Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Angie Pohl
Executive Summary
Project Statement
The purpose of this project was to collect non-biased evidence regarding policies, practices, and programming at
Wellstone International High School in order to examine how they align with the schools vision and mission.
Vision: WIHS provides innovative English and content instruction for students ages 14 to 21. A Wellstone
education empowers students to fully participate in society and prepares them for post-secondary education.
Mission: WIHS provides educational opportunities to High School English Language Learners by supporting
high academic achievement in an accredited high school setting and by working in partnership with local
colleges.
Methods
Data were collected through shadowing 3 students, the principal, and the behavior dean; interviewing various
staff members including counselors, teachers, and Associate Educators; participating in PDPLC, ILT, staff, and
future planning meetings; and examining documents related to school improvement, programming, events,
family outreach, student services, and community engagement. Data attached here include shadowing and
teacher-student talk observations.
Results
Results provided are examples of policies, practices, and programming that are in alignment with or are in
conflict with the mission and vision. Parenthetical statements represent text from the mission and vision.
In Alignment
Course offerings such as economics, government, physics, and advanced reading and writing that provide
students with rigorous learning opportunities (supporting high academic achievement)
Newly added courses to promote engagement and future planning: Jobs for Americas Graduates, Spanish
for Spanish Speakers (empowers students to fully participate in society)
Math blended learning model offering individualized instruction (innovative instruction)
Professional development supporting the use of student ACCESS data to inform instructional practices,
particularly around speaking and differentiation (innovative English and content instruction)
Discussion about designing innovative learning opportunities to fit students needs in the coming school
year in a new space (innovative English and content instruction)
Partnership with MCTC (partnership with local colleges)
In Conflict
High teacher talk compared to student talk; predominantly teacher direct instruction observed (innovative
instruction; supporting high academic achievement)
Unbalanced opportunities to participate in class for certain ethnic groups (empowers students to fully
participate in society; supporting high academic achievement)
Lack of courses aligned with college and career readiness such as CTE and AP courses; unstructured advisory
times with no guiding purpose (prepares them for post-secondary education)
Recommendations
The goal of this project was to provide instructional leaders within Wellstone with non-biased evidence
regarding how policies, practices, and programming align or conflict with the mission and vision of the school.
While some preliminary conclusions were drawn from the data, more meaningful conclusions will be those that
school leaders and staff draw from the data themselves. Therefore, it is recommended that as a next step the
ILT examine the attached data and utilize the discussion guide to self-assess the alignment of Wellstones
policies, practices, programming with the mission and vision of the school. The self-assessment should then be
used to guide planning for the future to ensure alignment to the mission and vision and learning for all students.
Teacher Talk
(min.)
Student
Talk (min.)
8.0
5.0
Teacher:
Student
Talk Ratio
62% : 38%
17.5
0.25
99% : 1%
Notes
10.5
2.4
81% : 19%
9.5
2.6
79% : 21%
Level 0-1
Content
14.5
0.3
98% : 2%
Level 0-1
Content
0.0
20.0
0% : 100%
Level 2-3
Content
13.2
4.2
76% : 24%
Level 2-3
Content
Level 2-3
Content
17.8
0.8
96% : 4%
5.9
0.1
98% : 2%
Level 3-5
Content
12.0
38.0
24% : 76%
Period 7 Elective
Not observed
Discussion questions:
Directions: Use the data provided as well as your knowledge of practices, policies, staff roles, during school and
after school programming, and student academic data to answer the following discussion questions.
1. Do our mission and vision truly represent our current mission, vision, and purpose for Wellstone? Will
our vision and mission change when Wellstone is in a new setting? Which oppose it?
2. Which practices, policies, and programming support at Wellstone support our vision of provid[ing]
innovative English and content instruction? Which oppose it?
3. Which practices, policies, and programming support at Wellstone support our vision of empower[ing]
students to fully participate in society and prepar[ing] them for post-secondary education. Which oppose
it?
4. Which practices, policies, and programming support at Wellstone support our vision of supporting high
academic achievement? Which oppose it?