Professional Documents
Culture Documents
P2
P3
P-branding
P4
T1
T1
T2
T3
Corporate
Brand
T2
T3
T4
T4
P1
P2
P3
P4
B
r
a
n
d
B
r
a
n
d
B
r
a
n
d
B
r
a
n
d
T1
Brand 1
T2
Brand 2
T3
Brand 3
T4
Brand 4
PT-branding
P1
P2
P3
P4
T1
B1
B2
B3
B4
T2
B5
B6
B7
B8
T3
B9
B 10 B 11 B 12
T4
B 13 B 14 B 15 B 16
T-branding
P1
P2
F-branding
e. g.:
Corporate
Brand
Subbrand44
Subbrand
Subbrand 3
Subbrand 2
Subbrand 1
P3
P4
Relational
exper.
&
relatl.
experiential &
symbolic
Symbolic
multiple
benefits
relational &
functional
Functional
symb.
&
functl.
7
6
1
e. & r.
Relational
P-branding
Fbranding
C-branding
multiple benefits
experiential & symb.
T-branding
Functional
Fbranding
s. & f.
C-branding
Limitations
explorative instrument providing theoretical
assistance in making strategic brand architecture
decisions
many empirical clues, no empirical proof
smooth transition between standard brand
architecture strategies
real-life product portfolios often consist of mixtures of
functionally, experientially, symbolicly & emotionally
positioned products
other stakeholders (employees, shareholders,
retailers) different brand architecture strategy?
S
o
m
e
Experiential
P-branding
Relational C-branding
e. & r. F-branding
multiple benefits
e
x
a
m
p
l
e
s
e & s PT-branding
r & f.
C-branding
F-branding
Symbolic
T-branding
s. & f.
Fbranding
Functional
C-branding
a very successful
Austrian store brand