Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Exploring
the
Accuracy
of
Fist-to-Five
Formative
Assessment
Strategy
to
Check
for
Student
Understanding
Lindsey Crider Bloodworth
Samford University
EDUC 591
EXPLORING
THE
ACCURACT
OF
FIST
TO
FIVE
FORMATIVE
ASSESSMENT
STRATEGY
TO
CHECK
FOR
STUDENT
UNDERSTANDING
ABSTRACT
The
purpose
of
this
study
was
to
better
understand
how
the
fist-to-five
formative
assessment
strategy
actually
works
with
students
since
Birmingham
City
Schools
has
made
fist-to-five
one
of
its
recommended
core
components
of
instruction.
This
qualitative
research
project
seeks
to
answer
the
following
research
questions:
Are
students
engaged
in
using
fist-to-five
to
demonstrate
their
understanding?
Do
students
accurately
represent
their
understanding
when
showing
their
hand
signal
in
front
of
the
class?
and
Do
students
fist-to-five
self-reported
numbers
provide
a
reliable
measure.
Ultimately,
the
study
found
that
students
were
engaged
with
fist-to-five
as
a
useful
tool
to
report
their
understanding
to
their
teacher
and
were
almost
honest
in
their
reporting
their
understanding.
This
study
concludes
that
using
the
fist-to-five
formative
assessment
strategy
to
check
for
understanding
is
a
simple
technique
that
can
help
instructors
gauge
student
understanding
in
a
quick,
reliable
way.
EXPLORING
THE
ACCURACT
OF
FIST
TO
FIVE
FORMATIVE
ASSESSMENT
STRATEGY
TO
CHECK
FOR
STUDENT
UNDERSTANDING
Though
educators
have
been
assessing
student
learning
and
progress
for
a
very
long
time,
recently
the
language
of
formative
and
summative
assessment,
along
with
data
tracking,
has
come
to
dominate
the
discussion
of
student
progress.
Books
like
Nancy
Frey
and
Douglas
Fishers
The
Formative
Assessment
Action
Plan:
Practical
Steps
to
More
Successful
Teaching
and
Learning
and
Teach
Like
a
Champion
promise
that
using
formative
assessment
strategies
will
improve
both
teaching
and
student
learning.
However,
the
definition
of
formative
assessment
is
not
always
clear
when
educators
begin
discussing
how
to
evaluate
student
learning
and
track
progress
through
formative
assessment.
In
the
late
1960s,
formative
assessment
began
to
be
discussed
as
a
formal
evaluation
system
utilizing
tests
that
would
give
teachers
feedback
on
how
their
students
were
progressing
in
order
to
see
where
students
needed
to
improve
(William,
2011,
p.
33-
34).
Early
discussion
of
formative
assessment
focused
on
what
role
evaluation
has
in
improving
the
curriculum
as
it
is
being
taught
(William,
2011,
p.
33).
Though
the
foundational
work
in
formative
assessment
is
still
relevant,
the
definition
of
formative
assessment
has
expanded
since
the
1960s.
According
to
W.
James
Popham
(2006),
the
idea
of
what
formative
assessment
is
has
evolved
over
the
years
to
be
understood
as
an
instructional
tool
teachers
can
use
to
improve
instructional
practices
throughout
class
instead
of
just
as
a
test
that
teachers
deliver
to
gauge
student
readiness
or
understanding
before
a
summative
assessment
(Popham
2006).
Indeed
Nancy
Fisher
and
Douglas
Frey
find
it
unfortunate
now
that
too
often
formative
assessment
has
been
reduced
to
two
or
three
district
benchmark
tests,
with
little
attention
given
to
the
data
that
surrounds
us
every
day
(Fischer
and
Frey,
2014,
p.
vii).
EXPLORING
THE
ACCURACT
OF
FIST
TO
FIVE
FORMATIVE
ASSESSMENT
STRATEGY
TO
CHECK
FOR
STUDENT
UNDERSTANDING
EXPLORING
THE
ACCURACT
OF
FIST
TO
FIVE
FORMATIVE
ASSESSMENT
STRATEGY
TO
CHECK
FOR
STUDENT
UNDERSTANDING
EXPLORING
THE
ACCURACT
OF
FIST
TO
FIVE
FORMATIVE
ASSESSMENT
STRATEGY
TO
CHECK
FOR
STUDENT
UNDERSTANDING
works
for
them
and
their
students.
Clearly
the
main
goal
of
the
strategies
is
to
get
meaningful
feedback
from
students.
