Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Instructional
Practices/Strategies
Student
Achievement
Data
Components
School:
West Cary MS
Plan Year
2014-2016
Areas of Strengths
Areas of Concern
We met all AMO proficiency targets for both the 2012 - 2013 and 2013 - 2014
school years.
For both the 2012 - 2013 and 2013 - 2014 school years, 7th Grade Math and
8th Grade Science exceeded expected growth in the School Value Added
model.
For 2012 - 2013, the following groups had a performance composite (based
on proficiency data) higher than the Western schools and the entire WCPSS:
Level 1 and 2, SWD, LEP, Multi-Risk, Black, Multiracial, Black Male,
Hispanic/Latino Male, and Multiracial Male.
For 2013 - 2014, the following composites were higher than those for both
Western Area and all WCPSS Middle Schools: 7th Reading (Levels 3, 4, and 5),
Grades 6 - 8 Reading (Levels 4 and 5), Grade 8 Science (Levels 3, 4, and 5)
and Grade 8 Science (Levels 4 and 5)
We have not met expected growth as a school for three years 2011 - 2012, 2012 2013, and 2013 - 2014. The EVAAS Growth Status for 2011 - 2012 was -1.89 and it
was -2.46 for 2012 - 2013 and -2.55 for 2013 - 2014.
For the 2012 - 2013 school year, 6th Grade Math, 6th Grade Reading, and 8th
Grade Math did not meet expected growth. For the 2013 - 2014 school year, the
same three areas did not meet expected growth again, and Common Core Math 1
EOC also did not meet expected growth.
For the 2012 - 2013 school year, while we met all AMO targets, we exceeded a
few of them by a limited amount including LEP Reading 11.6 to 9.4 (Percent
Proficient to Target Goal), Black Math 25.6 to 22.2, and ED Math 31.4 to 27.7. For
the 2013 - 2014 school year, we met all AMO targets but for some we met them
despite missing the Goal percent by a small number. Here are the areas where we
met the targets despite the Percent Proficient was slightly less than the Goal
Percent (Percent Proficient to Goal Percent): LEP Reading 14.5 to 18.5, SWD
Reading 21.6 to 18.0, Black Math 30.0 to 29.4, Hispanic Math 39.4 to 35.0,
Economically Disadvantaged Math 34.9 to 32.8, LEP Math 25.7 to 23.9, and SWD
Math 21.2 to 16.0.
Benchmark results from the 2013 - 2014 school year show low percentages of
students who are projected to be proficient including 6th Grade Math in Quarter 3
at 44.0%, 7th Grade Math in Quarter 3 at 41.3%, and 8th Grade Math in Quarter 3
at 36.0%.
Page 1 of 20
Data
Components
Areas of Strengths
Staff and
Student
Demographics
2012 - 2013:
School capacity of 1,075 students
20th Day Membership of 937
Annual School Campus % Crowding: 87.2
Student Stability at 94.3%
West Cary had 100% of classes taught by highly qualified teachers
43.5% of teachers have advanced degrees with 5 who are National Board
Certified
23.9% have been teaching 25 years of more
1 BT (2.2% of teachers)
School:
West Cary MS
Plan Year
2014-2016
Areas of Concern
2012 - 2013:
13.0% Staff Turnover Rate
52.5% Level 1 and Level 2 students
129 short term suspensions involving 82 students
2013 - 2014:
30 suspensions as of 5/15/14
2013 - 2014:
20th Day Membership of 864 students
10 BT's
Page 2 of 20
Perception
Data
Components
Areas of Strengths
School:
West Cary MS
Plan Year
2014-2016
Areas of Concern
2012 - 2013:
From the Teacher Working Conditions Survey, every reported comparison
result had an increase in the % agree from 2010 to 2012 except for 4 (77 out
of 81 increased) with the following examples:
Use of time in your school including time to collaborate (from 65.3 to 89.2),
sufficient instructional time to meet the needs of all students (from 58.1 to
85.3), and teachers are protected from duties that interfere with their essential
role (39.2 to 70.1)
Managing Student Conduct including students understand expectations (70.3
to 100), follow rules of conduct (59.5 to 94.0), and administrators consistently
enforce the rules (48.6 to 74.6)
Teacher Leadership including teachers recognized as educational experts
(82.2 to 92.6) and effective process for making group decisions to solve
problems (61.1 to 86.8)
In addition, West Cary had a higher % agree on the 2012 survey compared to
Middle Schools, Wake County, and NC on 77 out of 81 statements.
