting was done for future events and to
eliminate the damage in nonstructural elements.
●Steel bracing in transverse direction.
●Infilled masonry walls were reinforced to stiffen
the structure in the longitudinal direction.
Expected Performance
●Analysis was performed to verify that the
upgraded structure could resist the code loads
●The bracing frames were designed in such a way
that they would carry all the lateral loads while
the existing structure was considered to carry all
the vertical loads.
RETROFITTING OF MASONRY
STRUCTURES
INTRODUCTION
WHY MASONRY?
Easily available
DEFECTS OF MASONRY
2) type of masonry
4) Failure mode
FAILURE MODE OF MASONRY BUILDINGS
1) OUT – OF – PLANE FAILURE
2) IN – PLANE FAILURE
3) DIAPHRAGM FAILURE
4) POUNDING
5) CONNECTION FAILURE
• Damage to the diaphragm never impairs its gravity load carrying capacity.
Seismic inertial forces that originate in all elements of the building are
delivered to horizontal diaphragms through structural connections.
FORCE DISTRIBUTION
diaphragms vertical elements foundation.
CAUSE - adjacent roof levels of two buildings and vertical brick work faces
flush with one another
broadly classified into three categories on the basis of their effect on structural
performance
(2) improving the in-plane strength of the wall or any weak zone of the
section akin to LOCAL/MEMBER RETROFITTING
(1)surface coatings
(2) Shotcrete overlays or adhered fabric with wire mesh or FRP materials
(i)addition of reinforcement
(iii) prestressing
(i)masonry cracking,
(ii)masonry deterioration.
Masonry Cracking
CAUSE
seismic vibrations
Repair of GO and GI grade cracks
The repairing process remains much similar to the previous technique with an
exception to insert reinforcement in every injecting hole.
Repair of G3 grade cracks
Cracks due to loss of connection among the multi-wythe masonry walls may be
categorized as G3 grade cracking.
Used to repair and strengthen masonry walls having large voids or to fill the space
between adjacent portions of masonry.
Grout injection binds the inner and outer wythes together establishing a composite
action between them for an improved of-plane moment capacity.
The selection of grout depends on the desired strength, properties and on the
size of the crack network or void system.
Low lifting is preferred as it reduces the hydrostatic pressure, which prevents the
outward thrust of the grout from displacing one of the wythes.
MASONRY DETERIORATION
* most common – UNITS - due to water penetration and freeze thaw cycles
REPAIR TECHNIQUES
• carried out when the quality of the mortar happens to be poor but the units
remain in good condition.
• Involves removal of the existing mortar up to 1/3 of the walls thickness or at least
7+ inches from the joints on one or both sides of the wall,
• Steel reinforcement in bed joints improve the ductility and energy dissipation
capacity
MEMBER RETROFITTING
1)RETROFITTING TECHNIQUES
SHOTECRETE
1)WET MIX
Design of concrete
Selection of correct process
Skilled workmanship
DESIGN MIX
• Shortcrete mix
1 part portland cement & 3 parts sand by volume
EQUIPMENT
* Pressure gun, air compressor, material hose, air & water hose,
nozzle, water pump.
RESULT -
ADVANTAGES –
4) Simple construction
Wall acts as a truss element, where the struts are inclined strip of unreinforced
masonry.
Wall becomes more ductile and its load carrying capacity is increased several times
suitable for smaller building – upto 1 to 3 storey height with monolithic reinforced
concrete slab and horizontal band over the load bearing walls at the lintel level.
CONFINEMENT WITH STEEL ELEMENTS
Insertion of reinforcement from the centre of the wall may take place by
providing vertical cores, which may be termed as centre coring.
The floor stiffened by nailing layers of wood planks to the existing girders.
Steel ties are then nailed directly to the girders or wood slab and
anchored to the external face of the wall with steel fasteners
2) Creation of a composite structure formed by the wood structure and by a
reinforced concrete thin slab.
To increase the lateral strength, stability and integrated behavior of load bearing
walls, prestressing is very effective and viable method of retrofitting.
In prestressing of wall, two steel rods are placed on the two sides of the wall and
tightened by turnbuckles.
EXTERNAL BINDING OR JACKETING
Reinforced cement coating forming a jacket on one or both sides of the wall
is used to improve the lateral resistance.
The horizontal bands are called bandage while vertical steel are called splints.
The welded mesh type of steel is to be provided on both outdoor and inner surfaces at
critical sections.
The welded mesh should be nailed to the masonry and then be covered with micro-
concrete.
As a minimum provision these must be provided on all-external walls along with cross-tie
bars across the building in both directions and embedded in external bands.
The cross-tie bars are necessary to ensure integral action of bearing walls like a crate.
INSERTING NEW WALLS
The main problem in such modification is the connection of new wall with
old wall.
Must have sufficient capacity against overturning forces and uplift forces
It should have proper connection with the existing walls through dowel so that the
forces are transferred from the existing building to the new external vertical resisting
elements
This technique has limitations in case of buildings constructed at the property lines or
not having much space.
STRENGTHENING OF PARAPETS