Yet,
in
order
to
see
if
these
strategies
actually
work,
research
needs
to
be
done
to
gauge
the
effectiveness
of
these
student
response
formative
assessment
strategies
in
gauging
student
understanding
of
content.
This
study
seeks
to
begin
filling
this
gap
in
the
research.
The
purpose
of
this
study
was
to
better
understand
how
fist-to-five
actually
works
with
students
since
Birmingham
City
Schools
has
made
fist-to-five
one
of
its
recommended
core
components
of
instruction.
This
qualitative
research
plan
seeks
to
answer
the
following
research
questions:
Are
students
engaged
in
using
fist-to-five
to
demonstrate
their
understanding?
Do
students
accurately
represent
their
understanding
when
showing
their
hand
signal
in
front
of
the
class?
and
Do
students
fist-to-five
self-reported
numbers
provide
a
reliable
measure
for
how
well
the
students
comprehend
the
material
in
an
English
classroom?
METHOD
Participants
and
Setting
This
study
was
conducted
in
an
urban
city
magnet
school
freshman
English
classroom.
The
students
ranged
in
age
from
14-15
years
old.
No
students
had
IEPs.
The
class
meets
three
times
a
week,
twice
for
90-minute
blocks
and
once
for
35
minutes
on
Wednesdays.
I
provided
instruction
for
both
classes.
Student
desks
were
arranged
in
short
rows
of
three
and
four,
with
all
desks
having
a
view
of
the
front
of
the
classroom
where
the
Promethean
board
and
instructor
podium
is
located.
Some
student
desks
face
desks
on
the
other
side
of
the
room.
This
arrangement
EXPLORING
THE
ACCURACT
OF
FIST
TO
FIVE
FORMATIVE
ASSESSMENT
STRATEGY
TO
CHECK
FOR
STUDENT
UNDERSTANDING
allows
all
students
to
have
a
good
view
of
the
instructor
and
Promethean
board
but
also
see
their
peers
fist-to-five
responses.
To
get
feedback
on
student
engagement
using
fist-to-five,
all
113
9th
grade
freshmen
were
surveyed
to
get
an
understanding
of
student
engagement
across
all
class
periods
and
achievement
levels.
The
selection
of
the
classes
for
the
focus
of
this
research
was
based
on
the
size
of
the
class,
17
students
in
both
Classes
A
and
B,
and
the
range
of
student
reading
comprehension
levels1.
34
students
total
were
evaluated
for
in
class
use
of
fist-to-five.
Class
A
reading
levels
range
from
5.2
to
PHS
(Post
High
School)
and
Class
Bs
range
from
6.4
to
PHS.
Since
I
most
often
use
fist-to-five
to
check
for
comprehension
of
texts
when
reading
difficult
texts
like
The
Odyssey
and
Romeo
and
Juliet,
I
wanted
to
select
classes
of
students
to
focus
on
that
had
a
wide
range
of
reading
levels
present.
Design
and
Procedures
The
design
of
the
study
involved
three
main
processes.
First,
in
order
to
gauge
student
engagement
with
and
opinion
of
fist-to-five,
I
surveyed
all
my
students
in
all
classes,
113
total.
The
purpose
was
to
see
whether
or
not
students
were
engaged
in
the
response
system,
were
honest
in
their
reporting,
and
found
it
helpful
for
reporting
their
scores
to
the
instructor.
On
a
short
survey,
students
were
asked
to
respond
to
the
following
questions:
1.
Do
you
like
the
using
fist-to-five
response
system
in
class?
2.
Are
you
always
honest
when
responding
in
class?
Why
or
why
not?
3.
Do
your
other
teachers
use
fist-to-
five?
If
not,
what
methods
do
your
other
teachers
use
to
check
for
your
understanding?
Secondly,
as
Class
A
and
Class
B
read
Romeo
and
Juliet
Act
Three,
Scene
Five
and
Act
Four,
Scene
1,
I
frequently
assessed
for
student
understanding
using
fist-to-five.
In
Class
A
I
1
Student
reading
levels
were
measured
at
the
beginning
of
the
2014-2015
school
year
by
the
Gates-Macginite
diagnostic
reading
comprehension
test.
EXPLORING
THE
ACCURACT
OF
FIST
TO
FIVE
FORMATIVE
ASSESSMENT
STRATEGY
TO
CHECK
FOR
STUDENT
UNDERSTANDING
recorded
fist-to-five
responses
five
times.
In
Class
B,
I
recorded
fist-to-five
responses
four
times.