2012 - 2013:
From the 2012 - 2013 student survey given to 7th graders, Teachers give
students a second chance if work is not right the first time was the only area
where West Cary's students gave a higher positive value than the district
On the 2012 - 2013 Student Survey, 7th graders rated West Cary lower than the
average Wake County score in all by one category with the following examples:
Overall quality of the school (exellent 9 to 22 and good 44 to 47 -- West Cary to
Wake)
I feel safe at my school (excellent 12 to 23 and good 62 to 63)
Bullying is a problem at my school (strongly agree 18 to 14 and agree 39 to 36)
75% of parents get the weekly e-news messages from the school
2013 - 2014
From the 2014 NC TWC Survey, WCMS had a higher % Agree than All NC, Wake,
and NC MS on 74 out of 86 total statements (86.04%) including all of the
statements in the following categories: Community Support and Involvement
(8/8), Managing Student Conduct (7/7), Professional Development (14/14), and
Overall (2/2). Of the 12 statements not included above, in 3 of them the
WCMS Agree was higher than at least 1 of the other reported percentages.
The % of WCMS staff completing the survey rose from 92% in 2012 to 100% in
2014.
19 out of 83 statements (22.89%) had a higher % agree in 2014 compared to
2012 -- 1 statement was the same in both years (the faculty work in a school
environment that is safe -- 100% both times).
On the TWC survey, the following areas declined from 2010 to 2012:
access to instructional technology (82.7 to 76.8), sufficient access to office
equipment and supplies (84.0 to 82.4), reliabilty and speed of internet connections
are sufficient (89.3 to 87.0), and teachers provide parents with useful information
about student learning (100.0 to 98.5)
On the 2012 TWC survey, the following areas did not have as high a % agree as the
group listed:
non-instructional time is sufficient (60.9 which is less than middle schools at 61.7),
protected from duties that interfere with their essential role (70.1 which is less than
Wake County at 71.8), teachers feel comfortable raising issues and concerns (69.1
which is less than Wake County at 70.1 and in NC at 70.7), and teachers have
autonomy to make decisions about instructional pacing (79.1 which is less than
middle schools at 81.0 and NC at 79.5)
2013 - 2014
On the 2014 NC TWC Survey, the following areas did not had a lower % agree than
All NC, Wake, and NC MS (data provided is All NC/Wake/NC MS/WCMS):
Non-instructional time provided for teachers is sufficient (62.8/62.3/65.4/41.8),
Reliability and speed of internet connections are sufficient to support instructional
practices (76.1/71.3/74.2/60.3), The school leadership makes a sustained effort to
address concerns about the use of time in school (79.6/78.3/78.9/70.7), and
Teachers have autonomy to make decisions about instructional delivery (i.e. pacing,
materials, pedagogy) (79.9/76.4/82.8/75.9).
Both the Non-instructional time concern and the teachers have autonomy to make
decisions about instructional delivery were also lower scoring statements in the
2012 TWC survey.
Page 3 of 20
Program
Data
Components
School:
West Cary MS
Plan Year
2014-2016
Areas of Strengths
Areas of Concern
While discipline referrals are down, this could be reflective of the new system that
teachers are to use for referrals.
Working Lunch has been very successful for certain grades and teachers but not
for others -- need consistency across the school to make this successful.
Extended Learning Time can become more homework help or social time as the
number of students attending increases and may not be reaching the students who
really need this support.
V-Math classes for grades 7and 8 have not been as successful as 6th grade. Data
entry is not entered in a timely manner, so in the future all V-Math teachers will
received data entry professional development.
We need data to know the impact of the community volunteers in the classroom
program where members of the community spend time in specific classrooms on a
weekly basis to provide extra support.
