Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Ted Davies
Investigative Question
Out of four simple wing designs
(symmetrical, semi symmetrical, flat bottomed,
and under-cambered), which one lifts the most
mass?
Hypothesis
If each wing is tested in the exact same conditions, then
the under camber wing will lift the most because evidence
shows that the high pressure air will collect in the roof of
the wing camber, subsequently giving the wing more lifting
ability.
Variables
My independent variable is: The design of the
wing
My dependant variable is: How much mass the
wing lifts
Control
I did not use any controls in my experiment
Procedure
1.
Procedure (contd)
c.
2.
Centre Tunnel
i.
Obtain a box with the dimensions of about (in CM) 15.24 x 15.24 x 182.88
ii.
Cut a portion of the box out, so the new boxs dimensions are 15.24 x 15.24 x 50.8
iii.
Unfold the box so it is a flat sheet
iv.
With the PVC pipe, cut 81x 10.16 cm tubes
v.
With the wood blocks and clamps, place all 81 tubes inside so that the bottom ends are flush with each other
vi.
Carefully glue each pipe to the others by inserting several drops of glue into the holes between each tube
vii.
Once the glue is dry, remove the block of tubes
viii.
Place the block on the flat cardboard that will be the centre section
ix.
Make sure the block is 6 cm away from the end of the cardboard
x.
Using the packing tape, re-tape the centre section
xi.
Hot glue the block of tubes to the centre section
xii.
Cut holes in the side and top about 15.5 x 7 centimetres in dimension
xiii.
Cut the Lexan so that it overlaps each hole by about 2 cm
xiv.
Using the packing tape, tape each lexan slide to the windows
xv.
Around the top window, cut a flap that encompases the window, so that the window can be lifted out of the way with ease.
xvi.
Insert wood supports below the centre section
xvii.
Attach all 3 the sections together using lots of packing tape
Cutting the Wings
a.
Fine tune the foam cutter by using a right angle to adjust the wire angle
b.
Cut a 30.58 x 2.54 x 15.29 cm foam block into four equal blocks
c.
Tack down a wing template to the 15.29 cm section of one foam block
d.
Using a fine-tipped permanent marker, carefully trace around the wing
e.
Remove wing template
f.
Plug in the foam cutter
g.
Using extreme caution, move the block of foam so that the wire melts away the red line, revealing the wing (this took several tries)
h.
Repeat steps 2c-2g three more times, each time using a different wing template
i.
Find three common points on each wing, and mark them each with a marker
Procedure (contd)
3.
4.
Pictures
Picture credit to Dave Davies and myself
Data Table(s)/Charts
Symmetrical Wing
Semi-symmetrical
Wing
Flat bottom
Wing
Undercamber Wing
Test 1
22.0
22.0
18.0
2.0
Test 2
16.0
18.0
8.0
4.0
Test 3
18.0
18.0
12.0
4.0
Average
18.6
19.3
12.7
3.3
Graphs
.
Results
My results showed that the semi-symmetrical wing
lifted the most mass, averaging about 19.3 grams per test
The undercambered wing, surprisingly lifted the least mass,
averaging about 3.3 grams per test, which went against my
hypothesis. The symmetrical wing lifted the second most
mass, averaging at 18.3 grams per test. The flat-bottomed
wing lifted the second least mass, averaging 12.6 grams per
test.
Conclusion
I conclude that I proved my hypothesis wrong. The data showed the opposite of
what my hypothesis stated. The data I collected during experimentation clearly
showed that my hypothesis was incorrect.
I disproved my hypothesis, as the wing I thought would lift the most mass
actually lifted the least mass. In a way, there is a relationship between my two
variables. In a perfect wind tunnel, the Symmetrical wing lifts the least, and the
Undercamber wing lifts the most. Now, my wind tunnel was not perfect, nor
were the wings, so my results did vary from results that would come from a
wind tunnel, say, at NASA.
Considerations
If I were to do this experiment again, I would use a fan
with higher power, because I dont think the fan used wasn
t adequate. I would also explore making more accurate
wings, maybe using a 3D printer. For an even more indepth project, I could also implement the factor of wing
pitch, or for an even more complex project, add flaps into
the experimentation.
Application
My project, even though it has already been proven in
more ideal conditions, has some pretty serious impacts in
the aviation industry; as the wing is the most important
part of the airplane; so the design of the wing is extremely
crucial to the safety of the airplane.
Acknowledgments
I would like to thank my dad for helping me
through the whole process, and giving me
random tips and ideas.
Bibliography
"Beginner Series - Basic Aerodynamics." Flite Test. N.p., 23 Oct. 2013. Web. 08 Oct. 2014. <http://flitetest.com/articles/beginnerseries-basic-aerodynamics>.
"AIAA @ ASU - Outreach Project Wind Tunnel." AIAA ASU. N.p., Feb.-Mar. 2013. Web. 08 Oct. 2014. <http://aiaa.engineering.
asu.edu/?page_id=190>.
Mackowski, Mike. "Phoenix AIAA STEM Activities." Wind Tunnel. Phoenix AIAA Stem Activities, Web. 08 Oct. 2014. <http://stemaz.org/styled-2/>.
"Incorrect Lift Theory." Nasa.gov. Ed. Tom Benson. NASA, 12 June 2014. Web. 02 Dec. 2014. <http://www.grc.nasa.gov/WWW/k12/airplane/wrong1.html>.