The
only
difference
in
Class
A
and
Class
B
was
that
I
recorded
Class
As
response
to
the
question
How
well
do
you
understand
what
has
happened
in
Romeo
and
Juliet
up
to
this
point?
This
question
was
left
out
for
Class
B.
For
each
check
for
understanding,
I
had
students
show
their
score
with
their
fingers,
and
recorded
their
responses.
Then,
I
had
students
write
down
the
number
related
to
their
understanding
at
that
moment
on
an
index
card
in
order
to
see
if
the
responses
would
differ
when
students
knew
no
one
else
would
see
their
answers.
The
purpose
of
this
step
of
the
process
was
to
see
if
students
were
being
honest
in
their
public
showing
of
fist-to-five
and,
therefore,
whether
or
not
the
instructor
would
get
an
accurate
assessment
of
student
understanding
based
on
the
hand
signals
shown.
Finally,
in
order
to
see
whether
or
not
students
use
of
fist-to-five
actually
predicted
their
comprehension
of
the
content,
I
gave
students
in
Class
A
and
Class
B
the
same
quiz
at
the
end
of
the
class
period
on
comprehension
of
the
major
events
from
Act
Three,
Scene
Five
and
Act
Four,
Scene
One.
While
reading,
I
assessed
for
understanding
using
fist-to-five
and
students
answered
guided
reading
questions
as
they
read
the
scenes.
Before
the
quiz,
I
had
students
record
what
they
thought
was
their
level
of
understanding
on
the
fist-to-five
scale
in
the
heading
of
their
quiz.
I
then
compared
the
level
of
understanding
the
student
reported
he/she
had
about
the
text
to
the
grade
he/she
received
on
the
10
question
comprehension
quiz.
The
hypothesis
was
that
students
with
reportedly
higher
levels
of
understanding
(4-5)
should
do
well
on
the
quiz
(1
or
2
missed
questions),
and
students
with
reportedly
lower
levels
of
understanding
(2
and
below)
should
do
poorly
(missing
4
questions
or
more).
EXPLORING
THE
ACCURACT
OF
FIST
TO
FIVE
FORMATIVE
ASSESSMENT
STRATEGY
TO
CHECK
FOR
STUDENT
UNDERSTANDING
RESULTS
Student
Opinion
and
Engagement
Of
all
113
surveyed
students,
only
8
students
reported
that
they
disliked
using
fist-
to-five.
(See
Figure
2)
The
most
common
response
for
why
students
disliked
using
it
was
that
fist-to-five
was
inaccurate.
The
rest
of
the
students,
93%,
reported
enjoying
using
fist-to-five
and
their
reasons
were
similar
to
the
following:
yes
because
it
lets
the
teacher
know
where
we
are
in
the
class
or
lesson
and
I
like
it
because
you
can
see
where
the
students
are.
Multiple
students
pointed
out
that
fist-to-five
as
helpful
to
them
in
considering
their
own
comprehension
in
addition
to
helping
me
know
what
the
class
does
and
does
not
understand.
Student
Honesty
The
student
honesty
results
using
fist-to-five
consist
of
two
parts.
First,
the
students
self-reported
responses
on
the
survey
answering
whether
or
not
they
are
always
honest
when
responding
to
fist-to-five
prompts.
Secondly,
the
fist-to-five
response
cards
as
compared
to
the
actual
number
the
student
held
up
in
class
at
the
time
I
asked
a
question
to
check
for
understanding.
On
the
survey,
only
17
of
113
students
(15%)
reported
that
they
were
ever
dishonest
when
using
fist-to-five
in
class
(See
Figure
3).
Only
3
of
17
students
(18%)
in
Class
A
reported
not
always
being
honest
(See
Figure
4).
In
Class
B
only
1/17
students
reported
not
always
being
honest
in
his/her
response
(See
Figure
4).
Students
that
were
dishonest
gave
reasons
similar
to
the
following
in
their
explanation
of
their
answers:
I
dont
like
the
whole
class
knowing
when
I
dont
understand
or
comprehend
something
because
sometimes
its
embarrassing.
No
one
wants
to
be
the
only
one
to
not
understand
EXPLORING
THE
ACCURACT
OF
FIST
TO
FIVE
FORMATIVE
ASSESSMENT
STRATEGY
TO
CHECK
FOR
STUDENT
UNDERSTANDING
10
when
everyone
does.