Page 4 of 20
Priority Concerns
We did not meet expected growth as a school for
2011 - 2012, 2012 - 2013, and 2013 - 2014; for
2012 - 2013, 6th Grade Math, 6th Grade Reading,
and 8th Grade Math did not meet expected growth;
for 2013 - 2014, 6th Grade Math, 6th Grade
Reading, 8th Grade Math, and Common Core Math
1 EOC results did not meet expected growth
Root Causes
(with evidence)
Lack of or ineffective use of effective teaching
strategies designed to strengthen all students'
performance on the math and reading EOG/EOC
tests based on the EVAAS growth results
Inconsistent levels of rigor in classes including
not enough emphasis on questions and activiites
in the higher levels of depth of knowledge as
reflected on the CASE 21 Benchmark results
School:
West Cary MS
Plan Year
2014-2016
Solutions
Target as SIP goal
Strengthen our PLT's through professional
development that includes the expectations of a
successful PLT as well as on improving our use of
data in decision-making processes within the PLT's
Improve our walk-through process in terms of
the tool to be used, the training of all involved,
and an increase in the number of walk-throughs
conducted
Share successful literacy and math strategies in
PLT's
PLT's develop common assessments and discuss
the results of these assessments
PLT's engage in on-going discussions about data
using the data to assist in making decisions about
instructional practices to increase student
learning
Page 5 of 20
Priority Concerns
On the 2013 - 2014 Case 21 Benchmarks,
percentages of students who are projected to be
proficient are low including the following:
Quarter 3 -- Grade 6 Math -- 44.0%
Quarter 3 -- Grade 7 Math -- 41.3%
Quarter 3 -- Grade 8 Math -- 36.0%
Root Causes
(with evidence)
Misalignment of instruction with the Common
Core State Standards
Inconsistent implementation of PEP's and other
procedures in place to determine appropriate
interventions for at-risk students
Inconsistent effectiveness of data discussions
in PLT's in terms of using data to revise
instructional strategies or create plans to support
all students
Not meeting the needs of all students through
interventions currently in place
School:
West Cary MS
Plan Year
2014-2016
Solutions
Target as SIP goal
Strengthen our PLT's through professional
development that includes the expectations of a
successful PLT as well as on improving our use of
data in decision-making processes within the PLT's
Improve our walk-through process in terms of
the tool to be used, the training of all involved,
and an increase in the number of walk-throughs
conducted
PLT's develop common assessments and discuss
the results of these assessments
PLT's engage in on-going discussions about data
using the data to assist in making decisions about
instructional practices to increase student
learning
Create remediation classes that meet during
students' elective time for targeted students and
remediation groups that meet at other times
including during a remediation/enrichment period
or after school
Improve the alignment of students' grades with
the projected percent proficient on the Benchmark
Results by adjusting the school grading policy
especially with respect to retests
Page 6 of 20
School:
West Cary MS
Plan Year
2014-2016
Data Summary
Describe your conclusions
At West Cary MS, data is driving our decision-making processes. We want to recognize our strengths including that we met all of our AMO proficiency targets for
2012 - 2013 and 2013 - 2014 and both 7th Grade Math and 8th Grade Science exceeded expected growth in both 2012 - 2013 and 2013 - 2014. Some of our student
demographic groups also had performance composite scores (based on our proficiency scores) that exceeded the average of those for Western schools and the
average for all WCPSS schools in 2012 - 2013, and for 2013 - 2014, 7th Reading (Levels 3, 4, and 5), 6-8 Reading (Levels 4 and 5), 8th Science (Levels 3, 4, and 5),
and 8th Science (Levels 4 and 5) also met this distinction. We have administered the PathDriver Screening Assessment three times during the 2013 - 2014 year in
math and reading and have used the results to create remediation opportunities for the students found to be "at-risk" from this assessment. We have started using
Common Formative Assessments in core subjects, have had our IRT and AIG teacher push into classrooms to support math and language arts instruction, and have
heard presentations from our Teacher-Leader Corps members on technology. In addition the 2012 Teacher Working Conditions Survey yielded increases from the
2010 survey in positive responses for 77 of the 81 questions, and our positive responses were higher than those of other middle schools, Wake County, and all NC on
77 of the 81 questions. For 2014, our positive responses were higher than those of other middle schools, Wake County, and all NC on 74 out of 86 questions, and we
had a higher percent agree on 19 out of 83 questions compared to 2012. We also had 100% completion fo 2014 up from 92% in 2012. Finally our PBIS program
appears to be running fairly smoothly with students able to articulate our IMPS expectations.
While we wish that everything was a strength, we do recognize that we have some areas of concern that we need to address as we move forward. Some of the minor
concerns come from our program evaluation with adjustments needed to try to strengthen our Extending Learning Time and Working Lunch programs. We also need
to ensure that all of our V-Math classes show positive results instead of having positive results only from 6th grade this year. Our major concerns focus on student
achievement and our instructional practices/strategies. Our biggest concern is that we have not made expected growth for the last three years and last year's
benchmark scores projected over 50% of our students not being proficient on the 2014 EOG/EOC tests. We have included instructional specialists on our walk-through
data collection team, and our classroom walk-throughs are increasing. We need additional walk-through data, however, to accurately evaluate the effectiveness of
our instructional practides/strategies. In addition, our PLT's are not showing the effectiveness we believe is necessary for them to help improve student performance.
Based on the areas of concern above, we have a plan for 2014 - 2016 that we believe will ensure that we maintain our recent success in meeting all AMO proficiency
targets while also working to ensure that we meet or exceed expected growth as reported by EVAAS. We will implement effective PLT's that will focus on enhancing
student learning by completing the following: re-evaluate our grading policy focusing on the relationship between proficiency and student grades including our retest
policy, expand the options for PLT's to report their agendas and minutes, train staff on what makes a PLT effective including the expectation for our PLT's, increase
the number of walk-throughs , share literacy and math strategies, develop common assessments, participate in training on data analyisis, and discuss results of
various assessments and use the results to make decisions concerning instructional practices. We will also create remediation opportunities for targeted students
outside of their regular class time through both an academic elective as well as during a remediation/enrichment time. In addition to selecting these students and
creating a schedule for their remediation activities, teachers will monitor student performance to assess the success of this process. With careful monitoring and a
willingness to adjust our instructional practices based on our data, we expect that this plan will help our students meet all AMO proficiency targets as well as meet or
exceed Expected Growth.
Page 7 of 20
School:
West Cary MS
Plan Year
2014-2016
Principal:
Wanza Cole
Date:
Oct - 2014
Ann Mahlitz
Parent
Brittany Jones
Teacher
Charlesa Peoples-Duncan
Assistant Principal
Dale Archer
Teacher
Deb Kelly
Teacher Assistant
Elly Sato
Parent
Jacqueline Deas-Brown
Teacher
Juli Betts
Teacher
Kamilla Dancy
Teacher
10 Kathy Smyre
Teacher
11 Kevin Lauenstein
12 Marvin Breedlove
Teacher
Assistant Principal
14 Sheila Pattee
15 Shwety Goswami
Teacher
16 Stephanie Mood
Parent
17 Tara Jackson
Teacher
18 Toni Harris
Teacher
19 Wanza Cole
Principal
20 Wendy Blue
Teacher
21 William Slechta
Teacher
Page 8 of 20
School:
West Cary MS
Plan Year
2014-2016
Date:
Jun - 2014
Mission Statement:
The West Cary Middle School Community will facilitate learning for each student to become a globally
competitive and responsible citizen.
Vision Statement:
Our school community will work collaboratively to promote a safe and inviting learning environment. This
environment will support and prepare all students to successfully progress, on time, to their next grade
level. We will continually encourage responsible decision making that will make a positive impact on
student learning, and will foster the development of students to become productive citizens.
Value Statement:
Relationships: At WCMS we value professional, nurturing relationships established by a climate of
integrity, maturity, positivity, and self discipline.
Process: WCMS community takes responsibility for improving student achievement by consistently
focusing on data driven processes.
Results: WCMS uses our results to recognize our success and focus attention on areas for improvement.
Page 9 of 20
School:
West Cary MS
Plan Year
2014-2016
LEA:
School Goal All West Cary Middle School students will meet or exceed
Expected Growth as reported via EVAAS and all AMO targets
as demonstrated by the appropriate End-of-Grade or
End-of-Course test in all tested subjects.
Goal Manager Wanza Cole
Strategic Directive Focus on Learning and Teaching
State Board of Education Goal Globally Competitive Students
Data Justification for Goal Based on As a school we have not met expected growth in the last
Comprehensive Needs Assessment two years (-1.89 for 2011 - 2012 and -2.46 for 2012 - 2013)
-- did not meet expected growth in 2012 - 2013 in 6th grade
math, 6th grade reading, and 8th grade math.