However,
the
vast
majority
of
students
reported
being
honest
and
gave
reasons
similar
to
the
following:
There
is
no
reason
to
lie
if
you
understand
or
not
and
Heck
yea
[Im
always
honest],
why
I
gotta
lie?
Reliability
To
test
whether
or
not
a
students
perception
of
their
understanding
using
the
fist-
to-five
scale
predicted
their
success
on
a
comprehension
quiz,
I
gave
Class
A
and
Class
B
the
same
10
question
comprehension
quiz.
In
Class
A,
15
students
reported
a
level
4
or
5
understanding
of
the
text,
and
2
students
reported
a
level
3.
11
students
that
reported
a
score
of
either
4
or
5
missed
two
questions
or
fewer,
demonstrating
comprehension
of
the
text.
However,
4
of
the
students
that
reported
a
4
or
5
missed
3
questions
or
more.
Of
these
4
students,
3
of
the
students
had
diagnostic
reading
levels
lower
than
a
beginning
9th
grade
level
at
the
beginning
of
the
year.
Both
students
that
reported
a
level
3
understanding
of
the
text
missed
three
questions
on
the
quiz.
For
class
A,
13
of
17
students
perceptions
on
their
understanding
(using
fist-to-five)
did
accurately
line
up
with
their
comprehension
of
the
material.
For
4
of
the
17
students,
it
did
not.
(See
Figure
5.)
However,
In
Class
B
14
of
15
students
reported
either
a
level
4
or
5
understanding
and
the
lowest
reported
score
was
a
3.
The
maximum
number
of
questions
missed
by
any
student
was
2,
demonstrating
comprehension
of
the
text.
For
class
B,
students
perceptions
on
their
understanding
(using
fist-to-five)
did
accurately
line
up
with
their
comprehension
of
the
material.
EXPLORING
THE
ACCURACT
OF
FIST
TO
FIVE
FORMATIVE
ASSESSMENT
STRATEGY
TO
CHECK
FOR
STUDENT
UNDERSTANDING
11
DISCUSSION
Student
Engagement
and
Usefulness
of
fist-to-five
Clearly, a vast majority of students enjoy using fist-to-five in class and recognize its
usefulness
for
the
learning
process.
The
survey
feedback
was
valuable
because
it
confirmed
that
students
appreciate
having
a
way
to
demonstrate
their
understanding
to
the
teacher
in
a
simple
way.
In
addition,
because
I
always
explained
when
lower
scores
were
shown,
the
students
said
that
they
knew
that
showing
the
instructor
their
true
number
would
lead
them
to
a
better
understanding
of
the
text.
The
study
demonstrated
that
fist-to-five
was
most
helpful
for
me,
the
instructor,
when
a
majority
of
the
class
did
not
understand
a
certain
portion
of
the
text
and
signaled
the
teacher
with
lower
scores,
a
3
or
lower
generally.
When
the
whole
class
understood
what
was
going
on,
I
noted
that
students
were
more
vocal
in
their
responses
to
the
text,
answered
guided
questions
more
quickly
and
were
observed
to
be
more
engaged.
It
should
be
noted
that,
during
reading
of
complex
texts,
fist-to-five
should
not
be
the
only
method
of
gauging
student
understanding.
Rather,
teachers
should
also
rely
on
student
feedback
through
facial
expressions,
comments,
and
body
language.
I
observed
that
when
students
understood
the
language
and
what
was
going
on
in
Romeo
and
Juliet,
their
knowledge
presented
itself
in
multiple
ways.
Using
fist-to-five
along
with
knowledge
of
students,
teachers
can
assist
students
in
gaining
a
better
understanding
of
texts.
Student
Honesty
My
hypothesis
was
that
students,
especially
students
with
lower
comprehension
that
struggle
in
English,
would
not
be
honest
in
showing
their
fist-to-five
score
in
front
of
the
class
but
would
honestly
report
their
level
of
understanding
on
the
index
card
where
EXPLORING
THE
ACCURACT
OF
FIST
TO
FIVE
FORMATIVE
ASSESSMENT
STRATEGY
TO
CHECK
FOR
STUDENT
UNDERSTANDING
12
they
reported
their
scores
so
that
no
one
could
see
but
the
instructor.
However,
the
hypothesis
proved
to
be
untrue.
To
begin,
a
majority
of
students
reported
being
honest
during
the
survey
stage
of
the
study.
Then,
during
instruction
almost
all
students
honestly
reported
their
level
of
comprehension
of
the
text
and
there
were
few
discrepancies
in
the
numbers
students
displayed
to
the
class
and
the
numbers
students
reported
on
their
response
cards.
In
Class
A
there
were
only
5
instances
of
discrepancy
in
public
and
private
fist-to-five
scores.
In
Class
B,
only
3
out
of
60
instances
of
checks
for
understanding
did
not
line
up
with
the
students
public
fist-to-five
score
and
their
written
fist-to-five
score.
Additionally,
in
the
few
instances
when
the
discrepancy
occurred,
the
score
only
differed
by
one
number,
a
3
instead
of
a
4,
for
example.
In
Class
A
and
Class
B
there
were
no
instances
of
a
student
reporting
a
higher
score
publicly
and
a
drastically
lower
score
privately
on
the
card.
However,
though
the
results
demonstrate
that
students
are
almost
always
being
honest
about
their
level
of
understanding
when
using
fist-to-five,
it
is
still
vital
for
instructors
to
have
strong
relationships
with
their
students
and
know
their
strengths
and
weaknesses
to
know
whenever
there
is
a
departure
from
honesty
for
whatever
reason.
Instructors
should
not
rely
only
on
the
number
that
students
hold
up
to
check
for
daily
understanding,
particularly
with
students
that
have
lower
reading
comprehension
levels
and
struggle
in
English.
Additionally,
it
should
be
noted
that
this
study
was
conducted
near
the
end
of
the
school
year
and
students
were
very
familiar
with
one
another,
the
teacher,
and
the
fist-to-
five
method
by
the
time
of
the
study.
Had
this
study
been
done
at
another
time
of
the
year,
particularly
the
beginning,
it
might
have
yielded
different
results
as
trust
among
peers
and
EXPLORING
THE
ACCURACT
OF
FIST
TO
FIVE
FORMATIVE
ASSESSMENT
STRATEGY
TO
CHECK
FOR
STUDENT
UNDERSTANDING
13
with
the
teacher
was
still
being
established.
This
possibility
underscores
the
importance
of
building
trust
and
relationships
in
the
classroom
in
order
to
increase
student
engagement,
response,
and
learning.
Reliability
Based on the differences in student quiz scores in Class A and B, I can draw no
EXPLORING
THE
ACCURACT
OF
FIST
TO
FIVE
FORMATIVE
ASSESSMENT
STRATEGY
TO
CHECK
FOR
STUDENT
UNDERSTANDING
14
References
Fisher,
D.,
&
Frey,
N.
(2014).
Checking
for
Understanding:
Formative
Assessment
Techniques
for
Your
Classroom.
2nd
Edition.
Alexandria:
Association
for
Supervision
and
Curriculum
Development.
William,
D.
(2011).
Embedded
Formative
Assessment.
Bloomington:
Solution
Tree
Press.
Popham,
W.
J.
(2006).
Transformative
Assessment.
Alexandria:
Association
for
Supervision
and
Curriculum
Development.
EXPLORING
THE
ACCURACT
OF
FIST
TO
FIVE
FORMATIVE
ASSESSMENT
STRATEGY
TO
CHECK
FOR
STUDENT
UNDERSTANDING
Figure
1
Fist-to-Five
classroom
diagram.
15
EXPLORING
THE
ACCURACT
OF
FIST
TO
FIVE
FORMATIVE
ASSESSMENT
STRATEGY
TO
CHECK
FOR
STUDENT
UNDERSTANDING
16
8,
7%
Dislike
Fist-to-Five
Like
Fist-to-Five
105, 93%
Figure
2
demonstrates
that
a
majority
of
students
are
engaged
with
using
the
fist-to-five
method
to
check
for
understanding
in
class.
17, 15%
Always
Not
Always
Honest
96,
85%
Figure
3
demonstrates
that
a
majority
of
students
are
always
honest
in
reporting
their
level
of
understanding
when
using
fist-to-five.
EXPLORING
THE
ACCURACT
OF
FIST
TO
FIVE
FORMATIVE
ASSESSMENT
STRATEGY
TO
CHECK
FOR
STUDENT
UNDERSTANDING
17
16
14
14
12
10
Class A
Class B
6
4
0
Always
Honest
Figure
4
shows
the
comparison
of
students
in
Class
A
and
Class
B
that
say
they
are
honest
or
not
honest
in
reporting
their
true
level
of
understanding
when
using
fist-to-five.
4
Repored
Level
4
or
5--missed
more
than
3
questions
Figure
5
shows
the
breakdown
of
student
quiz
scores
based
on
their
reported
level
of
understanding
on
the
fist-to-five
scale.