As a school we met all AMO targets for the 2012 - 2013
school year, but we exceeded the target goals by a limited
amount in certain cases including LEP Reading 11.6 to 9.4
(Percent Proficient compared to our Target Goal), Black
Math 25.6 to 22.2, and ED Math 31.4 to 27.7.
Benchmark results for 2013 - 2014 show low percentages of
students who are projected to be proficient including 6th
Grade Math Quarter 3 44.0%, 7th Grade Math Quarter 3
41.3%, and 8th Grade Math Quarter 3 36.0%.
Page 10 of 20
School:
West Cary MS
Plan Year
2014-2016
LEA:
Measurable Process PLT leaders will keep a record of meeting agendas/minutes for review by
Check(s) department chairs, SIT members, and administration to evaluate the
effectiveness of PLT's.
PLT's will analyze data from the following categories at least twice a month
and will have results available for review by department chairs, Data Team
Members, SIT members, and administration: common assessments,
classroom grades, literacy and math strategies being used in all subject
areas, and walk-through data.
Action Step Train staff on what makes a PLT effective and what
the school expects from PLT's
Timeline From 8/2014 To 9/2014
Action Step Share walk-through data collection tool with all staff
and train those who will be conducting the
walk-throughs in the use of the tool
Timeline From 9/2014 To 10/2014
Action Step PLT members share literacy and math strategies they
are using in their classrooms
Timeline From 8/2014 To 6/2016
Action Step Discuss results of Benchmark Tests, EOG's, EOC's, PLT-created Common Formative
Assessments, PLT-created Common Summative Assessments, PathDriver assessments,
and student course grades; use the results to make decisions concerning instructional
practices including pacing, retesting, and particular instructional strategies to include to
improve student learning
Timeline From 8/2014 To 6/2016
Page 11 of 20
10
School:
West Cary MS
Plan Year
2014-2016
LEA:
11
12
Key Process Create remediation opportunities for targeted students outside of regular
class time
Process Manager Tara Jackson and Kamilla Dancy
Completion Date Jun - 2016
Restrainers Time management
Scheduling
Buy in
Resources AIG Teacher
After-School Tutorial Program
Community Volunteers
Middle Schools programming
Central Office Staff
Administration
Staff development
Transportation
Conversion of positions per state and WCPSS guidelines
EVAAS
PBIS
Duty Free Lunch and Planning
Healthy Active Children Policy
Safe and Orderly Schools Plan
Character Education Plan
We wish to utilize all budget flexibilities allowed by DPI, general statutes,
applicable laws and local policies
PathDriver
Parental Engagement
Measurable Process Teachers of remediation elective classes or targeted remediation groups will
Check(s) keep attendance records for review by SIT members and administration to
document student attendance.
Teachers of remediation elective classes will use their in-class assessments to
measure the growth of their students and to monitor the effects of the program.
All teachers will use the results of common assessments to measure the growth
of the students targeted for remediation and to monitor the effects of the
program.
Page 12 of 20
School:
West Cary MS
Plan Year
2014-2016
LEA:
Page 13 of 20
Waiver Request
School:
Date
West Cary MS
Apr - 2014
Waiver Requested
None
How will this waiver impact school improvement?
Not applicable
Please indicate the type of waiver:
Local
Not applicable
Page 14 of 20
School:
West Cary MS
Plan Year
2014-2016
School Year:
2014-2015
Topic:
Participants:
Supporting Data:
Effective Professional
Learning Teams including
Lesson Planning/Preparation
and Data Analysis
Cultural Proficiency
Page 15 of 20
School:
West Cary MS
Plan Year
2014-2016
School Year:
2015-2016
Participants:
Goal Supported:
Supporting Data:
Page 16 of 20
School:
West Cary MS
Plan Year
2014-2016
Student Identification
Reading
Math
Behavior
Page 17 of 20
School:
West Cary MS
Plan Year
2014-2016
Intervention Structure
Reading
Math
Behavior
Page 18 of 20
School:
West Cary MS
Plan Year
2014-2016
Reading
Math
Behavior
Instruction
Assessment
Curriculum/Resources
Page 19 of 20
School:
West Cary MS
Plan Year
2014-2016
Reading
Math
Behavior
Student Identification
Intervention
Structure
Instruction
Assessment
Curriculum/Resources
Page 20 of 20